Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)

Related Party Transactions

v3.19.1
Related Party Transactions
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]  
Related Party Transactions
Related Party Transactions

Loan Agreement with Lumexis
On February 24, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Lumexis Corporation (“Lumexis”), a company that provided in-flight entertainment systems to airlines. Lumexis was at the time majority-owned by PAR Investment Partners, L.P. (“PAR”), which beneficially owned approximately 31.6% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock as of March 14, 2019. At the time that the Company entered into the Loan Agreement, the Chair of its Board of Directors was also a Managing Partner of PAR and a member of Lumexis’s board of directors.
The Loan Agreement provided for extensions of credit by the Company to Lumexis of up to $5.0 million. The Company’s Board of Directors considered the Loan Agreement under the Company’s policies and procedures regarding related person transactions, and determined that it was appropriate and in the best interests and its stockholders to enter into the Loan Agreement due to Lumexis’ position as an important supplier to flydubai (one of the Company’s connectivity customers) and to another airline that was a potential customer, and in light of Lumexis’s future business prospects. The Company’s Board of Directors further determined that the parties’ relationships did not give rise to any material conflict of interest in entering into the Loan Agreement. The Company’s Board Chair recused himself from discussions regarding the Loan Agreement and did not vote on whether the Company should enter into the transaction.
The Loan Agreement qualifies Lumexis as the Company’s variable interest entity. In accordance with ASC 810, Consolidation, the Company was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of Lumexis because the Company did not hold any power over Lumexis’s activities that most significantly impacted its economic performance. Therefore, Lumexis was not subject to consolidation into the Company’s financial reporting. The maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Loan Agreement was the outstanding principal balance of the loan and any accrued interest thereon.
The borrowings under the Loan Agreement were evidenced by a senior secured promissory note (the “Note”) and bore interest at a per annum rate of 15%. The outstanding principal and accrued interest thereon were payable in full on December 31, 2016. As a result of information provided by Lumexis, in June 2016 as to the note’s collectability and Lumexis’s insolvency, the Company’s management impaired the value of Note during the three months ended June 30, 2016 and discontinued accruing interest receivable.
On December 5, 2016, the Company, Lumexis and PAR entered into a Partial Cancellation of Debt and Acceptance of Collateral, which provided a transfer of certain assets in the amount of $0.2 million to the Company in partial satisfaction of the Lumexis’ principal amount of the outstanding debt. On January 6, 2017, the Company—as the senior-most secured creditor of Lumexis—then foreclosed on substantially all of Lumexis’s remaining assets pursuant to a public foreclosure auction. During the third quarter of 2017, the Company entered into an arrangement with flydubai to sell to flydubai certain of the assets acquired on January 6, 2017. The arrangement resulted in a recovery of approximately $0.5 million and $0.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Due from WMS

In connection with the EMC Acquisition, the Company acquired a 49% equity interest in WMS. The Company accounts for its interest in WMS using the equity method and includes the Company’s share of WMS’s profits or losses in Income from equity method investments in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, sales to WMS were approximately $0.8 million and $1.2 million for the Company’s services provided to WMS for WMS’s onboard cellular equipment under the terms of the WMS operating agreement and an associated master services agreement with WMS. These sales are included in Revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2018, and 2017, the Company had a balance due from WMS of $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, included in Accounts receivable, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Note Payable to WMS
In December 2017, the Company entered into a demand promissory note with WMS (as an advance against future dividends that WMS may pay the Company) for approximately $6.4 million and concurrently signed an agreement to waive future dividends or other such distributions by WMS to the Company until such time as the outstanding principal on the demand promissory note has been repaid in full. The outstanding demand promissory note would be reduced dollar-for-dollar by any such distribution amounts waived. The Company may prepay the promissory note at any time without prepayment penalty. The unpaid principal of the promissory note bears interest at 2.64%, and all interest calculated under the promissory note commences upon the occurrence of an “Event of Default,” which includes, for example, the Company’s breach of the note or the WMS operating agreement, Company insolvency events and material judgments against the Company. The entire principal balance of this promissory note together with all accrued but unpaid interest was due on the earliest to occur of (i) demand by the holder, (ii) December 31, 2019 and (iii) the date of acceleration of the promissory note as a result of the occurrence of an event of default. During the year ended December 31, 2018, WMS declared dividends of $15.0 million in the aggregate, of which $6.4 million of the Company’s 49% proportion (equal to $7.4 million) has been applied against the outstanding principal amount of the demand promissory note to settle the note in full.

Due to Santander
Also in connection with the EMC Acquisition, the Company acquired a 49% equity interest in Santander. The Company accounts for its interest in Santander using the equity method and includes its share of Santander’s profits or losses in Income from equity method investments in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company purchased approximately $5.3 million and $3.4 million from Santander for their Teleport services and related network operations support services. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company owed Santander approximately $1.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, which is included in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for their teleport services and related network operations support services.
Transactions with TRIO Connect, LLC and its Affiliates

In July 2015, EMC divested its interest in TRIO Connect, LLC (“TRIO”), a joint venture formed to commercialize EMC’s ARABSAT Ka Band contract, such that TRIO became then owned by funds affiliated with ABRY Partners (a former EMC majority owner and one of the Company’s current significant stockholders), Abel Avellan (our former President and Chief Strategy Officer, who left the Company in April 2017) and other equity holders not affiliated with the Company. Global Eagle did not acquire the TRIO business as a part of the EMC Acquisition.
Prior to the EMC Acquisition, EMC and its subsidiaries had collectively made various loans to TRIO and its affiliated entities in an aggregate principal of approximately $5.7 million. Also, prior to the EMC Acquisition, STMEA (FZE), a wholly-owned subsidiary of TRIO, had made equipment sales and provided employee payroll services to EMC and its subsidiaries in an aggregate amount equal to approximately $4.9 million. After applying the trade payables against the outstanding loan amounts, TRIO and its affiliates collectively owed EMC and its subsidiaries approximately $0.8 million (as of July 2016). Due to the deterioration of TRIO’s financial condition, EMC determined the remaining balance was uncollectible and fully impaired the value of the loan receivable prior to the EMC Acquisition. The Company did not pay any consideration for the loan receivable in the EMC Acquisition, although the Company did assume the receivable in the EMC Acquisition. The Company believes that the receivable is uncollectible, and as such has written off its remaining balances.
In addition, immediately following the EMC Acquisition, EMC’s employees in the UAE were managed and employed by TRIO’s UAE entity. Because EMC did not have its own entity in UAE at the time the Company acquired EMC, the Company (through EMC) entered into a transition services agreement with TRIO whereby TRIO would continue to employ the UAE employees for the Company’s benefit-and “second” them to the Company at cost, until the Company formed its own licensed UAE subsidiary. For the three-month period (July 2016 to October 2016) following the EMC Acquisition, the Company paid to TRIO approximately $0.6 million for payroll related services and expenses for the “seconded” employees. The Company did not pay any further amounts under the transition services agreement after October 2016.
Between October 2016 and August 2017, the Company made payments to TRIO totaling $0.4 million for equipment purchases and service fees in connection with various customer contracts. In September 2017, the Company made additional equipment purchases totaling $0.4 million for customer orders and for inventory purposes. All of these purchase transactions were on arms’-length pricing and terms. There were no equipment purchases from TRIO during 2018.
During 2017 and the first quarter of 2018, the Company received payroll tax refunds from the Brazilian government relating to various periods from May 2007 through December 2009, which after applying tax, amounted to $1.7 million. These refunds relate to the Company’s fully consolidated subsidiary, Vodanet Telecomunicacoes Ltd, which the Company acquired as part of the EMC Acquisition. As the refunds relate to periods predating the EMC Acquisition, pursuant to the EMC purchase agreement, the net of tax refund amount belongs to the former owners of EMC. Through negotiations with the former owners, the Company offset against these refunds certain indemnified liabilities and losses totaling $0.2 million. The Company has paid the remaining $1.5 million to ABRY Partners and EMC’s other former stockholders during the fourth quarter of 2018.
Subscription Receivable with Former Employee

A former employee is the issuer of a Secured Promissory Note dated July 15, 2011, pursuant to which the former employee agreed to pay the Company (as successor to Row 44, Inc., which is a Company subsidiary) a principal sum of approximately $0.4 million, plus interest thereon at a rate of 6% per annum. The former employee granted the Company a security interest in shares of Row 44 held by him (which Row 44 shares were subsequently converted into 223,893 shares of the Company’s common stock) to secure his obligations to repay the loan. As of December 31, 2018, and 2017, the balance of the note (with interest) was approximately $0.6 million, which is presented as a subscription receivable. The Company recognizes interest income on the note when earned (using the simple interest method) but have not collected any interest payments since the origination of the note. Interest income recognized by the Company during the twelve months December 31, 2018 and 2017 was not material. The Company makes ongoing assessments regarding the collectability of this note and the subscription receivable balance.
masFlight Earn-Out
In August 2015, the Company acquired masFlight for approximately $10.3 million in cash and $9.3 million in contingent consideration. A former executive of masFlight (Joshua Marks) is now an executive officer of the Company. As a portion of the contingent consideration is subject to future employment of certain employees of masFlight, such contingent consideration is recorded as compensation expense subsequent to the acquisition date. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized compensation expense of less than $0.1 million relating to the masFlight contingent consideration. As of December 31, 2017, the remaining earn-out compensation liability was approximately $0.1 million, the beneficiaries of which include Mr. Marks and other former masFlight equityholders. This compensation liability was terminated in August 2017 without any required payment by the Company relating thereto. We did not record any compensation expense related to this during the year ended December 31, 2018.
Registration Rights Agreement

In connection with the closing of its business combination with Row 44 and Advanced Inflight Alliance AG, the Company entered into an amended and restated registration rights agreement, dated January 31, 2013 by and among the Company, Global Eagle Acquisition LLC (the “Sponsor”), Par Investment Partners, L.P. (“PAR”), Putnam Capital Spectrum Fund and Putnam Equity Spectrum Fund, and the members of the Sponsor signatory thereto, including Harry E. Sloan and Jeff Sagansky, pursuant to which the parties thereto obtained the right to cause the Company to register the resale of certain securities held by them (the “registrable securities”) and to sell such registrable securities pursuant to an effective registration statement in a variety of manners, including in underwritten offerings, all on the terms and conditions set forth therein. The Company is required under the terms of the amended and restated registration rights agreement to pay the expenses in connection with the exercise of these rights.

During 2017, Putnam Investments was a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. According to a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 7, 2018, Putnam Investments no longer holds more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, and as such has ceased to be a related party. PAR and Messrs. Sloan and Sagansky continue to be related parties.
The amended and restated registration rights agreement restricts our ability to grant registration rights to a third party on parity with or senior to those held by the “holders” (as defined under that agreement) without the consent of holders of at least a majority of the “registrable securities” under that agreement. In April 2018, we entered into a consent to the amended and restated registration rights agreement with PAR whereby PAR (as a holder of a majority of registrable securities thereunder) consented to the registration rights that we provided to Searchlight as part of its investment in us.