|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Table of Contents
Rev NR
|
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
|
||
Section A
|
Purchase Order Terms and Conditions
|
NR
|
Section A, Annex A1
|
Shipping Requirements
|
NR
|
Section A, Annex A2
|
Export Controls
|
NR
|
Section A, Annex A4
|
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) Information Requirements
|
NR
|
Section B
|
Additional Terms and Conditions Applicable to ContractsIssued under a Government Contract
|
NR
|
Section B, Annex B7
|
Additional Terms and Conditions Applicable to ContractsIssued under Canadian LAV-UP Contract
|
A
|
Section C
|
Quality Assurance
|
K
|
Section C, Annex C1
|
Externally Threaded Steel Fasteners
|
NR
|
Section D
|
Not Used
|
|
Section E
|
Canadian Industrial and Regional Benefits Requirements
|
NR
|
Section F
|
Not Used
|
|
STATEMENT OF WORK
|
||
Section G
|
Statement of Work
|
NR
|
Section G, Annex G1
|
Performance Specification
|
B
|
Section G, Annex G2
|
Subcontracts Data Requirements List (SDRL)
|
NR
|
Section G, Annex G3
|
Data Item Descriptions (DIDs)
|
NR
|
Section G, Annex G4
|
Design and Production Review Checklist
|
NR
|
Section H
|
Schedule
|
NR
|
Section H, Annex H1
|
Master Project Management Schedule
|
NR
|
Section I
|
Price and Payment
|
NR
|
Section I, Annex I1
|
Payment Plan
|
NR
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
1.
|
Definitions:
|
2.
|
The Contract:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
3.
|
Acceptance:
|
4.
|
Shipping; Billing; Payment:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
5.
|
Delivery:
|
6.
|
Expedited Shipments:
|
7.
|
Changes:
|
8.
|
Configuration Control:
|
9.
|
Supplier Quality and Development; Inspection:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
10.
|
Nonconforming Goods:
|
11.
|
Force Majeure:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
12.
|
Warranty:
|
13.
|
Ingredients Disclosure; Special Warnings and Instructions:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
14.
|
Stop Work Order:
|
15.
|
Termination for Cause:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
16.
|
Termination for Convenience:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
17.
|
Rights and Use of Proprietary Information and Materials:
|
18.
|
Intellectual Property:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
19.
|
Indemnification:
|
20.
|
Insurance and Workers’ Compensation:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
21.
|
Seller’s Property:
|
22.
|
Buyer’s Property:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
23.
|
Government Property
|
(i)
|
to use Government Property solely for the purposes of this Contract;
|
(ii)
|
that title in and to Government Property shall at all times remain with theGovernment;
|
(iii)
|
to take all necessary steps to protect and safeguard GovernmentProperty from loss, damage, destruction or theft; (iv) to tag and properly identify Government Property;
|
(v)
|
to segregate and secure Government Property so as to ensure that it does not become commingled with property of the Seller or third parties;
|
(vi)
|
not to incorporate Government Property into or attach it to any propertynot owned by the Government, unless permitted in writing by the Buyer or the Government;
|
(vii)
|
not to permit Government Property to become a fixture or to be attached to real property;
|
(viii)
|
to periodically perform a physical inventory of all Government Property; (ix)to bear the risk of any loss or damage to Government Property; and
|
(x)
|
to create and maintain records of all Government Property and permitaccess to those records by the Buyer and/or the Government as requested.
|
(b)
|
In the event Seller is provided with Government Property to support engineering and manufacturing activities relevant to the test and evaluation of form, fit and function of an end item deliverable, Seller shall return the Government Property to the Buyer or the Government in the same condition it was provided, less reasonable wear and tear.
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
(c)
|
Upon request, Government Property shall be immediately released, packed and delivered in accordance with suitable commercial practice to the destination set forth in the delivery instructions provided by the Buyer and/or the Government.
|
(d)
|
Disposal of Government Property shall only be as directed in writing by theBuyer or Government.
|
24.
|
Service and Replacement Parts:
|
25.
|
Remedies:
|
26.
|
Compliance with Laws; Customs; Export Controls:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
27.
|
Setoff/Recoupment:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
28.
|
No Advertising; Use of Trademarks:
|
29.
|
No Implied Waiver:
|
30.
|
Assignment, Delegation; Subcontracting:
|
31.
|
Relationship of Parties:
|
32.
|
Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Dispute Resolution:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
33.
|
Severability:
|
34.
|
Gratuities:
|
35.
|
Anti-Corruption Compliance:
|
(a)
|
they have not and will not directly or indirectly offer, give, promise or authorize anything of value to any government official, United Nations official, political party, party official or candidate for office (“Public Official”) for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or gaining any competitive advantage;
|
(b)
|
no Public Official has nor will benefit, directly or indirectly, from the compensation that the parties may receive in connection with this Contract or proceeds of any subcontract related thereto; and
|
(c)
|
they will cause their employees, directors and Subcontractors to comply with the provisions of this Article in connection with this Contract and any subcontract or agreement related thereto.
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
36.
|
Foreign Offset:
|
37.
|
Privacy:
|
38.
|
Entire Agreement; Amendments:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
39.
|
Notices:
|
40.
|
Work on Buyer’s/Buyer’s Customer(s) Premises:
|
41.
|
Records and Audit:
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A, Annex A1
Rev 12/16/2009
|
a.
|
Seller agrees: (1) to deliver goods to buyer at seller's dock in accordance with obligations outlined in FCA-Seller's Dock (Incoterms 2000) (2) suitably pack, mark and ship in accordance with Buyer s packing standards and carrier requirements to ensure lowest transportation cost and safe transport of the goods. No additional charge shall be made to the Buyer unless otherwise stated herein. If goods are to be exported from the United States, Seller agrees to 1) ensure that the appropriate destination control statement (i.e. ITAR or EAR) is referenced on Seller s commercial invoice and 2) provide Buyer s Export Compliance Department with a copy of applicable US export authorization prior to shipment of goods from the US.
|
b.
|
No charge shall be made by Seller for drayage or storage, unless otherwise stated herein.
|
c.
|
All shipping units (e.g. cartons, crates, skids, etc.) must be individually labeled, marked, or tagged clearly showing:
|
i.
|
Supplier s name
|
ii.
|
Complete Final Delivery Address
|
iii.
|
Purchase Order Number Including Line & Release Number- If Applicable iv.Part Number, Revision and Description
|
v.
|
Quantity Shipped Per Part
|
vi.
|
Shipping Unit number
|
vii.
|
Package Weight Specify pounds or kilograms
|
viii.
|
Waiver/Material Review Board (MRB) number where applicable
|
d.
|
Returnable containers must be clearly identified as such on the container and on the shipping documents.
|
e.
|
It is imperative that any previous markings on the shipping units are completely removed
|
f.
|
Separate manifests and packing list must be provided for each Final DeliveryAddress
|
g.
|
Two copies of Packing Lists must be provided with each shipment, included inside one of the shipping units (e.g. cartons, crates, skids, etc), and this unit must show “PACKING LIST ENCLOSED”
|
h.
|
All packing lists MUST include the following
|
i.
|
Supplier Name
|
ii.
|
GDLS-Canada Customer Contract Number If applicable
|
iii.
|
Purchase Order Number including Line Item and Release
|
iv.
|
Number
|
v.
|
Part Number and Description
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A, Annex A1
Rev 12/16/2009
|
vi.
|
Quantity Shipped per Part
|
vii.
|
Bill of Lading Reference
|
viii.
|
Total Number of Pieces Shipped
|
ix.
|
Total Weight Shipped
|
i.
|
Seller agrees to describe material on Bills of Lading or other shipping receipt and to route in accordance with the routing instructions of the Buyer s International Trade & Transportation Department. The ship-to address referenced on Buyer s purchase order must be shown as part of the Bill of Lading. EXPEDITED TRANSPORTATION PERMITTED ONLY WITH AUTHORIZATION FROM BUYER.
|
j.
|
Commercial invoice must be submitted in duplicate to the Accounts Payable Department, GDLS-Canada, London, Ontario. The proper commercial description of the goods must be on all invoices. Commercial invoices must show the marks, Numbers and Description of the Packages and GDLS-C purchase order number where applicable.
|
k.
|
Seller MUST complete appropriate GDLS-Canada Customs Invoices for all shipments originating outside of Canada destined to a Canadian address that originate from a point outside of Canada. Seller s failure to provide properly executed GDLS-Canada Customs Invoice shall entitle Buyer, at Buyer s option, to chargeSeller for reasonable administrative costs incurred. Seller shall refer to Buyers website http://www.gdlscanada.com/purchasing/index.htm) for instructions on determining appropriate GDLS-Canada Customs Invoice.
|
l.
|
(a) Seller shall (i) comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations, ordinances and orders of all applicable local, province/state and federal government authorities governing the transportation of dangerous goods and hazardous material and the, as amended from time to time, and (ii) procure all applicable registrations, licences/permits or other official authorizations, and pay all fees and other required charges.
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A, Annex A2
Rev 11/21/2008
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A, Annex A2
Rev 11/21/2008
|
Ÿ
|
A defense article is any good, software or piece of technical data that is designed, developed, configured, adapted or modified for a military application (22 CFR 120.3, 120.6)
|
Ÿ
|
A defense service includes the furnishing of any assistance, including training, to foreign persons in the design, development, engineering, manufacture, production, assembly, testing, repair, maintenance, modification, operation, demilitarization, distribution, processing, or use of defense articles (22 CFR 120.6)
|
Ÿ
|
The defense articles you manufacture and/or sell;
|
Ÿ
|
The defense services you provide;
|
Ÿ
|
The officers and directors of your company;
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A, Annex A2
Rev 11/21/2008
|
Ÿ
|
Whether your company, or any of its officers or directors, have been convicted of violating the Export Control Laws of the United States; and,
|
Ÿ
|
Whether your company is owned or controlled by a foreign company.
|
1.
|
If your company has determined that a license is not required under either the ITAR or the EAR, and that an exemption(s) will authorize all deliverables, provide notice stating applicable ITAR and/or EAR exemptions to Buyer within 30 days of receipt of the purchase order. Please note that the Canadian Exemption (ITAR) will be accepted as a valid exemption only in limited circumstances.
|
2.
|
If your company has determined one or more export license(s) and/or agreement(s) are required from the US government to export the deliverables, forward evidence that application has been made for these approvals (e.g., the license/agreement application numbers) to Buyer within 30 days of receipt of the purchase order.
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A, Annex A2
Rev 11/21/2008
|
3.
|
Within 15 days of receipt of US government export approvals at your company, and in any case prior to first shipment of deliverables, forward copies of the approvals to Buyer. Buyer will in turn, and as required by Canadian law, attach your license(s) or exemption citation(s) to Buyer’s application for Canadian export permit(s). You are further required to advise Buyer prior to shipment of parts if an export approval imposes special restrictions on use of a part (e.g. serialization).
|
4.
|
You are further required to notify your Buyer in the event that an export approval is expiring, has been suspended or revoked.
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A, Annex A2
Rev 11/21/2008
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A, Annex A2
Rev 11/21/2008
|
TO:
|
General Dynamics Land Systems Canada
|
GDLS – Canada Corporation
|
|
FAX:
|
519-964-5730 or 519-964-5688
|
|
|
ATTENTION:
|
Supply Chain Management Export Compliance
|
|
|
SUBJECT:
|
Export Controls Registration Status
|
FROM:
|
|
Company Name
|
|
Company Address
|
EXPORT COMPLIANCE
|
|
CONTACT NAME:
|
|
|
|
TITLE:
|
|
|
|
PHONE NUMBER:
|
|
|
|
FAX NUMBER:
|
|
|
|
EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURE:
|
o
|
Notification of Registration from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls is attached OR Certificate of Registration from the Controlled Goods Directorate is attached.
|
o
|
Application for Registration has been submitted. The date of application was ___________ Notification or Certificate of Registration will be forwarded once received.
|
o
|
Registration under the ITAR (US) or CGD (Canada) is not required, as we provide commercial material, technology, and/or services only.
|
o
|
Registration under the ITAR (US) or CGD (Canada) is not required, through government exemption.
|
Note:
|
Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) can exempt Canadian entities fromCGD registration (ex. Canadian Government Department or Agency).
|
|
Model Subcontract
Section A, Annex A4
Rev 3/1/2003
|
•
|
All liquids, gases, pastes, powders, flakes, gels, aerosols, and many solids.
|
•
|
Any product which generates dust, fumes, fog, vapor, etc., during shipping, storage, handling, use, or disposal.
|
•
|
Any product with specific ventilation requirements.
|
•
|
Any product with personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements or recommendations.
|
•
|
Any product stored in a pressurized cylinder or container.
|
•
|
Any product that emits radiation higher than background.
|
•
|
Any product intended to be altered, processed, etc., (e.g., cut, mold, grind).
|
•
|
Lubricants or coatings on steel or other articles.
|
•
|
“Articles” that will be processed by Buyer.
|
•
|
“Consumer products” that are not used in a manner typical to a consumer.
|
1.
|
Abrasives
|
2.
|
Acids & caustics
|
3.
|
Adhesives & sealers
|
4.
|
Castings, forging
|
5.
|
Cleaners
|
6.
|
Compressed gases
|
7.
|
Coolants & metalworking fluids
|
8.
|
Flux (e.g., soldering)
|
9.
|
Fuels (e.g., coal & gasoline)
|
10.
|
Insulating materials
|
11.
|
Lubricating oils & greases
|
12.
|
Nylons & other plastics
|
13.
|
Office supplies containing hazardous chemicals
|
14.
|
Oxidizers
|
15.
|
Paint & related chemicals
|
16.
|
Pesticides & biocides
|
17.
|
Printer’s inks
|
18.
|
Resins
|
19.
|
Soaps
|
20.
|
Solder
|
21.
|
Solvents
|
22.
|
Steel
|
23.
|
Welding rods & wires
|
24.
|
Wood
|
|
Model Subcontract
Section A, Annex A4
Rev 3/1/2003
|
•
|
A listing of all ingredients constituting 1% or more of the product
|
•
|
A listing of all ingredients constituting 0.1% or more of the product that are recognized as carcinogens
|
•
|
Written statements of compliance to all local, regional, national and international regulations for all non-listed ingredients constituting less than 1% of the product
|
|
Model Subcontract
Section A, Annex A4
Rev 3/1/2003
|
•
|
The MSDS date of preparation or effective/revision date must be less than 3 years old.
|
•
|
Date of Preparation - The date the MSDS was prepared or originated. This could also be the effective/revision date.
|
•
|
Effective/Revision Date - The date the MSDS is considered to be as complete and accurate as possible in describing the product as provided and relevant information such as manufacturer/supplier name, address and phone number. The effective and/or revision date will change as the product formulation changes or when new data on health, safety, environmental impact, regulations, toxicology or handling information becomes available.
|
•
|
Print Date - The print date will not be considered the effective date.
|
µ
|
1.
|
Indicate the product name or number as it appears on the label.
|
µ
|
2.
|
Provide appropriate synonyms that apply to the product.
|
µ
|
3.
|
Indicate the name of the manufacturer as it appears on the label. If the supplier is different from the manufacturer, then clearly identify the responsible party(ies) preparing or distributing the MSDS who could provide additional information on chemical components and/or emergency procedures. Include complete addresses and phone numbers for each party. Indicate the specific nature of the phone numbers such as information, fax, emergency, national emergency response lines (e.g., CHEMTREC - Chemical Transportation Emergency Center USA, NRC - National Response Center USA, CCOHS - Canadian Center for Occupational Health and Safety).
|
4.
|
Indicate the preparer’s name and title and include a phone number if it is different from the emergency or information phone number.
|
|
µ
|
5.
|
Clearly, indicate the date of preparation or the revision/effective date of the MSDS. If the date is more than three years old and no changes have been made to the data sheet (e.g. area code, address, verbiage) or the product, then a written statement with a current date may be submitted and it will be considered the effective date in lieu of revising the document.
|
|
Model Subcontract
Section A, Annex A4
Rev 3/1/2003
|
µ
|
1.
|
Buyer requires 100% disclosure of all ingredients found in a product. This means an ingredient present at 1% or greater (0.1% for carcinogens) must be listed, even if it is generally considered non-hazardous (e.g., water).In addition, ingredients present at less than 1% in the product must be listed if those ingredients would be present at 1% or greater in the “dry” product. (For example, if zinc oxide is present at 0.7% in the product as shipped, but is present at 1.2% after applying the product to a substrate, this ingredient must be listed.) If a CAS (Chemical Abstract Services) registry number exists for an ingredient, it must be listed along with the proper chemical name or common chemical name or synonym on the MSDS or addendum. Exceptions to CAS number disclosure for trade secret ingredients may be granted if a good chemical description is provided (see below for an explanation of a “good chemical description”).
|
If a CAS registry number of an ingredient is not available because the item is not a discrete chemical that can be represented by a chemical formula or is a mixture where the identity of individual components may be unknown or may vary, then a good chemical description must be provided. Examples of good chemical descriptions include, but are not limited to, those shown in the following table:
|
Unacceptable Name | Acceptable Name | |||
1.
|
Resin
|
1.
|
[Alkyd or benzophenol or other] resin (see other examples below)
|
|
2.
|
Urethane resin/polymer
|
2.
|
Diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) based urethane resin
|
|
3.
|
Polyurethane resin/polymer
|
3.
|
Diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) based urethane resin
|
|
4.
|
Hydrocarbon resin
|
4.
|
Alkyd resin
|
|
5.
|
Plasticizer
|
5.
|
Phthalate plasticizer
|
|
6.
|
Surfactant
|
6.
|
Linear alkyd sulfonate (LAS)
|
|
7.
|
UV Absorber
|
7.
|
Benzotriazole
|
|
8.
|
Additive
|
8.
|
A specific chemical family is required
|
|
9.
|
Epoxy resin
|
9.
|
Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether epoxy resin
|
|
10.
|
Phenol resin/polymer
|
10.
|
benzophenol based resin
|
|
11.
|
Thickener
|
11.
|
Starch (gelatin, semi-synthetic cellulose)
|
|
12..
|
Pigment or Colorant
|
12..
|
Yellow iron oxide pigment
|
|
13..
|
Inhibitor
|
13..
|
Acetanilide
|
|
14.
|
Antioxidant
|
14.
|
â-Naphthylamine
|
|
15.
|
Curing agent
|
15.
|
TDI based urethane prepolymer
|
|
16.
|
Emulsifier
|
16.
|
Fatty acid emulsifier
|
|
17.
|
Detergent
|
17.
|
Alkyl benzene sulfonate (ABS)
|
|
Model Subcontract
Section A, Annex A4
Rev 3/1/2003
|
µ
|
2.
|
Indicate the percentage of each ingredient in the product and identify if the value represents percent by weight or percent by volume. Ranges should be within ñ5% of the true value for all components (both hazardous and non-hazardous). Exceptions will be made in those situations where a ñ5% range will not accurately describe the product (e.g., when the base oils vary from batch to batch depending on crude oil availability). For a WHMIS controlled product for Canadian use, ranges must comply, at a minimum, with WHMIS regulations. Summation of exact percentages must equal 100%. Summation of maximum ranges must equal or exceed 100%. Summation of minimum ranges must equal or be less than 100%. Carcinogens and chemicals subject to national reporting requirements by CAS registry number (e.g., SARA 313, NPRI) should be given in exact percentages. For non-carcinogenic ingredients present in the product at <1%, but still provided on the MSDS, T for trace will be accepted in place of a numeric value (for carcinogenic, biocide, flame retardant, and pigment ingredients, T may be used for items < 0.1%). One item on the list may be listed as “balance” or “remainder”.
|
•
|
If the ingredient is present in the product at less than 1% and is not a hazardous substance, carcinogen, or known to cause toxicological problems in and of itself, or during processing, but is still provided on the MSDS, then a functional description such as “additive” will be acceptable.
|
•
|
In addition, similar items may be grouped (e.g., “colorants”), even if their total is greater than 1% (0.1% for appropriate chemicals), provided that no one chemical is present in the product at > 1%.
|
µ
|
3.
|
List appropriate exposure guidelines or limits for all of the product’s components identifying the source, e.g., OSHA PEL (Occupational Safety and Health Administration Permissible Exposure Limits), ACGIH TLV (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Values), NIOSH REL (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure Limits), manufacturer standard, etc., and clearly indicating the units of measure for the given guidelines.
|
µ
|
4.
|
For any ingredient that is not identified by the CAS number, the following toxicological information requirements apply.
|
If the component is greater than 10% of the chemical material, industrial hygiene sampling, monitoring and/or toxicological data must be provided on the component.
|
||
If the component is less than 10% of the chemical material, industrial hygiene sampling, monitoring and/or toxicological data may be required.
|
||
If industrial hygiene or toxicity information is not available, then a statement or words to that effect must appear on the MSDS or addendum.
|
||
See Sections 3, 8, 9, 10 and 11 for examples of industrial hygiene and toxicology information.
|
1.
|
Provide a clear, brief emergency overview describing the material’s appearance and most significant immediate concerns for emergency response personnel. This section may contain adverse human health effects, environmental effects, physical or chemical hazards.
|
|
µ
|
2.
|
Indicate the primary routes of entry such as skin, eye, inhalation, and ingestion or any combination thereof. If no applicable information is available; then a statement or words to that effect must appear on the MSDS or addendum.
|
µ
|
3.
|
Describe medical conditions (e.g., asthma) which are generally recognized as being aggravated by exposure to the product or its constituents. If no applicable information is available, then a statement or words to that effect must appear on the MSDS or addendum.
|
|
Model Subcontract
Section A, Annex A4
Rev 3/1/2003
|
SECTION 4 First Aid Measures
|
||
µ
|
1.
|
Provide emergency and first aid instructions to be followed in the event of overexposure to the product. If no applicable information is available, then a statement or words to that effect must appear on the MSDS or addendum.
|
2.
|
Describe any procedures to be used by trained medical personnel above and beyond first- aid procedures in event of overexposure.
|
|
3.
|
List any known antidotes, if applicable.
|
|
4.
|
Include notes to physicians, if applicable.
|
|
5.
|
Provide advice for the protection of first-aiders, if appropriate.
|
µ
|
1.
|
Indicate the flash point of the product and specify the method used. Use exact values whenever possible. For those instances where the flash point is difficult to determine (e.g., it boils out of the cup), or extremely dangerous to test, the following convention will be accepted: If the flash point is greater than 212°F (100°C), then >212°F (100°C) may be used if the actual value is unknown. If the flash point is less than 0°F (-17°C), then <0°F (-17°C) may be used. If no applicable information is available, then a statement or words to that effect must appear on the MSDS or addendum.
|
µ
|
2.
|
LEL/UEL (Lower Explosive Limits/Upper Explosive Limits) must be provided for liquids and gases. If no applicable information is available, then a statement or words to that effect must appear on the MSDS or addendum.
|
3.
|
List autoignition temperature for the product, if applicable.
|
|
µ
|
4.
|
Specify the appropriate fire extinguishing media. If no applicable information is available, then a statement or words to that effect must appear on the MSDS or addendum.
|
µ
|
5.
|
Indicate fire or explosion hazards. If no applicable information is available, then a statement or words to that effect must appear on the MSDS or addendum.
|
6.
|
Describe special fire fighting procedures, if applicable.
|
|
µ
|
7.
|
Give health, flammability and reactivity ratings for the product using NFPA criteria, if available.
|
µ
|
1.
|
Indicate steps to be taken in case material is released or spilled including recovery, neutralization or disposal if they are different than section 13.
|
2.
|
Describe expected environmental impact resulting from the release of the product.
|
|
3.
|
Provide information on secondary hazards and their prevention (e.g., contaminated surfaces may be slippery, post appropriate warnings, etc.).
|
µ
|
1.
|
Indicate storage precautions (e.g., incompatible products, conditions to avoid, temperature requirements, etc.,). If no applicable information is available, then a statement or words to that effect must appear on the MSDS or addendum.
|
2.
|
Indicate handling precautions recommended for other activities associated with the product such as grinding, power sanding, welding, etc.
|
|
Model Subcontract
Section A, Annex A4
Rev 3/1/2003
|
µ
|
1.
|
If appropriate, indicate engineering measures or controls recommended to reduce exposure including ventilation type and rate.
|
µ
|
2.
|
Provide any generally applicable personal protective equipment (PPE) recommendations in accordance with the intended use of the product including specific suitable materials (e.g., neoprene gloves - not impervious gloves; safety glasses - not eye protection; organic vapor respirator - not respirator) for respiratory, hand, eye, skin and/or body protection. If temperature and/or pressure conditions that warrant special and/or additional PPE precautions. If no applicable information is available, then a statement or words to that effect must appear on the MSDS or addendum.
|
µ
|
3.
|
If appropriate, indicate any specific hygiene measures or practices that should be followed.
|
µ
|
1. |
Identify the physical and chemical properties that characterize the product including information on physical state. Report data in appropriate units of measurement with pertinent reference conditions and/or test methods.
|
µ
|
2.
|
List the specific gravity or range for all liquid and semi solid materials (water = 1). If a range must be used, then it should be no greater than ¨0.05.
|
3.
|
Indicate the density of the product.
|
|
4.
|
Provide the theoretical or analytical Volatile Organic Content (VOC) or Reportable VOC (RVOC) in lbs./gal, gms/liter, or percent by weight, or if a solid, in gms/gm or lbs/lb.
|
•
|
For surface coatings (such as paints, inks, and adhesives) and solvent-based materials, analytical VOC content is preferred for all products and is required for productive materials. The analytical method used must be specified (e.g., U.S. EPA Method 24 or 24a).
|
|
•
|
For non-surface coatings, any constituent with a vapor pressure >0.1 mm HG at 20°C or at intended use conditions (e.g., heated fluids) and/or containing < 12 carbon atoms is considered to be a Reportable VOC (RVOC). Additionally, light naphthenic and paraffinic distillates should also be considered to be RVOCs.
|
•
|
If the VOC is 0 lb/gal, then a statement such as 0, zero, none, no VOC/RVOC present, or words to that effect must appear on the MSDS or addendum.
|
|
•
|
If the product obviously has no VOC content because of its ingredients, physical state (e.g., wood, oxygen, welding rod, inorganic) or generally accepted processing practices, then the VOC/RVOC statement does not have to appear on the MSDS or addendum. If the product releases VOCs or RVOCs during processing (e.g., plastics, elevated temperatures), then a VOC/RVOC value as described above must be reported.
|
µ
|
5.
|
Provide a pH value or description. Use exact values whenever possible. Terms such as acidic, neutral, caustic, or alkaline may be accepted in some situations but more specific information such as <4 or >10 are preferred when actual values are not available.In addition, specify if the reported pH represents the packaged material (e.g., concentrate) or the typical use dilution. When a dilution pH is given, list typical dilution percentage. If no applicable information is available, then a statement or words to that effect must appear on the MSDS or addendum.
|
6.
|
Indicate the specific temperature or temperature ranges at which changes in physical state occur (e.g., boiling point, freezing/melt point).
|
|
Model Subcontract
Section A, Annex A4
Rev 3/1/2003
|
7.
|
Indicate the vapor density and specify the temperature.
|
|
8.
|
Indicate the vapor pressure in mm Hg and specify the temperature.
|
|
9.
|
Indicate the percent solid by weight and for paints by volume.
|
|
10.
|
Indicate the evaporation rate. Specify the reference solvent (e.g., n-butyl acetate or ether as equal to 1).
|
|
11.
|
Indicate the product’s solubility in water.
|
|
12.
|
Indicate the molecular weight of products that are pure chemicals (e.g., gases).
|
|
13.
|
Indicate the viscosity of the product as supplied and specify the temperature.
|
|
µ
|
14.
|
Include additional chemical and physical data as deemed necessary to promote safe use and handling of the product (e.g., color, odor, radioactivity, particle size, softening point, octanol/water partition coefficient).
|
µ
|
1.
|
State if the material is stable or unstable under normal, anticipated storage and handling conditions of ambient temperature and pressure.
|
µ
|
2.
|
Indicate any hazardous material releases that will or may occur including both potential and actual releases through normal processes such as baking, welding, spraying, etc., that are not specifically listed as ingredients in Section 2 or listed below as hazardous decomposition products.
|
3.
|
List any conditions such as heat, pressure, shock, or other physical stresses that might result in a hazardous situation.
|
|
4.
|
Indicate incompatible materials that the product could react with to produce a hazardous situation.
|
|
µ
|
5.
|
Indicate hazardous decomposition products produced by burning, oxidation, heating or chemical reaction (e.g., phenol, formaldehyde and isocyanates.)
|
6.
|
State if the material is subject to hazardous polymerization and specify the conditions that might induce polymerization.
|
µ
|
1.
|
Summarize the information on the various possible health effects, which might arise if the user comes in contact with the product. If no data is available on the product, then information on the hazardous constituents may be used. Information may cover clinical test data on acute toxicity (e.g., LD50-oral/dermal [species specific], LC50-inhalation [species specific]), irritation scores, target organs, effect and no-effect levels, species differences, local effects, subchronic and/or long term toxicity, and sensitization. If applicable, list the information according to different exposure routes (e.g., inhalation, skin contact, eye contact and ingestion).
|
•
|
If applicable, list effects due to single exposure, repeated exposure and continuous exposure.
|
•
|
If applicable, list immediate and delayed effects.
|
•
|
If applicable, include specific results from studies or reports in areas such as teratogenicity, neurotoxicity, mutagenicity, reproductive effects and epidemiology.
|
µ
|
2.
|
State the carcinogenic status of any ingredient per NTP, IARC, OSHA, ACGIH and/or any other source appropriate to the country of origin and the country of destination.
|
|
Model Subcontract
Section A, Annex A4
Rev 3/1/2003
|
1.
|
Summarize information on the possible environmental effects of the material including potential environmental impact, soil mobility, product persistence or degradability, bioaccumulation and ecotoxicology data. If no applicable information is available, then a statement or words to that effect should appear on the MSDS or addendum.
|
2.
|
Provide a Material Environmental Data Sheet (MEDS), if available.
|
µ
|
1.
|
Recommend methods for safe and environmentally preferred disposal of uncontaminated bulk product, residue, or emptied packaging.
|
µ
|
1.
|
List appropriate national and international information on codes, classifications, hazardous material descriptions, proper shipping names and packing groups for regulatory purposes differentiated by mode of transport.
|
|
•
|
US Suppliers: indicate Department of Transportation (DOT) hazardous materials description/proper shipping name, hazard class, UN (United Nations)/NA (North American) identification numbers and packing group according to 49 CFR 172.101 and other international restrictions as applicable. Include classification changes based on quantity, packaging or shipment. If the material is not regulated by DOT, include a statement to that effect.
|
|
•
|
Canadian Suppliers: indicate Transportation of Dangerous Goods (TDG) classification and/or other international restrictions as applicable.
|
2.
|
Indicate additional transportation restrictions.
|
3.
|
Specify any precautionary transport measures and/or conditions.
|
µ
|
1.
|
Indicate information on regulations specifically applicable to the chemical product and/or its constituents and include appropriate international and national requirements.
|
•
|
US:
|
ð
|
Indicate the appropriate categories for the product under EPCRA (SARA Title III) 311 and 312 (i.e., immediate health hazard, delayed health hazard, fire hazard, sudden pressure release hazard, and reactivity hazard).
|
ð
|
Indicate whether the product or its constituents are listed in the EPA Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) inventory. Where appropriate include information on other elements of TSCA such as Significant New Use Rule (SNUR), Final Consent Orders, Research and Development Limitations, Export Notification Requirements, and Exemptions from TSCA (e.g., pesticides, foods, and drugs).
|
ð
|
List the RCRA hazardous waste codes that apply to the product as packaged.
|
|
Model Subcontract
Section A, Annex A4
Rev 3/1/2003
|
ð
|
List the CERCLA Reportable Quantity (RQ) for the product and its constituents.
|
•
|
Canada:
|
ð
|
Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System (WHMIS) Hazardous Product Act - Part II, Controlled Products Regulations; Hazardous Materials Information Review Act and Regulations;
|
ð
|
Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) - Domestic Substance List (DSL) or Non-Domestic Substance List (NDSL), Export Notification.
|
ð
|
National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI)
|
µ
|
2.
|
In the United States and/or Canada, list any state or province health & safety and environmental regulations for ingredients contained in the product for the states or provinces where the material is manufactured or marketed. Include state right-to-know listed substances or specialized data requirements.
|
|
1.
|
Use this section for information that does not fit into a previous category. Examples of data to include here are: label text, hazard ratings, revision indicators, key/legend, references, recommended use, special training needs and possible restrictions.
|
2.
|
Indicate the sections that have been revised or changed since the previous issue of the MSDS.
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section B
Rev 03/05/2009
|
1.
|
Notice Of Government Contract
|
2.
|
Access to Seller's Facilities
|
3.
|
Inspection
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section B
Rev 03/05/2009
|
4.
|
Interchangeability of Components
|
a)
|
The Seller shall maintain a change control system to ensure configuration control for the thirty (30) year period following contract award. The Seller shall not make any changes to the product without prior written approval from the Buyer where design changes affect "form, fit and function".
|
b)
|
All changes must be reflected in appropriate documentation, manuals, spares, and repair parts. The Buyer reserves the right to request a physical configuration audit (PCA) at the Seller's manufacturing facility during the contract period. The Seller shall be responsible for both conducting the "PCA" under Buyer supervision and incorporating any disclosed discrepancies into the Seller's configuration identification.
|
c)
|
The Buyer encourages any design change suggestions with respect to safety, reliability, quality, manufacturing cost performance, or any other aspect of product improvement.
|
5.
|
Continuing support
|
6.
|
Technical Information
|
7.
|
Subject To All Laws
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section B
Rev 03/05/2009
|
8.
|
New Material
|
10.
|
Pertains To Purchase Orders Placed By GDLS-A To AustralianSuppliers Only - Special Term (Australia)
|
a)
|
notify Buyer of amounts of such taxes
|
b)
|
provide the Buyer with a tax invoice, as that term is defined in the relevant goods and services tax legislation, on the day following the date the goods are dispatched or the services are provided to the Buyer; and
|
c)
|
do all things necessary (including, without limitation, registering with any required government authority) to enable Buyer to claim any credits or other benefits available for such taxes, or to otherwise comply with its obligations under the relevant goods and services legislation.
|
|
Section B, Annex B7
Rev A, October 2011
|
1.
|
Subcontracting
|
|
1.1.
|
Seller shall submit any request to subcontract, sublet or make any purchase to Buyer by written notice for prior approval. The Notice shall include the part number, model number, or description of service that will be listed with the Subcontractor and/or supplier. Buyer may, upon receipt of a Notice, approve the request. If Buyer does not notify Seller of its refusal to approve the request within thirty (30) days, Seller may assume that such approval has been granted.
|
1.2.
|
Without the prior written approval of Buyer, Seller may:
|
1.2.1.
|
subcontract or sublet work to any one Subcontractor to a value not exceeding $500,000 in the aggregate.
|
1.2.2.
|
make off the shelf purchases and purchases of such standard articles and materials as are ordinarily manufactured or produced by mills and manufacturers in the normal course of business ; and
|
1.2.3.
|
authorize its first and subsequent tier Subcontractors to subcontract, sublet or make purchases as permitted in Section 1.2.1 or 1.2.2 above.
|
1.3.
|
Except as otherwise provided in this article, Seller shall follow Seller’scompetitive process for the subcontract or the sublet of any work of any kind or to make any purchase in connection with this contract.
|
1.4.
|
Buyer or Canadian Government reserves the right to audit both Seller’s procedures and the application of said procedures at any time to ensure that Seller maintains the fairness and integrity of its selection process. Seller shall, upon request, provide Buyer or Canadian Government with access to all relevant documentation to allow for reasonable assessment of the selection procedures used in the procurement relative to this contract within twenty (20) days of such request.
|
|
Section B, Annex B7
Rev A, October 2011
|
|
1.5.
|
Seller recognizes that Buyer or Canadian Government Representatives, from time to time, may wish to meet with Subcontractors or suppliers. Any meetings between Buyer or Canadian Government Representatives or its authorized representatives and the Seller or the Seller’s suppliers shall be arranged through the Seller. Buyer may however, arrange such a meeting should the Seller refuse or neglect to arrange any such meeting following notice from Buyer or Canadian Government representatives.
|
1.6.
|
Seller shall bind its suppliers to all those relevant terms of the Contract in order that they shall always be able to satisfactorily perform their obligations in such subcontracts, sublets or purchases in a manner fully consistent with the due fulfillment of the terms of this contract by Seller. Deviations from the terms of this contract, including any termination rights in this contract, shall be at Seller’s entire risk.
|
|
1.7.
|
Notwithstanding any other terms of this contract, Seller shall always be fully responsible and liable for any matters or things done or provided by any Subcontractor or supplier pursuant to this contract.
|
|
1.8.
|
No act nor omission of Seller, whether occurring before or after the Effective Date of this contract, shall have the effect of rendering any monies payable by Buyer under this contract to any person, firm or corporation, other than the Seller, unless Buyer consents thereto in writing.
|
|
1.9.
|
Subcontracts which contain security requirements or requiring access to SENSITIVE (Designated/Classified) information or assets shall not be awarded without the prior written consent of the Industrial Security Division of “PWGSC”.
|
2.
|
Examination of Records By Canadian Government
|
|
Section B, Annex B7
Rev A, October 2011
|
3.
|
Not Used.
|
4.
|
Not Used.
|
5.
|
Translation Rights
|
6.
|
Controlled/Hazardous Products
|
7.
|
Security and Protection of the Work
|
8.
|
Royalties
|
|
8.1.
|
The term “Royalties” includes any costs or charges, including any claims for damages based upon the use or infringement in any country, in the nature of royalties, license fees, patent or licence amortizations costs and the like, and all other payments analogous to such for the use of, or rights in copyrights, registered industrial designs, trademarks, trade secrets, patents and patent applications or other intellectual property right, and any similar costs or expenses incurred as a result of the exercise by any person of moral rights as defined in the Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C42;
|
|
Section B, Annex B7
Rev A, October 2011
|
8.2.
|
Seller shall:
|
|
(i)
|
report in writing to Buyer prior to commencement of this contract and during the performance of this contract the amount of Royalties which Seller will pay, may be obligated to pay, or proposes to pay in respect of performing this contract, the basis of the Royalties, and the parties to whom the same are payable;
|
|
(ii)
|
promptly advise the Buyer of any and all claims which would or might result in further or different payments by way of Royalties being made by Seller or any of Seller’s subcontractors, and
|
8.3.
|
If and to the extent directed by Buyer upon instructions from the Government of Canada, Seller shall not pay and shall direct Seller’s subcontractors not to pay any royalties in respect of performing this contract. In the event of such direction by Buyer, and subject to the compliance by Seller with the foregoing provisions, Buyer shall indemnify the Seller and its subcontractors from and against all claims, actions, suits or proceedings for payment of such royalties as are covered by the direction. Seller shall not be entitled to any payment in respect to any Royalties included in the contract price to which the indemnity provided applies.
|
9.
|
Not Used.
|
10.
|
Section A, Clause 18 shall be deleted and replaced as follows: Intellectual Property and Copyright:
|
10.1.
|
Definitions:
|
i
|
"Firmware" means computer program stored in integrated circuits, read- only memory or other similar devices;
|
ii
|
"Invention" means any new and useful art, process, methodology,technique, machine, manufacture or composition of matter, whether or not patentable, first conceived, developed or reduced to practice as part of the Work under the Contract;
|
iii
|
"Software" means computer programs whether in source or object code (including Firmware), computer program documentation recorded in any form or medium, and includes modifications to any of the foregoing; and
|
iv
|
"Technical Information" means all information of a scientific or technical nature relating to the Work, recorded in any form or medium and whether or not copyrightable, and specified to be delivered to Buyer as part of the Work under the Contract, including, but not limited to, any Inventions, designs, methods, processes, techniques, know-how, schematics, experimental or test data, reports, drawings, plans, specifications, collections of information, manuals, publications and any other documents, Software and Firmware; and
|
v
|
"Intellectual Property Right" means any intellectual property rightrecognized by law, including any intellectual property right protected by legislation such as patents, copyright, industrial design, integrated circuitopography, and plant breeders’ rights, or subject to protection under the law as trade secrets and confidential information.
|
|
Section B, Annex B7
Rev A, October 2011
|
10.2.
|
The Seller must promptly report and fully disclose to the Buyer all Inventions, and must deliver to the Buyer all Technical Information not later than the time of completion of the Work or at such earlier time as this Contract may specify.
|
i
|
The Seller shall, in each disclosure under this Sub-article, indicate the names of all Subcontractors, if any, in which Intellectual Property Rights to any Inventions have vested or will vest.
|
ii
|
The Buyer and the Government of Canada have the right, at reasonable times and at their cost and expense, to examine all records and supporting data of the Seller that the Buyer or the Government of Canada reasonably deems pertinent to the identification of Inventions. This provision does not affect the Seller's obligation to retain accounts and records as required by the Defence Production Act nor the Government of Canada's rights thereunder.
|
10.3.
|
Without divesting Buyer or any third party of Intellectual Property Rights thathave come into being prior to the Contract or that relate to GFI supplied by Buyer during the Contract, copyright, patent and all other Intellectual Property Rights to all Technical Information shall, immediately upon their conception, development, reduction to practice or production, vest in and remain the exclusive property of the Seller and/or its Subcontractors.
|
10.4.
|
The Seller hereby grants to Buyer and the Government of Canada a non- exclusive, irrevocable, worldwide, fully paid and royalty-free license to use any Invention or Technical Information solely for the following purposes:
|
i
|
Use, operation, maintenance, repair or overhaul of the Goods by Buyer, but not for manufacturing purposes;
|
ii
|
Manufacturing of spare parts for the use, maintenance, repair or overhaul of any part of the Goods by Buyer in an emergency situation if those parts are not reasonably available from the Seller to enable timely use, maintenance, repair or overhaul; or
|
iii
|
Further development, alteration, integration or enhancement of any partof the Goods by Buyer.
|
10.5.
|
Buyer's license with respect to any Technical Information that is Software excludes the right to further develop, alter, enhance or otherwise modify that Software unless the owner of the Software, which may be the Seller or a Subcontractor otherwise, agrees.
|
10.6.
|
In any disclosure, sublicense, or authorization to use, made or given by Buyer to a contractor engaged by Buyer solely for any of the purposes contemplated in Para 10.4, Buyer must require that contractor to agree to maintain the confidentiality of the Technical Information and not to use any Technical Information except as may be necessary to carry out that work for Buyer, and must require the Seller to return the Technical Information to Buyer upon completion of the work.
|
10.7.
|
The Seller may refuse to grant any such right to disclose, sublicense or otherwise authorize the use of any Technical Information related to the Goods for the purposes contemplated in Para 10.4 (i) where the Seller is willing to perform the maintenance, repair or overhaul work for Buyer on reasonable commercial terms. The Seller must promptly notify Buyer whether consent will be granted by the Seller and if not, the reasons why.
|
|
Section B, Annex B7
Rev A, October 2011
|
10.8.
|
Although Buyer has no right to disclose, sublicense, or otherwise authorize the use of any Technical Information by any third parties whatsoever for any purposes contemplated in Para 10.4 the Seller and Buyer agree that during the lifetime of the Goods, Buyer may require the further development, alteration, integration or enhancement of any part of them. Therefore, during such period, the Seller agrees to either perform itself or to subcontract the performance of such work under terms and conditions agreeable to the Seller and Buyer that will provide Buyer with the optimum accomplishment of Buyer's requirement for timely performance, high quality and low price.
|
10.9.
|
Buyer must provide the following information to the Seller concurrent with providing any Technical Information to third parties and/or Sellers in accordance with Para 10.6:
|
i
|
A list of all third parties and Sellers that have received TechnicalInformation;
|
ii
|
The intended or actual use of the Technical Information; and
|
iii
|
The expected completion date of the work for which the TechnicalInformation has been supplied.
|
10.10.
|
Buyer's license under Para 10.4 shall not be affected by any transfer of title to, or assignment or license of, any Invention or Technical Information by the Seller to any third party.
|
10.11.
|
The Seller must not, without the written permission of the Buyer, deliver any Technical Information hereunder unless the Seller owns or has procured the rights necessary to provide the license to Buyer set out in Para 10.4
|
10.12.
|
Wherever practical, the Seller must mark or identify any Technical Information delivered to Buyer under this Article as "Property of (Seller or Subcontractor, as appropriate). Buyer must not be liable for any unauthorized use or disclosure of Technical Information that could have been so marked or identified and was not.
|
10.13.
|
Technical Information may contain information and data which is or becomes either publicly available without breach of Buyer's obligations hereunder, or is available from a source, other than the Seller, except any source that is under an obligation not to disclose such information or data. Such information or data is hereinafter referred to as the "Publicly Available Technical Information". The restrictions on use and disclosure of Technical Information contained in this Article do not apply to Publicly Available Technical Information. However, the remainder of the Technical Information which includes such Publicly Available Technical Information shall be subject to the restrictions on use and disclosure contained in this Article.
|
10.14.
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Article, modifications made by the Seller to Document Type Definition's (DTD) and Format Output Specification Instance's (FOSI) must be furnished to Buyer without any restrictions on use or disclosure.
|
|
Section B, Annex B7
Rev A, October 2011
|
11.
|
Section A, Clause 19 shall be deleted and replaced as follows: Indemnification: Seller shall indemnify and hold Buyer harmless from and against any liability, claims, demands or expenses (including attorney’s and other professional fees) for: (a) damages to the property of or injuries (including death) to Buyer, its employees or any other person arising from or in connection with Seller (including its agents, employees and subcontractors) performing this contract; (b) any liens, attachments, charges or other encumbrances; or (c) claims upon or in respect of any materials, parts, work in process or finished work furnished to, or in respect of which payment has been made by Buyer .
|
12.
|
Not Used
|
13.
|
Not Used.
|
14.
|
Not Used.
|
15.
|
Agreement
|
16.
|
Survival
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 1 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 2 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 3 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 4 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 5 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 6 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
A)
|
No high strength fasteners are contained within the assembly. The FPI/PPAP submission shall include a declaration (Form 4496, Appendix A), or
|
|
B)
|
High strength fasteners are contained within the commercial item assembly. The FPI/PPAP submission shall include a certification (Form 4496, Appendix C) stating that the supplier’s quality control system for fasteners meets the intent of Form 4496, section 2.0, or
|
|
C)
|
High strength fasteners are contained within the non-commercial item assembly. The FPI/PPAP submission shall include a certification (Form 4496, Appendix D) stating that the supplier’s quality control system for fasteners meets all the requirements of Form 4496, section 2.0.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 7 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 8 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
GDLS-C Originating Contracts
|
General Dynamics Land Systems - Canada
|
1991 Oxford Street East London, Ontario, Canada
|
N5V 2Z7 |
Attn: Quality Engineering ppap.fpi@gdls.com
|
|
1.
|
Weld Procedure Specification (WPS).
|
|
2.
|
Procedure Qualification Record (PQR) with accompanying test results.
|
|
3.
|
Welder Qualification Records.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 9 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
4.
|
Weld *map, detailing which WPS(s) apply to which weld joints.
|
|
5.
|
Visual inspection criteria/instructions in place.
|
|
6.
|
Weld rework instructions in place.
|
|
7.
|
First off weld specimens representative of production welding.
|
GDLS-C Originating Contracts
|
General Dynamics Land Systems - Canada
|
1991 Oxford Street East London, Ontario, Canada N5V 2Z7
|
Attn: Quality Engineering ppap.fpi@gdls.com
|
|
1)
|
All welds on items in this contract shall be visually inspected by Certified AWS or CWB Welding Inspectors. Weld inspectors shall:
|
|
i.
|
Hold current or previous certification as an AWS Certified Welding Inspector (CWI) in conformance with the provisions of AWS QC1 (Standard and Guide for Qualification of Welding Inspectors).
|
|
ii.
|
Hold current or previous certification by the Canadian Welding Bureau (CWB) in conformance with the requirements of the Canadian Standard Association (CSA) Standard W178.2 (Certification of Welding Inspectors).
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 10 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
A)
|
a report indicating work performed to bring material to usable condition.
|
B)
|
a Certificate Of Conformance indicating compliance to specification(s)and completion of repaired item functional testing to original test procedure(s).
|
C)
|
appropriate test results and/or measurements supporting requirement (b) above shall be submitted with the shipment, unless otherwise specified.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 11 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
GDLS-SHC Originating Contracts
|
GDLS-C Originating Contracts
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems
Lima Assembly Tank Plant
1161 Buckeye Road
Lima, Oh 45804
Attn: Material Control Laboratories
|
General Dynamics Land Systems - Canada
1991 Oxford Street East
London, Ontario, Canada
N5V 2Z7
Attn: Quality Engineering ppap.fpi@gdls.com
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 12 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
|
1.
|
No configuration changes have occurred.
|
|
2.
|
The part is manufactured at the same facility.
|
|
3.
|
The manufacturing process has remained the same.
|
|
4.
|
There has been no more than a one (1) year break in production.
|
|
5.
|
No formal corrective action has been required.
|
|
6.
|
The sub-tier suppliers and special processors have not changed.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 13 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 14 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 15 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
GDLS-C 4417
|
Page 16 of 16
|
29 Sept 2010 Rev. K
|
Section C
Annex C1
|
|
QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
|
Form GDLS-C 4496
|
EXTERNALLY-THREADED STEEL FASTENERS
|
Rev 03/01/2003
|
1.0
|
SCOPE
|
*
|
This document establishes the minimum requirements to be met by all manufacturers and/or distributors of at least Grade 5 or Property Class 8.8 externally-threaded steel fasteners, or by all suppliers of assemblies which contain externally-threaded steel fasteners. Such suppliers must comply with Section 2.0 or 3.0, as applicable.
|
*
|
Suppliers of assemblies which contain externally-threaded steel fasteners less than Grade 5 or Property Class 8.8, must submit, as part of the production Part Approval Process (PPAP), the declaration shown in Appendix A. The remainder of this document does not apply to such suppliers.
|
1.1
|
DEFINITIONS
|
*
|
1.1.1
|
High Strength Fasteners
|
*
|
1.1.6
|
Grade/Property Class
|
Section C
Annex C1
|
|
QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
|
Form GDLS-C 4496
|
EXTERNALLY-THREADED STEEL FASTENERS
|
Rev 03/01/2003
|
2.0
|
REQUIREMENTS FOR HIGH STRENGTH FASTENERS SHIPPED LOOSE
|
*
|
The supplier must implement and maintain a quality assurance system which ensures lot traceability back to the fastener manufacturer and provide objective evidence of the homogeneity of the lot. This objective evidence shall be prepared, maintained and provided to Buyer with each shipment, as detailed in Section 2.2.
|
|
2.1.1
|
Manufacturer’s Trademark (Logo)
|
|
2.1.2
|
Grade
|
|
2.1.3
|
Dimensional Characteristics
|
|
2.1.4
|
Chemical Composition
|
|
2.1.5
|
Mechanical Properties
|
|
2.1.6
|
Plating
|
Section C
Annex C1
|
|
QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
|
Form GDLS-C 4496
|
EXTERNALLY-THREADED STEEL FASTENERS
|
Rev 03/01/2003
|
|
2.2.1
|
A certification (Appendix B) stating that fasteners in a given lot meet all requirements shall be provided with each shipment.
|
|
2.2.2
|
Test reports confirming that the fasteners meet the following technical requirements, as applicable, shall be provided with each shipment: Chemical Composition, Hardness, Tensile Strength, and Plating. The name of the test laboratory shall be stated on the corresponding test report/certification.
|
|
2.2.3
|
Lot traceability shall be maintained and ensured by referencing the lot identification code on all corresponding documentation.
|
3.0
|
REQUIREMENTS FOR HIGH STRENGTH FASTENERS AS PART OF AN ASSEMBLY
|
*
|
3.1.1
|
Suppliers of commercial assemblies, as defined above, must provide certification (Appendix C) with PPAP only, stating that:
|
(a)
|
the item is a commercial item, as defined in Section 3.0, and
|
*
|
(b)
|
the fastener quality assurance system meets the intent of Section 2.0 and will prevent delivery of substandard product.
|
|
3.1.1
|
These requirements allow for the utilization of proven contractor Quality Assurance systems. These systems must assure fastener conformance to all requirements as defined in Section 2.0 above. Objective evidence of conformance shall be kept on file with the supplier and may be subject to review by the buyer.
|
Section C
Annex C1
|
|
QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
|
Form GDLS-C 4496
|
EXTERNALLY-THREADED STEEL FASTENERS
|
Rev 03/01/2003
|
*
|
Suppliers of non-commercial assemblies must prepare and maintain a fastener quality assurance system that meets the requirements as outlined in Section 2.0.
|
*
|
3.2.1
|
Suppliers of non-commercial assemblies must provide certification with PPAP only stating that their quality control systems for fasteners meet all requirements of Section 2.0 (Appendix D); and
|
|
3.2.2
|
Inspection and test reports must be kept on file with the supplier and be provided to the buyer upon request. These records may be subject to periodic review by Quality Assurance.
|
Section C
Annex C1
|
|
QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
|
Form GDLS-C 4496
|
EXTERNALLY-THREADED STEEL FASTENERS
|
Rev 03/01/2003
|
LOT
SIZE
|
SAMPLE
SIZE
|
CHEMICAL
COMPOSITION
|
CORE
HARDNESS
|
TENSILE
STRENGTH
|
PLATING
|
|||||
2-25
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||
26-150
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||
151-1200
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|||||
1201-35000
|
8
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
|||||
35001-OVER
|
|
13
|
|
6
|
|
3
|
|
3
|
|
1
|
LOT SIZE
|
SPECIAL INSPECTION LEVELS
|
GENERAL INSPECTION LEVELS
|
||||||||||||
S-1
|
S-2
|
S-3
|
S-4
|
I
|
II
|
III
|
||||||||
2-8
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
B
|
|||||||
9-15
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
|||||||
16-25
|
A
|
A
|
B
|
B
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|||||||
26-50
|
A
|
B
|
B
|
C
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
|||||||
51-90
|
B
|
B
|
C
|
C
|
C
|
E
|
F
|
|||||||
91-150
|
B
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
D
|
F
|
G
|
|||||||
151-280
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
E
|
G
|
H
|
|||||||
281-500
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
F
|
H
|
J
|
|||||||
501-1200
|
C
|
C
|
E
|
F
|
G
|
J
|
K
|
|||||||
1201-3200
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
G
|
H
|
K
|
L
|
|||||||
3201-10000
|
C
|
D
|
F
|
G
|
J
|
L
|
M
|
|||||||
10001-35000
|
C
|
D
|
F
|
H
|
K
|
M
|
N
|
|||||||
35001-150000
|
D
|
E
|
G
|
J
|
L
|
N
|
P
|
|||||||
150001-500000
|
D
|
E
|
G
|
J
|
M
|
P
|
Q
|
|||||||
500001-OVER
|
D
|
E
|
H
|
K
|
N
|
Q
|
R
|
Section C
Annex C1
|
|
QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
|
Form GDLS-C 4496
|
EXTERNALLY-THREADED STEEL FASTENERS
|
Rev 03/01/2003
|
SAMPLE SIZE CODE LETTER
|
SAMPLE SIZE
|
|
A
|
2
|
|
B
|
3
|
|
C
|
5
|
|
E
|
8
|
|
D
|
13
|
|
F
|
20
|
|
G
|
32
|
|
H
|
50
|
|
J
|
80
|
|
K
|
125
|
|
L
|
200
|
|
M
|
315
|
|
N
|
500
|
|
P
|
800
|
|
Q
|
1250
|
|
R
|
2000
|
Section C
Annex C1
|
|
QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
|
Form GDLS-C 4496
|
EXTERNALLY-THREADED STEEL FASTENERS
|
Rev 03/01/2003
|
SIGNATURE
|
||
DATE
|
||
COMPANY
|
||
ADDRESS
|
||
Section C
Annex C1
|
|
QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
|
Form GDLS-C 4496
|
EXTERNALLY-THREADED STEEL FASTENERS
|
Rev 03/01/2003
|
TEST LABORATORY
|
||
SIGNATURE
|
||
TITLE
|
||
DATE
|
||
COMPANY
|
||
ADDRESS
|
||
Section C
Annex C1
|
|
QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
|
Form GDLS-C 4496
|
EXTERNALLY-THREADED STEEL FASTENERS
|
Rev 03/01/2003
|
SIGNATURE
|
||
TITLE
|
||
DATE
|
||
COMPANY
|
||
ADDRESS
|
||
Section C
Annex C1
|
|
QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
|
Form GDLS-C 4496
|
EXTERNALLY-THREADED STEEL FASTENERS
|
Rev 03/01/2003
|
SIGNATURE
|
||
TITLE
|
||
DATE
|
||
COMPANY
|
||
ADDRESS
|
||
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section E
Rev 10/16/2009
|
•
|
Canadian Content - both direct and indirect
|
•
|
Regional Distribution:
|
-
|
Atlantic Region
|
-
|
Quebec Region
|
-
|
Western Region
|
-
|
Northern Ontario
|
•
|
Small Business Participation
|
1.
|
Canadian participation will equal, as a minimum, 100% of the contract value through work performed on the contract or through other activities.
|
2.
|
Our objective is to establish long-term supplier relationships that extend beyond the current contract. Our approach is to select companies that we can use in the export market.
|
3.
|
To survive in the export market, our suppliers must be cost and quality competitive.
|
4.
|
IRB transactions must make business sense; otherwise, they cannot be sustained in the long term.
|
5.
|
We ensure that our major subcontractors, both Canadian and foreign, provide IRBs that are commensurate with the value they receive from the contract. They use the same approach as we do in establishing long-term relationships that extend beyond the current contract. As a result, we allow our subcontractors to make their own business decisions as to how IRBs will be met.
|
6.
|
We support the approach of spreading benefits across Canada and our objective is to provide a balanced commitment to all regions.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section E
Rev 10/16/2009
|
1.
|
Commitment on Direct Canadian Content, stated as a percentage (%) of the value of the contract. Identify how you plan on achieving this content. Please provide details of planned work scope or components in response to the RFQ/RFP.
|
2.
|
Commitment of Indirect Canadian Content, stated as a percentage (%) of the value of the contract. Identify how you plan on achieving this content. Please provide details of planned work scope or components and the timeframe in which the work will be accomplished in response to the RFQ/RFP.
|
3.
|
Commitment on Regional Activity. Identify if any of the activities listed in items 1 and 2 will be performed in one of the designated regions of Canada.
|
4.
|
Commitment on Small Business Activity. Identify any of the activities, listed in items 1 and 2 that will be performed by a “Canadian Small Business”.
|
1.0
|
INTERPRETATION
|
|
(1)
|
For the purpose of this Section entitled INDUSTRIAL AND REGIONAL BENEFITS, unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the meanings set out beside them:
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section E
Rev 10/16/2009
|
|
a.
|
The “Atlantic Region”, consisting of the Provinces of Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia;
|
|
b.
|
The “Quebec Region”, consisting of the Province of Quebec;
|
|
c.
|
The “Northern Ontario Region”, consisting of that part of the Province of Ontario northward from the southern limits of Nipissing and Parry Sound Districts; and
|
|
d.
|
The “Western Region” consisting of the Provinces of Manitoba, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and British Columbia;
|
|
a.
|
A Canadian-based, independently-owned and operated manufacturer with fewer than 250 full-time personnel as of the date of issue of the RFP; or
|
|
b.
|
A Canadian-based, independently-owned and operated service company with less than 250 full-time personnel as of the date of issue of the RFP; or
|
|
c.
|
Agents and distributors of foreign goods and services as well as subsidiaries of large firms do not qualify as small business;
|
1.1
|
DETERMINATION OF CANADIAN CONTENT
|
|
(1)
|
The Cost Aggregate Method of accounting shall be used to determine the Canadian Content Value (CCV) of IRB Transactions. This method shall be subjected to an aggregate of the following:
|
|
a.
|
The cost of parts produced in Canada, and the cost of materials to the extent that they are of Canadian origin, that are incorporated in the equipment in the factory of the manufacturer in Canada, including parts or materials to the extent that the Contractor can verify that they are of Canadian origin and have been exported from Canada and subsequently imported into Canada as parts or materials.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section E
Rev 10/16/2009
|
|
b.
|
Transportation costs, including insurance charges incurred in transporting parts and materials from a Canadian supplier or frontier port of entry to the factory of the manufacturer in Canada for incorporation in the equipment, to the extent that such costs are not included in Paragraph 1.2(1)(a);
|
|
c.
|
Such part of the following costs, exclusive of Goods and Services and Excise Taxes, and royalties and license fees paid outside of Canada, as are reasonably attributable to the production or implementation of the equipment, service or activity:
|
|
1.
|
Wages and salaries paid for direct and indirect production and non- production labour in Canada paid to Canadians or to permanent residents as defined in the Immigration Act, RSC 1985, Chapter 1-2;
|
2.
|
Materials used in the work but not incorporated in the final products;
|
3.
|
Light, heat, power and water;
|
|
4.
|
Workers compensation, employment insurance and group insurance premiums, pension contributions and similar expenses incurred with respect to labour referred to above in Paragraph 1.2(1)(c)(i);
|
5.
|
Taxes on land and buildings in Canada;
|
|
6.
|
Fire and other insurance premiums relative to production inventories and the production plant and its equipment, paid to a company authorized by the laws of Canada or any province to carry on business in Canada or such province;
|
|
7.
|
Insurance purchased specifically from a company authorized by the laws of Canada or any province to carry on business in Canada or such province;
|
8.
|
Rent of factory or office premises paid to a registered owner in Canada;
|
|
9.
|
Maintenance and repairs to buildings, machinery and equipment used for production purposes that is executed in Canada;
|
|
10.
|
Tools, dies, jigs, fixtures and other similar plant equipment items of a non-permanent nature that have been designed, developed or manufactured in Canada;
|
|
11.
|
Engineering and professional services, experimental work and product or process development work executed in Canada;
|
|
12.
|
Pertinent miscellaneous factory and office expenses, such as administrative and general expenses, including profits earned in Canada that are reasonably attributable to the work, depreciation with respect to production machinery and permanent plant equipment and the installation costs of such machinery and equipment to the extent that such depreciation is reasonably attributable to the work; and a capital allowance not exceeding five per cent of the total capital outlay incurred for buildings in Canada owned by the producer of the work to the extent that such allowance is reasonably attributable to the production of the work;
|
|
13.
|
Travel expenses attributable to the work expended in Canadian dollars using Canadian carriers; and profit in accordance with the Contract relating to the product, service or activity.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section E
Rev 10/16/2009
|
|
14.
|
Fees paid for services attributable to the work not elsewhere specified; and profit in accordance with the Contract relating to the product, service or activity.
|
|
(2)
|
In determining the Canadian Content of an IRB Transaction where components only are to be supplied, the following rules shall also apply:
|
|
a)
|
"Canadian Content" means the aggregate of those costs of producing the components and those depreciation and capital cost allowances that are included in the calculation of Canadian Content as in the above PARAGRAPH 1.2(1);
|
|
b)
|
For the purpose of components mentioned in the above PARAGRAPH 1.2(2)(a), one of the following would apply:
|
|
i.
|
The cost reasonably and properly incurred in Canadian dollars of parts and materials acquired by a manufacturer from its parent corporation or form any subsidiary wholly-owned corporation or subsidiary controlled corporation of the manufacturer or of its parent corporation shall be deemed to be the value of the Canadian Content of the parts or the materials to the extent that they are of Canadian origin; or
|
|
ii.
|
The cost reasonably and properly incurred of parts and materials acquired by manufacturer from a supplier other than a corporation described in the above PARAGRAPH 1.2(2)(b)(i) shall be deemed to be the selling price of the parts and materials to the manufacturer, less the duty paid value of imported goods used in the production thereof and foreign charges applicable thereto.
|
(3)
|
Canada’s IRB policies promote high quality IRBs in high technology sectors of theCanadian economy. Amounts claimed for IRBs shall therefore exclude:
|
|
i.
|
The value of materials, labour and services imported into Canada;
|
|
ii.
|
The value of raw materials and semi-processed goods (in the case of indirect IRBs) exported from Canada;
|
|
iii.
|
The value of any travel, living, relocation costs, or remuneration paid to individuals classified as non-Canadians who may work on the project;
|
|
iv.
|
Any amount claimed as an IRB Credit for the achievement of the Subcontractor’s IRB Commitment during the Definition Phase Contract;
|
|
v.
|
The amount of all Canadian Excise Taxes, Import Duties, Federal and Provincial Sales Taxes, and Goods and Services Taxes or administration duties;
|
|
vi.
|
The value of goods and services with respect to which credit has been received or is being claimed by the Subcontractor or its Eligible Parties as an Industrial and Regional Benefit to Canada under any other agreement;
|
|
vii.
|
Any proposal or bid preparations costs;
|
|
viii.
|
All transportation costs except for the costs of transportation via Canadian carriers;
|
|
ix.
|
Obligations of the federal government e.g. government furnished equipment; payments;
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section E
Rev 10/16/2009
|
|
x.
|
Licence fees paid by the Canadian IRB recipient and any on-going royalty payments;
|
|
xi.
|
IRB Transactions claimed by the Subcontractor that pertain to the Subcontractor influence or that of one of its Eligible Parties over their own country’s Purchasing Agent/Department or the Purchasing Agent/Department of another country shall be disallowed. The decisions of the Purchasing Agents/Departments of democratically elected governments are the responsibility of their elected Officials. The Subcontractor claim or that of its Eligible Parties to have influence can neither be confirmed or denied; and
|
|
xii.
|
Interest costs associated with Letters of Credit or other financial instruments to support IRB Investments are not eligible for IRB consideration.
|
|
4)
|
Except in the case of goods related to the current project or any versions thereof wherever sold, where any IRB Indirect Transaction is for the purchase of goods that are essentially similar to those acquired from Canada by the same purchaser prior to the effective date of the contract then in determining the Canadian Content of the IRB Transaction, the Industrial and Regional Benefit Authority shall include only the increase that the IRB Transaction will provide over the average amount spent by the purchaser for those essentially similar goods during the previous three year period.
|
1.2
|
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR IRB TRANSACTIONS
|
|
1)
|
Each IRB Transaction must be one, which was clearly and demonstrably brought about by either the Subcontractor’s efforts or the efforts of one of the Subcontractor’s Eligible Parties as a result of the specific project against which the transaction is being claimed. It must not be one, which probably would have been entered into if the project had not existed. It should be noted that the Subcontractor must provide evidence of causality in situations where IRB commitments are flowed down to Subcontractors. In these cases, the Subcontractor must prove that the recipient Canadian company would not have achieved the export sales as a result of its own marketing efforts. In any case, the Subcontractor is 100% responsible for IRB Commitments, regardless of flow down to Subcontractors. In addition, to demonstrate causality to this Contract/project, Contractor approval for a proposed IRB Transaction must be obtained prior to the Subcontractor making public announcements, media or press releases related to the proposed business activities. Failure to do so will result in the rejection of the business activity as an IRB under this Contract.
|
|
2)
|
Where an Indirect IRB Transaction is for the purchase of goods or services that are similar to those that the purchaser has acquired in Canada prior to the effective date, then in determining the Canadian Content Value of the IRB Transaction there shall be included only the increase that the transaction will provide over the average amount spent by that purchaser for those goods or services after program award specified by the Buyer, unless it can be clearly shown that such purchases would have been less than such average without the intervention of the Contractor.
|
|
3)
|
Timing is an important factor in the determination of eligibility of individual transactions. Normally, IRB Transactions must be implemented after the date of signing of the Prime Contract and should be concluded by the completion date of the Contract. However, if a long-term business relationship can be developed but exceeds the end of the Contract, then the Contractor may consider a longer performance period for that specific transaction.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section E
Rev 10/16/2009
|
|
4)
|
As per the definition stated above in this Contract, IRB Transactions must be undertaken by an eligible party as defined in the Contract.
|
1.3
|
REPORTS
|
1.4
|
DAMAGES
|
1.5
|
Examination of Records by Canadian Government
|
|
1)
|
The Subcontractor shall keep proper records and documentation relating to the determination of the Canadian Content of the work provided under this Contract, including invoices and proofs of payment. The Subcontractor shall not, without the prior written consent of the Contractor, dispose of any such records or documentation until the expiration of two (2) years after final payment of this Contract, seven (7) years after the claim against the transaction or until settlement of all outstanding claims and disputes, whichever is earlier. All such records and documentation shall at all times during, the aforementioned retention period be open to verification, inspection and examination by the Contractor or his/her delegate, who may make copies thereof and take extracts there from.
|
|
2)
|
In addition, the Contractor may request, from time to time, that the Subcontractor provide copies of all such information via mail or courier for a random sample of IRB Transactions.
|
|
3)
|
Where, subsequent to the verification action taken pursuant to this Article, the Contractor determines that the records are insufficient to verify the Subcontractor’s achievements in respect of any IRB Commitment; the Subcontractor shall provide such additional information as may be required by the Contractor.
|
|
4)
|
Where it cannot be verified that an IRB Transaction has provided the IRB claimed, that portion of the IRB, which cannot be verified, shall be considered as not having been achieved and the Contracting Authority shall give Notice to the Subcontractor of the Shortfall.
|
|
5)
|
Should the Subcontractor disagree with a decision delivered pursuant to the above Subarticle 4, the Subcontractor, within twenty (20) Business Days from the notification of the said decision, may appeal the above decision by describing fully the issue, all relevant factors and the reasons for its disagreement with the said decision. The Contractor, on subsequent review of the factors surrounding the disagreement, shall issue a final determination, identifying the amount of any such IRB achieved.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section E
Rev 10/16/2009
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.1
|
General
|
G.2
|
Program Management
|
G.3
|
Configuration Management
|
G.4
|
Engineering
|
G.5
|
Quality Assurance
|
G.6
|
Production Management
|
G.7
|
Logistics Engineering
|
G.8
|
Obsolescence Management
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.1
|
GENERAL
|
G.1.1
|
This Subcontract is issued in support of General Dynamics Land Systems – Canada's (GDLS-C) Contract with Canadian Department of National Defence (DND) and The Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) to upgrade the Canadian LAV III vehicle fleet with improved protection, mobility and lethality
|
G.1.1.1
|
Description. This Subcontract is for the supply, integration, and related support of CSS Commander’s Sighting System (CSS) described in the Statement of Work (SOW) herein and the Performance Specification.
|
G.1.1.2
|
Background. GDLS-C produces the Light Armoured Vehicle III (LAVIII) for the Canadian Forces. CSS The specific requirements for the CSS are defined under Section G, Annex G1, Performance Specification, of this Statement of Work.
|
G.1.2
|
Order of Precedence. The order of precedence for the Subcontract shall be as per Part A, Purchase Order Terms and Conditions, Article 2, The Contract.
|
G.1.3
|
Security of Work. The security classification of the work being performed under the Subcontract may be considered to be "CLASSIFIED UP TO SECRET". The Subcontractor shall provide personnel suitably security cleared to handle the classified information involved if needed. The Subcontractor shall be responsible for acquiring original classified source documentation referred to in GDLS-C specifications, from the Department of National Defence, as and where required.
|
G.1.4
|
Licensing. The Subcontractor shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining all technical data, and associated license agreements including any Canadian Controlled Goods Registration Program (CGRP), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and any other Canadian and/or US Department of State regulations (TAA etc.) that are required to satisfy the requirements of this contract, including technical deliverables.
|
G.1.5
|
Language. All documentation shall be in English.
|
G.1.6
|
Period of Performance. The period of performance shall be six (6) years with design/integration phase in 2011 and production phase from 2012 through 2017.
|
G.1.7
|
Roles and Responsibilities
|
G.1.7.1
|
The Subcontractor shall carry out all the necessary Work to design, manufacture, test, and deliver the CSS in support of this Subcontract including the requirements of this Statement of Work and all referenced attachments.
|
G.1.7.2
|
The Subcontractor shall manage and execute the work detailed in this SOW, for the delivery of the CSS and its associated support items, as well as associated documentation. The product requirements description of the CSS is described in Section G, Annex G1.
|
G.1.7.3
|
The Subcontractor shall maintain and update all data deliverables, including plans and documents, as required for the duration of the Subcontract.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.1.8
|
Scope of Work
|
G.1.8.1
|
The Subcontractor shall be required to complete all Non-Recurring and Qualification requirements detailed under this Subcontract as well as the Production Requirements outlined herein.
|
G.1.9
|
Program Schedule
|
G.1.9.1
|
The Program milestones shall be progressed according to the following schedule:
|
Activity
|
Reference
(if required)
|
Location
|
Date
|
Duration
|
Prototype Unit
|
G.4.3.1
|
GDLS WTC
|
02 Aug 2011
|
|
Award of Contract (AOC)
|
October 2011
|
|||
Master Program Management Schedule
|
G.2.4
|
With Proposal
15 April 2011
|
||
Start of Work Meeting (concurrent with System Functional Review and Production Start of Work meeting)
|
G.2.5.1
G.4.11
G.6.4.1
|
Subcontractor’s
Facility
|
1 WAC
|
2 Days
|
Deliver Two (2) Updated Prototype Units
|
G.4.3.2
|
GDLS WTC
|
3 WAC
|
|
Project Management Review #1 (PMR) (concurrent with Preliminary Design Review and Production Readiness Review meeting)
|
G.2.5.2
G.4.12
G.6.4.3
|
GDLS WTC
|
1 MAC
|
2 Days
|
Deliver Two (2) EDUs
|
G.4.3.3
|
GDLS WTC
|
3 MAC
|
|
Project Management Review #2 (PMR) (concurrent with Critical Design Review)
|
G.2.5.2
G.4.13
|
Subcontractor’s
Facility
|
3 MAC
|
2 Days
|
Deliver One (1) PRU
|
G.4.3.4
|
GDLS WTC
|
17 WAC
|
|
Project Management Review #3 (PMR)
|
G.2.5.2
|
Subcontractor’s
Facility
|
5 MAC
|
1 Day
|
Deliver Two (2) Final PRUs
|
G.4.3.5
|
GDLS WTC
|
8 MAC
|
|
Initial Delivery of Production Units
|
Section H
|
Refer to
Purchase Order
|
9 MAC
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.2
|
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
|
G.2.1
|
General. The Subcontractor shall implement the management tools and resources required in order to ensure that the overall program is executed in accordance with the Performance Specification and with the scope of work described herein.
|
G.2.2
|
Program Management.
|
G.2.2.1
|
The Subcontractor shall be responsible for overall program management. The Subcontractor shall prepare a Project Management Plan (PMP) indicating its approach and structure to manage the work together with a description of the work content and the means to ensure its orderly progress. The PMP shall be prepared, submitted and maintained in accordance with SDRL PM-001. This plan includes a requirement for the Subcontractor to identify by name, the staff that will be assigned to this program. If GDLS-C deems that a critical level of skill has been lost by the substitution of personnel which cannot be rectified to the satisfaction of GDLS-C through the use of the other staff members, the Subcontractor shall Subcontract the impacted work scope to a suitably qualified out-of-house resource.
|
G.2.2.2
|
The PMP shall be presented at the initial Start of Work Meeting following Subcontract award. Data provided may relate to the Subcontractor’s internal work breakdown and scheduling systems, and be presented in Gantt or bar chart form. Critical activities and expected problem areas shall be identified together with intended methods of achieving “on schedule” completion of work.
|
G.2.2.3
|
The PMP shall identify all additional deliverables (plans, reports, equipment, services, etc).
|
G.2.2.4
|
The Subcontractor shall implement, operate and maintain the program in accordance with the PMP. GDLS-C will use the PMP as the principal standard by which to monitor the Subcontractor's performance, achievement and schedules.
|
G.2.3
|
Reserved.
|
G.2.4
|
Master Project Management Schedule
|
G.2.4.1
|
The Subcontractor shall establish, maintain and use a Master Project Management Schedule (MPMS). The MPMS shall allow the Subcontractor to report to GDLS-C and to schedule the Work, determine and allocate resources, assess the impact of schedule slippage, and measure schedule performance of the Subcontractor's departments and principal sub- contractors.
|
G.2.4.2
|
The Subcontractor shall develop, deliver and amend the MPMS in accordance with SDRL PM-003.
|
G.2.4.3
|
The Subcontractor shall report on scheduling activities and status of the MPMS in the Progress Reports (SDRL PM-008).
|
G.2.5
|
Meetings, Reviews and Audits
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.2.5.1
|
Start of Work Meeting (SOW-M). The Subcontractor shall host a Start of Work Meeting at the Subcontractor’s facility, no later than five (5) working days after contract award. The Subcontractor shall present an overview of its entire contractual effort to include, as a minimum: the program WBS to the third level, design and integration schedules, detailed paths/entrance and exit criteria for each milestone leading to full capability for CSS supply including integration to vehicle requirements; detailed delivery schedules including those that satisfy the qualification, and development; any required testing; Logistics Engineering (LE) efforts; Risk Registry, Compliance Matrix; Subcontractor award schedules/status, and the Production Management Plan.
|
G.2.5.2
|
Project Management Reviews (PMRs). The initial PMR shall be conducted one (1) MAC, the second PMR shall be three (3) MAC, and the third PMR shall be five (5) MAC. GDLS-C reserves the right to request additional PMRs on an as required basis, based on the performance of the program.
|
G.2.5.2.1
|
The Subcontractor shall, in the PMRs, identify all progress and risks as related to Project Management, Engineering, Test and Evaluation, Logistics Engineering, Configuration Management, and Serial Production, under this Subcontract. This shall include cost, performance and schedule metrics for each major element of the Subcontract work.
|
G.2.5.3
|
Weekly Action Item Reviews. Weekly teleconferences will be held at the discretion of GDLS-C to monitor resolution of critical issues and to identify pending issues. The teleconferences shall be initiated by the GDLS-C designated Subcontract Authority and the Subcontractor will participate as required.
|
G.2.5.4
|
Meetings, Reviews, Audits. The Subcontractor shall schedule and conduct all meetings that are identified in the Statement of Work. The GDLS-C designated Subcontract Authority shall be notified in advance of any plans for or meetings held between GDLS-C and the Subcontractor.
|
G.2.5.4.1
|
Informal Reviews. Informal reviews between GDLS-C and the Subcontractor are encouraged to facilitate the flow of information between the parties and to foster effective working relationships. Such meetings help to provide to GDLS-C visibility with respect to the conduct and progress of the Work.
|
G.2.5.5
|
Special Meetings. In addition to the formal and informal reviews, GDLS-C, at its sole discretion, may call upon the Subcontractor to provide representation at special meetings. Special meetings are intended to address matters of a serious nature that cannot reasonably be delayed until the next schedule formal review.
|
G.2.5.6
|
Meeting Agendas. The Subcontractor shall provide agendas for all meetings, reviews and audits, for approval by GDLS-C, five (5) days in advance of the meeting. Meeting agendas shall be provided in accordance with SDRL PM-006.
|
G.2.5.7
|
Meeting Minutes. The Subcontractor shall provide minutes for all meetings, reviews and audits, for approval by GDLS-C, five (5) days after the conclusion of the meeting. Meeting minutes shall be provided in accordance with SDRL PM-007.
|
G.2.5.8
|
System Functional Review (SFR), Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and Critical Design Review (CDR). The Subcontractor shall host a SFR, PDR, and CDR at the Subcontractor’s facility.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.2.5.8.1
|
System Functional Review (SFR). There shall be an SFR concurrent with the Start of Work Meeting.
|
G.2.5.8.2
|
Preliminary Design Review (PDR). There shall be a PDR one (1) month after Subcontract award concurrent with PMR #1.
|
G.2.5.8.3
|
Critical Design Review (CDR). There shall be a CDR concurrent with PMR #2 at three (3) months after Subcontract award.
|
G.2.6
|
Reports
|
G.2.6.1
|
Progress Reports. The Subcontractor shall prepare, amend and deliver monthly Progress Reports in accordance with SDRL PM-008. Progress Reports shall describe the progress made by the Subcontractor in performing both Subcontracted and directed Work. The Progress Report shall be used by the Subcontractor as the basis for developing the agenda for the PMRs.
|
G.2.7
|
Organizational Arrangements.
|
2.7.1
|
The Subcontractor shall designate an individual as the "Program Manager", who shall be the single point of contact within the Subcontractor's organization for all substantive matters related to the Subcontract. The Subcontractor's Program Manager shall have Terms of Reference that clearly establish his/her responsibilities.
|
G.2.7.2
|
The Subcontractor shall designate points of contact for the exchange of information in each of the following areas:
|
|
a.
|
Project Management;
|
|
b.
|
Engineering Management;
|
|
c.
|
Senior Design Engineer;
|
|
d.
|
Configuration Management;
|
|
e.
|
Quality Assurance Management;
|
|
f.
|
LEM Management;
|
|
g.
|
Financial Management;
|
|
h.
|
Procurement and Subcontract Management;
|
|
i.
|
Production Management;
|
|
j.
|
Obsolescence Management
|
G.2.7.3
|
The Subcontractor's organizational arrangements and associated lines of communication shall recognize the interfacing and liaison necessary with GDLS-C.
|
G.2.7.4
|
The Subcontractor shall report their Organizational Structure in the PMP.
|
G.2.7.5
|
The Subcontractor shall advise GDLS-C in writing of any changes to the organizational structure fourteen (14) days prior to any such change.
|
G.2.7.6
|
Subcontracting Authority. All Subcontract correspondence and unclassified document deliverables shall be addressed to the GDLS-C Subcontract Authority at:
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.2.7.7
|
Classified Documentation. Classified documentation shall be sent to the following contact at the Government of Canada prior to reaching the Company Security Officer for GDLS-C:
|
G.2.7.7.1
|
The Subcontractor shall include a cover letter to the Government of Canada stating that the classified documentation shall be sent to the following Company Security Officer at GDLS-C upon receipt:
|
G.2.7.7.2
|
Notification shall be provided to the GDLS-C Subcontract Authority pending classified documentation is sent.
|
G.2.8
|
Data Management System
|
G.2.8.1
|
The Subcontractor shall use a data management system for the identification, acquisition, distribution, delivery and control of data and the maintenance of an overall status and record keeping system of project data as part of the work. The data management system shall be in accordance with the Subcontractor's current process.
|
G.2.8.2
|
The Subcontractor shall describe the Subcontractor’s data management process in the PMP and shall report on data management in Progress Reports.
|
G.2.9
|
Risk Management
|
G.2.9.1
|
Risk Management Plan. The Subcontractor shall develop and implement a Risk Management Plan that identifies the risks associated with this project, in accordance with SDRL PM-011. The Risk Management Plan shall include Risk Management Planning, Risk Identification, Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Analysis, Risk Response Planning, and Risk Monitoring and Control through an integrated approach involving cost, schedule, and technical performance. Risk mitigation shall be an integral part of all reviews, and meetings.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.2.9.2
|
The Subcontractor shall report on all identified risks in the Progress Reports (SDRL PM-008). The Subcontractor shall report risks that satisfy at least one of the following potential impacts:
|
|
a.
|
CAD$100,000 variation on Subcontract Price;
|
|
b.
|
Two (2) weeks or more schedule slippage in any of the elements identified in the MPMS;
|
|
c.
|
One (1) week variance to the MPMS Critical Path, and/or
|
|
d.
|
Specification or Statement of Work non-compliance.
|
G.2.11
|
Subcontract/Material Management
|
G.2.11.1
|
Reserved.
|
G.2.11.2
|
The Subcontractor shall establish, maintain and use procedures that control, manage and track all Subcontracts and procurements in accordance with the Approved Subcontract Management Plan.
|
G.2.12
|
Subcontract Change Proposal. When requested by GDLS-C, the Subcontractor shall submit Subcontract Change Proposals (SCPs) in accordance with SDRL PM-013.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.3
|
CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (CM)
|
G.3.1
|
Applicable Documents. The following documents, of the issue or revision in effect at Subcontract Award, unless otherwise specified, form a part of this statement of work to the extent specified herein.
|
STANAG 4569 AEP-55, Vol.2
|
Procedures for Evaluating Protection Levels
|
MIL-STD-130N
|
Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property
|
MIL-HDBK-61A
|
Configuration Management Guidance
|
MIL-STD-31000
|
Technical Data Packages
|
ASME Y14.100-2004
|
Engineering Drawing Packages
|
ANSI/EIA-649-1998
|
National Consensus Standard for Configuration Mgt
|
DoD DID DI-CMAN-80639C
|
Engineering Change Proposal
|
DoD DID DI-CMAN-80556A
|
Configuration Audit Plan
|
DoD DID DI-CMAN-81022C
|
Configuration Audit Summary Report
|
DND-STD-D-02-002-001/SG-001
|
Identification Marking of Canadian Military Property
|
G.3.2
|
Configuration Identification. The Subcontractor shall develop a technical data package to the extent required for effective manufacture, and quality assurance purposes, and shall provide GDLS-C sufficient specification details for GDLS-C to detail requirements in appropriate drawings of the CSS. The Subcontractor shall document and maintain Configuration Items (CI’s) to ensure complete identification, status accounting, configuration control, and audits.
|
G.3.2.2
|
Part Marking Identification. The CSS shall be marked in accordance with Canadian DND standard DND-STD-D-02-002-001/SG-001-Identification Marking of Canadian Military Property (English/French).
|
G.3.3
|
Configuration Documentation
|
G.3.3.1
|
Reserved
|
G.3.3.2
|
Product Configuration Documentation (PCD). The PCD is defined as the combined performance and/or design documentation utilized for the production and/or procurement of the CSS. The PCD includes documentation that describes functional, performance, interoperability and interface requirements, and the verifications necessary to confirm the achievement of those specific requirements.
|
G.3.3.3
|
Functional Configuration Documentation (FCD). The FCD includes only those documents that describe the functional and performance requirements and the verifications necessary to confirm the achievement of those specific requirements. The PCD and FCD shall document the hardware that successfully passes the Physical Configuration Audit (PCA).
|
G.3.4
|
Configuration Baselines
|
G.3.4.1
|
Initial Configuration Baseline. An initial Configuration Baseline shall be established upon initial release of the Technical Data Package (TDP) following the / each CDR. Any changes made to the hardware or TDP during the period prior to establishing the Functional Configuration Baseline and the Product Configuration Baseline shall be submitted to GDLS-C in accordance with SDRL CM-002 for informational purposes.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.3.4.2.
|
Functional Configuration Baseline. The Functional Configuration Baseline (FCB) shall be established upon successful completion of Subcontractor Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) Ref. Para G.3.7.
|
G.3.4.3.
|
Product Configuration Baseline. The Product Configuration Baseline (PCB) shall be established upon successful completion of the Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) -Ref. Para G.3.7. Following the establishment of the PCB, changes that affect the PCD shall be submitted to GDLS-C for approval or concurrence as required.
|
G.3.5
|
Configuration Management.
|
G.3.5.1
|
The Subcontractor shall maintain a discrete configuration management department within its manufacturing facility. The Subcontractor shall assign a senior CM point of contact throughout the life of the contract with whom GDLS-C can communicate any configuration management related issues.
|
G.3.5.2
|
The Subcontractor’s CM department personnel shall be responsible for configuration identification, control, and status accounting (for hardware and documentation) using MIL- HDBK-61A and/or ANSI/EAI 649-1998 as a guide.
|
G.3.5.3
|
Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs). Should engineering changes occur upon completion of each CDR, the Subcontractor shall submit ECPs to GDLS-C for informational purposes. After establishment of each PCB, the Subcontractor shall prepare and submit formal ECPs to identify and record any and all new drawings/specifications and changes to existing CSS documentation. ECPs shall be submitted in accordance with SDRL CM-002. All formal changes regardless of classification shall be submitted to GDLS-C for approval prior to implementation. GDLS-C shall either approve or disapprove Class I changes and provide concurrence of Class 2 changes prior to implementation.
|
G.3.5.3.1
|
Classification of Engineering Changes. The change shall be Class I if it affects:
|
|
a.
|
The item performance as it relates to Section G, Annex G1, Performance Specification
|
|
b.
|
The Product Configuration Documentation (PCD), once established;
|
|
c.
|
Safety;
|
|
d.
|
Retrofits; and
|
|
e.
|
Item fit, form, function
|
G.3.5.4
|
Request For Deviation (RFD). The Subcontractor shall prepare RFDs in accordance with SDRL CM-006, using MIL-HDBK-61A Section 6.3 as a guide. An RFD shall be used to obtain authorization to deliver nonconforming material which may not meet an item’s approved documentation but is nevertheless suitable for use “As is” or after a repair and/or retrofit. GDLS-C shall have approval authority for all classifications of RFD’s.
|
G.3.6
|
Serialization. All supplied CSSs and attaching hardware, shall be marked in accordance with Canadian DND standard DND-STD-D-02-002-001/SG-001-Identification Marking of Canadian Military Property. The Subcontractor shall ensure each CSS is uniquely identified. A part number (GDLS-C and Supplier), serial number, and Subcontractor Cage Code shall be permanently applied to the CSS and the Subcontractor shall maintain serialization records as part of its CSA whereby each CSS has traceability.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.3.6.1
|
Lot Traceability. The Subcontractor shall also ensure that there will be batch/lot traceability such that the production batch from which the CSSs are manufactured can be traced.
|
G.3.7.
|
Configuration Audits. If requested by GDLS-C, the Subcontractor shall identify, schedule and conduct the following configuration audits:
|
|
a.
|
Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) using MIL-HDBK-61A Section 8 as a guide
|
|
b.
|
Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) in accordance with MIL HDBK-61A Section 8 as a guide
|
G.3.7.1
|
Functional Configuration Audit. If requested by GDLS-C, the FCA(s) shall be conducted which will verify the CSS performance to the requirements as defined in the Performance Specification. Test data presented and reviewed during the FCA(s) shall be that collected from the analysis, inspections and tests delineated in the Inspection and Test Summary Matrix found in the Performance Specification. All inspections and tests shall be those conducted on a production representative Article. Subject to mutual agreement between the Subcontractor, GDLS-C and the Crown as the case may be, the FCA(s) may be conducted in increments or progressively to ensure that all requirements of the FCA have been satisfied while minimizing the risk of generating ECPs and retrofits after the PCB has been established. In cases where the item verification can only be completely determined after system level integration and testing, a final FCA shall be conducted using the results of these tests. MIL-HDBK-61A Section 8 shall be used as a guide in planning and performing the FCA(s). The FCA(s) shall be conducted following the/each scheduled CDR. Each FCA shall not exceed one (1) day in duration.
|
G.3.7.1.1
|
FCA Verification Matrix. To support the FCA(s), the Subcontractor shall provide an FCA Verification Matrix. The Matrix shall be prepared and delivered in accordance with SDRL CM-009.
|
G.3.7.2
|
Physical Configuration Audit. If requested by GDLS-C, the PCA(s) shall consist of the formal physical examination of the "As-Built” production configuration of a Configuration Item against its technical documentation and any related data. All end product configuration items shall be audited. The audit shall be performed on the First Production Article which will be the CSS Configuration Items submitted for First Article Testing. MIL-HDBK-61A Section 8 shall be used as a guide in planning and performing the PCA(s). A PCA candidates list shall be provided with the PCA Agenda (SDRL CM-004) for each audit, The list shall include all CI’s that will be audited against their design documentation, estimated duration being four (4) days for the/each PCA.
|
G.3.7.3
|
FCA/PCA Plan. The Subcontractor shall provide a set of audit procedures in the form of an FCA and PCA plan. DI-CMAN-80556A shall be used as a guide in the preparation of the Configuration Audit plan. The FCA and PCA plan shall be submitted in accordance with SDRL CM-003.
|
G.3.7.4
|
Audit Agenda and Report.
|
G.3.7.4.1
|
The Subcontractor shall prepare a separate Audit Agenda and Audit Report for each FCA and PCA conducted.
|
G.3.7.4.2
|
Each Audit Agenda shall be submitted to GDLS-C in accordance with SDRL CM-004.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.3.7.4.3
|
An Audit Report shall be submitted to GDLS-C thirty (30) days after successful completion of the audit. The Audit Report shall be submitted in accordance with SDRL CM-005.
|
G.3.8
|
Technical Data Package. The Subcontractor shall deliver a Technical Data Package (TDP) in accordance with the following:
|
G.3.8.1
|
Existing Drawings. Existing Subcontractor drawings are acceptable provided they meet the requirements as stated in MIL-STD-31000 Technical Data Packages. CSS
|
G.3.8.2
|
New Drawings. New drawings and parts lists created by the Subcontractor in support of the CSS contract shall meet the requirements of MIL-STD-31000. Drawings shall be prepared in accordance with ASME Y14.100-2004 Engineering Drawing Packages.
|
G.3.8.3
|
TDP Delivery. The Subcontractor shall provide CSS TDPs as follows:
|
|
a.
|
Preliminary TDP – the preliminary TDP shall include drawings, associated lists, and supporting data. The technical/engineering data required by GDLS-C shall be prepared by the Subcontractor in the form of a Technical Data Package (TDP). The TDP shall be prepared and delivered prior to each PCA conducted in accordance with SDRL CM-010.
|
|
b.
|
Final TDP – The final TDP shall include all updates to the Preliminary TDP resulting from the FCA/PCA. The final TDP shall be prepared and delivered in accordance with SDRL CM-010.
|
c.
|
Drawing Revisions - Within 15 days of receipt of GDLS-C approval of Subcontractor Class I and Class II ECP’s, the Subcontractor shall revise the associated drawings to include the changes shown on such ECP’s.”
|
G.3.9
|
Configuration Status Accounting (CSA). The Subcontractor shall implement and maintain Configuration Status Accounting (CSA) processes and procedures as part of the CM Program, for the duration of the Subcontract. The Subcontractor shall prepare and deliver CSA Reports in accordance with SDRL CM-007, to provide the information required to effectively manage the Configuration of the CSS and provide visibility of CM activities including status of deviations and engineering changes (proposed and approved).
|
G.3.10
|
Indented Bill of Material (IBOM). The Subcontractor shall develop an Indented Bill of Material for each CSS and CSS as applicable in accordance with SDRL CM-008. The IBOM shall be submitted concurrently with the preliminary and Final TDP delivery (s).
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.4
|
ENGINEERING
|
G.4.1
|
Engineering Management
|
G.4.1.1
|
The Subcontractor shall conduct the engineering activities required to ensure that the CSS procured under this Subcontract meet all the requirements of the Performance Specification, as included under Section G, Annex G1 of this Subcontract.
|
G.4.2
|
Project Engineering
|
G.4.2.1
|
The Subcontractor shall provide an Engineering Point of Contact to oversee the engineering activities under the Subcontract including: design engineering, reliability and maintainability engineering, human factors engineering, safety engineering, obsolescence management, and design reviews.
|
G.4.3
|
Prototypes and Engineering Units
|
G.4.3.1
|
The Subcontractor shall provide one (1) Prototype Unit and deliver to GDLS-C in accordance with the program schedule at Para 1.9. This unit will be used for evaluation and will remain with GDLS.
|
G.4.3.1.1
|
The Prototype Unit shall be at Test Readiness Level (TRL) 6. TRL 6 is defined as a system or prototype that has been demonstrated in a relevant environment. The system is beyond the breadboard tested for TRL 5 and has been tested in a relevant environment. It represents a major step up in a technology's demonstrated readiness. Examples include testing a prototype in a high fidelity laboratory environment or in simulated operational environment.
|
G.4.3.2
|
The Subcontractor shall provide two (2) updated Prototype Units incorporating any changes from design and integration in accordance with the program schedule at Para 1.9. These units shall represent the expected hardware and software production configuration. One unit upgrades or replaces the prototype previously delivered.
|
G.4.3.3
|
The Subcontractor shall provide two (2) Engineering Development Units (EDU) in accordance with the program schedule at Para 1.9. These units upgrade or replace the prototypes previously delivered.
|
G.4.3.3.1
|
The EDU shall be at TRL 7. TRL 7 is defined as a prototype near or at planned operational system. It represents a major step up from TRL 6, requiring the demonstration of an actual system prototype in an operational environment, such as in an aircraft, vehicle or space. Examples include testing the prototype in a test bed aircraft.
|
G.4.3.4
|
The Subcontractor shall provide one (1) Production Representative Unit (PRU) in accordance with the program schedule at Para 1.9. This unit upgrades or replaces a prototype previously delivered and shall be in the same configuration as units going through qualification.
|
G.4.3.5
|
The Subcontractor shall provide two (2) Final Production Representative Units (PRU) with any changes resulting from qualification in accordance with the program schedule at Para 1.9. These units upgrade or replace any prototypes previously delivered.
|
G.4.4
|
Current Specification
|
G.4.4.1
|
The Subcontractor is requested to provide a copy of any readily-available Specification per SDRL ENG-001.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.4.5
|
Updated Specification
|
G.4.5.1
|
The Subcontractor shall submit updated CSS Specifications as required per SDRL ENG-001.
|
G.4.6
|
Software Requirements Specification (SRS)
|
G.4.6.1
|
The Subcontractor shall submit a SRS. An initial and updated version of the SRS shall be delivered per SDRL ENG-002.
|
G.4.7
|
Envelope and Installation Drawing
|
G.4.7.1
|
The Subcontractor shall provide an Envelope and Installation Drawing per SDRL ENG-006.
|
G.4.8
|
Interface Control Drawing
|
G.4.8.1
|
The Subcontractor shall provide an Interface Control Drawing per SDRL ENG-006
|
G.4.9
|
CAD Model
|
G.4.9.1
|
The Subcontractor shall provide a CAD model of CSS in either Unigraphics or Pro-E per SDRL ENG-004.
|
G.4.10
|
Design Reviews
|
G.4.10.1
|
The GDLS-C design process includes, at a minimum, three (3) major milestone events. If necessary, an In-Process Design Review (IPDR) may be requested between any of the major design reviews.
|
|
a.
|
System Functional Review (SFR);
|
|
b.
|
Preliminary Design Review (PDR);
|
|
c.
|
Critical Design Review (CDR).
|
G.4.10.2
|
The Subcontractor shall conduct the Design Reviews (SFR, PDR, and CDR) at the Subcontractor’s facilities. In order to minimize the number of design review meetings, the Subcontractor shall be permitted, with prior approval from GDLS-C, to combine the design review milestone events. The Design Reviews shall include, but are not limited to, the items as described as per the following discussion points and shall use the Design and Production Review Checklist at Annex G4 as a guide:
|
|
a.
|
progress of ongoing activities, special issues, and the resolution of problems;
|
|
b.
|
status of the design and the development of the TDP and other schedule milestones;
|
|
c.
|
any new problems and recommended solutions;
|
|
d.
|
activities planned until the next Design Review;
|
|
e.
|
explanation of any schedule variation and the corrective action to be taken; and
|
|
f.
|
review of changes to the design as presented at Prior Design Review shall be carried forward to the next Design Review for approval and tracking.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.4.11
|
System Functional Review (SFR)
|
G.4.11.1
|
The Subcontractor shall host an SFR in accordance with the program schedule at Para 1.9.
|
G.4.11.2
|
The Subcontractor shall conduct a System Functional Review (SFR) to the extent that all aspects of the review may be addressed. The SFR shall include, but is not limited to;
|
|
a.
|
an in-depth review of the performance and technical requirements and a presentation of the Subcontractor’s design approach to satisfy the technical requirements of the CSS, and its integration with the GDLS-C supplied turret configuration data;
|
|
b.
|
a presentation of the Subcontractor’s concept of design to include solid/math model representation(s) and trade off studies as appropriate;
|
|
c.
|
a detailed review of the Subcontractor’s development and integration schedules;
|
|
d.
|
present draft sub system specification/ICD documentation;
|
|
e.
|
present budget estimates for weight;
|
|
f.
|
a completed, formal check list for the content of the SFR/PDR/CDR
|
|
g.
|
present and status the Performance Specification Qualification matrix in accordance with SDRL ENG-013; and, present and status the Risk Registry.
|
G.4.11.3
|
SFR Material. The Subcontractor shall submit the materials to be presented at the design review, in accordance with SDRL ENG-014, five (5) days before the SFR.
|
G.4.11.4
|
SFR Action Items. The Subcontractor shall respond to action items as assigned in the SFR Meeting Minutes.
|
G.4.11.5
|
SFR Exit Criteria. The Subcontractor shall meet the SFR requirements including:
|
|
a.
|
GDLS-C approval of the CAD model submitted in accordance with SDRL ENG-004.
|
|
b.
|
GDLS-C approval of SFR action item responses as assigned in the SFR Meeting Minutes.
|
|
c.
|
Completed, formal check list for the content of the Design Review.
|
G.4.12
|
Preliminary Design Review (PDR)
|
G.4.12.1
|
The Subcontractor shall host a PDR in accordance with the program schedule at Para 1.9.
|
G.4.12.2
|
The Subcontractor shall conduct a Preliminary Design Review (PDR) to the extent that all aspects of the review may be addressed. The PDR shall include but not be limited to:
|
|
a.
|
present the CSS design, integration and requirements compliance;
|
|
b.
|
evaluate the progress, technical adequacy, and risk resolution (on a technical, cost, and schedule basis) of the Subcontractor’s design approach;
|
|
c.
|
present and status the Performance Specification Qualification Matrix in accordance with SDRL ENG-013;
|
|
d.
|
evaluate the degree of definition and assess the technical risk associated with the Subcontractor’s design approach;
|
|
e.
|
establish the existence and compatibility of the physical and functional interfaces of the Subcontractor’s preliminary designs with the turret;
|
|
f.
|
present models of the complete design for the CSS, including its integration;
|
|
g.
|
present sub system specification/ICD documentation;
|
|
h.
|
support the design decision making process with trade off studies and qualification data reports;
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
i.
|
present budget performance against initial estimates for weight;
|
j.
|
present the status of the release of the TDP;
|
k.
|
present suggested manufacturing/ processing information
|
G.4.12.3
|
PDR Material. The Subcontractor shall submit the materials to be presented at the design review, in accordance with SDRL ENG-014, five (5) days before the PDR.
|
G.4.12.4
|
PDR Action Items. The Subcontractor shall respond to action items as assigned in the PDR Meeting Minutes.
|
G.4.12.5
|
PDR Exit Criteria. The Subcontractor shall meet the PDR requirements including:
|
a.
|
GDLS-C acknowledgement of receipt of the preliminary drawings submitted in accordance with SDRL ENG-006.
|
b.
|
GDLS-C approval of PDR action item responses as assigned in the PDR Meeting Minutes.
|
c.
|
GDLS-C acknowledgement of receipt of the CAD model submitted in accordance with SDRL ENG-004.
|
d.
|
Completed, formal check list for the content of the Design Review.
|
G.4.13
|
Critical Design Review (CDR)
|
G.4.13.1
|
The Subcontractor shall host a CDR in accordance with the program schedule at Para 1.9.
|
G.4.13.2
|
The Subcontractor shall conduct a Critical Design Review (CDR) to the extent that all aspects of the review may be addressed. During the CDR, the Subcontractor shall:
|
a.
|
present the complete, detailed CSS design, integration and requirements compliance;
|
b.
|
present a detailed review of the hardware breakdown and Bill of Material (“BOM”);
|
c.
|
present final Performance Specification Qualification Matrix in accordance with SDRL ENG-013
|
d.
|
present the qualification documentation and verification in accordance with SDRL ENG-018 for the system;
|
e.
|
assess configuration risk areas (on a technical, cost, and schedule basis);
|
f.
|
present final sub system specification/ICD documentation;
|
g.
|
present the status of the release of the final TDP.
|
G.4.13.3
|
CDR Material. The Subcontractor shall submit the materials to be presented at the design review, in accordance with SDRL ENG-014, five (5) days before the CDR.
|
G.4.13.4
|
CDR Action Items. The Subcontractor shall respond to action items as assigned in the CDR Meeting Minutes.
|
G.4.13.5
|
CDR Exit Criteria. The Subcontractor shall meet the PDR requirements including:
|
|
a.
|
GDLS-C acknowledgement of receipt of the final drawings submitted in accordance with SDRL ENG-006.
|
|
b.
|
GDLS-C approval of CDR action item responses as assigned in the CDR Meeting Minutes
|
|
c.
|
GDLS-C acknowledgement of receipt of the CAD model submitted in accordance with SDRL ENG-004.
|
|
d.
|
Completed, formal check list for the content of the Design Review.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.4.14
|
Engineering Support
|
G.4.14.1
|
The Subcontractor shall be available to provide any hardware/software integration support on an as required basis.
|
G.4.14.2
|
The Subcontractor may be required to travel to support hardware and software integration at GDLS sites in Woodbridge, Virginia; London, Ontario; and Edmonton, Alberta.
|
G.4.15
|
Qualification
|
G.4.15.1
|
Qualification. The Subcontractor shall conform to Section G, Annex G1, Performance Specification and shall provide objective evidence that the requirements have been satisfied according to the final Qualification Matrix. The Subcontractor shall manage the Qualification Matrix in accordance with SDRL ENG-013 that shall summarize current compliance status, as well as planned and completed qualification activities.
|
G.4.15.2
|
Qualification Test Plan. The Subcontractor shall provide a Qualification Test Plan in accordance with SDRL ENG- 017 and fifteen (15) days prior to conducting any new qualification activity. GDLS reserves the right to witness any of the required qualification activities. The Subcontractor shall support GDLS on-site qualification attendance.
|
G.4.15.3
|
Qualification Test Report. The Subcontractor shall provide a Qualification Test Report in accordance with SDRL ENG-018.
|
G.4.16
|
Hazardous Materials
|
G.4.16.1
|
The Subcontractor shall not use the hazardous materials identified the Hazardous Materials section of the Performance Specification.
|
G.4.16.2
|
Hazardous Materials Management Report. The Subcontractor shall submit Hazardous Material Management Reports in accordance with SDRL ENG-008 which, at a minimum, shall identify all hazardous materials required for system production, a listing of prioritized hazardous materials for minimization/elimination per the criteria established in the Hazardous Materials Management Plan, and identify those hazardous materials/processes for which non-hazardous substitute materials/technologies may be available for implementation.
|
G.4.17
|
Human Factors Engineering
|
G.4.17.1
|
The Subcontractor is responsible for implementing a Human Factors program that incorporates effective design principles and practices in order to meet the performance and HFE requirements of the Performance (or other) Specification. Changes and modifications to current design affecting the soldier-machine interface and soldier performance (for operator, maintainer and support personnel) shall meet the appropriate HFE criteria and requirements, defined in MIL-STD-1472 and MIL-HDBK-759. As part of the human factors program, the Subcontractor shall complete the necessary activities to generate the data requested by GDLS-C.
|
G.4.17.2
|
Human Factors Data Report. The Subcontractor shall report the results of the above activities in a Human Factors Data Report in accordance with SDRL ENG-011. The Human Factors Data Report (HFDR) shall detail the following information, consistent with MIL-STD-46855.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
|
a.
|
Detail a Task Description & Analysis (TD&A) of activities performed by each operator of the equipment during normal operations.
|
|
b.
|
Detail the type and frequency of interaction with each man-machine interface.
|
G.4.18
|
System Safety Engineering
|
G.4.18.1
|
Safety Program. The Subcontractor shall develop and implement a safety program using MIL-STD-882C in determining whether safety engineering objectives are met. The Subcontractor shall complete a safety assessment, in accordance with MIL-STD-882C, Task 301. As a minimum, the Subcontractor shall do the following:
|
|
a.
|
Identify hazards associated with the product by conducting safety analyses and hazard evaluations. Analyses shall include both operational and maintenance aspects of each component.
|
|
b.
|
Eliminate or reduce significant hazards by appropriate design or materiel selection. If hazards to personnel are not avoidable or eliminated, take steps to control or mitigate those hazards.
|
G.4.18.2
|
Safety Assessment Report (SAR). The Subcontractor shall develop a Safety Assessment Report (SAR) which documents all safety analyses completed to support system design development. The SAR shall also identify all safety features and inherent hazards associated with the system. The SAR shall be generated in accordance with SDRL ENG-012. Further, the SAR shall identify special procedures and/or precautions to be observed by test agencies and product item users. As an appendix to the SAR, the Subcontractor shall identify and incorporate Health Hazards associated with the product. The Subcontractor shall provide a description and discussion of each potential or actual health hazards of concern for each subsystem or component.
|
G.4.18.3
|
Health Hazards. The Subcontractor shall identify potential health hazards that are indigenous to and generated by the product and eliminate or reduce such health hazards to an acceptable level as determined by GDLS-C. Health hazards shall be reported as a part of the Safety Assessment Report in accordance with SDRL ENG-012. The following are examples of some areas of concern that may contain safety and health hazards. This is not an all-inclusive list:
|
|
a.
|
Fire prevention issues b. Toxic gases
|
|
c.
|
Noise levels
|
|
d.
|
Electrical issues
|
|
e.
|
Radiation Hazards (HERO/HERP/HERF)
|
|
f.
|
Radioactive Materials (if any)
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.4.19
|
Finite Element Analysis (FEA).
|
G.4.19.1
|
The Subcontractor shall submit the results of the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) which was conducted on the system in accordance with SDRL ENG-015. This shall be delivered ten (10) days prior to the PDR and CDR and as required.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.5
|
QUALITY ASSURANCE
|
G.5.1
|
Quality Management System
|
G.5.1.1
|
The Subcontractor shall have a quality system that meets the requirements of ISO 9000 and demonstrates continuous improvement. The Subcontractor’s system may be audited for evidence of compliance.
|
G.5.1.2
|
The Subcontractor shall make available to GDLS-C, a record of all their annual Internal Audit Reports and any third party audit reports for the duration of this Subcontract.
|
G.5.2
|
Quality Assurance Plan
|
G.5.2.1
|
The Subcontractor shall prepare and submit to GDLS-C for approval, a detailed Quality Plan that describes its QA Program. This plan shall include as a minimum a plan to control suppliers, Subcontractors, and internal and external quality processes that will be used to assure the quality of the product. The plan should make specific provisions for the delivery and inspection of the production representative hardware to be delivered in accordance with this subcontract. The plan and associated revisions shall be in accordance with SDRL QA-001. This document will form part of this contract and cannot be changed without GDLS-C approval.
|
G.5.2.2
|
Once approved, compliance with the requirements of the Quality Plan shall be subject to audit and surveillance by GDLS-C.
|
G.5.2.3
|
The plan must take into consideration that Government Quality Assurance is a requirement of this order. Arrangements must be made promptly with the Quality Assurance representative for the Subcontractor’s area or facility so that appropriate Government Quality Assurance can be accomplished prior to release authorization. Government Quality Assurance shall not be used by the Subcontractor as evidence of effective control of quality. Government Quality Assurance shall not absolve the Subcontractor of the responsibility to provide acceptable product.
|
G.5.2.4
|
Quality Assurance Clauses EQD2A.0, QG5.2, QJ7H.0, QJ21.1, QK12.0, QP5.1, QY-10, QG7.0, QY11.9, QP44.0, QP8.0, QL46.0 apply to this contract. Refer to Section C, Quality Clauses, GDLS-C Form 4417, Rev K, for a detailed description of the below:
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.5.3
|
First Piece Inspection (FPI)
|
G.5.3.1
|
FPI is GDLS-C’s first piece inspection process. The FPI submission must be accepted prior to parts being released for shipment, unless otherwise authorized by GDLS-C. FPI documentation will be submitted in accordance with SDRL QA-004.
|
G.5.3.2
|
The submission shall be in accordance with GDLS PQA3000, QY11. The Subcontractor shall retain a warrant, design records, change documents, dimensional results, checking aids, test results and process flow charts. The other requirements are only applicable when directed in writing by GDLS-C.
|
G.5.3.3
|
The Subcontractor shall notify GDLS-C ten (10) working days prior to the FPI submission. The FPI shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements defined in the TDP.
|
G.5.3.4
|
During production, FPI resubmission may be required. The reasons for FPI resubmission are:
|
•
|
Initial submission
|
•
|
GDLS-C engineering changes, ECO;
|
•
|
Tooling: transfer, replacement, refurbishment;
|
•
|
Correction of discrepancy;
|
•
|
Change to optional construction or material;
|
•
|
Sub-supplier or material source change;
|
•
|
Change in part processing;
|
•
|
Parts produced at additional location; and,
|
•
|
Other
|
G.5.4
|
First Article Inspection
|
G 5.4.1
|
First Article Test Plan. The Subcontractor shall develop and provide a First Article Test Plan for GDLS approval in accordance with SDRL QA-005 that completely addresses the First Article (FA) verification requirements detailed in the technical specification outlined in the subcontract.
|
G.5.4.2
|
First Article Test Report. The Subcontractor shall provide a First Article Test Report per SDRL QA-008 that fully documents the results of the First Article (FA) verification of the requirements detailed in the technical specification outlined in the subcontract.
|
G.5.4.3
|
Testing Notification. Prior to the commencement of any Subcontractor tests, special inspections or demonstrations intended to prove compliance with requirements of the Subcontract Specification, the Subcontractor shall furnish in advance, written notification to GDLS. The required notifications shall be not less than fifteen (15) days in advance of the planned activity. GDLS reserves the right to witness any of the required verification activities. The Subcontractor shall support GDLS on-site Acceptance Test and First Article attendance.
|
G.5.4.4
|
Documentation. Upon request, the Subcontractor shall make available to GDLS, at the time of product inspection, the applicable product inspection records, drawings, Engineering Change Orders/Engineering Change Requests (ECOs/ECRs), specifications, Request for Deviations (RFDs), Request for Waiver (RFWs), to which the product was manufactured.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.5.4.5
|
Inspection Equipment. Inspection equipment shall be made available to GDLS upon request for any GDLS end item or component inspections at the subcontractor’s facility. Upon completion of the inspection by GDLS such inspection equipment will be returned to the Subcontractor.
|
G.5.4.6
|
Inspection and Test Equipment. Except as otherwise expressly provided for under this subcontract, the Subcontractor is responsible for the supply and maintenance of all inspection and test equipment necessary to ensure that the end item/end item components (including GFM) conform to contract requirements. All Subcontractor furnished inspection equipment shall be available for use on or before the start of production.
|
G.5.5
|
Production Representative Hardware. The unit provided as production representative will be in accordance with the specifications of this statement of work. The unit will represent a production configuration and will be subject to inspection criteria as outlined in the system specification which should be clearly defined in the Subcontractors quality plan SDRL QA-001.
|
G.5.6
|
Subcontractor Inspection & Test
|
G.5.6.1
|
The Subcontractor shall implement and maintain a product acceptance system to ensure production compliance with the TDP requirements prior to offering any product to GDLS-C for acceptance. The Subcontractor shall ensure that all production material including purchased products conforms to the TDP and applicable specifications. An Inspection and Test Plan in accordance with SDRL QA-002 shall be provided by the Subcontractor. The Inspection and Test Plan shall be subject to approval by GDLS-C. Manufacturing activities shall not commence until the approval of the relevant Inspection and Test Plan.
|
G.5.6.2
|
The inspection and certification requirements of the approved Quality Plan are to apply to all work associated with the product.
|
G.5.6.3
|
GDLS-C and Government Quality Assurance Representatives (GQARs) shall be permitted access to all records, documentation, test pieces and samples, suppliers test data / results for audit purposes.
|
G.5.6.4
|
Inspection & Test Equipment. Except as otherwise expressly provided for under this Subcontract, the Subcontractor is responsible for the supply and maintenance of all inspection and test equipment necessary to ensure end item conformance to the Subcontract requirements. All Subcontractor furnished inspection and test equipment shall be available for use on or before the start of production and shall be made available to GDLS-C or the Government at the Subcontractor’s facility upon request for any GDLS-C or Government tests and inspections.
|
G.5.6.5
|
Test Deficiencies
|
G.5.6.5.1
|
Failure. A failure is defined as an event, or state, in which the system or a component of the test set does not or would not perform as specified in the applicable specification.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.5.6.5.2
|
Defect. A defect is defined as a nonconformance to a technical requirement. Defects are classified as critical, major and minor, as defined in the applicable specification.
|
G.5.6.5.3
|
In the event of component failure, GDLS-C reserves the right to retest the component upon correction of the defects by the Subcontractor to the complete extent and duration specified in the test program, or to such a lesser extent as GDLS-C shall consider appropriate at their sole discretion. The Subcontractor shall be responsible for delays in the program. Delays caused by defective items shall not be a basis for adjustment of the Subcontract delivery schedule or the Subcontract price. Any Subcontractor modifications to the system shall first be approved by GDLS-C. The Subcontractor, at no additional cost to GDLS-C, shall correct defects.
|
G.5.6.6
|
Control of Nonconforming Product
|
G.5.6.6.1
|
The Subcontractor shall document all inspection and test failures and take appropriate corrective action. The Subcontractor shall document all rework and record re-inspection and re-test results.
|
G.5.6.6.2
|
The Subcontractor does not have the authority to deviate from the applicable Technical Data Package. All deviation requests classified as Class I as described in G.3.5.2.1 shall require GDLS-C approval prior to implementation. All other deviations or waivers will be made available to GDLS-C upon delivery as referenced in G.5.4.4.
|
G.5.6.6.3
|
The Subcontractor shall establish and maintain a functional system to maintain traceability of non-conforming material released with GDLS-C authority.
|
G.5.6.7
|
Quality Records. The Subcontractor shall retain quality records for a period of seven (7) years after completing of the subcontract.
|
G.5.7
|
Supplier/Subcontractor Evaluation and Approval Survey
|
G.5.7.1
|
The Subcontractor shall complete and return a copy of GDLS-C Form 4615 in accordance with SDRL QA-003.
|
G.5.7.2
|
The Subcontractor shall support a QA site visit / audit prior to start of production build.
|
G.5.8
|
Acceptance Testing.
|
G.5.8.1
|
Acceptance Test Plan/Report. The Subcontractor shall develop and implement an Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP) for the units delivered under this contract in accordance with SDRL QA-006 and QA-007. GDLS-C will validate the ATP used for acceptance. The Subcontractor shall notify GDLS-C prior to making any procedural changes to the ATP. GDLS-C reserves the right to require revalidation of any ATP changed/modified by the Subcontractor. If revalidation is required, it shall be coordinated such that no hardware is offered for acceptance until the change has been incorporated and validated by GDLS-C. A completed copy of the ATP shall be retained by the Subcontractor for all units produced.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.6
|
PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT
|
G.6.1
|
General. The Subcontractor shall supply a CSS that meets the requirements of this Statement of Work, and the Performance Specification. The Subcontractor shall have system responsibility as defined herein and in the Performance Specification for all CSS supplied for this program.
|
G.6.2
|
Production Plan. The Subcontractor shall develop and implement a Production Management Plan. The plan shall address all efforts required to produce a CSS in accordance with the schedule set forth in Section H. The Subcontractor shall deliver the Production Management Plan in accordance with SDRL PM-014. Amendments to the Production Management Plan are to be approved by GDLS-C prior to the amended Plan being executed by the Subcontractor.
|
G.6.2.1
|
Production Program. The Subcontractor shall establish, implement and maintain a program for the production and delivery of the CSS in accordance with the Approved Production Plan. GDLS-C will use the plan as the principal standard by which to monitor the Subcontractor's performance, achievement and schedules with respect to the Production Program.
|
G.6.2.2
|
Line of Balance. The Subcontractor shall submit a Line of Balance in accordance with SDRL PM-015 to detail deliveries of major Line Replaceable Units (LRUs) to the Subcontractor’s facility and final deliveries.
|
G.6.3
|
Schedule. The Subcontractor shall execute the program in accordance with the deliveries and performance schedule provided in Section H.
|
G.6.4
|
Production Meetings and Reviews
|
G.6.4.1
|
Production Start of Work (SOW) Meeting. As part of the project, the Subcontractor shall present the Production Management Plan concurrent with the Start of Work Meeting. As a minimum, this plan shall include an overview of the Subcontractors’ production plans, production locations, facility status, material lead-time assessment, detailed production schedules.
|
G.6.4.2
|
Reserved.
|
G.6.4.3
|
Production Readiness Review (PRR). The Subcontractor shall host a PRR concurrent with PMR #1. The PRR shall address the management and technical discipline areas: design maturity, item configuration, facilities, equipment, production line status, and overall production readiness of the system. The Subcontractor shall provide the personnel and facilities necessary to support the review team. The Subcontractor shall make available the working papers, documents, and data developed and/or utilized under this contract. During the PRR, the Subcontractor shall status the following production activities and shall use the Design and Production Review Checklist at Annex G4 as a guide::
|
•
|
Program Overview
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
•
|
Production Plan and Requirements
|
•
|
Material Delivery and Status
|
•
|
Personnel Requirements
|
•
|
Training Requirements
|
•
|
Security Requirements
|
•
|
Review of Facility Start-up Checklist
|
•
|
Lessons Learned from Previous Builds
|
•
|
Pre-Operational Safety Assessment
|
•
|
Potential Risk and Mitigation Plans
|
•
|
Quality Issues
|
•
|
Engineering/Technical Issues
|
•
|
TDP Baseline Review
|
•
|
Tour and Inspection of the Production Facilities
|
G.6.4.3.1
|
Rate Capability. At the PRR, the Subcontractor shall demonstrate, through analysis, the capability to meet the required delivery rate of 10 vehicle sets per month.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.7
|
LOGISTICS ENGINEERING (LE)
|
G.7.1
|
Supportability Technical Data Request. The Subcontractor shall complete and return the Supportability Data Requested Form, SDRL LE-001.
|
G.7.2
|
Indented Engineering Bill of Materials. The Subcontractor shall provide an indented Engineering Bill of Material (EBOM) for the system. The EBOM shall be documented to the depth of the Line Replaceable Unit (LRU / Shop Replaceable Assembly (SRA). The document shall be in Microsoft Excel 2003 format (.xls). The EBOM shall be delivered in accordance with SDRL LE-002.
|
G.7.3
|
Technical Data Documentation. The Subcontractor shall deliver TDP/SPTD down to the Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) / Shop Replaceable Assembly (SRA) per the maintenance philosophy established for the system. The TDP/SPTD may be altered to conceal proprietary information critical to manufacturing, as long as the required information listed above is provided. TDP/SPTD is not required for parts that are identified by a Military Standard or Government Specification. SPTD delivered to GDLS-C shall comply with MIL-PRF-49506 (Logistics Management Information) and DOD 4100.38.M. The Subcontractor will submit TDP/SPTD in order to catalogue new items into the supply system, and to assign NATO Stock Numbers (NSN) to procurable items. All Technical data delivered to GDLS-C shall be free of any restrictive markings or legends and be delivered in accordance with SDRL LE-003.
|
G.7.4
|
Spare Parts. Spare parts may be procured by GDLS-C in conjunction with the production buy of the system. The Subcontractor shall complete and deliver a list of all procurable LRUs, SRAs, repair piece parts, hardware, and consumables in accordance with SDRL LE-004.
|
G.7.5
|
Technical Manuals. The Subcontractor shall deliver existing commercial or military standard technical publications - examples include but are not limited to; installation and removal instructions, operation, maintenance, and illustrated parts manuals. The Subcontractor shall provide with all delivered manuals, a written copyright-release for GDLS-C to use the data in the development of technical manuals that are required by the customer. The technical publications shall be delivered in electronic format (MS Word or SGML/XML format, SGML/XML preferred). The technical publications shall be delivered in the English, and in accordance with SDRL LE-005.
|
G.7.6
|
Technical Illustrations. The Subcontractor shall deliver parts illustrations for the system and associated down components to the LRU/SRA level. The illustrations shall be provided in electronic medium and in a format in accordance with SDRL LE-006.
|
G.7.7
|
Support Equipment List. The Subcontractor shall provide a list of all the tools required to install/remove and repair the system/assembly in question. The list of tools shall include all Special Tools and Test Equipment (STTE). Available part numbers, NSNs, drawings, and pricing shall be provided. The data shall be delivered in Subcontractor format and in accordance with SDRL LE-007.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.7.8
|
LEM Impact Statement. The Subcontractor shall have in place a procedure for assessing and providing impact statements to GDLS-C with respect to Subcontract Change Proposals (SCPs) and Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), including deviations and waivers. The Subcontractor shall prepare and include LEM Impact Statements for each change proposal to identify the impact on the program. The Logistic Impact Statements shall identify the specific nature and impact of the proposed change, including but not limited to impacts to Subcontractor provided technical data, support equipment requirements, and schedule impacts. The LE Impact Statements shall be delivered in accordance with the Configuration Management requirements outlined in this Subcontract.
|
G.7.9
|
Subcontractor Technical Support. The Subcontractor shall provide technical support to GDLS-C during the supportability data development period. Technical support shall include telephone and e-mail support to technical questions related to the product and/or the supportability data provided. Technical support shall be made available, as required, to support customer validation/verification activities and logistics demonstrations.
|
G.7.10
|
Reliability and Maintainability Support Data. The Subcontractor shall deliver the results of the reliability and maintainability analysis that has been conducted such that GDLS-C can substantiate repair policies and produce vehicle level reliability prediction and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) estimates for the end customer. The data shall be provided in accordance with SDRL LE-008.
|
G.7.11
|
Diagnostic Support Data. If the data is not made available within the Subcontractor provided technical/commercial manuals, the Subcontractor shall provide documentation to enable GDLS-C to create accurate and complete troubleshooting manuals. Such information includes a list of error messages and/or fault codes that the systems produces and how to interpret and diagnose the problem related to the error message/fault code. For powered systems (for instance electrical or hydraulic systems), a schematic shall be provided that is suitable for troubleshooting purposes. If special diagnostic equipment/software has been developed for the system in question, the Subcontractor shall provide instructions how to properly and safely use the equipment to diagnose the system. Diagnostic supporting data shall be provided in accordance with SDRL LE-009.
|
G.7.12
|
Definitions.
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.7.13
|
Abbreviations
|
CBIL
|
Consumable and Bulk Item List
|
CCP
|
Contract Change Proposal
|
CDRL
|
Contract Data Requirements List
|
DID
|
Data Item Description
|
EBS
|
Equipment Breakdown Structure
|
ECP
|
Engineering Change Proposal
|
FACAR
|
Failure Analysis Corrective Action Report
|
FFP
|
Firm Fixed Price
|
FMECA
|
Failure Modes Effect and Criticality Analysis
|
GDLS-C
|
General Dynamics Land Systems - Canada
|
IBM
|
Indented Bill of Material
|
ILS
|
Integrated Logistics Support
|
ILSMT
|
Integrated Logistics Support Management Team
|
IP
|
Initial Provisioning
|
LCC
|
Life Cycle Cost
|
LCN
|
Logistics Control Number
|
LE
|
Logistics Engineering
|
LLRC
|
Long Life Reusable Container
|
LORA
|
Level of Repair Analysis
|
LRR
|
Logistics Requirements Review
|
LRU
|
Line Replaceable Unit
|
LSA
|
Logistic Support Analysis
|
LSAR
|
Logistic Support Analysis Record
|
MSDS
|
Material Safety Data Sheet
|
MTA
|
Maintenance Task Analysis
|
NSN
|
NATO Stock Number
|
PHST
|
Packaging, Handling, Storage and Transportability
|
PM
|
Preventative Maintenance
|
POC
|
Point of Contact
|
PPL
|
Provisioning Parts List
|
RCM
|
Reliability Centered Maintenance
|
RFP
|
Request for Proposal
|
RSCL
|
Reusable Shipping Containers List
|
RSERL
|
Recommended Support Equipment Requirements List
|
RSPL
|
Recommended Spare Parts Lists
|
RPSTL
|
Repair Parts and Special Tools List
|
RTAEL
|
Recommended Training Aids and Equipment List
|
SOW
|
Statement of Work
|
SPTD
|
Supplemental Provisioning Technical Documentation
|
SRA
|
Shop Replaceable Assembly
|
STTE
|
Special Tools and Test Equipment
|
TDP
|
Technical Data Package
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G - Statement of Work
Rev NR
|
G.8
|
OBSOLESCENCE MANAGEMENT
|
G.8.1
|
General The Subcontractor shall provide Obsolescence Management (OM) Services for the Equipment. The intent of this service is to ensure that the potential impacts of obsolescence in terms of equipment supply, effectiveness and support costs are mitigated by proactive management activities completed by the Subcontractor. These activities and reporting requirements are described below. The Subcontractor shall be responsible, at their expense, for resolving obsolescence on their delivered equipment in a timely manner such that the equipment availability due to obsolescence is not impacted for the duration of this contract + 2 years.
|
G.8.2
|
OM Plan. The Subcontractor shall deliver an Obsolescence Management Plan in accordance with SDRL OM-001.
|
G.8.3
|
OM Candidates List. The subcontractor shall develop and deliver for approval an Obsolescence Management Candidate List in accordance with SDRL OM-002. Once approved, the list shall be updated quarterly and the subcontractor shall perform proactive OM on items listed on the OM Candidates List.
|
G.8.4
|
OM Issues Report. The Subcontractor shall provide GDLS an Obsolescence Management Issues Report for the Equipment in accordance with SDRL OM-003. The OM Issues Report shall outline the specifics of a pending issue for all high-risk LRUs or component parts. A component shall be considered to be high risk if it will become obsolete within one year or less.
|
G.8.5
|
Critical OM Issues Advisement. If the Subcontractor, through daily proactive obsolescence management, is made aware of a critical OM issue that is time-sensitive in nature and requires immediate action in order to take advantage of any risk-mitigating available opportunity, they are to promptly notify GDLS-C via email. The Subcontractor shall provide all pertinent and available details pertaining to the OM issue, and their recommended course of action.
|
G.8.5.1.
|
Upon arriving at a proposed course of action to resolve a given obsolescence issue, the Subcontractor shall provide a proposed corrective action plan to GDLS-C for their review and concurrence.
|
G.8.6
|
Quarterly OM Issues Review Meeting. The Subcontractor will host a quarterly teleconference to review the OM Candidates List and OM Issues Report with GDLS-C.
|
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
SDRL
No.
|
Description
|
Subcontract
Reference
|
Initial Delivery
Date
|
Frequency
|
No. of
Copies
|
Format
|
Approval
|
Comments:
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL Rev NR
|
SDRL
No.
|
Description
|
Subcontract
Reference
|
Initial Delivery
Date
|
Frequency
|
No. of
Copies
|
Format
|
Approval
|
PM-001
|
Program Management
Plan
|
SOW
G.2.2.1
|
With Proposal
|
Final 15
days AOC. Updates as required
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
Final A/30
|
Refer to DID PM-001
|
|||||||
PM-003
|
Master Project
Management Schedule
(MPMS)
|
SOW G.2.4.2
|
With Proposal
|
Final 15 days AOC.
Updates as required
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
Final A/30
|
Refer to DID PM-003
|
|||||||
PM-006
|
Meeting Agenda
|
SOW
G.2.5.6
|
5 days prior to
planned meeting date
|
N/A
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A/2
|
Refer to DID PM-006. Meeting Agenda shall be provided to GDLS-C for approval and input 5 days prior to planned meeting date. GDLS-C will provide comments within 2 working days. GDLS-C requested agenda items will be included as presentation topics.
|
|||||||
PM–007
|
Meeting Minutes
|
SOW G.2.5.7
|
Within 5 working days following meeting
completion.
|
Per comments
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A/10
|
Refer to DID PM-007. Minutes shall be provided within 5 working days following meeting completion. GDLS-C will provide comments or
approval within 10 working days. Updates incorporating agreed upon GDLS-C revisions shall be provided within 3 working days.
|
|||||||
PM-008
|
Progress Reports
|
SOW G.2.4.3
G.2.6.1
G.2.9.2
|
1 Month AOC
|
Monthly
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
I
|
Refer to DID PM-008
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
SDRL
No.
|
Description
|
Subcontract
Reference
|
Initial Delivery
Date
|
Frequency
|
No. of
Copies
|
Format
|
Approval
|
PM-011
|
Risk Management Plan
|
SOW G.2.9.1
|
With Proposal
|
Final 15 days AOC.
Updates as required
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
Final A/30
|
Refer to DID PM-011
|
|||||||
PM-013
|
Subcontract Change
Proposal
|
SOW
G.2.12
|
As Required
|
As Required
|
1-E
|
Refer to DID
|
A/30
|
Refer to DID PM-013
|
|||||||
PM-014
|
Production Management
Plan
|
SOW
G.6.2
|
With Proposal
|
Final 15
days AOC. Updates as required
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
Final A/30
|
Refer to DID PM-014
|
|||||||
PM-015
|
Line of Balance
|
SOW G.6.2.2
|
Refer to DID
|
Weekly
|
1-E
|
Refer to DID
|
I
|
See DID PM-015
|
|||||||
CM-002
|
Engineering Change
Proposal (ECP)
|
SOW G.3.4.1
G.3.5.3
|
From
Completion of
CDR
|
As Required
|
1-E
|
Refer to DID
|
Refer to
DID
|
Refer to DID CM-002
|
|||||||
CM-003
|
FCA/PCA Plan
|
SOW
G.3.7.3
|
With Proposal
|
See
comments
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
Final A/15
|
Refer to DID CM-003. – 30 days prior to Configuration Audit
|
|||||||
CM-004
|
Audit Agenda
|
SOW
G.3.7.2
G.3.7.4.2
|
See comment
|
Refer to DID
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A/30
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
SDRL
No.
|
Description
|
Subcontract
Reference
|
Initial Delivery
Date
|
Frequency
|
No. of
Copies
|
Format
|
Approval
|
Refer to DID CM-004. Initial Audit Agenda shall be submitted to GDLS-C 10 days prior to the date of the Configuration Audit. Agenda shall
contain as a minimum: location, date(s), duration and daily chronological listing of events which are to take place.
|
|||||||
CM-005
|
Audit Report
|
SOW
G.3.7.4.3
|
30 days after
successful completion of FCA/PCA
|
As Required
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A
|
Refer to DID CM-005.
|
|||||||
CM-006
|
Request for Deviation
(RFD)
|
SOW
G.3.5.4
|
As Required
|
As Required
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A/Refer to
DID
|
See DID CM-006
|
|||||||
CM-007
|
Configuration Status
Accounting Report
|
SOW G.3.9
|
10 days prior to
PCA
|
See comment
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
I
|
Refer to DID CM-007. Deliveries to be monthly until 30 days after the last delivery concurrent with SDRL CM-008.
|
|||||||
CM-008
|
Indented Bill of Material
(IBOM)
|
SOW
G.3.10
|
Refer to DID
|
See
Comment
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A/10
|
Refer to DID CM-008. Deliveries to be monthly until 30 days after the last delivery concurrent with SDRL CM-007.
|
|||||||
CM-009
|
FCA System Spec
Verification Matrix
|
SOW
G.3.7.1.1
|
With Proposal
|
Concurrent
with delivery of FCA Plans
|
1-E
|
Refer to DID
|
A/30
|
Refer to DID CM-009 for Preparation instructions
|
|||||||
CM-010
|
Technical Data Package
(TDP)
|
SOW
G.3.8.3
|
With Proposal
|
See
Comment
|
1-E
|
Refer to DID
|
A/10
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
SDRL
No.
|
Description
|
Subcontract
Reference
|
Initial Delivery
Date
|
Frequency
|
No. of
Copies
|
Format
|
Approval
|
Refer to DID CM-010 for Preparation instructions. TDPs shall be delivered 10 days prior to PCA. Final TDP shall be delivered not later than 30
days after Final Delivery. Updates are required as a result of ECP activity. Updated drawings shall be delivered no later than 15 days after approval or classification concurrence of ECPs.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
SDRL
No.
|
Description
|
Subcontract
Reference
|
Initial Delivery
Date
|
Frequency
|
No. of
Copies
|
Format
|
Approval
|
ENG-001
|
Current Specification
|
SOW
G.4.4.1
G.4.5.1
|
With Proposal
|
As Required.
|
1 – E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
I
|
No DID.
|
|||||||
ENG-002
|
Software Requirements
Specification (SRS)
|
SOW
G.4.6.1
|
With Proposal
|
As Required.
|
1 – E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
I
|
No DID.
|
|||||||
ENG-004
|
CAD Model
|
SOW
G.4.9.1
|
With Proposal
|
At SFR,
PDR, CDR and As Required.
|
1 – E
|
Refer to DID.
|
I
|
Refer to DID ENG-004.
|
|||||||
ENG-006
|
Drawings
|
SOW G.4.7.1
G.4.8.1
|
With Proposal
|
At SFR, PDR, CDR
and As
Required.
|
1 – E
|
Refer to DID.
|
I
|
Refer to DID ENG-006.
|
|||||||
ENG-008
|
Hazardous Material
Management Report
|
SOW G.4.16.2
|
30 days after
AOC
|
One/R
|
1-E
|
Refer to DID
|
A/30
|
Refer to DID ENG-008.
|
|||||||
ENG-011
|
Human Factors Data
Report (HFDR)
|
SOW G.4.17.2
|
5 days before
GDLS-C SFR
|
Final: 20 days before GDLS-C
PDR
|
1 - E
|
Refer to DID
|
A/30
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
SDRL
No.
|
Description
|
Subcontract
Reference
|
Initial Delivery
Date
|
Frequency
|
No. of
Copies
|
Format
|
Approval
|
Refer to DID ENG-011.
|
|||||||
ENG-012
|
Safety Assessment
Report (SAR)
|
SOW G.4.18.2
G.4.18.3
|
5 days before
GDLS-C SFR
|
Final – 20 days before
GDLS-C PDR
|
1 – E
|
Refer to DID.
|
A/30
|
Refer to DID ENG-012.
|
|||||||
ENG-013
|
Qualification Matrix
|
SOW G.4.11.2
G.4.12.2
G.4.13.2
G.4.15.1
|
With Proposal
|
Refer to DID
|
1 – E
|
Refer to DID.
|
A/30
|
Refer to DID ENG-013.
|
|||||||
ENG-014
|
Design Review
Presentation Material
|
SOW
G.4.11.3
G.4.12.3
G.4.13.3
|
5 days prior to
SFR
|
At PDR,
CDR, & as required
|
1 – E
|
Refer to DID.
|
I
|
Refer to DID ENG-014.
|
|||||||
ENG-015
|
Finite Element Analysis
(FEA) Report
|
SOW
4.19.1
|
Refer to DID
|
Refer to DID
|
1 – E
|
Refer to DID.
|
I
|
Refer to DID ENG-015.
|
|||||||
ENG-017
|
Qualification Test Plan
|
SOW G.4.15.2
|
4 MAC
|
Refer to DID
|
1 – E
|
Refer to DID.
|
A/30
|
Refer to DID ENG-017.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
SDRL
No.
|
Description
|
Subcontract
Reference
|
Initial Delivery
Date
|
Frequency
|
No. of
Copies
|
Format
|
Approval
|
ENG-018
|
Formal Qualification
Report
|
SOW G.4.15.3
|
8 MAC
|
Refer to DID
|
1 – E
|
Refer to DID.
|
A/15
|
Refer to DID ENG-018.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
SDRL
No.
|
Description
|
Subcontract
Reference
|
Initial Delivery
Date
|
Frequency
|
No. of
Copies
|
Format
|
Approval
|
QA-001
|
Quality Assurance Plan
|
SOW
G.5.2.1
G.5.5
|
With Proposal
|
Refer to DID
|
1- E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
Final A/30
|
Refer to DID QA-001
|
|||||||
QA-002
|
Quality Assurance
Inspection and Test
Plan
|
SOW
G.5.6.1
|
With Proposal
|
Refer to DID
|
1 – E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
Final A/15
|
Refer to DID QA-002
|
|||||||
QA-003
|
Supplier / Subcontractor
Evaluation & Approval
Survey
|
SOW
G.5.7.1
|
With Proposal
|
N/A
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
See DID
|
Refer to DID QA-003
|
|||||||
QA-004
|
First Piece Inspection
|
SOW G.5.3.1
|
14 days prior to first shipment of
production material.
|
Refer to DID
|
1-H
|
Refer to DID
|
A/15
|
Refer to DID QA-004
|
|||||||
QA-005
|
First Article Test Plan
|
SOW
G.5.4.1
|
30 days prior to
First Article production.
|
N/A
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A/30
|
Refer to DID QA-005.
|
|||||||
QA-006
|
Acceptance Test Plan
|
SOW G.5.8.1
|
Refer to DID
|
Refer to DID
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A/7
|
Refer to DID QA-006
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
SDRL
No.
|
Description
|
Subcontract
Reference
|
Initial Delivery
Date
|
Frequency
|
No. of
Copies
|
Format
|
Approval
|
QA-007
|
Acceptance Test Report
|
SOW G.5.8.1
|
Refer to DID
|
Refer to DID
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A/30
|
Refer to DID QA-007
|
|||||||
QA-008
|
First Article Test Report
|
SOW G.5.4.2
|
Refer to DID
|
N/A
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A/30
|
Refer to DID QA-008
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
SDRL
No.
|
Description
|
Subcontract
Reference
|
Initial Delivery
Date
|
Frequency
|
No. of
Copies
|
Format
|
Approval
|
LE-001
|
Supportability Technical
Data Request
|
SOW
G.7.1
|
With Proposal
|
One/R
|
1-E
|
Refer to DID
|
A/5
|
Refer to DID LE-001.
|
|||||||
LE-002
|
Indented Bill of
Materials (IBOM)
|
SOW
G.7.2
|
10 Days prior to
PDR
|
Refer to DID
|
1-E
|
Refer to DID
|
A/5
|
Refer to DID CM-008.
|
|||||||
LE-003
|
Technical Data Package
|
SOW G.7.3
|
10 Days prior to
PDR
|
30 Days post CDR
|
1-E
|
Refer to DID
|
A/30
|
Refer to DID LE-003.
|
|||||||
LE-004
|
List of Spare Parts
|
SOW G.7.4
|
10 Days prior to
PDR
|
30 Days post CDR
|
1-E
|
Refer to DID
|
A/30
|
Refer to DID LE-004
|
|||||||
LE-005
|
Technical Publications
|
SOW G.7.5
|
10 Days prior to
PDR
|
30 Days post CDR
|
1-E
|
Refer to DID
|
A/5
|
Refer to DID LE-005.
|
|||||||
LE-006
|
Technical Illustrations
|
SOW G.7.6
|
30 Days post
CDR
|
One/R
|
1-E
|
Refer to DID
|
A/10
|
Refer to DID LE-006.
|
|||||||
LE-007
|
Support Equipment List
|
SOW G.7.7
|
10 days prior
PDR
|
10 days post CDR
|
1-E
|
Refer to DID
|
A/5
|
Refer to DID LE-007.
|
|||||||
LE-008
|
Reliability and
Maintainability Support
Data
|
SOW
G.7.10
|
10 days prior
PDR
|
10 Days
prior to CDR
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A/5
|
Refer to DID LE-008.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
SDRL
No.
|
Description
|
Subcontract
Reference
|
Initial Delivery
Date
|
Frequency
|
No. of
Copies
|
Format
|
Approval
|
LE-009
|
Diagnostic Support Data
|
SOW
G.7.11
|
10 Days prior to
CDR
|
30 days
post CDR
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A/10
|
Refer to DID LE-009.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
SDRL
No.
|
Description
|
Subcontract
Reference
|
Initial Delivery
Date
|
Frequency
|
No. of
Copies
|
Format
|
Approval
|
OM-001
|
OM Plan
|
SOW
G.8.2
|
With Proposal
|
1MAC
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
I
|
Refer to DID OM-001
|
|||||||
OM-002
|
OM Candidates List
|
SOW
G.8.3
|
With Proposal
|
Quarterly –
Concurrent with OM Issues Report
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A/15
|
Refer to DID OM-002
|
|||||||
OM-003
|
OM Issues Report
|
SOW
G.8.4
|
With Proposal
|
Quarterly –
Concurrent with OM Candidates List
|
1-E
|
Subcontractor
Format
|
A/15
|
Refer to DID OM-003
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
DID PM-001
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Program Management Plan (PMP)
|
DID PM-001
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
The PMP shall describe how the Subcontractor
|
SDRL PM-001
|
|||
intends to provide effective Program Management
|
SOW G.2.2.1 of the Work, how it is organized, how it will be
|
|||
conducted and the methods, procedures and controls used to assure effective Program Management.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
GDLS-Canada Subcontracts Management
|
A/30
|
|||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
Initial copy with proposal
|
Final copy 15 days after a ward of contract. Updates as required.
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
General. The format shall be suitable for the use of the PMP as an overview of the system for Subcontractor personnel as well as detailing the Subcontractor’s arrangements for management and control of the Work. Where identified, annexes shall be prepared, delivered and amended in accordance with their respective DIDs.
|
9.2
|
Content. The following represents the recommended content of the PMP. GDLS- Canada may approve Subcontractor proposed alternatives to this PMP as long as the requirements of this DID are met.
|
SECTION
|
TITLE
|
|
1.0
|
Introduction, Purpose and Scope
|
|
2.0
|
Organisational Arrangements
|
|
3.0
|
Program Management Approach and Processes
|
|
4.0
|
Spare Parts Management
|
|
5.0
|
Risk Management
|
|
6.0
|
Data Management
|
|
7.0
|
Production Management
|
|
8.0
|
|
Procurement and Subcontract Management
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
9.0
|
Engineering
|
|
10.0
|
Configuration Management
|
|
11.0
|
Quality Assurance
|
|
12.0
|
Logistics Engineering Management
|
|
13.0
|
Business and Financial Management
|
|
ANNEXES
|
||
A
|
Work Breakdown Structure
|
|
B
|
Master Program Management Schedule
|
|
C
|
Delivery Schedule
|
|
D
|
Cash Flow Forecasts
|
|
E
|
List of Figures
|
|
F
|
List of Acronyms
|
|
G
|
Master Review and Audit Plan
|
|
H
|
Risk Management Plan
|
|
I
|
|
Subcontract Management Plan
|
9.3
|
The content of each section should provide an overview of how the Subcontractor intends to meet the requirement of the SOW.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
DID PM-003
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Master Project Management Schedule (MPMS)
|
DID PM-003
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
THE MPMS shall schedule and report all elements of the subcontractor’s Work defined by the approved WBS.
|
SDRL PM-003
SOW G.2.4.2.
|
|||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation Subcontract Management
|
A/30
|
|||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
Initial draft due with proposal
|
Final copy due 15 days AOC Updates as required.
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
The subcontractor shall ensure the MPMS clearly identifies:
|
|
a)
|
all activities necessary to complete each WBS
|
|
b)
|
actual performance for each activity completed or in progress for all previous and current reporting period
|
|
c)
|
detailed activity scheduling for the next reporting period
|
|
d)
|
key milestones beyond the next reporting period e) the expected duration for all scheduled activities
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
DID PM-006
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Meeting Agenda
|
DID PM-006
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To provide an agenda to General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation in support of meetings and reviews.
|
SDRL PM-006
SOW G.2.5.6
|
|||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation Subcontract Management
|
A/2
|
|||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
5 days prior to planned meeting date
|
NA
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
The agenda shall address the following:
|
|
a)
|
the scope, purpose and objectives of the review or meeting,
|
|
b)
|
time, date, location and anticipated duration
|
|
c)
|
suggested Government attendees
|
|
d)
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation attendees e) Subcontractor attendees
|
|
f)
|
Need for any General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation or Government documentation to be presented at the review or meeting
|
|
g)
|
Alternative dates and location for General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation consideration
|
|
h)
|
Security classification and visit clearance requirements
|
|
i)
|
Review and acceptance of the minutes of the previous meeting
|
|
j)
|
Status and update of current items under review
|
|
k)
|
New subject items to be introduced by the subcontractor and/or the Government
|
|
l)
|
Other business
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
DID PM-007
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Meeting Minutes
|
DID PM-007
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
Minutes shall describe the content of the reviews and meetings between General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation and the subcontractor.
|
SDRL PM-007
SOW G.2.5.7
|
|||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation Subcontracts Management
|
A/10
|
|||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
Within 5 working days following meeting completion.
|
Revisions due within 3 wc rking days of General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation revisions or comments.
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
The format shall provide for the clear identification of requests for action items resulting from such reviews and meetings and the individual, group or organisation responsible for pursuing such action and the schedule time for response to each action request.
|
9.2
|
Meeting Minutes shall be prepared in a brief narrative form aligned to the topics and sequencing of the discussions.
|
9.3
|
Meeting Minutes shall include hard copies of any presentation material used during the review.
|
9.4
|
Meeting Minutes shall be a true reflection of the discussions and shall not be construed as agreed until signed by the Project Authority.
|
9.5
|
Meeting Minutes shall, in addition to the above requirements, identify, as a minimum:
|
|
a)
|
scope, purpose, meeting reference code and objectives of the review
|
|
b)
|
time, date, location and attendees
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
|
c)
|
security classification of the minutes
|
d)
|
proposed timing and location of any follow-up reviews
|
e)
|
distribution list
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
DID PM-008
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
|||
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|||
Progress Report
|
DID PM-008
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
The Progress Reports shall describe the progress made by the subcontractor in performing both subcontracted and directed work. The Progress Report shall be used by the subcontractor as the basis for developing PSR agendas.
|
SDRL PM-008
SOW G.2.4.3, G.2.6.1, G. 2.9.2.
|
|||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation Subcontracts Management
|
I
|
|||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
One month after award of contract
|
Monthly
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
Progress Reports shall present, in an easily readable form, a summary of, as a minimum:
|
|
a)
|
Project Status: shall include an objective status of, but not limited to, the following:
|
|
i)
|
subcontract value summary
|
|
ii)
|
subcontract invoicing status
|
|
iii)
|
milestone payment status
|
|
iv)
|
status of SCPs
|
|
v)
|
subcontract deliverable status
|
|
vi)
|
warranty status
|
|
vii)
|
schedule status
|
|
viii)
|
retrofit status
|
|
ix)
|
ECP status
|
|
x)
|
waiver and deviation status
|
|
xi)
|
action item status
|
|
xii)
|
risk status
|
|
xiii)
|
technical issue status
|
|
xiv)
|
part order status
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
|
i)
|
The Objective – the cumulative delivery schedule
|
|
ii)
|
The Program – the planned production
|
|
iii)
|
Progress – the current performance
|
|
iv)
|
Comparison – program progress to objective
|
|
i)
|
Explanation of variances from scheduled to actual
|
|
ii)
|
Statement of problems which resulted in variances
|
|
iii)
|
Corrective action taken
|
|
iv)
|
Proposed recovery schedules
|
|
v)
|
Impact on delivery schedule
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G2 - SDRL
Rev NR
|
DID PM-011
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Risk Management Plan
|
DID PM-011
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERE
|
|
The Risk Management Plan shall describe how the subcontractor intends to provide effective Risk Management for the System, how it is organized, how it will be conducted and the methods, procedures and controls used to assure effective management of risk.
|
SDRL PM-011
SOW G.2.9.1
|
|||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATIO
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation Subcontracts Management
|
A/30
|
|||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENC
|
|
Draft due with proposal.
|
Final copy 15 days AOC. Updates as required.
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
The subcontractor shall establish, implement and maintain a Risk Management Plan that provides:
|
|
a)
|
early identification of potential risk elements
|
|
b)
|
monitoring of risk elements for significant trends that would indicate an increase or decrease in risk significance
|
|
c)
|
Risk Data Management to identify and classify risk
|
|
d)
|
Quick action to determine the extent of risk, to assess the options available to eliminate risk, to implement a preferred course of action, to monitor progress until a satisfactory solution is achieved and then report the results to management
|
|
e)
|
A periodic review of unresolved problems and the conduct of a thorough analysis of the impact of these problems of the program
|
|
f)
|
A review of all problems and their solutions utilising a “lessons learned” philosophy to improve early problem detection, improve methods of correcting and reducing the financial or schedule impact of future problems to the program.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
9.2
|
The Risk Management Plan shall include Risk Management Planning, Risk Identification, Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Analysis, Risk Response Planning, and Risk Monitoring and Control through an integrated approach involving cost, schedule, and technical performance, and shall contain as a minimum the following sections:
|
SECTION
|
TITLE
|
1.0
|
Scope, Application and Definitions
|
2.0
|
Risk Management Requirements
|
3.0
|
Risk Management Overview
|
4.0
|
Risk Management Process
|
5.0
|
Documentation
|
Annexes
|
As Required
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
DID PM-013
|
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
Subcontract Change Proposal
|
DID PM-013
|
||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
The purpose of this DID is to establish a standard content and form for the subcontractor or General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation to use when requesting a change to the subcontract.
|
SDRL PM-013
SOW G.2.12.
|
||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATIO N:
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation Subcontracts Management
|
A/30
|
||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENC Y:
|
As required
|
As required
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
Submission shall be in accordance with the attached template.
|
9.2
|
All SCPs shall be accompanied by supporting data addressing the impact of the proposed change in the following areas:
|
|
a)
|
Operational
|
|
b)
|
Technical/Production
|
|
c)
|
Systems Engineering
|
|
d)
|
Logistics Engineering
|
|
e)
|
Quality Assurance
|
|
f)
|
Program Management
|
|
g)
|
Cost
|
|
h)
|
Risk
|
|
i)
|
Implication if not approved
|
|
j)
|
Other relevant factors and considerations
|
9.3
|
All SCPs shall be numbered sequentially by the subcontractor. ECPs shall be referenced in the SCPs to which they correspond.
|
9.4
|
Revisions to SCPs shall be allocated a revision number by the subcontractor.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
SUBCONTRACT PURCHASE ORDER USA
SUBCONTRACT CHANGE PROPOSAL
|
PRIORITY (Tick as appropriate)
|
||
EMERGENCY
|
|||
URGENT
|
|||
ROUTINE
|
|||
SUBCONTRACT REFERENCE:
|
SERIAL NUMBER:
|
||
WBS NO:
|
ECP REFERENCE:
|
||
ITEM IDENTIFICATION:
|
|||
TITLE AND SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE:
|
|||
DETAIL OF PROPOSED CHANGE AND REASON:
|
|||
SUBCONTRACT DOCUMENTATION AFFECTED:
|
|||
LIST OF REVISED SUBCONTRACT DOCUMENTATION PAGES AFFECTED:
|
|||
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
DID PM-014
|
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
Production Management Plan
|
DID PM-014
|
||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES: |
The Production Management Plan shall describe how the subcontractor intends to provide effective Production Management for the subcontractor’s work, how it is organized, how it will be conducted and the methods, procedures and controls used to assure effective production management.
|
SDRL PM-014
SOW G.6.2
|
||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation Subcontracts Management
|
A/30
|
||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
Draft due with Proposal
|
Final copy 15 days AOC. Updates as required.
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
1
|
The Production Plan shall include the following information and data:
|
a)
|
Overview of Manufacturing Organisational Arrangements. The Plan should explain the manufacturing management organisation, which will implement and maintain surveillance over all elements of manufacturing. Provide organizational charts and explain functional responsibilities of the manufacturing manager and other key manufacturing personnel to be assigned.
|
b)
|
Resource and Manufacturing Capability. This section shall include:
|
|
i)
|
Industrial Facilities
|
|
•
|
Provide a breakdown of Subcontractor facilities to be used in support of the System.
|
|
•
|
List facilities required by the Subcontractor including modification of existing facilities. This listing will contain the items, lead time and required date related to the Master and Support Schedules.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
|
ii)
|
Manpower (Tooling and Manufacturing). Prepare Charts or tables with forecasts at monthly intervals of tooling and manufacturing (direct and indirect) personnel resources required to support the manufacturing program.
|
|
iii)
|
Materials - Identify any special or hard-to-get material to be utilized on the manufacturing program which relate to previous applications. Present data to justify the selection of new or critical alloys and lead time required to ensure their availability to meet the proposed schedule
|
|
iv)
|
Components - Identify new major units of assemblies to be developed and existing ones that require redesign. Depict their development/testing and production lead times within the MPMS.
|
|
v)
|
Tooling Plan and special tooling - Submit details on tooling philosophy covering planning, fabrication, control and manufacturing, identifying clearly the extent of 'soft' (limited) and/or 'hard' (durable) tooling. The plan will identify each item of special tooling which could be considered as 'common' to manufacturing requirements or maintenance support. The duration of use for this property to support production will be explained, together with an estimated use upon completion of the effort to be carried out by the Subcontractor and Sub-Subcontractors.
|
c)
|
Identify by category the special tooling that should be retained for spares support, after phase-out of the production program.
|
d)
|
Production Planning. This section shall include details on the following:
|
|
i)
|
Delivery schedule. Depict the production schedule that will support the contracted delivery schedule for all Deliverable End Items to be produced.
|
|
ii)
|
Production Work Breakdown Structure (PWBS). Provide a logical framework to describe all the production activities and to support schedule monitoring. This shall be traceable to the Approved WBS.
|
|
iii)
|
Manufacturing Lead Time. Depict the relationship of time-phased milestones for in-plant and subcontracted effort from the Effective Date of the Subcontract to the delivery of all Deliverable End Items.
|
|
iv)
|
Production Control. Provide an explanation of the existing or proposed production control system. Details of the system should be outlined to ensure that the planned project can be accomplished. The relationship between configuration control, quality control and production control shall be explained.
|
|
v)
|
Plant Utilization. Describe any other production scheduled to occur concurrently. In particular identify anticipated production constrictions as a basis for determining any production rate tooling costs.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
DID PM-015
|
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
Line of Balance
|
DID PM-015
|
||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFEREN CES:
|
To provide details on major LRUs being delivered to the Subcontractor’s facility in support of final system deliveries.
|
SDRL PM-015
SOW G.6.2.2
|
||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation Subcontracts Management
|
I
|
||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
1 MAC
|
Weekly
|
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1.
|
The Subcontractor shall submit a line of balance showing top level kit part number and deliveries to GDLS by date.
|
9.2.
|
The kit part number will then be broken down to next level of indenture showing dates of completion in Subcontractor’s facility.
|
9.3.
|
The Subcontractor shall include a listing of all major LRUs for the seat and associated hardware showing detailed deliveries dates from their down suppliers to the Subcontractor’s facility in support of final kit delivery. Example as follows:
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
Due Date #1
|
Due Date #2
|
|||
Kit P/N
|
Quantity of Kits Due
|
Quantity of Kits Due
|
||
Item #1 P/N
(# per kit)
|
Date Completed, Quantity
Date Completed, Quantity, etc.
|
Date Completed, Quantity
Date Completed, Quantity, etc.
|
||
Major LRU #1
(# per Item #1)
|
Delivery Date, Quantity
Delivery Date, Quantity, etc.
|
Delivery Date, Quantity
Delivery Date, Quantity, etc.
|
||
Major LRU #2, etc.
(# per Item #1)
|
Delivery Date, Quantity
Delivery Date, Quantity, etc.
|
Delivery Date, Quantity
Delivery Date, Quantity, etc.
|
||
Item #2 P/N
(# per kit)
|
Date Completed, Quantity
Date Completed, Quantity, etc.
|
Date Completed, Quantity
Date Completed, Quantity, etc.
|
||
Major LRU #1
(# per Item #2)
|
Delivery Date, Quantity
Delivery Date, Quantity, etc.
|
Delivery Date, Quantity
Delivery Date, Quantity, etc.
|
9.4.
|
The line of balance shall be updated as changes occur and submitted to GDLS on a weekly basis clearly showing any delta changes from one week to the next. Any changes shall be discussed during telecons with GDLS.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
DID CM-002
|
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
Engineering Change Proposal
|
DID CM-002
|
||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
An engineering Change Proposal (ECP) includes both the engineering change and the documentation by which the change is described and suggested. An ECP describes the changes to the configuration items and associated configuration documentation that are affected by the proposed engineering change.
|
DID DI-CMAN-80639C Engineering Change Proposal(ECP)
SDRL CM-002
SOW G.3.4.1, 3.5.3
|
||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
GDLS-C Subcontract Management
|
Submission of ECPs for information purposes shall be initiated from date of completion of each CDR.
|
||
Formal submission of ECPs shall occur upon establishment of the PCB. Approval limitations for formal submissions are as follows:
|
|||
Class I changes:
|
|||
Emergency 96 Hours ,Urgent 30 days,Routine:90 days
|
|||
Class II ECPs: shall be submitted to GDLS-C for concurrence of classification
|
|||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
From Completion of CDR
|
As required
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
DID CM-3
|
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) / Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) Plan
|
DID CM-003
|
||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
The Subcontractor’s FCA/PCA Plan (CMP) shall provide the Contractor with an overview of the preparation and planning for the FCA/PCA activity.
|
MIL-HDBK-61A Configuration Management Guidance (Section 8)
DID DI-CMAN-80556A
SDRL CM-003
SOW Para. G.3.7.3
|
||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
GDLS-C Subcontract Management
|
A/15
|
||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
Due with proposal
|
30 days prior to Configuration Audit
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
The FCA/PCA Plan shall be prepared using DI-CMAN-80856A as a Guide.
|
9.2
|
MIL-HDBK-61A Section 8 shall be used as guidance in identifying those areas of the audit planning process and pre-audit preparation that should be identified in the Plan.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
DID CM-4
|
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
Audit Agenda
|
DID CM-004
|
||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
Configuration Audit Agendas are documents that describe particulars with regard to scheduled audit dates, attendance and events during the course of the audit. Audit Agendas are provided in accordance with the requirements of the FCA and PCA Plan (Ref DID CM-003)
|
SDRL CM-004
SOW G.3.7.2, G.3.7.4.2
|
||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
GDLS-C Subcontract Management
|
A/30
|
||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
10 days prior to schedule date of the Configuration Audit.
|
10 days prior to scheduled date of all other FCA/PCA audits
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
Contractor Subcontractor format for the agenda is acceptable; the minimum content of each document is as follows:
|
9.2
|
Audit Agenda: The agenda shall contain as a minimum the following agenda items and reference material:
|
|
a.
|
Audit date, location and a list of attendees
|
|
b.
|
Duration
|
|
c.
|
Daily Chronological listing of events which are to take place.
|
|
d.
|
PCA candidates list shall be provided with the PCA Agendas
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
DID CM-5
|
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
Audit Report
|
DID CM-005
|
||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
A Configuration Audit Report details the results of the audit and is provided in accordance with the requirements of the FCA/PCA Plan.
|
DID DI-CMAN-81022C Configuration Audit Report
SDRL CM-005
SOW G.3.7.4.3
|
||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
GDLS-C Subcontract Management
|
A
|
||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
30 days after successful completion of FCA/PCA
|
As required
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
The contractor shall prepare audit reports in accordance with DI-CMAN-81022C.
|
9.2
|
Contractor format for the agenda and report is acceptable; the minimum content of the audit report is as follows:
|
|
a.
|
Identification of hardware and/or documentation audited
|
|
b.
|
Identification of reference documents used during the conduct of the audit
|
|
c.
|
Identification of the audit agenda
|
|
d.
|
List of personnel involved
|
|
e.
|
Action items identified, responsible individuals assigned to each action item,
|
|
f.
|
Status and schedule date for clearing each action item.
|
9.3
|
Revisions shall be provided until all outstanding FCA/PCA discrepancies are addressed and closed.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
DID CM-6
|
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
Request for Deviation (RFD)
|
DID CM-006
|
||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
A request for deviation describes the proposed(prior to manufacture) departure from configuration documentation for a specific number of units or for a specified period of time. A request for Deviation enables GDLS-C to determine the impact on performance, operational readiness, logistics support, or other affected areas.
|
MIL-HDBK-61A Configuration Management Guideline Section 6.
SDRL CM-006
SOW G.3.5.4
|
||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
GDLS-C Subcontract Management
|
GDLS-C Approval Limitations are:
Critical: 2 Days
Major: 5 Days
Minor: 10 Days
|
||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCy:
|
As Required
|
As Required
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
All classification of RFDs shall be submitted to GDLS-C for approval.
|
9.2
|
Recurring Deviations are discouraged and may result in the submittal of a Class I ECP.
|
9.3
|
RFD content shall be in accordance with MIL-HDBK-61A Table 6-9
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
DID CM-007
|
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
Configuration Status Accounting Reports
|
DID CM-007
|
||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
Configuration Status Accounting Reports document the configuration status (including proposed changes, deviations) of the configuration items and their related documentation
|
SDRL CM-007
SOW Para. G.3.9
|
||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
GDLS-C Subcontract Management
|
N/A
|
||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
10 days prior to PCA or FPI
|
Monthly until 30 days after the last End Product delivery
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
General: The Subcontractor shall provide Configuration Status Accounting Reports which shall include the following:
|
|
a.
|
An ECP index listing the ECPs (number, revision, correction, date raised, title, type, class, status and the Configuration Items (CI), part number and documentation affected.
|
|
b.
|
A Deviation index listing the deviations (number, date raised, title, status and affectivity.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
DID CM-008
|
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
Indented Bill of Material (IBOM)
|
DID CM-008
|
||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
The IBOM defines the Product Baseline of the Equipment/System and shall provide a complete indentured breakdown to individual piece part. Both hardware and software items are to be shown. Amendments to the IBOM shall be required to reflect all approved configuration changes. If there are no changes to the IBOM then the applicable quarterly update is not required.
|
SDRL CM-008
SOW G.3.10
|
||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
GDLS-C Subcontract Management
|
A/10
|
||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
Concurrent with initial delivery of CM-007 CSA/LE-002 Delivery and TDP
|
Monthly concurrent with CM-007 CSA Delivery , LE-002 and / or TDP Updates
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
The IBOM shall as a minimum include the following:
|
|
(a) Cover sheet to include;
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
|
(b)
|
A forward that briefly explains the purpose/intent of the IBOM, followed by: a definition of data elements used in the IBOM; a list of applicable CAGE Codes; and a list of non-standard abbreviations;
|
|
(c)
|
The IBOM shall be a top-down generation breakdown of each System or major equipment.
|
9.3
|
The data shall be in a common data format, preferable Excel or Access. The data shall not be write-protected and shall allow filtering and sorting.
|
9.4
|
Data elements to include in the IBOM are not restricted. The Subcontractor can include any other data elements that are judged necessary as a management tool:
|
|
(a)
|
As a minimum the following data elements are required;
|
|
(b)
|
The following data elements will also be included if available at the time of preparation:
|
9.5
|
The Subcontractor can use any code already in use, but these codes must be explained.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
DID CM-009
|
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) System Spec Verification Matrix
|
DID CM-009
|
||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
The FCA Verification Matrix identifies the method of verification used for compliance to the System Spec Performance. The Matrix shall be used for each FCA.
|
Performance Specification
SDRL CM-009
SOW G.3.7.1.1
|
||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
GDLS-C Subcontract Management
|
A/30
|
||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
FCA verification Matrix Template to be provided with proposal
|
Provided concurrent with each FCA Plan
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
The Subcontractor shall prepare the System Specification Compliance Matrix for System Specification verification. All requirements of the System Specification must be addressed
|
|
b.
|
Item #
|
|
c.
|
Performance Specification
|
|
d.
|
Specification Description
|
|
e.
|
Title of the Specification Section
|
|
f.
|
The method of verification i.e.,
|
|
•
|
Government Test (GT)
|
|
•
|
Subcontractor Test (ST)
|
|
•
|
Subcontractor Demo (Sd)
|
|
•
|
Subcontractor Analysis
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
|
•
|
Inspection/Test (X)
|
|
•
|
Certification (X*)
|
|
Note: Each method may be a separate column
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
DID CM-010
|
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
Technical Data Package (TDP)
|
DID CM-010
|
||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
The TDP comprises the final, baseline, engineering drawings, associated lists and supporting data
|
MIL-STD-31000 Technical Drawing Packages
ASME Y14.100-2004 Engineering Drawing Packages
SDRL CM-010
SOW G.3.8.3
|
||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
GDLS-C Subcontract Management
|
A/10
|
||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
Samples Drawings with proposal (hard copy one soft copy).
60 days after CDR
|
As required, no later than 15 days after ECP approval.
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
The TDP drawings and associated lists and supporting data for the System shall be prepared in accordance with the following:
|
|
a.
|
Existing Drawings will be acceptable if they meet the requirements of MIL-STD- 31000.
|
9.2
|
The TDP should be supplied in digital format. TIF or PDF format are acceptable but must meet 200 dpi minimum resolution.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
9.3
|
The naming convention for the Drawing files being delivered under the SDRL that comprise the TOP shall be mutually agreed agreed before submittal.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
DID CM-004
|
Data Item Descriptions
|
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
CAD Model
|
DID ENG-004
|
||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
The CAD Model shall be generated for the System.
Revisions to the CAD Model shall be required to reflect all configuration changes.
|
SDRL ENG-004
G.4.9.1
|
||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada Corporation Subcontract Management
|
I
|
||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
With Proposal
|
At SFR, PDR, CDR and as required.
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
9.1
|
The subcontractor shall submit a concept design 10 days following the SFR and 10 days prior to PDR and CDR. The CAD model showing the proposed System integration shall form the basis of the design review.
|
9.2
|
The subcontractor shall provide one (1) electronic copy (UG.PRT files to version 18 or earlier) at each revision and/or issue.
|
9.3
|
General. The CAD Model shall, as a minimum, include the following:
|
|
a.
|
The CAD Model shall represent all the elements of the System as defined by the program requirements including Interface Control Document (ICD) information.
|
|
b.
|
The CAD Model shall be a representation of the System in its entirety.
|
|
c.
|
The CAD Model shall indicate the current revision status at each issue under an agreed configuration management regime.
|
9.4
|
The Subcontractor shall deliver, to the GDLS, the CAD Model as follows:
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
|
a.
|
In STEP format compatible with version 18 (or earlier) of UniGraphics engineering software package and Safework human modeling package.
|
|
b.
|
File sizes shall be restricted to TBD.
|
|
c.
|
CAD files shall be delivered on CD or over secure email/web system.
|
9.5
|
Data elements included in the CAD Model are not restricted. The Subcontractor may include other data elements that are judged necessary as a management tool.
|
|
a.
|
As a minimum the following data elements are required;
|
DATA ELEMENT
|
DEFINITION
|
Part Number
|
Part Number;
|
Item Nomenclature
|
Item Nomenclature;
|
Indenture level
|
Breakdown Level ;
|
Revision
|
Revision Level of Document;
|
|
b.
|
The following data elements may be included if available at the time of preparation:
|
|
c.
|
DATA ELEMENT
|
DEFINITION
|
NSN
|
NATO Stock Number;
|
NSCM
|
NATO Supply Code for Manufacturers
|
9.6
|
Subcontractor can use any code already in use, but these codes must be explained.
|
9.7
|
If the Subcontractor has an CAD Model system in place, a copy of the format shall be submitted for GDLS-C approval but shall be compatible with version 18 (or earlier) of the UniGraphics engineering software package.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
|
||||
DID ENG-006
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Drawings
|
DID ENG-006
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERE NCES:
|
|
To provide drawings for review.
|
SDRL ENG-006
|
|||
G.4.7.1, G.4.8.1
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATIO N:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
I
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENC Y
|
|
With Proposal
|
At SFR, PDR, CDR and as required
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
9.1
|
The Subcontractor shall submit preliminary drawings depicting the System in its entirety.Drawings, if preliminary, must include all dimensions, bills of material, material specifications, Interface Control Document (ICD) information, and other engineering notes that would be needed for manufacturing. These drawings shall be available for review with proposal.
|
9.2
|
The subcontractor shall submit a drawing package containing any updates needed since the proposal 10 days prior to a Design Review. The drawing package submitted for the CDR shall be complete and ready for release pending any required changes driven by the CDR. Review of these drawings will form a part of the CDR agenda.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
|
|||||
DID ENG-008
|
|||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
|||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
||
Hazardous Material Management Report
|
DID ENG-008
|
||||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERE NCES:
|
||
To provide report, based on Hazardous Material
|
SDRL ENG-008
|
||||
Management Plan.
|
|||||
SOW G.4.16.2
|
|||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATIO N:
|
||
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/30
|
||||
Corporation Subcontracts Management
|
|||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENC Y:
|
||
30 days after award of contract
|
One/R
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
•
|
All liquids, gases, pastes, powders, gels, aerosols, and many solids.
|
•
|
Any product which generates dust, fumes, fog, vapor, etc. during shipping, storage, handling, production, use or disposal.
|
•
|
Any product which is recommended for use with specific ventilation requirements.
|
•
|
Any material recommended for use with personal protective equipment (PPE).
|
•
|
Any material stored in a pressurized cylinder or container.
|
•
|
Any plating methods that contain hazardous materials
|
•
|
Any radioactive material
|
|
Examples of these products include (but are not limited to):
|
|
(1)
|
Adhesives, Bonding Agents, Glues, Loctites, etc.
|
|
(2)
|
Aerosols
|
|
(3)
|
Castings, Forgings, which are machined on-site
|
|
(4)
|
Cleaners
|
|
(5)
|
Coal
|
|
(6)
|
Compressed Gases
|
|
(7)
|
Construction Steel (e.g. angle iron, flat stock, channel iron, l-beams)
|
|
(8)
|
Coolants
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
(9)
|
Cutting Oils
|
|
(10)
|
Drawing Compounds
|
|
(11)
|
Epoxies
|
|
(12)
|
Flux (soldering flux, welding flux, furnace flux)
|
|
(13)
|
Fuels (gasoline, kerosene, diesel fuel)
|
|
(14)
|
Furnace Refractory Material
|
|
(15)
|
Insulation (e.g. fiberglass)
|
|
(16)
|
Lubricating Oils and Greases
|
|
(17)
|
Metalworking Fluids
|
|
(18)
|
Paint and Related Items (e.g. thinners, varnishes)
|
|
(19)
|
Pesticides
|
|
(20)
|
Plastic Resin
|
|
(21)
|
Sealers
|
|
(22)
|
Shot (for shot peening)
|
|
(23)
|
Soaps
|
|
(24)
|
Solder
|
|
(25)
|
Solvents
|
|
(26)
|
Tapping Compounds
|
|
(27)
|
Welding Rods and Wires
|
|
(28)
|
Plating
|
a)
|
Introduction - Description of the document and its overall status. Basic assemblies require about a paragraph of information.
|
b)
|
Purpose and scope - The scope and goals of the document, and what it will achieveand include, again a paragraph is fine with a basic assembly.
|
a)
|
Overview - the how, what, where, when, and why of their hazardous materials.
|
b)
|
Determination of Hazard or Analysis Methods - this documents how your company determines the level of hazard associated with a material, and methods of determining how a material gets included as a hazardous material.
|
c)
|
Research Methodology - detailed information explaining how parts are captured using your described criteria and how they are controlled or tracked.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
d)
|
Results of Analysis – As a result of a hazardous materials analysis, summary tables are to be included in this report. For each part/item identified as hazardous, the following information shall also be included:
|
|
•
|
The part number you are detailing to include, were applicable, both your companies number and the GM part number
|
•
|
The Nomenclature of that part
|
•
|
The Hazardous Material component for that part
|
•
|
Its application in the completed assembly
|
•
|
If the material poses a serious threat to human health or the environment, indicate whether or not there is an alternate material option for that part/application
|
•
|
Where applicable the Variant for which the part is being supplied
|
(i)
|
Construction Materials – Consumables. These would be materials that once used to assemble the system would not require to be reapplied in the future and would have no adverse effects on human/environmental health after delivery.
|
(ii)
|
Maintenance Materials – Consumables. These would be materials that would be required for the ongoing maintenance of the vehicle, and therefor may come in contact with personnel in its reapplication during maintenance or repair.
|
(iii)
|
Construction Materials – Persistent. These are materials that once applied will remain hazardous and present throughout the life of the part/assembly/vehicle, and may cause adverse health effects through release or exposure into the environment whether it is during operation or disposal.
|
a)
|
Documentation – Any reference materials used in the creation of the report
|
b)
|
List of Abbreviation – Where not clear in the document, or where there are large numbers of Abb. a list can be included
|
c)
|
Anything else as required.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID ENG-011
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Human Factors Data Report
|
DID ENG 011
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To support General Dynamics Land Systems-
|
SDRL ENG-011
|
|||
Canada Corporation (GDLS-C) HFE Program
|
SOW G.4.17.2
|
|||
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/30
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
5 days before General Dynamics Land Systems-
|
Final due 20 days before General
|
|||
Canada Corporation SFR
|
Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
|||
Corporation PDR
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
a)
|
The purpose and intended use of the system.
|
b)
|
A brief historical summary of system development.
|
c)
|
A brief description of the system and its components. Include name, type, model number, and general physical characteristics of the overall system and its major subsystems and components.
|
d)
|
A brief description of all human factors features associated with the system.
|
e)
|
As applicable, either photos, charts, flow/functional diagrams, sketches, orschematics to support the system description, task, or operation. Human Factors Data. This section shall include the following:
|
a)
|
Summarize the task description & analysis of activities performed by each
|
b)
|
Summarize the type and frequency of interaction with each man-machine interface during normal operation
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
c)
|
Summarize the workload analysis for each operator during normal operation
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
|
||||
DID ENG-012
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Safety Assessment Report
|
DID ENG-012
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
The SAR is a comprehensive evaluation of the
safety risks being assumed at contract completion. It identifies all safety features of the system, design and procedural hazards that may be present in the system being acquired, and specific procedural controls and precautions that should be followed.
|
Task 301 of MIL-STD-882 C
SOW G.4.18.2, G.4.18.3
|
|||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/30
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
5 days before General Dynamics Land Systems-
|
Final due 20 days before General
|
|||
Canada Corporation SFR
|
Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
|||
Corporation PDR
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
a)
|
The purpose and intended use of the system.
|
b)
|
A brief historical summary of system development.
|
c)
|
A brief description of the system and its components. Include name, type, model number, and general physical characteristics of the overall system and its major subsystems and components.
|
d)
|
As applicable, a description of any other system(s) which will be tested or operated in combination with this system.
|
e)
|
As applicable, either photos, charts, flow/functional diagrams, sketches, or schematics to support the system description, task, or operation.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
a)
|
Briefly describe or reference the procedures for operating the system. Discuss the safety design features and controls incorporated into the system as they relate to the operating procedures.
|
b)
|
Describe any special safety operational procedures needed to ensure safe operations, including emergency procedures.
|
c)
|
Describe anticipated operating environments, and any specific skills required forsafe operation, maintenance, and disposal.
|
d)
|
Describe any special facility requirements or personal equipment to support the system.
|
a)
|
Briefly summarize or reference the safety criteria and methodology used to classify and rank hazardous conditions.
|
b)
|
Describe or reference analyses and tests performed to identify hazardousconditions inherent in the system.
|
c)
|
List all hazards that have been identified and considered from the inception of the program in an appendix to this SAR. The list should be broken down to the subsystem or major component level.
|
d)
|
Discuss the hazards and the actions that have been taken to eliminate or control these hazards.
|
e)
|
Discuss the effects of these controls on the probability of occurrence and severitylevel of the potential mishaps.
|
f)
|
Discuss or reference results of tests conducted to validate safety criteria requirements and analyses.
|
a)
|
Include a short assessment of the results of the safety program efforts. Include a list of all significant hazards along with specific safety recommendations or precautions required to ensure the safety of personnel and property. Categorize the list of hazards as to whether or not they may be expected under normal or abnormal operating conditions.
|
b)
|
For all hazardous materials generated by or used in the system, the followinginformation shall be included:
|
•
|
Material identification as to type, quantity, and potential hazards.
|
•
|
Safety precautions and procedures necessary during use, storage, transportation, and disposal.
|
•
|
A copy of the Material Safety Data Sheet (or equivalent)
|
c)
|
Conclude with a statement signed by the Contractor System Safety Manager and the Contractor Program Manager stating that all identified hazards have been eliminated or controlled and that the system is ready to operate. In addition, the contractor shall make recommendations applicable to the safe interface
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
|
||||
DID ENG-013
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Qualification Matrix
|
DID ENG-013
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERE NCES:
|
|
To provide a Qualification Matrix to all sections
|
Performance Specification
|
|||
within the Performance Specification
|
||||
SOW G.4.11.2, G.4.12.2, G.4.13.2,
|
||||
G.4.15.1,
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A30
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
With Proposal
|
As Required
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
9.1
|
The subcontractor shall provide a Qualification Matrix indicating current compliance as well as planned and completed qualification activities for each requirement of the Performance Specification.
|
9.2
|
Initial delivery shall include requirement qualification assessment as well as any planned dates available. PDR delivery shall include updated qualification assessment, qualification plan document references, planned qualification dates, planned qualification report submittal dates, as well as any completed qualification data. CDR delivery shall include updated qualification assessment, and qualification results and report references.
|
9.3
|
All qualification activities required during the QUAL Phase shall be planned for completion prior to CDR.
|
9.4
|
The subcontractor shall provide an electronic copy of the qualification Matrix (inMicrosoft Office compatible format).
|
9.5
|
The format of the Qualification Matrix shall be as follows:
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID ENG-013 Engineering Qualification Matrix - "Project Name"
|
Date: | Rev: | ||||||||||
Performance Specification Para. Ref.
|
Requirement
Description
|
Verification
Phase
|
Method of
Verification
|
Subcontractor
Verification Plan/Procedure Document (Rev./date)
|
Planned Verification Date
|
Verifcation
Location
|
Planned Verification Report Submittal Date
|
Subcontractor
Verification Report Document (Rev./Date)
|
Compliance
|
Discrepancy, Actions or Comments
|
Actionee
|
Status
(Open/Closed)
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID ENG-14
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Design Review Presentation Material
|
DID ENG-014
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERE NCES:
|
|
To provide advanced copies of presentation
|
SDRL ENG-014
|
|||
material for review at SFR, PDR and CDR.
|
SOW G.4.11.3, G.4.12.3, G.4.13.3
|
|||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
I
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
5 days prior to SFR
|
At PDR, CDR and as req uired
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
9.1
|
The subcontractor shall submit advanced copies of all presentation material to be reviewed at each design review (SFR, PDR & CDR), five (5) days prior to each design review.
|
9.2
|
One (1) electronic version of the presentation material shall be delivered in a format that will be used at each design review (ie. Microsoft PowerPoint, Word, etc.).
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID ENG-015
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Report
|
DID ENG-015
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERE NCES:
|
|
To provide advanced copies of FEA presentation
|
SDRL ENG-015
|
|||
material for review at PDR and CDR.
|
||||
SOW G.4.19.1
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
I
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
Ten (10) days prior to PDR
|
Ten (10) days prior to CDR and as
|
|||
required
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
9.1
|
The subcontractor shall submit a report which summarizes the FEA analysis which has been performed on the system, to be reviewed at each design review (PDR & CDR), ten (10) days prior to each design review. The report shall outline the cases performed as well as the results of the analysis.
|
9.2
|
One (1) electronic version of the presentation material shall be delivered in a format that will be used at each design review (ie. Microsoft PowerPoint, Word, etc.).
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
|
||||
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Qualification Test Plan
|
DID ENG-017
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To provide Qualification plans for each
|
Performance Specificatio n
|
|||
requirement of the Performance Specification
|
||||
SOW G.4.15.2
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/30
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
4 MAC
|
As Required
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
9.1
|
Documented plans and/or procedures shall be provided to address each requirement of the Performance Specification (Analysis excepted) (Reference Qualification Matrix). For inspections and demonstrations, the proposed checklist or report format shall be submitted. For tests, the detailed plan or procedure shall be submitted. The Qualification Matrix (DID-ENG-013) shall be updated with specific qualification dates, locations, plan/procedure ref. numbers, and planned report submittal dates and submitted with DID-ENG-017.
|
9.2
|
The subcontractor shall provide electronic copies of the Qualification Plans (in MicrosoftOffice compatible format).
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID ENG-018
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Qualification Test Report
|
DID ENG-018
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To provide a qualification report to show
|
Performance Specificatio n
|
|||
compliance to each requirement of the
|
SOW G.4.15.3
|
|||
Performance Specification (Refer to Qualification
|
||||
Test Matrix)
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/15
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
4MAC
|
As Required, as stated in DID ENG-
|
|||
013 Submittals.
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
9.1
|
The Subcontractor shall submit a formal Qualification Test Report to include objective evidence and fully document the results of each qualification activity specified by the Performance Specification (Reference Qualification Matrix). For Analysis, reports must completely address all details of the specific requirement. The Qualification Matrix (DID- ENG-013) shall be updated with relevant report references and qualification results and submitted with ENG-018.
|
9.2
|
The Subcontractor shall provide electronic copies of the Qualification Reports (in Microsoft Office compatible format) in Subcontractor format.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID QA-001
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Quality Assurance Plan
|
||||
DID QA-001
|
||||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
The purpose of the plan is to address the Quality
|
SOW G.5.2.1, G.5.5
|
|||
System requirements and will describe the
|
||||
management and control of the supplies to be
|
||||
delivered under the contract. The Quality Plan
|
||||
shall be written to assist GDLS-C with Contract
|
||||
quality audit and surveillance activities.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/30
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
Due with proposal
|
N/A
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
The Quality Plan shall be in the supplier’s own format. ISO 9000 should be used for guidance in developing this plan.
|
9.2
|
The Quality Plan shall identify key appointments, responsibilities and functional relationships to ensure the quality management of the contract.
|
9.3
|
The Quality Plan shall describe in detail the quality relationship, responsibilities and authorities between the supplier and GDLS-C.
|
9.4
|
The Quality Plan shall define the proposed procedures for ensuring conformance of supplies with the specified requirements and in compliance with specified quality standard.
|
9.5
|
The Quality Plan shall describe the method for amendment and how changes to theQuality Management System will be reflected into the Quality Plan.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
9.6
|
The Quality Plan shall address the schedule and timing of quality assurance activities for the contract, including, but not limited to quality system audits, and functional/ physical configuration audits and delivery and inspection of product.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID QA-2
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Quality Assurance Inspection Test Plan
|
DID QA-002
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To define the Inspection and Testing activities to
|
SOW G.5.6.1
|
|||
be carried out during the manufacturing of the
|
||||
parts detailed in this subcontract.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/15
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
Due with proposal
|
Any changes to Technical Data
|
|||
Package require a minimum of 7-days
|
||||
notification to GDLS-C in advance of
|
||||
execution.
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
The Inspection and Test Plan shall be in the supplier’s own format.
|
9.2
|
The Inspection and Test Plan shall detail all Inspection and Testing activities within the assembly process.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID QA-3
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
DID QA-003
|
||||
Supplier / Subcontractor Evaluation & Approval
|
||||
Survey
|
||||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To provide a formal test plan for each First Article
|
SOW G.5.7.1
|
|||
verification requirement.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/15
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
With Proposal
|
N/A
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1.
|
The Subcontractor shall complete and return a copy of GDLS-C Form 4615.
|
9.2.
|
The Subcontractor shall support a QA site visit / audit prior to start of production build.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID QA-4
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
First Piece Inspection
|
DID QA-004
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To define the required manufacturing
|
SOW G.5.3.1
|
|||
qualification and certification
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/15
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
Initial Delivery Date due 14 days prior to first
|
Any changes to the Technical Data
|
|||
shipment of production material.
|
Package, tooling and/or FPI
|
|||
information during the length of the
|
||||
subcontract require a minimum of 7-
|
||||
days notification to GDLS-C in
|
||||
advance of execution.
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
Reference Procurement Quality Assurance Handbook - PQA3000. The PQA Handbook is available at the following internet address: http://procurement.gdls.com/, Quality Instructions, Quality Instructions, Procurement Quality Assurance Handbook for exact FPI requirements.
|
9.2
|
Product samples and complete supporting data are reviewed at Contractor's manufacturing location.
|
9.3
|
The Quality Assurance requirements of this subcontract will be managed byGDLS Supplier Quality Assurance based in Sterling Heights, Michigan, USA.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID QA-5
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
First Article Test Plan.
|
DID QA-005
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To provide a formal test plan for each First Article
|
SOW G.5.4.1
|
|||
verification requirement.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/30
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
30 days prior to First Article production.
|
As Required.
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
A documented plan must be developed describing how the contractor will complete each First Article verification requirement detailed in the System Specification. The plan must completely address all the specific details of each qualification requirement. The plan must include verification dates and locations. GDLS-C shall review and determine plan approval. The Subcontractor shall not proceed with execution of the plan until GDLS-C approval has been given.
|
9.2
|
The Subcontractor shall provide two final hardcopies, and one final electronic copy (in MicrosoftOffice compatible file formats).
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID QA-6
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Acceptance Test Plan
|
DID QA-006
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To provide a formal test plan
|
SOW G.5.8.1
|
|||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/7
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
14 days prior to delivery.
|
As Required.
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1.
|
The Subcontractor shall develop and submit an Acceptance Test Plan (ATP) inSubcontractor format.
|
9.2.
|
The ATP shall test all critical characteristics of material function to the production released technical data package.
|
9.3.
|
The Subcontractor will submit each unit to the ATP they have developed and submit the results with each shipment for GDLS-C review.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID QA-7
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Acceptance Test Report
|
DID QA-007
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERE NCES:
|
|
To provide a formal report detailing the results of First
|
SOW G.5.8.1
|
|||
Article verification.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATIO N:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/30
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
1 week prior to Final Acceptance of First Article
|
N/A
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
A formal report shall be submitted that fully details the results of the verification of the Acceptance requirements detailed in ATP. The report shall sufficiently detail compliance in accordance with the approved Acceptance Test Plan (DID QA-006). GDLS-C shall review and determine approval prior to Final Acceptance of the product.
|
9.2
|
The Subcontractor shall provide one electronic copy (in Microsoft Office compatible file formats).
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID QA-008
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
First Article Test Report
|
DID QA-008
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To provide a formal report detailing the results of First
|
SOW G.5.4.2
|
|||
Article verification.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/30
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY:
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY:
|
|
1 week prior to Final Acceptance of First Article
|
N/A
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
|
9.1
|
A formal report shall be submitted that fully details the results of the verification of the First Article requirements detailed in the Subcontract Specification. The report shall sufficiently detail compliance in accordance with the approved First Article Test Plan (DID QA-004). GDLS-C shall review and determine approval prior to Final Acceptance of the product. The subcontractor shall not proceed with product shipment until GDLS-C approval has been given.
|
9.2
|
The Subcontractor shall provide one electronic copy (in Microsoft Office compatible file formats).
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID LE-001
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Supportability Technical Data Request
|
DID LE-001
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
Provides necessary data for GDLS-C to
|
SDRL LE-001
|
|||
perform trade-off analysis against other
|
|
|||
potential suppliers
|
SOW G.7.1
|
|||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/5
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
Provide response to following survey with
|
One/R
|
|||
RFP submittal
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
Id# |
Requirement/Question
|
Y/N | Supporting Detail |
1
|
Is your product repairable?
|
If No – Please explain why the item is not
repairable.
|
|
2
|
If Yes to 1, is it repairable by a facility
other than your own company
|
If No – Please explain why the item is not
repairable by GDLSC or the end user.
|
|
3
|
Do you currently have an indented Bill
of Material for the item?
|
If Yes – Please provide the BOM. Also identify
which down components can be purchased (spares) to support the repair policy with their price and estimated lead time.
|
|
4
|
Do you have Failure Rate / Reliability
Predictions for the item?
|
If Yes – Please provide the system/item level
failure rate/reliability prediction. Please identify the source of your failure rate/reliability prediction (i.e. engineering estimate, testing, data from fielded units, warranty claims, etc).
|
|
5
|
Do you have Life Cycle Cost estimates for the item?
|
If Yes - Please provide LCC analysis estimates,
as well as the assumed conditions under which the LCC prediction is based upon (for example assumptions related to Level of Repair, task frequency, failure rates, etc).
|
|
6
|
Do you have technical
manuals/publications for the item?
|
If Yes – Please identify if the manuals are military
specification or commercial manuals. Also list the manuals that you have available (i.e. operation, maintenance, overhaul, troubleshooting,
illustrated parts list, etc).
If No – If you were awarded this subcontract, how many months after award of contract would manuals be available?
|
|
7
|
If Yes to 6, can you provide a copy of your technical manuals for GDLSC to
determine if they are suitable for use by the end user?
|
||
8
|
Do you have 2D or 3D illustrations
that are available to assist GDLSC in the creation of military standard publications?
|
If Yes - Please provide details as to the
format of the files (2D vs. 3D, Unigraphics, Pro-E, Adobe Illustrator, EPS, CGM, etc).
If No – Do you have hardcopy illustrations that
you can provide for GDLS-C reference/use when developing technical manuals?
|
|
9
|
Does your product require special
tools to install/remove, repair, or test?
|
If Yes – If available, please provide a list of
special tools, lifting devices, fixtures, diagnostic equipment, etc. required to maintain the product. If available, prices would be preferred for the tools.
|
|
10
|
Do you offer training with respect to
the operation and maintenance of the product?
|
If Yes – Please provide details as to the
min/max class size, duration, location, and any pre-requisites required for the training.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID LE-002
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Indented Engineering Bill of Materials
|
DID LE-002
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
The indented EBOM allows the Logistics
|
SDRL LE-002
|
|||
Engineering to structure the supportability
|
||||
data consistent with the engineering
|
SOW G.7.2
|
|||
documentation and allows early
|
||||
maintenance planning.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
Approval Required – 5 Da ys
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
10 Days prior to PDR
|
Final 10 Days prior to CD R, and
|
|||
PCA. 30 days after ECP approval.
|
a.
|
Indenture code (numeric or alphabetic);
|
b.
|
Find Number of the part
|
c.
|
Part number
|
d.
|
Part description
|
e.
|
Quantity per assembly
|
f.
|
Nato Stock Number (NSN) if available
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID LE-003
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Technical Data Package
|
DID LE-003
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
The TDP allows the Logistics Engineering
|
SDRL LE-003
|
|||
to structure the supportability data
|
||||
consistent with the engineering
|
SOW G.7.3
|
|||
documentation.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATIO N:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-
|
A/5
|
|||
Canada Corporation Subcontract
|
||||
Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
10 Days prior PDR for existing TDP and
|
30 Days post CDR
|
|||
SPTD
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
1.
|
Provide SPTD down to the Lowest Repairable Unit (LRU) / Shop Replaceable Unit (SRA). SPTD also encompasses consumables, bulk items, special tools and test equipment, as well as all applicable kits.
|
2.
|
The SPTD shall provide the following:
|
a.
|
Technical identification of items for maintenance support considerations.
|
b.
|
Alternate sources of supply, if available.
|
3.
|
The SPTD is required in the following order of preference:
|
a.
|
Government or recognized industry specifications or standards.
|
b.
|
Engineering Drawings.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
c.
|
Commercial catalogues or catalogue descriptions.
|
d.
|
Sketches or photographs with brief descriptions of dimensional, material, mechanical, electrical or other descriptive characteristics. When sketches orphotographs are provided for an assembly, a parts list shall be provided.
|
4.
|
All drawings shall be provided to GDLS-C electronically on a CD in a commercially available electronic Adobe Acrobat PDF file. Each drawing shall be submitted as a separate file using the part number as the file name. Text on all documentation shall be in the English language.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID LE-4
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
List of Spare Parts
|
DID LE-004
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
Defines the List of Spare Parts required to
|
SDRL LE-004
|
|||
support the product.
|
SOW G.7.4
|
|||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/30
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
10 Days prior to PDR
|
30 Days post CDR
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
9.1
|
The Indented List of Spare Parts shall be prepared in contractor format and provided in electronic format. The data shall be prepared in Microsoft Excel spreadsheet format, with the following columns for each item listed and each item in a separate row:
|
a.
|
Part Number
|
b.
|
Description
|
c.
|
Type of Part – Identify whether hardware, consumable or repair part d.Price
|
e.
|
Lead Time
|
f.
|
NSN if available
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID LE-5
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Technical Publications
|
DID LE-005
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To provide technical data for the General
|
SDRL LE-005
|
|||
Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
||||
Corporation to support technical
|
SOW G.7.5
|
|||
publications.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-
|
A/5
|
|||
Canada Corporation Subcontract
|
||||
Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
10 Days prior to PDR
|
30 Days post CDR
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
9.1
|
The Technical Publications shall be provided in contractor format if not military standard.One electronic copy and one hardcopy shall be provided. The data shall be in MS Word or SGML/XML format as available. The material shall meet the following requirements:
|
a.
|
Written in the English language.
|
b.
|
Existing commercial or military standard.
|
c.
|
The Manuals shall cover the depth of maintenance supported by the procurable parts.
|
d.
|
Include a written copyright release for GDLS-C to use the data in thedevelopment of technical manuals for the end user.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID LE-6
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Technical Illustrations
|
DID LE-006
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To provide technical data for the General
|
SDRL LE-006
|
|||
Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
||||
Corporation to support technical
|
SOW G.7.6
|
|||
illustrations.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/10
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
30 Days post CDR
|
One/R
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
9.1
|
The parts illustrations shall be provided in electronic medium and be delivered in one of the following formats listed in the order of preferred submission:
|
a.
|
Files provided in Unigraphics (UG) in part file format or Pro-E in Step file format
|
b.
|
Files provided in Adobe Illustrator format, .eps (isometric view orientation)
|
c.
|
Files provided as .cgm (Computer Graphics Matafile), (isometric view orientation)
|
d.
|
Files provided in AutoTrol in .ps (postscript) format (isometric vieworientation)
|
e.
|
Illustration developed using CAD applications shall be provide in .dxf format(isometric view orientation).
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID LE-7
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Support Equipment List
|
DID LE-007
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
Provides necessary data in order to write
|
SDRL LE-007
|
|||
maintenance tasks and communicate with
|
||||
customer on maintenance concept.
|
SOW G.7.7
|
|||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/5
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
10 days prior PDR
|
10 days post CDR
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
1.
|
Part Number and CAGE Code
|
2.
|
Nomenclature / Description
|
3.
|
NSN (if available)
|
4.
|
Shelf Life (If applicable)
|
5.
|
Unit of Measure
|
6.
|
Unit of Issue
|
7.
|
Price
|
8.
|
Suggested Quantity (if applicable)
|
9.
|
Drawings if available
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID LE-008
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Reliability and Maintainability Support Data
|
DID LE-008
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To provide technical data for the General
|
SDRL LE-008
|
|||
Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
||||
Corporation to conduct LCC/LORA analysis
|
SOW G.7.10
|
|||
for equipment supportability evaluation and
|
||||
maintenance plan development.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/5
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
10 Days prior to PDR
|
10 Days prior to CDR
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
1.
|
Support Data File: The data shall be prepared in Microsoft Excel 2003 (.xls) format, with the following columns and each item listed in a separate row.
|
•
|
Item cage code
|
•
|
Item part number
|
•
|
Item name
|
•
|
Quantity per next higher assembly
|
•
|
Item indenture code (top assy = 1, sub assy = 2, etc.)
|
•
|
Failure rate (Mean time between failures in hours)
|
•
|
Mission critical failure rate (Mean time between mission failures in hours)
|
•
|
Duty cycle (percentage of time item is in use relative to top assembly)
|
•
|
Condemnation rate (percentage of time that item failure results in discard of the item)
|
•
|
Scheduled maintenance hours per year
|
•
|
Training hours per year for scheduled and unscheduled maintenance
|
•
|
Weight (lb)
|
•
|
Volume: Height (in.), Length (in.), Width (in.)
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
•
|
Shelf life (N if no, if yes, provide duration in months)
|
•
|
Procurement lead time (duration in months)
|
•
|
Currency (indicate the currency the costs are provided in)
|
•
|
Cost (budgetary pricing, not a firm fixed price)
|
•
|
Lot size (applicable for each cost provided)
|
•
|
Repair material cost (average cost of repair parts if DoD was to repair the item)
|
•
|
Contractor repair cost (average cost for contractor repair of the item)
|
•
|
Support & test equipment costs (cost of all common and peculiar equipment)
|
•
|
Diagnostic software costs (costs to develop software used on support and test equipment)
|
2.
|
Reliability Prediction - The subcontractor shall also provide an upper level reliability prediction for the system/assembly in question. GDLSC must use this number to determine performance to allocation and to determine vehicle level reliability.
|
3.
|
Preventative Maintenance – If available, the subcontractor shall provide their preventative maintenance procedures and schedule for the system.
|
4.
|
Dangers, Warnings, Cautions – The subcontractor shall provide a document summarizing all the applicable dangers, warnings, and cautions that an operator and/or maintainer would need to know before using or performing maintenance on the system/assembly in question. Particular attention shall be given to any mode of failure or type of maintenance that could cause severe injury and/or loss of life.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID LE-009
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Diagnostic Support Data
|
DID LE-009
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
To provide technical data for the General
|
SDRL LE-009
|
|||
Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
||||
Corporation to develop efficient and accurate
|
SOW G.7.11
|
|||
troubleshooting procedures.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/10
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
10 Days prior to CDR
|
30 days post CDR
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
•
|
Fault indication method.
|
o
|
Indicator light, hard wired line to OEM indicator
|
o
|
Text display, flash codes, network broadcast.
|
•
|
List of all messages. For each message provide:
|
o
|
Method of indication to user of existence.
|
o
|
Name of message
|
o
|
Type of message
|
§
|
Text message
|
§
|
Fault or diagnostic code
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
o
|
Method of detection
|
§
|
Power On Built In Test
|
§
|
Initiated Built In Test
|
§
|
Continuous Built In Test
|
§
|
Other method of detection.
|
o
|
Troubleshooting procedure for fault isolation to a single Line Replaceable Unit or Shop Replaceable Unit. Supporting material may be in the form of technical manuals, written procedures or flow chart procedures.
|
o
|
When applicable list which network message Is broadcast on.
|
•
|
When system supports network broadcast of messages indicate applicable standards and exceptions to standards.
|
9.c
|
When special tools are required for reading diagnostic codes provide the following:
|
•
|
Part number, CAGE code, Nomenclature / description, NSN if available, Price, Technical manual ordering information.
|
9.d
|
Provide schematic and/or functional block diagram of systems suitable for troubleshooting the system.
|
9.e
|
Technical Support
|
•
|
On going technical support shall be required via phone or email to support GDLS-C development of the troubleshooting procedures.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID OM-001
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Obsolescence Management Plan
|
DID OM-001
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
The Obsolescence Management Plan shall
|
SDRL OM-001
|
|||
provide details on how the Subcontractor
|
||||
plans to manage obsolescence issues over
|
SOW G.8.2
|
|||
the next ten (10) years.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
I
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
With Proposal
|
1 MAC, As Required
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID OM-002
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Obsolescence Management Candidates
|
DID OM-002
|
|||
List
|
||||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
The Obsolescence Management
|
SDRL OM-002
|
|||
Candidates List shall specify the Equipment
|
||||
components that are considered to be
|
SOW G.8.3
|
|||
critical to the availability or serviceability of
|
||||
the Equipment.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/15
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
With Proposal
|
Quarterly (with DID OM-0 03)
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
9.1
|
The Obsolescence Management Candidates List shall specify the Subcontractor Equipment components that are most at risk of becoming obsolete, are considered to be critical to the availability or serviceability of the vehicle, or if no longer available, would cause a mission failure.
|
9.2
|
The Obsolescence Management Candidates List shall be prepared in Subcontractor’s format. As a minimum, the following information shall be provided for each part on the Obsolescence Management Candidates List:
|
a.
|
NATO Stock Number;
|
b.
|
Subcontractor Part Number;
|
c.
|
GDLS-C Part Number, where available d. Nomenclature;
|
e.
|
Manufacturer; and
|
f.
|
Any other information that is deemed to be critical to the identification of the part.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
9.3
|
The OM Candidates List must be scaled by level of criticality. The method of scaling is inSubcontractor format, but must include the following categories:
|
1.
|
The component is available from multiple manufacturing sources and is at no risk.
|
2.
|
There is only one active manufacturing source and the component is at high risk.
|
3.
|
The component has only one active manufacturer and this manufacturer intends on discontinuing the product within the next 12 months.
|
4.
|
The component is at the end of its life cycle and will not be manufactured now or in the near future.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section G, Annex G3 - DIDs
Rev NR
|
DID OM-003
|
||||
Data Item Descriptions
|
||||
1.
|
TITLE:
|
2.
|
IDENTIFICATION NO.:
|
|
Obsolescence Management Issues Report
|
DID OM-003
|
|||
3.
|
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE:
|
4.
|
APPLICABLE REFERENCES:
|
|
The Obsolescence Management Issues Report
|
SDRL OM-003
|
|||
shall outline the specifics of a pending issue for
|
||||
those component parts that represent the most
|
SOW G.8.4
|
|||
significant risk in terms of obsolescence.
|
||||
5.
|
TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
|
6.
|
APPROVAL LIMITATION:
|
|
General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada
|
A/15
|
|||
Corporation Subcontract Management
|
||||
7.
|
INITIAL DELIVERY
|
8.
|
REVISIONS/FREQUENCY
|
|
With Proposal
|
Quarterly (with DID OM-0 02)
|
9.
|
PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
|
9.1
|
The OM Issues Report shall outline the specifics of a pending issue for all high-risk LRUs or component parts. A component shall be considered to be high risk if it is on the Obsolescence Management Candidates List and/or it will become obsolete within one year or less. The OM Issues Report shall be prepared in Subcontractor’s format and shall be delivered to GDLS-C in accordance with the Issue Date given in Section 4 above and will provide supporting data and recommendations as follows:
|
a.
|
A detailed description of the industry development leading to the obsolescence and the impact this will have on Equipment supportability and/or availability.
|
b.
|
In most cases, a minimum of three (3) options outlined below and their analysis will be considered. When the Subcontractor considers that option i. or ii. Is the best option and that option iii. would require considerable effort to develop or would cause unnecessary delay in the submission of the OM Issues Report, the Subcontractor shall only submit options i. and ii. with the initial OM Issues Report. Option iii. will be implemented and fully explored only as and when required by GDLS-C. The analysis shall include, as appropriate, for each option the impact on all ILS elements as referenced in GDLS-C Form 4525 B (Supportability Requirements Form), including the impact on support equipment and the impact to spares and R&O (if applicable), and an estimated cost of each option. The three (3) options for the analysis are:
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
|
Subcontract PO 35334144
Section A
Rev 03/10/2011
|
i.
|
A life-time buy or a buy for a specified duration of support;
|
ii.
|
A new source for the item; and
|
iii.
|
Redesign or replace the obsolete item with a similar or enhanced item.
|
|
c.
|
The impact of the obsolescence on enhancements to the system under study;
|
|
d.
|
The time by which the decision is imperative; and
|
|
e.
|
The Subcontractor’s recommendation.
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Model Subcontract
Section G, Annex G4
Rev NR
|
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
GREEN - G
|
ARTIFACT MEETS EXPECTATION-PROCEED.
|
||||||||
YELLOW - Y
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - PROCEED WITH ACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
RED - R
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - DO NOT PROCEED, UNACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
BLACK - B
|
NOT APPLICABLE. (MUST IDENTIFY RATIONALE)
|
||||||||
#
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP US
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP GDLS-C
|
CHECKLIST ITEM
|
Artifact Description / Expectations
|
STATUS
(COLOR CODE)
|
ASSIGNEE
|
ARTIFACT
LOCATION
|
ACTION
ID
|
STATUS
COMMENTS
|
1
|
PEM
|
PE/SE
|
Updated Integrated Master Schedule
|
Integrated Master Schedule / Project Schedule
|
|||||
2
|
SE
|
PE/SE
|
Technical Performance Measures
(TPM) Assessment
|
TPM Assessment and supporting analysis for each
|
|||||
3
|
SE (REQT)
|
PE/SE
|
Updated System Level
Requirements
|
List of modified or updated requirements post SRR System Performance Specification
Requirements Workbook (GDLS-C
Requirements Bi-Directional Traceability matrix/report with system and subsystem
Spec Tree with system and subsystem
|
|||||
4
|
SE/SSE
|
PE/SE/DE
|
System Requirements Decomposed and Allocated to Subsystem Performance Specification(SSPS)
|
Subsystem Performance Specifications (SSPS) baselined including functions, performance, constraints, weight, power, thermal, reliability, affordability, maintainability, transportability, survivability, lethality, mobility, safety, and C4ISR allocations
|
|||||
5
|
SE (REQT)
|
PE/SE
|
Requirements Compliance Matrix
|
System compliance matrix summary tables showing compliance with supporting analyses
Corrective action plans for noncompliant requirements
|
|||||
6
|
SE (REQT)
|
PE/SE
|
Verification Plan
|
Design Verification Plan and Report (DVP&R) at the System level.
|
|||||
7
|
SE/SSE
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Structured Decisions of Alternative
System Concepts
|
Trade study list
Trade study /major decisions summary, showing options and outcome
Subsystem concepts
Structured decision records
|
|||||
8
|
SE (PA)
|
DE
|
Physical Architecture Assembly Models (PA_ASM) -Space Claim allocations
|
System Concept defined and baselined (PA_ASM models representing subsystem space allocations excluding distributed systems and structural interfaces.)
|
|||||
9
|
SE (PA)
|
DE
|
System level Interference analysis
|
System to subsystem interference analysis complete, documented with corrective action plans identified.
|
|||||
10
|
SE (FA)
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Functional Analysis / Architecture
|
Function Flow Block Diagrams (FFBD) at Subsystem level
State/Mode Diagrams Sequence Diagrams Use Cases
|
|||||
11
|
SE/SSE
|
PE/SE
|
Electrical & Mechanical Power, and
Signal Architecture
|
System Architecture Diagram
Power list
Signal list
|
|||||
12
|
SE (SA)
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Interface Management
|
Subsystem Interface Control Documents (ICDs)
|
|||||
13
|
SE (PA)
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Product Structure/ Engineering Bill of
Materials (EBOM)
|
EBOM representing Product Structure, released, down to the installation level.
|
|||||
14
|
SE
|
LE
|
Reliability Analysis
|
System/Subsystem boundary/block diagram
|
|||||
15
|
SE
|
SE
|
Design Assessments
|
Safety Assessment
Human Factors Engineernig (HFE) Assessment
|
|||||
16
|
SE
|
PE/SE
|
Design to Cost (DtC) Assessments
|
Average Unit Production Cost (AUPC) Initial Estimate
|
|||||
17
|
LOG
|
LE
|
Logistics
|
Maintainability/Supportability Assessment
|
|||||
18
|
SE
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Identified System/Subsystem Level
Risks / Issues
|
Risk registers
Risk mitigation plans
|
|||||
19
|
SSE
|
SE
|
Software
|
Software Development Plan (SDP)
|
|||||
20
|
SE
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Integrated Design Assessmen
|
Completed Integrated Design Assessmen
|
GREEN - G
|
ARTIFACT MEETS EXPECTATION-PROCEED.
|
||||||||
YELLOW - Y
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - PROCEED WITH ACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
RED - R
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - DO NOT PROCEED, UNACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
BLACK - B
|
NOT APPLICABLE. (MUST IDENTIFY RATIONALE)
|
||||||||
#
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP US
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP GDLS-C
|
CHECKLIST ITEM
|
Artifact Description / Expectations
|
STATUS
(COLOR CODE)
|
ASSIGNEE
|
ARTIFACT
LOCATION
|
ACTION
ID
|
STATUS
COMMENTS
|
Approval of this Checkpoint Review documents the review team agreement that the design is self consistent, non- conflicting and mutually executable with issues and risks identified and quantified such that the team supports the gate decision. (sign/date)
|
GREEN - G
|
ARTIFACT MEETS EXPECTATION-PROCEED.
|
||||||||
YELLOW - Y
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - PROCEED WITH ACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
RED - R
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - DO NOT PROCEED, UNACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
BLACK - B
|
NOT APPLICABLE. (MUST IDENTIFY RATIONALE)
|
||||||||
#
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP US
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP GDLS-C
|
CHECKLIST ITEM
|
Artifact Description / Expectations
|
STATUS
(COLOR CODE)
|
ASSIGNEE
|
ARTIFACT
LOCATION
|
ACTION
ID
|
STATUS
COMMENTS
|
1
|
PEM
|
PE/SE
|
Updated Integrated Master Schedule
|
Integrated Master Schedule / Project Schedule
|
|||||
2
|
SE
|
PE/SE
|
Technical Performance Measures
(TPM) Assessment
|
TPM Assessment and supporting analysis for each
|
|||||
3
|
SE (REQT)
|
PE/SE
|
Updated System Level
Requirements
|
List of modified or updated requirements post SFR System Performance Specification
Requirements Workbook (GDLS-C
Requirements Bi-Directional Traceability matrix/report with system, subsystem , and component
Spec Tree with system, subsystem, component
|
|||||
4
|
SE (REQT)
|
PE/SE/DE
|
System Requirements Allocated to
Subsystems
|
List of modified and updated requirements post SFR. Subsystem Development Specifications (Subsystem Requirements Workbook - GDLS-C)
updated to include post SFR changes including weight, power, thermal, reliability, affordability, maintainability, transportability, survivability, lethality, mobility, safety, and C4ISR allocations
|
|||||
5
|
SSE
|
DE
|
Subsystem Requirements Allocated to Components
|
Component Development Specifications (Subsystem
Requirements Workbook - GDLS-C)
including weight, power, thermal, reliability, affordability, maintainability, transportability, survivability, lethality, mobility, safety, and C4ISR allocations
|
|||||
6
|
SE (REQT)
|
PE/SE
|
Requirements Compliance Matrix
|
System and Subsystem compliance matrix summary tables showing compliance with supporting analyses
Corrective action plans for noncompliant requirements
|
|||||
7
|
SSE
|
PE/SE
|
Verification Plan
|
Design Verification Plan and Report (DVP&R) at the
Subsystem level.
|
|||||
8
|
SE/SSE
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Functional Analysis / Architecture
|
Function Flow Block Diagrams (FFBD) Updated State/Mode Diagrams Updated Sequence Diagrams
Updated Use Cases
|
|||||
9
|
SE/SSE
|
PE/SE
|
Electrical & Mechanical Power, and
Signal Architecture
|
Updates since SFR to: System Architecture Diagram Power list
Signal list
|
|||||
10
|
SSE
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Interface Management
|
Updated Subsystem Interface Control Documents (ICDs) and initial component ICDs
|
|||||
11
|
SE(PA)
|
DE
|
Physical Architecture Assembly
Models (PA_ASM)
|
Physical Architecture system definition (space allocation in vehicle position and distributed system routings) updated and baselined (representing subsystems, including structural interfaces)
|
|||||
12
|
SSE
|
DE
|
Installation models
|
Installation models, drawings ready for detailed design (show proof of lifecycle phase (e.g., initial, WIP, detailed, baseline released)
|
|||||
13
|
SE (PA)
|
DE
|
System level Interference analysis
|
Subsystem to subsystem interference analysis complete , documented with with no interferences identified.
|
|||||
14
|
SSE
|
DE
|
Subsystem Interference analysis
|
Intra-subsystem to subsystem interference analysis complete
, documented with corrective action plans identified.
|
|||||
15
|
SE/SSE
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Structured Decisions of Alternative
Subsystem Concepts
|
Trade study list
Trade study /major decisions summary, showing options and outcome
Structured decision records
|
|||||
16
|
SE
|
LE
|
Reliability Analysis
|
Initial system/subsystem Design Failure Mode & Effects
Analysis (DFMEA)
|
GREEN - G
|
ARTIFACT MEETS EXPECTATION-PROCEED.
|
||||||||
YELLOW - Y
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - PROCEED WITH ACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
RED - R
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - DO NOT PROCEED, UNACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
BLACK - B
|
NOT APPLICABLE. (MUST IDENTIFY RATIONALE)
|
||||||||
#
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP US
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP GDLS-C
|
CHECKLIST ITEM
|
Artifact Description / Expectations
|
STATUS
(COLOR CODE)
|
ASSIGNEE
|
ARTIFACT
LOCATION
|
ACTION
ID
|
STATUS
COMMENTS
|
Analysis of failure modes exceeding Risk Priority Number
(RPN) threshold (DARTS)
Quantitative assessment (MTBSA, MTBSF, MTBSA/MTBHMF, Operational Availability - Ao)
|
|||||||||
17
|
SE/SSE
|
SE/DE
|
Design Assessments
|
Survivability Assessment Lethality Assessment Mobility Assessment Transportabilty Assessment Radiation Assessment
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMI), Electromagnetic Interference (EMC), Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Thermal analysis
Structural Analysis
Fluid Analysis
Noise Vibration Harshness (NVH) Analysis
Crash Analysis
Mine blast
Dimensional Management
Safety Assessment
Human Factors Engineering (HFE) Assessment Manufacturability/Assembly Assessment Obsolescence Assessment
|
|||||
18
|
SSE
|
SE/DE
|
Design to Cost (DtC) Assessments
|
Updated Target Cost Achievement Plan
|
|||||
19
|
SSE
|
SE/DE
|
Subsystem Design
|
System/Subsystem Design Description (SSDD)
|
|||||
20
|
LOG
|
LE
|
Logistics
|
Maintainability/Supportability Assessment
|
|||||
21
|
SE
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Identified System/Subsystem/Component Level Risks/Issues
|
Risk registers
Risk mitigation plans
Issue list / Corrective action plans
|
|||||
22
|
PEM
|
SE/DE
|
Engineering Release
|
Release Schedule including Supplier SOWs, CIDS, ICDs, Models and/or Drawings, identified with established dates to support hardware first use
|
|||||
23
|
SE
|
SE/DE
|
Engineering Bill of Materials (EBOM)
|
EBOM released, identifying all configuration items and released to the product structure.
|
|||||
24
|
SE
|
PE/SE
|
Build Plan
|
Prototype Build Plan
|
|||||
25
|
PROC
|
SCM
|
Major Suppliers
|
Major Suppliers Identified
|
|||||
26
|
PROC
|
SCM
|
Long Lead Items
|
Long Lead Items Identified
|
|||||
27
|
SSE
|
SE
|
Software
|
Updated Software Development Plan (SDP) Software Requirements
|
|||||
28
|
SE
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Integrated Design Assessment
|
Completed Integrated Design Assessment
|
|||||
Approval of this Checkpoint Review documents the review team agreement that the design is self consistent, non- conflicting and mutually executable with issues and risks identified and quantified such that the team supports the gate decision. (sign/date)
|
GREEN - G
|
ARTIFACT MEETS EXPECTATION-PROCEED.
|
||||||||
YELLOW - Y
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - PROCEED WITH ACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
RED - R
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - DO NOT PROCEED, UNACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
BLACK - B
|
NOT APPLICABLE. (MUST IDENTIFY RATIONALE)
|
||||||||
#
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP US
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP GDLS-C
|
CHECKLIST ITEM
|
Artifact Description / Expectations
|
STATUS
(COLOR CODE)
|
ASSIGNEE
|
ARTIFACT
LOCATION
|
ACTION
ID
|
STATUS
COMMENTS
|
1
|
PEM
|
PE/SE
|
Finalized Integrated Master
Schedule
|
Integrated Master Schedule / Project Schedule
|
|||||
2
|
SE
|
PE/SE
|
Technical Performance Measures
(TPM) Assessment
|
Finalized TPM Assessment and supporting analysis for each
|
|||||
3
|
SE (REQT)
|
PE/SE
|
Finalized System Level
Requirements
|
List of modified or updated requirements post PDR System Performance Specification
Requirements Workbook (GDLS-C
Requirements Bi-Directional Traceability matrix/report with system, subsystem , and component
Spec Tree with system, subsystem, component
|
|||||
4
|
SE (REQT)
|
PE/SE/DE
|
System Requirements Allocated to
Subsystems
|
List of modified and updated requirements post PDR. Subsystem Development Specifications (Subsystem Requirements Workbook - GDLS-C)
updated to include post PDR changes including weight, power, thermal, reliability, affordability, maintainability, transportability, survivability, lethality, mobility, safety, and C4ISR allocations
|
|||||
5
|
SSE
|
DE
|
Subsystem Requirements Allocated
to Components
|
List of modified and updated requirements post PDR. Component Development Specifications (Subsystem Requirements Workbook - GDLS-C)
including weight, power, thermal, reliability, affordability, maintainability, transportability, survivability, lethality, mobility, safety, and C4ISR allocations
|
|||||
6
|
SE (REQT)
|
PE/SE
|
Requirements Compliance Matrix
|
System, Subsystem, and Component compliance matrix summary tables showing compliance with supporting analyses
Corrective action plans for noncompliant requirements
|
|||||
7
|
SSE
|
PE/SE
|
Verification Plan
|
Design Verification Plan and Report (DVP&R) at the component level.
|
|||||
8
|
SSE
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Interface Management
|
Finalized Subsystem Interface Control Documents (ICDs) and component ICDs
|
|||||
9
|
SE
|
DE
|
Interface Control Models (ICM)
|
Interface Control Models (ICM) released.
|
|||||
10
|
SE/SSE
|
DE
|
Interference analysis
|
No system/subsystem/component interferences.
|
|||||
11
|
SE
|
LE
|
Reliability Analysis
|
Completed System/subsystem Design Failure Mode & Effects
Analysis (DFMEA)
Design Action Reporting and Tracking issues (DARTs)
closed.
Quantitative assessment (MTBSA, MTBSF, MTBSA/MTBHMF, Operational Availability - Ao)
|
|||||
12
|
SE/SSE
|
SE/DE
|
Design Assessments
|
Survivability Assessment Lethality Assessment Mobility Assessment Transportabilty Assessment Radiation Assessment
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMI), Electromagnetic Interference (EMC), Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Thermal analysis
Structural Analysis
Fluid Analysis
Noise Vibration Harshness (NVH) Analysis
Crash Analysis
Mine blast
Dimensional Management
Safety Assessment
Human Factors Engineering (HFE) Assessment
|
|||||
GREEN - G
|
ARTIFACT MEETS EXPECTATION-PROCEED.
|
||||||||
YELLOW - Y
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - PROCEED WITH ACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
RED - R
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - DO NOT PROCEED, UNACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
BLACK - B
|
NOT APPLICABLE. (MUST IDENTIFY RATIONALE)
|
||||||||
#
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP US
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP GDLS-C
|
CHECKLIST ITEM
|
Artifact Description / Expectations
|
STATUS
(COLOR CODE)
|
ASSIGNEE
|
ARTIFACT
LOCATION
|
ACTION
ID
|
STATUS
COMMENTS
|
Manufacturability/Assembly Assessment
Obsolescence Assessment
|
|||||||||
13
|
SSE
|
SE/DE
|
Design to Cost (DtC) Assessments
|
Updated Target Cost Achievement Plan
|
|||||
14
|
SSE
|
SE/DE
|
Subsystem Design
|
System/Subsystem Design Description (SSDD)
|
|||||
15
|
LOG
|
LE
|
Logistics
|
Maintainability/Supportability Assessment
Training Products (Identified
Special tooling (Identified)
Packaging, handling, transportation considerations
|
|||||
SS
|
|||||||||
SS
|
|||||||||
SS
|
|||||||||
16
|
SE
|
PE/SE
|
Identified
System/Subsystem/Component
Level Risks/Issues
|
Risk registers
Risk mitigation plans
Issue list / Corrective action plans
|
|||||
17
|
SE/SSE
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Engineering Release
|
All CIDs complete and ready for release
|
|||||
All Supplier SOWs complete and ready for release
|
|||||||||
All ICDs complete and ready for release
|
|||||||||
All Component Models and/or Drawings complete and ready for release. Drawings ready to enter checking (GDLS-C)
|
|||||||||
18
|
SE
|
SE/DE
|
Engineering Bill of Materials (EBOM)
|
EBOM - complete (All parts released in EBOM to include fasteners & COTS items)
|
|||||
19
|
SE
|
PE/SE
|
Build Plan
|
Prototype Build Plan Completed
|
|||||
20
|
SSE
|
SE
|
Software
|
Updated Software Development Plan (SDP) Updated Software Requirements
Software Design
|
|||||
21
|
SE
|
PE/SE/DE
|
Integrated Design Assessment
|
Completed Integrated Design Assessment
|
|||||
Approval of this Checkpoint Review documents the review team agreement that the design is self consistent, non- conflicting and mutually executable with issues and risks identified and quantified such that the team supports the gate decision. (sign/date)
|
GREEN - G
|
ARTIFACT MEETS EXPECTATION-PROCEED.
|
||||||||
YELLOW - Y
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - PROCEED WITH ACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
RED - R
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - DO NOT PROCEED, UNACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
BLACK - BB
|
NOT APPLICABLE. (MUST IDENTIFY RATIONALE)
|
||||||||
#
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP US
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP GDLS-C
|
CHECKLIST ITEM
|
Artifact Description / Expectations
|
STATUS
(COLOR CODE)
|
ASSIGNEE
|
ARTIFACT
LOCATION
|
ACTION
ID
|
STATUS
COMMENTS
|
1
|
SE/SSE
|
PE/SE
|
System/Subsystem Validation
|
System Validation Complete
Subsystem Validation Complete
|
|||||
2
|
SE/SSE
|
PE/SE
|
Engineering Release
|
EBOM Released
S/W Configuration Released CAD Model Released Drawing(s) Released Specification Released
S/W Products Released
|
|||||
SE
|
|||||||||
DE
|
|||||||||
DE
|
|||||||||
PE/SE
|
|||||||||
SE
|
|||||||||
3
|
SSE
|
SE/DE
|
Hazardous Materials
|
Hazardous Materials Management Report Complete
|
|||||
4
|
LOG
|
LE
|
Logistics
|
Parts Manuals Incremental Delivery(s) Completed Maintenance Manuals Incremental Delivery(s) Completed Operator Manuals Incremental Delivery(s) Completed
|
|||||
5
|
MFG
|
MFG
|
Manufacturing
|
Tooling Identified and Purchased / On Hand
Facilities Plan Completed Personnel Plan Completed All TIR/UIR/CA Completed
All MPR Resolved/Completed
CR Improvements Cut-in Plans in Place PRRs conducted at the Major Suppliers Operating Sheet Instructions Completed Production Configuration Baseline Completed
Producibility and Quality Requirements Documented
Build Plan Completed
MBOM Complete
|
|||||
Approval
(sign/date)
|
GREEN - G
|
ARTIFACT MEETS EXPECTATION-PROCEED.
|
||||||||
YELLOW - Y
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - PROCEED WITH ACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
RED - R
|
ARTIFACT DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION - DO NOT PROCEED, UNACCEPTABLE RISK. DOCUMENT AS AN ACTION ITEM AND SUBMIT AS A RISK IF APPLICABLE.
|
||||||||
BLACK - B
|
NOT APPLICABLE. (MUST IDENTIFY RATIONALE)
|
||||||||
#
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP US
|
FUNCTIONAL
GROUP GDLS-C
|
CHECKLIST ITEM
|
Artifact Description / Expectations
|
STATUS
(COLOR CODE)
|
ASSIGNEE
|
ARTIFACT
LOCATION
|
ACTION
ID
|
STATUS
COMMENTS
|
1
|
SE/SSE
|
PE/SE
|
System/Subsystem Validation
|
System Validation Complete
Subsystem Validation Complete
|
|||||
2
|
SE/SSE
|
PE/SE
|
Engineering Release
|
EBOM Released
S/W Configuration Released CAD Model Released Drawing(s) Released Specification Released
S/W Products Released
|
|||||
SE
|
|||||||||
DE
|
|||||||||
DE
|
|||||||||
PE/SE
|
|||||||||
SE
|
|||||||||
3
|
SSE
|
SE/DE
|
Hazardous Materials
|
Hazardous Materials Management Report Complete
|
|||||
4
|
LOG
|
LE
|
Logistics
|
Parts Manuals Incremental Delivery(s) Completed Maintenance Manuals Incremental Delivery(s) Completed Operator Manuals Incremental Delivery(s) Completed
|
|||||
5
|
MFG
|
MFG
|
Manufacturing
|
Tooling Identified and Purchased / On Hand
Facilities Plan Completed Personnel Plan Completed All TIR/UIR/CA Completed
All MPR Resolved/Completed
CR Improvements Cut-in Plans in Place PRRs conducted at the Major Suppliers Operating Sheet Instructions Completed Production Configuration Baseline Completed
Producibility and Quality Requirements Documented
Build Plan Completed
MBOM Complete
|
|||||
Approval
(sign/date)
|
Model Subcontract
Section G, Annex G4
Rev NR
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Model Subcontract
Section G, Annex G4
Rev NR
|
H.1
|
Introduction
|
H.1.1
|
Purpose
|
H.1.1.1
|
The purpose of this document is to outline program and delivery schedules.
|
H.2
|
Master Project Management Schedule
|
H.2.1
|
MPMS
|
H.3
|
Delivery Terms & Schedule
|
H.3.1
|
Delivery Terms
|
Item
|
Quantity
|
Location
|
Date
|
Prototype CSS
|
1
|
GDLS WTC
|
29-Jul-11
|
Item
|
Quantity
|
Location
|
Date
|
Updated Prototype CSS
|
2
|
GDLS WTC
|
3 WAC
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Model Subcontract
Section G, Annex G4
Rev NR
|
Item
|
Quantity
|
Location
|
Date
|
EDU CSS
|
2
|
GDLS WTC
|
3 MAC
|
Item
|
Quantity
|
Location
|
Date
|
PRU
|
1
|
GDLS WTC
|
17 WAC
|
Item
|
Quantity
|
Location
|
Date
|
Final PRU
|
2
|
GDLS WTC
|
8 MAC
|
Item
|
Quantity
|
Location
|
Date
|
CSS
|
2
|
TBA
|
9 MAC
|
CSS
|
2
|
TBA
|
10 MAC
|
CSS
|
4
|
TBA
|
11 MAC
|
CSS
|
6
|
TBA
|
12 MAC
|
CSS
|
8
|
TBA
|
13 MAC
|
CSS
|
10 per month
|
TBA
|
14 MAC through 19 MAC
|
CSS
|
7 per month
|
TBA
|
20 MAC through 21 MAC
|
CSS
|
10 per month
|
TBA
|
22 MAC through 24 MAC
|
CSS
|
7
|
TBA
|
25MAC
|
CSS
|
10 per month
|
TBA
|
26 MAC through 31 MAC
|
CSS
|
6 per month
|
TBA
|
32 MAC through 33 MAC
|
CSS
|
9 per month
|
TBA
|
34 MAC through 36 MAC
|
CSS
|
6
|
TBA
|
37 MAC
|
CSS
|
9 per month
|
TBA
|
38 MAC through 43 MAC
|
CSS
|
6 per month
|
TBA
|
44 MAC through 45 MAC
|
CSS
|
9 per month
|
TBA
|
46 MAC through 48 MAC
|
CSS
|
6
|
TBA
|
49 MAC
|
CSS
|
9 per month
|
TBA
|
50 MAC through 55 MAC
|
CSS
|
6 per month
|
TBA
|
56 MAC through 57 MAC
|
CSS
|
9 per month
|
TBA
|
58 MAC through 60 MAC
|
CSS
|
6
|
TBA
|
61 MAC
|
CSS
|
9 per month
|
TBA
|
62 MAC through 67 MAC
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
Model Subcontract
Section G, Annex G4
Rev NR
|
Item
|
Quantity
|
Location
|
Date
|
CSS
|
6 per month
|
TBA
|
68 MAC through 69 MAC
|
CSS
|
4
|
TBA
|
70 MAC
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
Model Subcontract
Section G, Annex G4
Rev NR
|
[**]
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
Model Subcontract
Section G, Annex G4
Rev NR
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
Model Subcontract
Section G, Annex G4
Rev NR
|
SLIN
|
Description
|
Ref
|
Hrs
|
Price
|
001
|
Engineering CSSs (Qty 2)
|
Section G, Section 4.3
|
$100,000
|
|
002
|
SDRLs
|
Per SDRL as outlined in
Section G, Annex G2
|
2330
|
$195,595
|
003
|
Other NRE Costs
|
Attachment 3 – Pricing
Template
|
800
|
$198,100
|
Table 1 – Non-Recurring Engineering Costs
|
SLIN
|
Description
|
Qty
|
Unit Price
|
Total price
|
004
|
CSS
|
**
|
$**
|
$**
|
Table 2–Recurring/Hardware Costs
|
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
Model Subcontract
Section G, Annex G4
Rev NR
|
Part
Number
|
Description
|
Price
Break
|
2012
Price
|
2013
Price
|
2014
Price
|
2015
Price
|
2016
Price
|
2017
Price
|
2018
Price
|
2019
Price
|
|
**
|
** |
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|||
**
|
** |
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|||
**
|
** |
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|||
**
|
** |
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|||
**
|
** |
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|||
**
|
** |
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|||
**
|
** |
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|||
Table 3 – Spare Parts Price Break Template
|
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
GDLS-C Proprietary Information
|
See Restriction on First Page
|
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
Subcontract PO 35334144
|
|
Section I, Annex I1
|
|
Revision NR
|
|
Section I, Annex I1 - Payment Plan
|
CLIN
|
Description
|
Amount
|
||||
001
|
Engineering CSSs
|
$ 100,000.00
|
||||
002
|
SDRLs
|
$ 195,595.00
|
||||
003
|
Other NRE Costs
|
$ 198,100.00
|
||||
004*
|
CSS Production Units
|
$ 7,337,000.00
|
62.21%
|
$ **
|
Unit Price
|
$ **
|
Total Contract (US) |
$ 7,830,695.00
|
Payment
#
|
Event
|
Completion/Acceptance Criteria
|
Estimated
Completion /
Invoice Date
|
Milestone
Payment
|
Extended
Unit Cost
|
Liquidated
Amount
|
CLIN
Number
|
Invoice
Amount
(US)**
|
Estimated
Payment Date
(MNS2)
|
1
|
Start of Work Meeting System Functional Review Production Start of Work
|
GDLS-C has accepted PDP's:
a. SOW-M Minutes b. SFR Exit Criteria
c. Production Management Plan
|
Nov-11
|
Yes
|
003
|
** |
Jan-12
|
||
004
|
** | ||||||||
2
|
Delivery of Two (2) Updated
Prototypes
|
Receipt of 2 Updated Prototypes at GDLS
|
Nov-11
|
Yes
|
001
|
** | Jan-12
|
||
002
|
** | ||||||||
004
|
** | ||||||||
3
|
Preliminary Design Review
PRM #1
Production Readiness Review
|
GDLS-C has accepted PDP's:
a. PDR Exit Criteria
b. PMR#1 Status & Meeting Minutes c. PRR Meeting Minutes
|
Nov-11
|
Yes
|
002
|
** | Jan-12
|
||
004
|
** | ||||||||
4
|
Placement of Long Lead Material
(LLM)
|
PDP has provided List of LLM and certification that all LLM is on order.
|
Nov-11
|
Yes
|
003
|
** | Jan-12
|
||
004
|
** | ||||||||
5
|
Delivery of Two (2) EDUs
|
Receipt of 2 EDUs at GDLS
|
Dec-11
|
Yes
|
001
|
**
|
Feb-12
|
||
002
|
** | ||||||||
004
|
** | ||||||||
6
|
Critical Design Review
PRM #2
|
GDLS-C has accepted PDP's:
a. CDR Exit Criteria
b. PRM#2 Status & Meeting Minutes
|
Jan-12
|
Yes
|
002
|
** | Mar-12
|
||
004
|
** | ||||||||
7
|
Delivery of One (1) PRU
|
Receipt of One PRU at GDLS
|
Feb-12
|
Yes
|
001
|
**
|
Apr-12
|
||
002
|
** | ||||||||
004
|
** | ||||||||
8
|
PRM #3
|
GDLS-C has accepted PDP's PRM#3 Status and
Meeting Minutes
|
Mar-12
|
Yes
|
003
|
** | May-12
|
||
004
|
** | ||||||||
9
|
Delivery of Two (2) Final PRUs
|
Receipt of Two Final PRUs at GDLS
|
Jun-12
|
Yes
|
002
|
** | Aug-12
|
||
003
|
** | ||||||||
004
|
** | ||||||||
10
|
CSS Qty 2
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jul-12
|
No
|
$ **
|
$ **
|
004
|
** |
Sep-12
|
11
|
CSS Qty 2
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Aug-12
|
No
|
$ **
|
$ **
|
004
|
** |
Oct-12
|
12
|
CSS Qty 4
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Sep-12
|
No
|
$ **
|
$ **
|
004
|
** |
Nov-12
|
13
|
CSS Qty 6
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Oct-12
|
No
|
$ **
|
$ **
|
004
|
** |
Dec-12
|
14
|
CSS Qty 8
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Nov-12
|
No
|
$ **
|
$ **
|
004
|
** |
Jan-13
|
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
Subcontract PO 35334144
|
|
Section I, Annex I1
|
|
Revision NR
|
|
Section I, Annex I1 - Payment Plan
|
CLIN
|
Description
|
Amount
|
||||
001
|
Engineering CSSs
|
$ 100,000.00
|
||||
002
|
SDRLs
|
$ 195,595.00
|
||||
003
|
Other NRE Costs
|
$ 198,100.00
|
||||
004*
|
CSS Production Units
|
$ 7,337,000.00
|
62.21%
|
$ **
|
Unit Price
|
$
**
|
Total Contract (US)
|
$ 7,830,695.00
|
Payment
#
|
Event
|
Completion/Acceptance Criteria
|
Estimated
Completion /
Invoice Date
|
Milestone
Payment
|
Extended
Unit
Cost
|
Liquidated
Amount
|
CLIN
Number
|
Invoice
Amount
(US)**
|
Estimated
Payment Date
(MNS2)
|
15
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Dec-12
|
No
|
** | **
|
004
|
** |
Feb-13
|
16
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jan-13
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
** |
Mar-13
|
17
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Feb-13
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
** |
Apr-13
|
18
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Mar-13
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
May-13
|
19
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Apr-13
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jun-13
|
20
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
May-13
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jul-13
|
21
|
CSS Qty 7
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jun-13
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Aug-13
|
22
|
CSS Qty 7
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jul-13
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Sep-13
|
23
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Aug-13
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Oct-13
|
24
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Sep-13
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Nov-13
|
25
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Oct-13
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Dec-13
|
26
|
CSS Qty 7
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Nov-13
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jan-14
|
27
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Dec-13
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Feb-14
|
28
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jan-14
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Mar-14
|
29
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Feb-14
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Apr-14
|
30
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Mar-14
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
May-14
|
31
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Apr-14
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jun-14
|
32
|
CSS Qty 10
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
May-14
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jul-14
|
33
|
CSS Qty 6
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jun-14
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Aug-14
|
34
|
CSS Qty 6
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jul-14
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Sep-14
|
35
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Aug-14
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Oct-14
|
36
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Sep-14
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Nov-14
|
37
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Oct-14
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Dec-14
|
38
|
CSS Qty 6
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Nov-14
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jan-15
|
39
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Dec-14
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Feb-15
|
40
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jan-15
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Mar-15
|
41
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Feb-15
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Apr-15
|
42
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Mar-15
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
May-15
|
43
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Apr-15
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jun-15
|
44
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
May-15
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jul-15
|
45
|
CSS Qty 6
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jun-15
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Aug-15
|
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY OPTEX SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
Subcontract PO 35334144
|
|
Section I, Annex I1
|
|
Revision NR
|
|
Section I, Annex I1 - Payment Plan
|
CLIN
|
Description
|
Amount
|
||||
001
|
Engineering CSSs
|
$ 100,000.00
|
||||
002
|
SDRLs
|
$ 195,595.00
|
||||
003
|
Other NRE Costs
|
$ 198,100.00
|
||||
004*
|
CSS Production Units
|
$ 7,337,000.00
|
62.21%
|
$ **
|
Unit Price
|
$ **
|
Total Contract (US) |
$ 7,830,695.00
|
Payment
#
|
Event
|
Completion/Acceptance Criteria
|
Estimated
Completion /
Invoice Date
|
Milestone
Payment
|
Extended
Unit
Cost
|
Liquidated
Amount
|
CLIN
Number
|
Invoice
Amount
(US)**
|
Estimated
Payment Date
(MNS2)
|
46
|
CSS Qty 6
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jul-15
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Sep-15
|
47
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Aug-15
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Oct-15
|
48
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Sep-15
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Nov-15
|
49
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Oct-15
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Dec-15
|
50
|
CSS Qty 6
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Nov-15
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jan-16
|
51
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Dec-15
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Feb-16
|
52
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jan-16
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Mar-16
|
53
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Feb-16
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Apr-16
|
54
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Mar-16
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
May-16
|
55
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Apr-16
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jun-16
|
56
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
May-16
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jul-16
|
57
|
CSS Qty 6
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jun-16
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Aug-16
|
58
|
CSS Qty 6
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jul-16
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Sep-16
|
59
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Aug-16
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Oct-16
|
60
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Sep-16
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Nov-16
|
61
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Oct-16
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Dec-16
|
62
|
CSS Qty 6
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Nov-16
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jan-17
|
63
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Dec-16
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Feb-17
|
64
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jan-17
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Mar-17
|
65
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Feb-17
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Apr-17
|
66
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Mar-17
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
May-17
|
67
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Apr-17
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jun-17
|
68
|
CSS Qty 9
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
May-17
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Jul-17
|
69
|
CSS Qty 6
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jun-17
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Aug-17
|
70
|
CSS Qty 6
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Jul-17
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Sep-17
|
71
|
CSS Qty 4
|
Receipt of Material at GDLS
|
Aug-17
|
No
|
**
|
**
|
004
|
**
|
Oct-17
|
** CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.
Subject:
|
LAVUP Subcontract 35334144 Award – Commander’s Sighting System
|
Attachment:
|
(1) Subcontract 35334144
|
(2) Purchase Order 35334144
|
|
(3) Execution of Subcontract and Purchase Order 35334144
|
|
|
|
|
Danny Scheoning
|
Heath Brown
|
|
General Manager / COO
|
Subcontract Administrator, GDLS-C
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Acceptance
|
|
Date of Acceptance
|