ReUNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2010
OR
o TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission
File Number 001-15799
Ladenburg
Thalmann Financial Services Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Florida
|
|
65-0701248
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
|
Identification
Number)
|
4400
Biscayne Boulevard, 12th
Floor
|
|
|
Miami,
Florida
|
|
33137
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(212)
409-2000
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
Yes
þ No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large
accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of November 10, 2010, there
were 182,363,289 shares of the registrant's common stock
outstanding.
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
Page
|
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
|
26 |
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(in
thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
September
30,
2010
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
December
31,
2009
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
5,873 |
|
|
$ |
5,702 |
|
Securities
owned at fair value
|
|
|
2,936 |
|
|
|
2,209 |
|
Receivables
from clearing brokers
|
|
|
15,180 |
|
|
|
13,406 |
|
Receivables
from other broker-dealers
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
Other
receivables, net
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
|
|
6,203 |
|
Furniture,
equipment and leasehold improvements, net
|
|
|
2,781 |
|
|
|
3,154 |
|
Restricted
assets
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
|
|
27,101 |
|
|
|
28,509 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
29,754 |
|
|
|
29,739 |
|
Unamortized
debt issue cost
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
3,357 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
95,993 |
|
|
$ |
94,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
sold, but not yet purchased, at market value
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
Accrued
compensation
|
|
|
4,825 |
|
|
|
4,299 |
|
Commissions
and fees payable
|
|
|
6,323 |
|
|
|
5,957 |
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
6,326 |
|
|
|
5,671 |
|
Deferred
rent
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
3,378 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
Accrued
interest
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
Notes
payable
|
|
|
27,163 |
|
|
|
35,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
50,109 |
|
|
|
56,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par
value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common
stock, $.0001 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized; shares
issued and
outstanding, 181,350,459 in 2010 and 167,907,038 in
2009
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Additional paid-in
capital
|
|
|
189,275 |
|
|
|
171,349 |
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(143,409 |
) |
|
|
(133,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders’
equity
|
|
|
45,884 |
|
|
|
37,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
95,993 |
|
|
$ |
94,637 |
|
See
accompanying notes.
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in
thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions
|
|
$ |
27,775 |
|
|
$ |
24,897 |
|
|
$ |
79,958 |
|
|
$ |
67,413 |
|
Advisory
fees
|
|
|
12,886
|
|
|
|
8,573
|
|
|
|
36,584
|
|
|
|
22,904
|
|
Investment
banking
|
|
|
4,283
|
|
|
|
3,077
|
|
|
|
15,171
|
|
|
|
8,750
|
|
Principal
transactions
|
|
|
(826 |
) |
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
(696 |
)
|
|
|
882 |
|
Interest
and dividends
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
Other
income
|
|
|
4,101
|
|
|
|
1,502
|
|
|
|
8,494
|
|
|
|
4,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
$ |
48,363 |
|
|
$ |
39,246 |
|
|
$ |
139,918 |
|
|
$ |
106,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions
and fees
|
|
$ |
31,529 |
|
|
$ |
22,958 |
|
|
$ |
87,079 |
|
|
$ |
62,014 |
|
Compensation
and benefits
|
|
|
9,772
|
|
|
|
10,845
|
|
|
|
32,003
|
|
|
|
29,743
|
|
Non-cash
compensation
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
|
4,656
|
|
|
|
5,273
|
|
Brokerage,
communication and clearance fees
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
1,664
|
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
|
|
5,111
|
|
Rent
and occupancy, net of sublease revenue
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
2,636
|
|
|
|
2,589
|
|
Professional
services
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
3,962
|
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
2,533
|
|
|
|
3,191
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
|
|
2,811
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,965
|
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
|
|
8,618
|
|
|
|
6,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
expenses
|
|
$ |
51,341 |
|
|
$ |
43,066 |
|
|
$ |
149,101 |
|
|
$ |
121,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before
income taxes
|
|
|
(2,978 |
)
|
|
|
(3,820 |
)
|
|
|
(9,183 |
)
|
|
|
(14,660 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
(92 |
)
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(3,205 |
)
|
|
$ |
(3,728 |
)
|
|
$ |
(9,837 |
)
|
|
$ |
(15,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per common share (basic and diluted)
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
)
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
)
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares used in computation of per share
data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
181,327,242 |
|
|
|
167,624,573
|
|
|
|
173,370,977 |
|
|
|
168,875,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
181,327,242 |
|
|
|
167,624,573
|
|
|
|
173,370,977 |
|
|
|
168,875,151
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
LADENBURG THALMANN
FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in
thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
167,907,038 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
171,349 |
|
|
$ |
(133,572 |
) |
|
$ |
37,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock in private equity offering, net of expenses of
$116
|
|
|
13,325,000 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
13,208 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
51,791 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
of stock options
|
|
|
132,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
options granted to members of
former Advisory Board and consultants
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation to employees
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,611 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase
and retirement of common stock
|
|
|
(65,370 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(9,837 |
) |
|
|
(9,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
181,350,459 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
189,275 |
|
|
$ |
(143,409 |
) |
|
$ |
45,884 |
|
See
accompanying notes.
LADENBURG THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES
INC.CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine
months ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(9,837 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,127 |
) |
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
Adjustment
to deferred rent
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Amortization
of debt discount
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,271 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
Amortization
of debt issue cost
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
Gain
on forgiveness of principal of note payable under forgivable
loan
|
|
|
(1,429 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Non-cash
compensation expense
|
|
|
4,656 |
|
|
|
5,273 |
|
Disposal
of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in operating assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
owned
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
2,547 |
|
Receivables
from clearing brokers
|
|
|
(1,774 |
) |
|
|
1,949 |
|
Receivables
from other broker-dealers
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
Other
receivables, net
|
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
(1,458 |
) |
Other
assets
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
(1,137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in operating liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
sold, but not yet purchased
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
Accrued
compensation
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
2,035 |
|
Accrued
interest
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
Commissions
and fees payable
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(4,520 |
) |
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premier
Trust acquisition, net of cash received
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Purchases
of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
(368 |
) |
Decrease
in restricted assets
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock in private equity offering
|
|
|
13,209 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Issuance
of common stock under stock plans
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
Repurchases
of common stock
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(2,717 |
) |
Issuance
of notes payable
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Principal
payments under revolving credit facility, net
|
|
|
(3,100 |
) |
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
Principal
payments on other notes payable
|
|
|
(5,165 |
) |
|
|
(4,977 |
) |
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
5,006 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(997 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
5,702 |
|
|
|
6,621 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
5,873 |
|
|
$ |
5,624 |
|
LADENBURG THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES
INC.CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS – (Continued)
(in
thousands)
(Unaudited)
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
|
$ |
1,701 |
|
|
$ |
2,109 |
|
Taxes
paid
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Acquisition
of Premier Trust:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
acquired, including goodwill of $15
|
|
$ |
2,565 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Liabilities
assumed
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net
assets acquired
|
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Note
issued in acquisition
|
|
|
(1,161 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Cash
paid in acquisition
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Cash
acquired in acquisition
|
|
|
(1,037 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net
cash paid in acquisition
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
|
— |
|
See
accompanying notes.
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
1.
|
Description
of Business and Basis of
Presentation
|
Description
of Business
Ladenburg
Thalmann Financial Services Inc. (“LTS” or the “Company”) is a holding
company. Its wholly-owned principal operating subsidiaries are
Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (“Ladenburg”), Investacorp, Inc. (collectively
with related companies, “Investacorp”), Triad Advisors, Inc.
(“Triad”), Ladenburg Thalmann Asset Management Inc. (“LTAM”) and
Premier Trust, Inc. (“Premier”).
Ladenburg
is a full service registered broker-dealer that has been a member of the New
York Stock Exchange since 1879. Broker-dealer activities include sales and
trading and investment banking. Ladenburg provides its services principally for
middle market and emerging growth companies and high net worth individuals
through a coordinated effort among corporate finance, capital markets, brokerage
and trading professionals.
Investacorp
and Triad are registered broker-dealers and investment advisors that have been
serving the independent financial advisor community since 1978 and 1998,
respectively. Investacorp’s and Triad’s independent financial advisors primarily
serve retail clients. Investacorp and Triad derive revenue from advisory fees
and commissions, primarily from the sale of mutual funds, variable annuity
products and other financial products and services.
LTAM is a registered investment
advisor. It offers various asset management products utilized by Ladenburg and
Premier’s clients, as well as clients of Investacorp’s and Triad’s financial
advisors.
Premier,
acquired on September 1, 2010, is a Nevada trust company formed in
2001. Premier provides wealth management services, including trust
administration of personal and retirement accounts, estate and financial
planning and custody services.
Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad
customer transactions are cleared through a single clearing broker on a
fully-disclosed basis. Each of Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad is
subject to regulation by, among others, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the Municipal
Securities Rulemaking Board. Triad is also subject to regulation by the
Commodities Futures Trading Commission and the National Futures
Association. Premier is subject to regulation by the Nevada
Department of Business and Industry Financial Institutions Division.
Basis
of Presentation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions
to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of
management, the interim data includes all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the
periods presented. Because of the nature of the Company’s business,
interim period results may not be indicative of full year or future
results.
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all
information and notes required in annual audited financial statements in
conformity with GAAP. The statement of financial condition at December 31, 2009
has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does
not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete
financial statement presentation. Please refer to the notes to the consolidated
financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC, for additional
disclosures and a description of accounting policies.
Certain
prior year items have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s
presentation. All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated.
The
Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial
statements contained in this report were issued.
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
2.
|
Securities
Owned and Securities Sold, But Not Yet
Purchased
|
The
components of securities owned and securities sold, but not yet purchased, at
fair value at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
Securities
owned
|
|
|
Securities
sold,
but
not
yet purchased
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates
of deposit
|
|
$ |
589 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Common
stock and
warrants
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Restricted
common stock and warrants
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,936 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates
of deposit
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Common
stock and
warrants
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Restricted
common stock and warrants
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,209 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
As
of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, approximately $1,482 and
$687, respectively, of securities owned were deposited with the Company’s
subsidiaries’ clearing brokers. Under the clearing agreements with such
clearing brokers, the securities may be sold or hypothecated by such
clearing brokers. At September 30, 2010, the Company's
subsidiaries had a single clearing
broker.
|
Securities
sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value represent obligations of the
Company’s subsidiaries to purchase the specified financial instrument at the
then current market price. Accordingly, these transactions result in
off-balance sheet risk as the Company's subsidiaries’ ultimate obligation to
repurchase such securities may exceed the amount recognized in the condensed
consolidated statements of financial condition.
|
The
fair value hierarchy, established under authoritative accounting guidance,
ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine
fair values. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are
classified and disclosed in one of the following three
categories:
|
|
•
|
Level 1 —quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
|
|
•
|
Level 2 —inputs,
other than quoted prices in active markets, that are directly or
indirectly observable for the asset or
liability.
|
|
•
|
Level 3 —
unobservable inputs for the asset where there is little or no market data,
which requires the reporting entity to develop its own
assumptions.
|
Securities
are carried at fair value and classified as follows:
As of
September 30, 2010:
Securities
owned, at fair value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Certificates
of deposit
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
589 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
589 |
|
Common
stock and warrants
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
$ |
2,216 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
2,936 |
|
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Securities
sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Common
stock and warrants
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
As of
December 31, 2009:
Securities
owned, at fair value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Certificates
of deposit
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock and warrants
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
517 |
|
|
$ |
1,692 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
2,209 |
|
Securities
sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Common
stock and warrants
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
Warrants
are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model which takes into account
the current market value and market volatility of the underlying securities, the
term of the warrants, exercise price, and risk-free rate of
return. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair
value of the warrants was $1,422 and $1,351, respectively, and is included in
common stock and warrants (level 2) above.
On
September 1, 2010 the Company acquired all the outstanding shares of Premier, a
Nevada trust company, which provides wealth management services. The
acquisition was made due to the complementary nature of Premier’s operations to
those of the Company’s subsidiaries. The consideration for the transaction was
$2,360, consisting of cash of $1,199 and a note in the aggregate principal
amount of $1,161. Results of operations of Premier are included in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations from the date of acquisition
and are not material. Pro forma results of operations as if Premier
was acquired as of January 1, 2009 are not presented because they are not
material.
4.
|
Net
Capital Requirements
|
As a
registered broker-dealer, Ladenburg is subject to the SEC’s Uniform Net Capital
Rule 15c3-1, which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital.
Ladenburg has elected to compute its net capital under the alternative method
allowed by this rule. At September 30, 2010, Ladenburg had net
capital, as defined in the SEC’s Net Capital Rule, of $4,247, which exceeded its
minimum capital requirement of $250, by $3,997.
Investacorp
and Triad are also subject to the SEC’s Net Capital Rule, which requires the
maintenance of minimum net capital and requires that the ratio of aggregate
indebtedness to net capital, both as defined in the SEC’s Net Capital Rule, not
exceed 15 to 1. At September 30, 2010, Investacorp had net capital of
$958 which was $687 in excess of its required net capital of
$271. Investacorp’s net capital ratio was 4.2 to 1. At
September 30, 2010, Triad had net capital of $1,514, which was $1,140 in excess
of its required net capital of $374. Triad’s net capital ratio was
3.7 to 1.
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Ladenburg,
Investacorp and Triad claim exemption from the provisions of the SEC’s Rule
15c3-3 pursuant to paragraph (k) (2) (ii) of such Rule as they clear their
customer transactions through a correspondent broker on a fully-disclosed
basis.
Premier,
chartered by the state of Nevada, is subject to regulation by the Nevada
Department of Business and Industry Financial Institutions
Division. Under Nevada law, Premier must maintain minimum
stockholders’ equity of $1,000. At September 30, 2010, Premier had
stockholders’ equity of $2,365.
|
Income
tax expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010
primarily represents deferred income taxes relating to amortization of
goodwill for tax purposes.
|
Notes
payable consisted of the following:
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Note
payable to former Investacorp shareholder, net of $2 and $124 of
unamortized discount at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively
|
|
$ |
441 |
|
|
$ |
4,230 |
|
Note
payable to affiliate of principal shareholder of LTS
|
|
|
15,350 |
|
|
|
18,450 |
|
Note
payable to former Triad shareholders, net of $68 and $204 of unamortized
discount at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
Note
payable to clearing firm under forgivable loan
|
|
|
8,571 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Note
payable to a subsidiary of Premier’s former shareholder
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
27,163 |
|
|
$ |
35,438 |
|
The
Company estimates that the fair value of notes payable was $28,295 at September
30, 2010 and $30,076 at December 31, 2009 based on interest rates at which
similar debt amounts could then be borrowed.
During
the third quarter of 2010, $1,429 of principal and $525 of accrued interest of
the note payable to clearing firm was forgiven and is included in
other income in the accompanying 2010 consolidated statements of
operations.
7.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Litigation
and Regulatory Matters
In May
2003, a suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District
of New York by Sedona Corporation against Ladenburg, former employees of
Ladenburg and a number of other firms and individuals. The plaintiff alleged,
among other things, that certain defendants (not Ladenburg) purchased
convertible securities from plaintiff and then allegedly manipulated the market
to obtain an increased number of shares from the conversion of those securities.
Ladenburg acted as placement agent and not as principal in those transactions.
Plaintiff’s original complaint alleged that Ladenburg and the other defendants
violated federal securities laws and various state laws. In August 2005,
Ladenburg’s motion to dismiss was granted in part and denied in
part. On May 27, 2009, the Court granted in part and denied in
part motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, and granted plaintiff
leave to replead. On July 9, 2009, plaintiff filed its Third Amended
Complaint, which contains no claims under the federal securities laws,
leaving only common law claims; the plaintiff seeks compensatory damages from
the defendants of at least $660,000 and punitive damages of
$400,000. Ladenburg’s motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint
is currently pending. The Company believes the plaintiff’s claims are
without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.
In July
2004, a suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Arkansas by Pet Quarters, Inc. against Ladenburg, a former employee of
Ladenburg and a number of other firms and individuals. The plaintiff alleged,
among other things, that certain defendants (not Ladenburg) purchased
convertible securities from the plaintiff and then allegedly manipulated the
market to obtain an increased number of shares from the conversion of those
securities. Ladenburg acted as placement agent and not as principal in those
transactions. Plaintiff has alleged that Ladenburg and the other defendants
violated federal securities laws and various state laws. The plaintiff seeks
compensatory damages from the defendants of at least $400,000. In April 2006,
Ladenburg’s motion to dismiss was granted in part and denied in part. On July
23, 2010, the plaintiff dismissed its claims against all defendants other than
Ladenburg and the former Ladenburg employee. Ladenburg's motion for
reconsideration of the motion to dismiss as to the remaining claims is currently
pending. The Company believes that the plaintiff’s claims are without
merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
In July
2008, a suit was filed in the Circuit Court for the 17th Judicial Circuit,
Broward County, Florida, by BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. against
Ladenburg and a former Ladenburg research analyst. The plaintiffs alleged, among
other things, that research reports issued by defendants were false and
defamatory, and that defendants were liable for defamation per se and
negligence; the amount of the alleged damages was unspecified. In February 2010,
the plaintiffs entered into a settlement agreement resolving all claims against
Ladenburg; the settlement expense is reflected in accrued liabilities in the
Company’s 2009 financial statements. On July 1, 2010, the plaintiffs and
the former research analyst voluntarily dismissed the remaining claims with
prejudice. The former research analyst has indicated that he may
initiate a proceeding against Ladenburg and the Company for indemnification and
breach of contract seeking reimbursement of expenses he incurred in defending
the suit; the Company believes such claims are without merit and intends to
vigorously defend against them.
One of
the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries had a short-term net-capital
deficiency, discovered during a routine regulatory review, that was not
disclosed properly on a monthly FOCUS report. A FOCUS report is a
periodic regulatory report filed by broker-dealers with the SEC that contains
detailed information about a firm’s financial and operational status. The
broker-dealer subsidiary has taken, and continues to take, corrective actions,
including reporting the deficiency to governmental and self-regulatory
organizations, preparing amended FOCUS reports for historical periods, reviewing
net capital compliance for historical periods, implementing new procedures to
monitor net capital compliance, and terminating the employees who had primary
responsibility for monitoring and reporting its net capital. The Company
is unable to determine whether and to what extent any governmental and/or
self-regulatory organizations may seek to discipline such broker-dealer
subsidiary concerning this matter. Such disciplinary actions could include
fines, a suspension of such subsidiary’s operations and/or rescission of such
subsidiary’s revenues relating to the period of non-compliance, any of which
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and
financial condition.
In the
ordinary course of business, the Company’s subsidiaries are defendants in
litigation and arbitration proceedings and may be subject to unasserted claims
or arbitrations primarily in connection with their activities as securities
broker-dealers or as a result of services provided in connection with securities
offerings. Such litigation and claims may involve substantial or indeterminate
amounts and are in varying stages of legal proceedings. When the Company
believes that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount
of loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company includes an estimation of such
amount in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
Upon
final resolution, amounts payable may differ materially from amounts accrued.
The Company had accrued liabilities in the amount of approximately $286 at
September 30, 2010 and $453 at December 31, 2009 for these matters. For
other pending matters, the Company is unable to estimate a range of possible
loss; however, in the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel,
the ultimate resolution of these matters should not have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations
or liquidity.
8.
|
Off-Balance-Sheet
Risk and Concentration of Credit
Risk
|
Ladenburg,
Investacorp and Triad do not carry accounts for customers or perform custodial
functions related to customers’ securities. They introduce all of their customer
transactions, which are not reflected in these financial statements, to their
clearing broker, which maintains cash and the customers’ accounts and clears
such transactions. Also, the clearing broker provides the clearing and
depository operations for proprietary securities transactions. These activities
may expose the Company to off-balance-sheet risk in the event that customers do
not fulfill their obligations to the clearing broker, as each of Ladenburg,
Investacorp and Triad has agreed to indemnify the clearing broker for any
resulting losses. Each of Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad continually assesses
risk associated with each customer who is on margin credit and records an
estimated loss when management believes collection from the customer is
unlikely.
The
clearing operations for the Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad securities
transactions are provided by one clearing broker, a large financial institution.
At September 30, 2010, a significant percentage of securities owned and amounts
due from clearing broker reflected in the consolidated statements of financial
condition are positions held at, and amounts due from, this one clearing broker.
The Company is subject to credit risk should this clearing broker be unable to
fulfill its obligations.
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
In the
normal course of its business, Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad may enter into
transactions in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. These
financial instruments consist of financial futures contracts, written equity
index option contracts and securities sold, but not yet purchased. As of
September 30, 2010, Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad were not contractually
obligated for any equity index or financial futures contracts; however,
Ladenburg and Triad sold securities that they do not own and will therefore be
obligated to purchase such securities at a future date. These obligations have
been recorded in the statements of financial condition at market values of the
related securities, and Ladenburg and Triad will incur a loss if the market
value of the securities increases subsequent to September 30, 2010.
The
Company and its subsidiaries maintain cash in bank deposit accounts, which, at
times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any
losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit
risk on cash.
|
On
May 28, 2010, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements with
various investors, including investors who were affiliated with the
Company, under which the investors agreed to purchase an aggregate of
14,050,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $1.00 per
share. On September 15, 2010, the Company completed the sale of
an aggregate of 13,325,000 shares of common stock and received gross
proceeds of $13,325 from investors who are not affiliated with the
Company. In accordance with NYSE Amex rules, the Company’s shareholders
approved the sale of the remaining 725,000 shares of common
stock to investors who are directors and executive officers of the
Company, or affiliates thereof, at the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting held
on September 24, 2010. On October 1, 2010, the Company
completed the sale of such 725,000 shares of common stock to its
affiliates and received gross proceeds of $725. The funds received from
the private equity offering were used for general corporate purposes,
including repayment of debt.
|
Repurchase
Program
In March
2007, the Company’s board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to
2,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time on the open
market or in privately negotiated transactions, depending on market conditions.
The repurchase program is funded using approximately 15% of the Company’s
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, as
adjusted. As of September 30, 2010, 1,013,194 shares had been
repurchased for $1,753 under the program.
Stock
Compensation Plans
On
January 14, 2010, the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of
3,645,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of
$0.90 per share to employees and directors. The options, which expire on January
14, 2020, vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant.
The Company has valued the options at $1,964 using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model.
On August
11, 2010, the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of 400,000 shares
of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.10 per share to
employees and consultants. The options which expire on November 11,
2020, vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of
grant. The Company has valued the options at $333 using the
Black-Scholes pricing model.
On
September 23, 2010, the Company awarded restricted stock grants of 200,000
shares of the Company’s common stock to newly-hired employees in connection with
the Premier acquisition. The shares vest on September 23, 2012,
contingent upon continued employment of the employees. The Company has valued
the shares at $208 based on the market price of the stock on the grant
date.
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
On
September 24, 2010, the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of
160,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.11 per
share to directors. The options, which expire on September 24, 2020,
vest 100% on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. The
Company has valued the options at $124 using the Black-Scholes pricing
model.
A summary
of the status of the 1999 Performance Equity Plan at September 30, 2010 are
presented below:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
Options
outstanding, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
15,117,290 |
|
|
$ |
1.46 |
|
|
|
6.91 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,200,000 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(132,000 |
) |
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(345,000 |
) |
|
|
1.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
outstanding, September 30, 2010
|
|
|
17,840,290 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
|
6.72 |
|
|
$ |
1,837 |
|
Vested
or expected to vest
|
|
|
17,703,583 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
|
6.71 |
|
|
$ |
1,828 |
|
Options
exercisable, September 30, 2010
|
|
|
11,189,790 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
$ |
1,423 |
|
A summary
of the status of the 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan at September 30, 2010 are
presented below:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
Options
outstanding, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
$ |
0
.79 |
|
|
|
9.75 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,005,000 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
outstanding, September 30, 2010
|
|
|
1,145,000 |
|
|
$ |
0
.99 |
|
|
|
9.56 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
Vested
or expected to vest
|
|
|
986,273 |
|
|
$ |
0.
99 |
|
|
|
9.58 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
Options
exercisable, September 30, 2010
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
0
.77 |
|
|
|
8.95 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
A summary
of the status of the non-plan options at September 30, 2010 are presented
below:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
Options
outstanding, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
5,764,000 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
|
|
6.97 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(650,000 |
) |
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
outstanding, September 30, 2010
|
|
|
5,114,000 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
Vested
or expected to vest
|
|
|
5,114,000 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
Options
exercisable, September 30, 2010
|
|
|
4,114,010 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
As of
September 30, 2010, there was $5,137 of unrecognized compensation cost for
stock-based compensation, of which $2,139 related to the 2010 grants. This cost
is expected to be recognized over the vesting periods of the options, which on a
weighted-average basis are approximately 1.3 years for all grants and
approximately 3.2 years for the 2010 grants.
The total
intrinsic value of options exercised during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 was $0 and $74, respectively.
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Basic net loss per common share is
computed using the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding. The dilutive effect of common shares potentially
issuable under outstanding options and warrants is included in diluted earnings
per share. The computations of basic and diluted per share data were
as follows:
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(3,205 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,728 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,837 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,127 |
) |
Weighted-average
common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding
basic and diluted
|
|
|
181,327,242 |
|
|
|
167,624,573 |
|
|
|
173,370,977 |
|
|
|
168,875,151 |
|
Net
loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
At
September 30, 2010 and 2009, options and warrants to purchase 30,999,290 and
28,298,540 common shares, respectively, and at September 30, 2010, non-vested
restricted stock grants for 200,000 common shares were not included in the
computation of diluted loss per share as the effect would have been
anti-dilutive.
The
Company has three operating segments. The Ladenburg segment includes the
broker-dealer and asset management activities conducted by Ladenburg and
LTAM. The Independent Brokerage and Advisory Services segment
includes the broker-dealer and investment advisory services provided by
Investacorp and Triad. The Premier Trust segment includes the wealth
management services provided by Premier, since its acquisition on September 1,
2010.
Segment
information for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was as
follows:
|
|
Ladenburg
|
|
|
Independent
Brokerage and Advisory
Services
|
|
|
Premier Trust
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
7,420 |
|
|
$ |
38,819 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
1,930 |
|
|
$ |
48,363 |
|
Pre-tax
(loss) income
|
|
|
(2,272 |
) |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(566 |
)(1) |
|
|
(2,978 |
) |
Identifiable
assets
|
|
|
19,101 |
|
|
|
74,029 |
|
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
95,993 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
Interest
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
179 |
|
Segment
information for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was as
follows:
|
|
Ladenburg
|
|
|
Independent
Brokerage and Advisory
Services)
|
|
|
Premier Trust
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
10,076 |
|
|
$ |
29,138 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
39,246 |
|
Pre-tax
(loss) income
|
|
|
(1,395 |
) |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,555 |
)(1) |
|
|
(3,820 |
) |
Identifiable
assets
|
|
|
19,631 |
|
|
|
74,805 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
95,396 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
Interest
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
310 |
|
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Segment
information for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was as
follows:
|
|
Ladenburg
|
|
|
Independent
Brokerage and Advisory
Services
|
|
|
Premier Trust
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
29,617 |
|
|
$ |
108,122 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
1,985 |
|
|
$ |
139,918 |
|
Pre-tax
(loss) income
|
|
|
(4,712 |
) |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(4,779 |
)(1) |
|
|
(9,183 |
) |
Identifiable
assets
|
|
|
19,101 |
|
|
|
74,029 |
|
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
95,993 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
Interest
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,503 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
302 |
|
Segment
information for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was as
follows:
|
|
Ladenburg
|
|
|
Independent
Brokerage and Advisory
Services
|
|
|
Premier Trust
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
26,358 |
|
|
$ |
80,399 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
106,861 |
|
Pre-tax
(loss) income
|
|
|
(7,583 |
) |
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(7,646 |
)(1) |
|
|
(14,660 |
) |
Identifiable
assets
|
|
|
19,631 |
|
|
|
74,805 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
95,396 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
Interest
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
3,186 |
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
368 |
|
(1)
|
Includes
interest, compensation, professional fees and other general and
administrative expenses.
|
12.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
On August
13, 2010, Investacorp Group, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, entered into a
five-year office lease ("Lease") with Frost Real Estate Holdings, LLC ("FREH"),
an entity affiliated with Phillip Frost, M.D., the Company’s chairman of the
board and principal shareholder. The Lease provides for aggregate payments
during the five-year term of approximately $1,581 and commenced on October 1,
2010.
Item
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (in
thousands, except share and per share data)
Overview
We are
engaged in investment banking, equity research, institutional sales and trading,
independent brokerage and advisory services, asset management services and trust
services through our principal subsidiaries, Ladenburg Thalmann & Co.
Inc. (“Ladenburg”), Investacorp Inc. (collectively with related companies,
“Investacorp”), Triad Advisors, Inc. (“Triad”), Ladenburg Thalmann
Asset Management Inc. (“LTAM”) and Premier Trust, Inc. (“Premier”). We are
committed to establishing a significant presence in the financial services
industry by meeting the varying investment needs of our corporate, institutional
and retail clients.
Ladenburg,
headquartered in New York, NY, is a full service broker-dealer that has been a
member of the New York Stock Exchange since 1879. It provides its services
principally for middle market and emerging growth companies and high net worth
individuals through a coordinated effort among corporate finance, capital
markets, asset management, brokerage and trading professionals.
Investacorp,
headquartered in Miami, Florida, is an independent broker-dealer and registered
investment advisor that has been serving the independent financial advisor
community since 1978. Investacorp’s national network of independent financial
advisors primarily serves retail clients. Investacorp’s independent financial
advisors are located in approximately 304 offices in 42 states.
Triad,
headquartered in Norcross, Georgia, is an independent broker-dealer and
registered investment advisor that offers a broad range of products, services
and total wealth management solutions to independent financial advisors located
nationwide. Triad’s independent financial advisors primarily serve retail
clients. Triad was founded in 1998, and we acquired Triad in August 2008.
Triad’s independent financial advisors are located in approximately 254 offices
in 38 states.
LTAM,
headquartered in New York, NY, is a registered investment advisor. LTAM offers
various asset management products utilized by Ladenburg and Premier’s clients as
well as clients of Investacorp’s and Triad’s financial advisors.
Premier,
headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada, is a Nevada trust
company. Premier, founded in 2001, provides wealth management
services, including trust administration of personal and retirement accounts,
estate and financial planning and custody services. We acquired
Premier on September 1, 2010.
Through
our acquisitions of Investacorp and Triad, we have become a significant presence
in the independent broker-dealer industry. During the past decade, this has been
one of the fastest growing segments of the financial services
industry. We have become one of the approximately 30 largest
independent broker-dealer firms as a result of Investacorp and Triad’s combined
revenues of approximately $108 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and approximately 1,000 financial advisors. We believe that we have the
opportunity through acquisitions and recruiting to significantly expand our
market share in this segment over the next several years. Our goal remains, as a
public financial services company, to marry the more recurring and predictable
revenue and cash flows of the independent broker-dealer business with
Ladenburg’s traditional investment banking, capital markets, institutional
equity and related businesses. Ladenburg’s businesses are generally more
volatile and subject to the cycles of the capital markets than our independent
broker-dealer subsidiaries, but historically have enjoyed strong operating
margins in favorable market conditions.
Each of
Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad is subject to regulation by, among others, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (“FINRA”), and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and is a
member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Triad is
also subject to regulation by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission and the
National Futures Association. Premier is subject to regulation by the
Nevada Department of Business and Industry Financial Institutions
Division.
Ladenburg’s
private client services and institutional sales departments serve approximately
12,000 customer accounts nationwide and LTAM provides investment management
services to numerous individuals and institutions. At September 30, 2010,
Investacorp’s 441 financial advisors served approximately 160,000 customer
accounts nationwide and Investacorp had approximately $6.8 billion in
client assets. Triad’s 586 financial advisors served approximately 133,000
customer accounts nationwide and had approximately $11.6 billion in client
assets at September 30, 2010. On a consolidated basis, total client assets
exceeded $20 billion at September 30, 2010.
Recent
Developments
Private
Equity Offering
On May
28, 2010, we entered into stock purchase agreements with various investors,
including investors who were affiliated with the Company, under which the
investors agreed to purchase an aggregate of 14,050,000 shares of our common
stock, at a price of $1.00 per share. On September 15, 2010, we
completed the sale of an aggregate of 13,325,000 shares and received gross
proceeds of $13,325 from investors who are not affiliated with us. Under NYSE
Amex rules, our shareholder approved the sale of the remaining 725,000 shares to
investors who are our directors and executive officers, or affiliates thereof,
at our 2010 Annual Meeting on September 24, 2010. On October 1, 2010 we
completed the sale of such 725,000 shares of common stock to our affiliates and
received gross proceeds of $725. The funds received from the private
equity offering were used for general corporate purposes and repayment of
debt.
Premier
Trust Acquisition
On
September 1, 2010, we acquired Premier Trust, Inc., a provider of wealth
management services, including trust administration, estate and financial
planning and custody services. Founded in 2001, Premier is a Nevada-chartered
trust company headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada, with assets under
administration in excess of $530 million.
Acquisition
Strategy
We
continue to explore opportunities to grow our businesses, including through
potential acquisitions of other securities and investment banking firms, both
domestically and internationally. These acquisitions may involve payments of
material amounts of cash, the incurrence of material amounts of debt, which may
increase our leverage, or the issuance of significant amounts of our equity
securities, which may be dilutive to our existing shareholders. We cannot assure
you that we will be able to complete any such potential acquisitions on
acceptable terms or at all or, if we do, that any acquired business will be
profitable. Also we may not be able to integrate successfully acquired
businesses into our existing business and operations.
Critical Accounting
Policies
There have been no material changes to
the critical accounting policies set forth in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Please
refer to those sections for disclosures regarding the critical accounting
policies related to our business.
Results
of Operations
The
following discussion provides an assessment of our results of operations,
capital resources and liquidity and should be read in conjunction with our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this report. The unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of Ladenburg,
Investacorp, Triad, Premier (since September 1, 2010) and our other
subsidiaries.
|
|
Three
months ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Nine
months ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
$ |
48,363 |
|
|
$ |
39,246 |
|
|
$ |
139,918 |
|
|
$ |
106,861 |
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
51,341 |
|
|
|
43,066 |
|
|
|
149,101 |
|
|
|
121,521 |
|
Pre-tax
loss
|
|
|
(2,978
|
) |
|
|
(3,820
|
) |
|
|
(9,183
|
) |
|
|
(14,660
|
) |
Net
loss
|
|
|
(3,205
|
) |
|
|
(3,728
|
) |
|
|
(9,837
|
) |
|
|
(15,127
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation
of EBITDA, as adjusted, to net loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA,
as adjusted
|
|
|
(141
|
) |
|
|
(189
|
) |
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
(3,450
|
) |
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
(11
|
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(29
|
) |
|
|
65 |
|
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(641
|
) |
|
|
(1,013
|
) |
|
|
(2,533
|
) |
|
|
(3,191
|
) |
Income
tax expense
|
|
|
(227
|
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(654
|
) |
|
|
(467
|
) |
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
|
|
(894
|
) |
|
|
(941
|
) |
|
|
(2,723
|
) |
|
|
(2,811
|
) |
Non-cash
compensation expense
|
|
|
(1,291
|
) |
|
|
(1,688
|
) |
|
|
(4,656
|
) |
|
|
(5,273
|
) |
Clearing
firm conversion expense
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(306
|
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(3,205 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,728 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,837 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,127 |
) |
Earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, adjusted for
gains or losses on sales of assets, non-cash compensation expense and clearing
firm conversion expense is a key metric we use in evaluating our financial
performance. EBITDA is considered a non-GAAP financial measure as defined by
Regulation G promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. We consider EBITDA, as adjusted, important in evaluating our financial
performance on a consistent basis across various periods due to the significance
of non-cash and non-recurring items. We use EBITDA, as adjusted, as a primary
measure, among others, to analyze and evaluate financial and strategic planning
decisions regarding future operating investments and potential acquisitions. We
believe that EBITDA, as adjusted, eliminates items that are not indicative of
our core operating performance, such as expenses related to Investacorp’s
conversion to a single clearing firm as part of a new seven-year clearing
agreement, or do not involve a cash outlay, such as stock-related compensation.
EBITDA, as adjusted, should be considered in addition to, rather than as a
substitute for, pre-tax (loss) income, net (loss) income and cash flows from
operating activities.
Third
quarter 2010 EBITDA, as adjusted, was $(141), an increase of $48 from third
quarter 2009 EBITDA, as adjusted, of ($189), primarily because of the $1,954
principal and interest forgiven in the third quarter of 2010 under our loan
agreement with National Financial Services, which we refer to as NFS, our
subsidiaries’ clearing firm. This was partially offset by increases
in rent and occupancy expense of $417 and professional services expense of
$781. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 EBITDA, as
adjusted, was $1,064, an increase of $4,514 from the EBITDA, as adjusted, of
$(3,450) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, primarily because of
increased revenues of $33,057, partially offset by increased commissions and
fees of $25,065 and increased compensation and benefits of $2,260.
Segment
Description
We have
three operating segments:
|
·
|
Ladenburg
-- includes the retail and institutional securities brokerage, investment
banking services, asset management services and investment activities
conducted by Ladenburg and LTAM.
|
|
·
|
Independent
brokerage and advisory services -- includes the broker-dealer and
investment advisory services provided by Investacorp and Triad through
their independent contractor registered
representatives.
|
|
·
|
Premier
Trust – includes the trust administration, estate and financial planning,
custody and investment services conducted by
Premier.
|
|
|
Three
months
ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
months
ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ladenburg
|
|
$ |
7,420 |
|
|
$ |
10,076 |
|
|
$ |
29,617
|
|
|
$ |
26,358 |
|
Independent
brokerage and advisory services
|
|
|
38,819 |
|
|
|
29,138 |
|
|
|
108,122 |
|
|
|
80,399 |
|
Premier
Trust
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Total
revenues
|
|
$ |
48,363 |
|
|
$ |
39,246 |
|
|
$ |
139,918 |
|
|
$ |
106,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax
(loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ladenburg
|
|
$ |
(2,272 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,395 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,712 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,583 |
) |
Independent
brokerage and advisory services
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
Premier
Trust
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(566 |
) |
|
|
(2,555 |
) |
|
|
(4,779 |
) |
|
|
(7,646 |
) |
Total
pre-tax loss
|
|
$ |
(2,978 |
) |
|
|
(3,820 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,183 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,660 |
) |
Three
months ended September 30, 2010 versus three months ended September 30,
2009
For the
quarter ended September 30, 2010, we had a net loss of $3,205 compared to a net
loss of $3,728 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.The decrease in net loss
of $523 is attributable to an increase in investment banking fees, an increase
in the independent brokerage and advisory services segment’s commissions and
advisory fees and the forgiveness of principal and interest under our NFS loan
agreement.
Our total
revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased $9,117 (23%)
from the 2009 period, primarily as a result of increased advisory fees revenue
of $4,313, increased commissions revenue of $2,878, increased investment banking
revenue of $1,206 and increased other income of $2,599, partially offset by
decreased principal transactions revenue of $1,535 and decreased interest and
dividends revenue of $344.
Our total
expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased by $8,275 (19%)
from the 2009 period, primarily as a result of increased commissions and fees
expense of $8,571, increased professional services of $781, increased rent and
occupancy, net of sublease revenue of $417 and increased other expense of $522,
partially offset by decreased compensation and benefits of $1,073, decreased
interest expense of $372 and decreased non-cash compensation of
$397.
The
$2,878 (12%) increase in commissions revenue for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily attributable to
the recruitment of higher-producing financial advisors in our independent
brokerage and advisory services segment which had increased commissions revenue
of $5,400 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009
period, primarily the result of an increase in sales of variable life and
variable annuity products. Ladenburg commissions decreased by $2,522,
which was primarily attributable to unfavorable market conditions. Also,
Ladenburg closed two offices during the second quarter of 2010, resulting in an
$800 decrease in commissions for the three months ended September 30, 2010
compared to the 2009 period.
The
$4,313 (50%) increase in advisory fee revenue for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily attributable to
the increase in advisory assets under management. We expect asset management
revenue to continue to increase in the near term due to improving market
conditions and newly-added advisory assets.
The
$1,206 (39%) increase in investment banking revenue for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily due to an
increase in capital raising activities of $1,661, partially offset by a decrease
in strategic advisory services fees of $455. We derive investment
banking revenue from Ladenburg’s capital raising activities, including
underwritten public offerings, registered direct offerings and PIPES (private
investment in public equity securities) offerings and strategic advisory
services. Revenue from capital raising activities was $4,006 for the 2010 period
as compared to $2,345 for the 2009 period. Revenue from strategic advisory
services fees was $277 for the 2010 period as compared to $732 for the 2009
period.
The
$1,535 (217%) decrease in principal transactions for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily attributable to
losses in the fair value of securities received as consideration in capital
raising activities.
The $344
(70%) decrease in interest and dividends for the three months ended September
30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily attributable to lower
interest rates and a decrease in margin account balances. We
currently expect continued lower interest and dividends revenue in 2010 due to
expected low interest rates and reduced interest sharing from our clearing
broker.
The
$2,599 (173%) increase in other income for the three months ended September 30,
2010 as compared to 2009 is primarily attributable to $1,429 of forgiven
principal and $525 of forgiven interest under our NFS loan agreement, which is
reflected in our corporate segment. Other income also increased due to increases
in direct investment marketing allowances received from product sponsor programs
of $66, conference revenue of $56, transaction-related fees of $66 and
miscellaneous trading services of $406 in our independent brokerage and advisory
services segment.
The
$8,571 (37%) increase in commissions and fees expense for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily due to an
increase in commissions and advisory fees revenue. Commissions and fees expense
comprises compensation payments earned by the independent contractor registered
representatives in our independent brokerage and advisory services
segment. These payments are calculated based on a percentage of
revenues generated and vary by product. Accordingly, when the
independent contractor registered representatives increase their business, both
our revenues and expenses increase since they earn additional compensation based
on the revenue produced.
The
$1,073 (10%) decrease in compensation and benefits expense for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period was primarily due to
decreases in the Ladenburg segment of $1,329 in producers’ compensation, which
is directly correlated to revenue production, and a $281 decrease in salaries
and benefits primarily attributed to a one-time severance charge to Ladenburg of
$365 in 2009, partially offset by an increase in bonus at the corporate segment
of $537.
The $417
(87%) increase in rent and occupancy, net of sublease revenue, for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period relates to a $421
reversal of a charge recorded in the first quarter of 2009 for abandoning office
space. Ladenburg re-opened a retail brokerage branch in the third
quarter of 2009.
The $781
(76%) increase in professional services expense for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily due to an
increase in legal fees of $859 in the independent brokerage and advisory
services segment, partially offset by a decrease of $117 in Ladenburg’s legal
fees.
The $372
(32%) decrease in interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2010
as compared to the 2009 period is primarily attributable to lower average
debt outstanding.
The $522
(21%) increase in other expense for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as
compared to the 2009 period is primarily attributable to increases in our
independent brokerage and advisory services segment of $357 for fees related to
transitioning new independent registered representatives and increases in errors
and omissions insurance premiums, $39 for marketing and advertising costs and
$108 in miscellaneous trading costs.
We
incurred income tax expense of $227 for the three months ended September 30,
2010 as compared to a benefit of $92 for the 2009 period. After consideration of
all the evidence, both positive and negative, management has determined that a
valuation allowance at September 30, 2010 was necessary to fully offset the
deferred tax assets based on the likelihood of future realization. Our current
deferred income tax liabilities increased by approximately $174 during the 2010
period due to goodwill amortization for tax purposes. The income tax rates for
the 2010 and 2009 periods do not bear a customary relationship to effective tax
rates, primarily as a result of the increase in the valuation allowance for the
2010 and 2009 periods.
Nine
months ended September 30, 2010 versus nine months ended September 30,
2009
Our net
loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $9,837 compared to a
net loss of $15,127 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The
decrease in net loss of $5,290 is attributable to the increase in advisory fees
revenue, commission revenue and investment banking transactions, partially
offset by an increase in commission and fees expense and compensation and
benefits expenses.
Our total
revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased $33,057 (31%)
from the 2009 period, primarily as a result of increased commissions revenue of
$12,545, increased advisory fees revenue of $13,680, increased investment
banking revenue of $6,421, increased other income of $3,926, partially offset by
decreased interest and dividends revenue of $1,937 and decreased principal
transactions of $1,578.
Our total
expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased by $27,580 (23%)
from the 2009 period, primarily as a result of increased commissions and fees
expense of $25,065, increased compensation and benefits expense of $2,260 and
increased other expense of $2,200, partially offset by decreased interest of
$658 and decreased professional services expense of $409.
The
$12,545 (19%) increase in commissions revenue for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily attributable to
the recruitment of higher-producing financial advisors in our independent
brokerage and advisory services segment, which had increased commissions revenue
of $14,953, primarily the result of an increase in sales of variable life
insurance, variable annuity and limited partnership
products. Ladenburg commissions decreased by $2,408, primarily due to
unfavorable market conditions. Also, Ladenburg closed two offices resulting in a
$988 decrease in commissions for the 2010 period.
The
$13,680 (60%) increase in advisory fees revenue for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily attributable to
the increase in advisory assets under management. We currently expect
asset management revenue to continue to increase in the near term due to
improved market conditions and newly added advisory assets.
The
$6,421 (73%) increase in investment banking revenue for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily due to an
increase in capital raising activities of $6,907, partially offset by a decrease
in strategic advisory services fees of $486. Revenue from capital
raising activities was $12,624, including $706 in warrants for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $2,547 for the 2009
period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
investment banking revenue included $405 and $3,575, respectively, of deferred
fees from SPAC (Specified Purpose Acquisition Company) transactions which were
received upon a SPAC’s completion of a business combination
transaction.
The
$1,578 (179%) decrease in principal transactions for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily attributable to
losses in the fair value of securities received as consideration in capital
raising activities.
The
$1,937 (83%) decrease in interest and dividends for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily attributable to
lower interest rates and a decrease in margin account balances. We
currently expect continued lower interest and dividends revenue in 2010 due to
expected low interest rates and reduced interest sharing from our clearing
broker.
The
$3,926 (86%) increase in other income for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 as compared to 2009 is primarily attributable to $1,429 of forgiven
principal and $525 of forgiven interest under our NFS loan agreement in our
corporate segment. Other income also increased due to increases in
direct investment marketing allowances received from product sponsor programs of
$402, conference revenue of $191, transaction-related fees of $297 and
miscellaneous trading services of $744 in our independent brokerage and advisory
services segment.
The
$25,065 (40%) increase in commissions and fees expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily due to an
increase in commissions and fees revenue. Commissions and fees expense comprises
compensation payments earned by the independent contractor registered
representatives in our independent brokerage and advisory services
segment. These payments are calculated based on a percentage of
revenues generated and vary by product. Accordingly, when the
independent contractor registered representatives increase their business, both
our revenues and expenses increase since they earn additional compensation based
on the revenue produced.
The
$2,260 (8%) increase in compensation and benefits expense for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period was primarily due to
increases in the Ladenburg segment of $1,870 in producers’ compensation and
bonus, which is directly correlated to revenue production, increase
in bonus at the corporate segment of $558 and a $194 increase in bonus in our
independent brokerage and advisory services segment, partially offset by
decreases in salaries and benefits of $232 and $241 at Ladenburg and our
independent brokerage and advisory services segment, respectively.
The $409
(9%) decrease in professional services expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily due to a decrease
of $1,012 in Ladenburg’s legal fees and a decrease of $257 in audit, tax and
consulting expense for all segments, partially offset by an increase of $809 in
our independent brokerage and advisory services segment.
The $658
(21%) decrease in interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
as compared to the 2009 period is primarily attributable to lower average
debt outstanding.
The
$2,200 (34%) increase in other expense for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 as compared to the 2009 period is primarily attributable to increases in
our independent brokerage and advisory services segment of $278 for fees related
to transitioning new independent registered representatives, $217 for marketing
and advertising costs, $300 in miscellaneous trading costs, $403 for increases
in errors and omissions insurance premiums, $111 for conference expense and $306
for expenses related to the conversion of client accounts to one clearing
firm. Ladenburg experienced increases of $292 in travel expense
primarily attributable to investment banking transactions and $188 for
miscellaneous trading costs.
We
incurred income tax expense of $654 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
as compared to $467 for the 2009 period. After consideration of all the
evidence, both positive and negative, management has determined that a valuation
allowance at September 30, 2010 was necessary to fully offset the deferred tax
assets based on the likelihood of future realization. Our current deferred
income tax liabilities increased by approximately $540 during the 2010 period
due to goodwill amortization for tax purposes. The income tax rates for the 2010
and 2009 periods do not bear a customary relationship to effective tax rates
primarily as a result of the increase in the valuation allowance for the 2010
and 2009 periods.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Approximately
26% and 23% of our total assets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively, consisted of cash and cash equivalents, securities owned and
receivables from clearing brokers and other broker-dealers, all of which
fluctuate, depending upon the levels of customer business and trading and
investment banking activity. As securities dealers, our broker-dealer
subsidiaries may carry significant levels of securities inventories to meet
customer needs. A relatively small percentage of our total assets are fixed. The
total assets or the individual components of total assets may vary significantly
from period to period because of changes relating to economic and market
conditions, and proprietary trading strategies.
Each of
Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad is subject to the SEC’s net capital
rules. Therefore, Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad are subject to
certain restrictions on their use of capital and their related liquidity. At
September 30, 2010, Ladenburg’s regulatory net capital of $4,247 exceeded
minimum capital requirements of $250 by $3,997. At September 30,
2010, Investacorp’s regulatory net capital of $958 exceeded minimum capital
requirements of $271 by $687. At September 30, 2010, Triad’s
regulatory net capital of $1,514 exceeded minimum capital requirements of $374
by $1,140. Failure to maintain the required net capital may subject
Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad to suspension or expulsion by FINRA, the SEC
and other regulatory bodies, and ultimately may require their liquidation. The
net capital rule also prohibits the payment of dividends, redemption of stock
and prepayment or payment of principal of subordinated indebtedness if net
capital, after giving effect to the payment, redemption or prepayment, would be
less than specified percentages of the minimum net capital requirement.
Compliance with the net capital rule could limit the operations of Ladenburg,
Investacorp and Triad that require the intensive use of capital, such as
underwriting and trading activities, and also could restrict our ability to
withdraw capital from our subsidiaries, which in turn, could limit our ability
to pay dividends and repay and service our debt.
Premier,
chartered by the state of Nevada, is subject to regulation by the Nevada
Department of Business and Industry Financial Institutions
Division. Under Nevada law, Premier must maintain stockholders’
equity of $1,000. At September 30, 2010, Premier had stockholders’
equity of $2,365.
Our
primary source of liquidity consists of borrowings under our $30,000 revolving
credit agreement with an affiliate of Phillip Frost, M.D., our chairman and
principal shareholder. Borrowings under the $30,000 revolving credit agreement
bear interest at a rate of 11% per annum, payable quarterly. At September 30,
2010, $15,350 was outstanding under the revolving credit agreement. During the
first nine months of 2010, we repaid a net amount of $3,100 under the $30,000
credit agreement primarily using proceeds from the June 2010 private placement.
We may repay amounts outstanding or re-borrow amounts under our revolving credit
facility at any time prior to its amended maturity date of August 25, 2016,
without penalty. We believe our existing assets and borrowings available under
our $30,000 revolving credit facility provide adequate funds for continuing
operations at current activity levels. We are currently in compliance with all
debt covenants in our debt agreements.
Cash used
in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $4,520,
primarily due to our net loss, an increase in securities owned at fair value,
receivables from clearing broker and other broker-dealers, other receivables,
and other assets partially offset by an increase in accrued compensation,
commissions and fees payable, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities. This
compares to cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 of $1,097 primarily due to our net loss, an increase in other
assets and receivables from other broker-dealers, partially offset by securities
owned, receivables from clearing brokers and accrued compensation.
Cash
used in investing activities was $315 for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, due to the purchase of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements,
and the acquisition of Premier, partially offset by a decrease in restricted
assets due to Investacorp’s receipt of an escrowed deposit upon the termination
of a clearing agreement with one of its clearing firms. This compares to cash
used in investing activities of $42 for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, primarily due to an increase in furniture, equipment and leasehold
improvements partially offset by a decrease in restricted assets related to the
termination of a letter of credit securing obligations under one of Ladenburg's
office leases.
Cash
provided by financing activities was $5,006 for the nine months ended September
30, 2010, due to the private equity offering, stock option exercises and
purchases under our employee stock purchase plan, offset by repayments of notes
payable and common stock repurchases, as compared to financing activities
provided $142 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to the
$10,000 forgivable loan agreement, partially offset by repayments of amounts
outstanding under our revolving credit facility, repayments of notes payable and
common stock repurchases.
At
September 30, 2010, we were obligated under several non-cancelable lease
agreements for office space, which provide for future minimum lease payments
aggregating approximately $30,000 through 2015, exclusive of escalation charges.
We have subleased vacant space under subleases which entitle us to receive rents
aggregating approximately $22,300 through such date. Effective August
13, 2010, our subsidiary, Investacorp Group, Inc., entered into a five-year
lease with Frost Real Estate Holdings, LLC, an entity affiliated with Phillip
Frost, M.D., our chairman and principal shareholder, which began on October 1,
2010 and provides for aggregate payments during the term
of $1,581. This amount is included in the future minimum
lease payments above.
In
connection with our subsidiaries’ clearing agreements, NFS provided us with a
seven-year, $10,000 forgivable loan. Interest on the loan accrues at the prime
rate plus 2%. If our broker-dealer subsidiaries meet certain aggregate annual
clearing revenue targets set forth in the loan agreement, the principal balance
of the loan will be forgiven in seven equal yearly installments of $1,429,
continuing on an annual basis through August 2016. Interest payments due
for each such year also will be forgiven if we meet the annual clearing revenue
targets. Any principal amounts not forgiven will be due in August 2016, and
any interest payments not forgiven are due annually. If any principal amount is
not forgiven, we may have such principal forgiven in future years if our
broker-dealer subsidiaries exceed subsequent annual clearing revenue targets. We
have expensed, and expect to continue to expense, interest under the loan
agreement until such interest is forgiven. We met the first annual
clearing revenue targets in August 2010. Accordingly, in the third
quarter of 2010, we recognized income of $1,429 and $525 from the forgiveness of
principal and interest, respectively, and the outstanding balance under the loan
was reduced to $8,571.
In
connection with the Investacorp acquisition, we issued a $15,000 promissory note
to Investacorp’s former principal shareholder. The note bore interest
at 4.11% per annum and was payable in 36 monthly installments. At
September 30, 2010, the outstanding balance of this note was
$442. The note was retired in October 2010.
In
connection with the Triad acquisition, we issued a $5,000 promissory note to
Triad’s former shareholders. The note bears interest at a rate of 2.51% per
annum, is payable quarterly and matures in August 2011. The outstanding balance
of this note at September 30, 2010 was $1,709.
In
connection with the Premier acquisition, we issued a $1,161 promissory note to a
subsidiary of Premier’s former shareholder. The note bears interest
at a rate of 6.50% per annum, is payable quarterly and matures in September
2015. The outstanding balance of this note at September 30, 2010 was
$1,161.
In
March 2007, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 2,500,000
shares of our common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions, depending on market conditions. The repurchase program
is funded using approximately 15% of our EBITDA, as adjusted. From
inception through September 30, 2010, 1,013,194 shares have been repurchased for
$1,753 under the program.
Off-Balance-Sheet Risk and
Concentration of Credit Risk
Each of
Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad, as guarantor of its customer accounts to its
clearing broker, is exposed to off-balance-sheet risk in the event that its
customers do not fulfill their obligations to the clearing broker. Also, to the
extent Ladenburg, Investacorp or Triad maintain a short position in any
securities, they are exposed to off-balance-sheet market risk, since their
ultimate obligation to repurchase securities to close their short positions may
exceed the amount recognized in the financial statements.
Please
see Note 7 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Market
Risk
Market
risk generally represents the risk of loss that may result from the potential
change in the value of a financial instrument as a result of fluctuations in
interest and currency exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, changes in
the implied volatility of interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and
commodity prices and also changes in the credit ratings of either the issuer or
its related country of origin. Market risk is inherent to both derivative and
non-derivative financial instruments and, accordingly, the scope of our market
risk management procedures extends beyond derivatives to include all market-risk
sensitive financial instruments.
Current
and proposed underwriting, corporate finance and other commitments are subject
to due diligence reviews by our senior management, as well as professionals in
the appropriate business and support units involved. Credit risk related to
various financing activities is reduced by the industry practice of obtaining
and maintaining collateral. We monitor our exposure to counterparty risk through
the use of credit exposure information, the monitoring of collateral values and
the establishment of credit limits.
We
maintain inventories of trading securities which are generally received as
compensation in banking transactions. At September 30, 2010, the fair market
value of our inventories was $1,422 in long positions and $0 in short
positions. We performed an entity-wide analysis of our financial
instruments and assessed the related market risk. Based on this analysis, we do
not expect that the market risk associated with our financial instruments at
September 30, 2010 will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
Special Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements
We and
our representatives may from time to time make oral or written “forward-looking
statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995, including any statements that may be contained in the foregoing
discussion in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations” in this report and in other filings with the SEC and in
our reports to shareholders, which reflect our expectations or beliefs with
respect to future events and financial performance. These forward-looking
statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties and, in connection
with the “safe-harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act, we have identified under “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statement made by or on behalf of us.
Results
actually achieved may differ materially from expected results included in these
forward-looking statements as a result of these or other factors. Due to such
uncertainties and risks, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which such
statements are made. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement
that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of us. Further,
readers should keep in mind that our quarterly revenues and profits can
fluctuate materially depending on many factors, including the number, size and
timing of completed offerings and other transactions. Accordingly, our
revenues and profits in any particular quarter may not be indicative of future
results.
Item
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The
information under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations — Market Risk” is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) are our controls and other
procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding disclosure.
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we have evaluated
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report, and, based on that evaluation, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that these controls
and procedures were effective as of such date. Due to a short-term net-capital
deficiency at one of our broker-dealer subsidiaries, which was discovered during
a routine regulatory review, beginning in the third quarter of 2010, we have
taken, and continue to take, corrective actions, including implementing new
procedures to monitor net capital compliance at such broker-dealer subsidiary,
reviewing net capital compliance for historical periods at such broker-dealer
subsidiary, preparing amended FOCUS reports for historical periods, reporting
the deficiency to governmental and self-regulatory organizations and terminating
employees who had primary responsibility for monitoring and reporting such net
capital compliance.
Changes in Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter ended September 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are
reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
Please
see Note 7 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
contained elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Item
1A. RISK FACTORS
In
addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully
consider the factors set forth in Item 1A of Part I of our annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and Item 1A of Part II of our
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, which could
materially affect our business, financial condition or future
results.
Item
6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Description
|
10.1
|
|
Lease
agreement, dated as of August 13, 2010 between Investacorp Group, Inc. and
Frost Real Estate Holdings, LLC.(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1
of the registrant's current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
August 13, 2010).
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
.*
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.*
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.*
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.*
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES
INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November
15, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/
Brett H. Kaufman |
|
|
|
Brett
H. Kaufman |
|
|
|
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|