UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009
Commission File Number 1-15799
LADENBURG THALMANN FINANCIAL
SERVICES INC.
(Exact Name Of Registrant As Specified In Its Charter)
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
65-0701248
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
4400 Biscayne Boulevard, 12th Floor
Miami, Florida
|
|
33137
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(212) 409-2000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common stock, par value $.0001 per share
|
|
NYSE Amex
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Exchange
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statement incorporated by reference in Part III
of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company þ
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of June 30, 2009 (the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter), the aggregate market value of the registrants
common stock (based on the closing price on the NYSE Amex on
that date) held by non-affiliates of the registrant was
approximately $49,900,000.
As of March 11, 2010, there were 167,932,038 shares of
the registrants common stock outstanding.
Documents
Incorporated by Reference:
Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
is incorporated by reference from the definitive Proxy Statement
for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days
after the end of the Registrants fiscal year covered by
this report.
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
Form 10-K
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PART I
General
We are engaged in investment banking, equity research,
institutional sales and trading, independent brokerage and
advisory services and asset management services through our
principal subsidiaries, Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc.
(Ladenburg), Investacorp Inc. (collectively with
related companies, Investacorp), Triad Advisors,
Inc. (Triad) and Ladenburg Thalmann Asset Management
Inc. (LTAM). We are committed to establishing a
significant presence in the financial services industry by
meeting the varying investment needs of our corporate,
institutional and retail clients.
Ladenburg is a full service broker-dealer that has been a member
of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) since 1879. It
provides its services principally for middle market and emerging
growth companies and high net worth individuals through a
coordinated effort among corporate finance, capital markets,
asset management, brokerage and trading professionals.
Investacorp, headquartered in Miami Lakes, Florida, is an
independent broker-dealer and registered investment advisor that
has been serving the independent financial advisor community
since 1978. Investacorps national network of independent
financial advisors primarily serves retail clients. We acquired
Investacorp in October 2007.
Triad, headquartered in Norcross, Georgia, is an independent
broker-dealer and registered investment advisor that offers a
broad range of products, services and total wealth management
solutions to independent contractor financial advisors located
nationwide. Triads independent financial advisors
primarily serve retail clients. Triad was founded in 1998 and we
acquired Triad in August 2008.
LTAM, headquartered in New York, NY, is a registered investment
advisor. LTAM offers various asset management products utilized
by Ladenburg clients as well as clients of Investacorp and
Triads financial advisors.
Through our acquisitions of Investacorp and Triad, we have
become a significant presence in the independent broker-dealer
space. During the past decade, this has been one of the fastest
growing segments of the financial services industry. With
combined revenues of approximately $112 million for 2009
and approximately 1,000 financial advisors for Investacorp and
Triad, we have become one of the approximately 25 largest firms
in the independent broker-dealer space. We believe that, as a
result of the current market turmoil, we have the opportunity
through acquisition and recruiting to significantly expand our
market share in this segment over the next several years. Our
goal remains as a public financial services company to marry the
more recurring and predictable revenue and cash flows of the
independent broker-dealer business with Ladenburgs
traditional investment banking, capital markets, institutional
equity and related businesses. Ladenburgs businesses are
generally more volatile and subject to the cycles of the capital
markets than our independent broker-dealer subsidiaries, but
historically have enjoyed strong operating margins in good
market conditions.
Each of Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad is subject to
regulation by, among others, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (FINRA), and the Municipal Securities
Rulemaking Board (MSRB) and is a member of the
Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC).
Ladenburg and Triad are also subject to regulation by the
Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and
National Futures Association.
Ladenburgs private client services and institutional sales
departments serve approximately 12,000 accounts nationwide and
LTAM provides investment management services to numerous
individuals and institutions. At December 31, 2009,
Investacorps approximately 460 financial advisors served
approximately 134,000 accounts nationwide and Investacorp had
approximately $7.3 billion in client assets. Triads
approximately 540 financial advisors served approximately
130,000 accounts nationwide and had approximately
$10.3 billion in client assets at December 31, 2009.
We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida in
February 1996. Our principal executive offices are located at
4400 Biscayne Boulevard, 12th Floor, Miami, Florida 33137.
Our telephone number is
(212) 409-2000.
Ladenburg and LTAMs principal executive offices are
located at 520 Madison Avenue, New
1
York, New York 10022. Ladenburg has branch offices located in
Melville, New York, Miami and Boca Raton, Florida, Lincolnshire,
Illinois, Los Angeles, California and Princeton, New Jersey.
Investacorps principal executive offices are located at
15450 New Barn Road, Miami Lakes, Florida 33014.
Investacorps independent financial advisors are located in
approximately 309 offices in 42 states. Triads
principal executive offices are located at 5185 Peachtree
Parkway, Suite 280, Norcross, GA 30092. Triads
independent financial advisors are located in approximately 257
offices in 40 states.
Available
Information
Our corporate filings, including our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
our quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
our current reports on
Form 8-K,
our proxy statements and reports filed by our officers and
directors under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and any amendments to those filings,
are available, free of charge, on Ladenburgs website,
www.ladenburg.com, as soon as reasonably practicable
after we electronically file or furnish such material with the
SEC. We do not intend for information contained in our website,
or those of our subsidiaries, to be a part of this annual report
on
Form 10-K.
In February 2004, our board of directors adopted a code of
ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees as
well as those of our subsidiaries. We will provide to any
person, without charge, a copy of our code of ethics. Requests
for copies of our code of ethics should be sent in writing to
Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc., 4400 Biscayne Blvd.,
12th Floor, Miami, FL 33137, Attn: Corporate Counsel.
Caution
Concerning Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors
This annual report on
Form 10-K
includes certain forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. These statements are based on managements current
expectations or beliefs and are subject to uncertainty and
changes in circumstances. Actual results may vary materially
from the expectations contained in this report due to changes in
economic, business, competitive, strategic
and/or
regulatory factors, and other factors affecting the operation of
our businesses. For more detailed information about these
factors, and risk factors about our operations, see
Item 1A, Risk Factors, and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition Special Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements below. We are not
required (and expressly disclaim any obligation) to update or
alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, subsequent events or otherwise.
Recent
Developments
Amendment
of Clearing Arrangements and Forgivable Loan
In August 2009, we amended the terms of our clearing agreements
with National Financial Services LLC (NFS), a
Fidelity Investments company. NFS now serves as the exclusive
clearing broker for Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad, and the
clearing agreements between the firms and NFS have a seven-year
term. We are realizing significant cost savings as a result of
these new clearing arrangements.
On August 25, 2009, NFS provided us with a seven-year,
$10,000,000 forgivable loan. Interest on the loan accrues at the
prime rate plus 2%. If our broker-dealer subsidiaries meet
certain aggregate annual clearing revenue targets set forth in
the loan agreement, the principal balance of the loan will be
forgiven in seven equal yearly installments of $1,429,000
commencing in August 2010 and continuing on an annual basis
through August 2016. Interest payments due for each such year
also will be forgiven if we meet the annual clearing revenue
targets. Any principal amounts not forgiven will be due in
August 2016, and any interest payments not forgiven are due
annually. If any principal amount is not forgiven, we may have
such principal forgiven in future years if our broker-dealer
subsidiaries exceed subsequent annual clearing revenue targets.
We have expensed, and expect to continue to expense, interest
under the loan agreement until such interest is forgiven.
The loan agreement contains other covenants including
limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness,
maintenance of minimum adjusted shareholders equity levels
and a prohibition on the termination of our revolving credit
agreement. If an event of default occurs, the outstanding
principal and interest under the loan agreement may be
accelerated and become immediately due and payable. If the
clearing agreements are terminated prior to the loan maturity
date, all amounts then outstanding must be repaid on demand. The
loan agreement is
2
collateralized by our (but not our broker-dealer
subsidiaries) deposits and accounts held at NFS or its
affiliates, which amounted to $468,000 at December 31, 2009.
We used the loan proceeds to repay amounts outstanding under our
revolving credit agreement. We intend to use the increased
availability under that facility to support our strategy to
become a leader in the independent broker-dealer space.
Acquisition
Strategy
We continue to explore opportunities to grow our businesses,
including through potential acquisitions of other securities and
investment banking firms, both domestically and internationally.
These acquisitions may involve payments of material amounts of
cash, the incurrence of material amounts of debt or the issuance
of significant amounts of our equity securities, which may be
dilutive to our existing shareholders
and/or may
increase our leverage. We cannot assure you that we will be able
to complete any such potential acquisitions on acceptable terms
or at all or, if we do, that any acquired business will be
profitable. Also we may not be able to integrate successfully
acquired businesses into our existing business and operations.
Business
Segments
Effective as of October 19, 2007 (the date we acquired
Investacorp), we have two operating segments which correspond to
our Ladenburg subsidiary and our independent brokerage and
advisory services business conducted by Investacorp and Triad.
Financial and other information by segment for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is set forth in
Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements.
Ladenburg
Ladenburg is a full-service investment bank that provides
investment banking, sales and trading and equity research to its
corporate and institutional clients and high net-worth
individuals.
Investment
Banking Activities
Ladenburgs investment banking professionals provide
corporate finance and strategic and financial advisory services
to public and private companies, primarily those companies with
market capitalizations below $500 million, which we refer
to as middle-market companies. Ladenburg provides these
middle-market companies with capital raising and strategic
advisory services throughout their growth cycles. Ladenburg
offers its clients a high level of attention from senior
personnel and has designed its organizational structure so that
the investment bankers who are responsible for securing and
maintaining client relationships also actively participate in
providing all related transaction execution services to those
clients. Ladenburgs 19 investment banking professionals
serve clients nationwide and worldwide from its offices in
Miami, Florida and New York, New York.
Corporate
Finance
Ladenburgs capital markets group provides capital
origination services primarily to middle-market companies.
Ladenburgs investment bankers develop financing
strategies, transaction structures and financing instruments for
its corporate clients. Ladenburg offers a broad range of
financing options including underwritten public offerings,
registered direct offerings,
at-the-market
offerings, PIPEs (private investment in public equity) and other
private placements. Ladenburgs ability to effectively
structure offerings and to identify likely buyers of such
offerings makes it a valuable advisor to small and middle-market
companies. Although the initial public offering market may not
be favorable consistently in the future, we expect that
Ladenburg will participate in follow-on offerings, PIPEs,
registered direct offerings and private placements to generate
corporate finance revenues. We believe there is a significant
opportunity for continued growth in the PIPE and registered
direct areas given issuers desire to identify and pursue
faster and less costly financing alternatives to traditional
follow-on offerings and institutional investors continuing
interest in these financing transactions. Further, we believe
the establishment of relationships with issuers through our
capital raising efforts will lead to additional investment
banking services, including further capital raising, and other
advisory services. In 2009, Ladenburg placed 11 registered
direct and
3
PIPE offerings, which raised approximately $124 million for
clients in the healthcare, biotechnology, energy and other
industries.
Ladenburg seeks to capitalize on its distribution network by
focusing on the financial services and energy/utilities sectors.
These sectors have yield-oriented equities which are attractive
to institutional and retail investors. These yield products
include offerings by mortgage REITS, business development
companies (BDCs) and master limited partnerships (MLPs).
Ladenburg also has dedicated investment bankers focused on the
healthcare and biotechnology sectors.
Strategic
and Financial Advisory Services
Ladenburg advises clients on a wide range of strategic and
financial issues. When Ladenburg advises a company in the
potential acquisition of another company, business or assets,
its services include evaluating potential acquisition targets,
providing valuation analyses, evaluating and proposing financial
and strategic alternatives and rendering, if appropriate,
fairness opinions. Ladenburg also may provide advice regarding
the timing, structure, financing and pricing of a proposed
acquisition and may assist in negotiating and closing the
acquisition. Ladenburgs buy-side and sell-side mandates
often require that it leverage its extensive relationships and
capital markets expertise. These mandates generally have a
limited duration so Ladenburg seeks to develop new engagements
from existing and prior clients, as well as their legal and
other advisors.
Ladenburg has extensive expertise in the fairness opinion
market. Fairness opinions often are necessary or requested in a
variety of situations, including mergers, acquisitions,
restructurings, financings and privatizations. Ladenburg
provides fairness opinions and analyses to boards of directors,
independent committees of boards of directors and shareholders.
The firm also provides objective advice on the valuation of
businesses and securities in connection with mergers,
acquisitions, leveraged buyouts and restructurings,
going-private transactions and certain other market activities.
Also, Ladenburgs professionals have extensive valuation
expertise and regularly determine the value of private
companies, closely-held business interests, limited partnership
interests, intellectual property and other intangible assets and
corporate securities with marketability concerns.
Sales and
Trading
Ladenburgs private client services and institutional sales
departments currently serve a total of approximately 12,000
accounts nationwide. Ladenburg charges commissions to its
individual and institutional clients for executing securities
trading orders.
Ladenburgs sales and trading operation distributes our
equity research product and communicates our proprietary
investment recommendations to our growing base of institutional
investors. Also, our sales and trading staff executes equity
trades on behalf of our clients and sells the securities of
companies for which we act as an underwriter.
We have established a broad institutional client base through a
consistent focus on the investment and trading objectives of our
clients. Our sales and trading professionals work closely with
our equity research staff to provide insight and differentiated
investment advice to institutional clients nationwide.
We believe that our sales and trading clients turn to us for
timely, differentiated investment advice. We believe that our
equity research features proprietary themes and actionable ideas
about industries and companies that are not widely evaluated by
many other investment banks without our middle-market emphasis.
In recent years, many investment banks have reduced equity
research coverage and market making activities for companies
with market capitalizations below certain thresholds. However,
we continue to commit research and sales and trading resources
to smaller-capitalization companies with the belief that
institutional investors will value such specialized knowledge
and service.
Our sales and trading personnel are also central to our ability
to market equity offerings and provide after-market support. Our
equity capital markets group manages the syndication, marketing,
execution and distribution of equity offerings. Our syndicate
activities include managing the marketing and order-taking
process for underwritten transactions and conducting
after-market stabilization and initial market making. Our
syndicate staff is also responsible for developing and
maintaining relationships with the syndicate departments of
other investment banks.
4
Research
Services
We believe that Ladenburgs research department takes a
fresh, critical approach to analyzing primary sources and
developing proprietary research. Many individuals, institutions,
portfolio managers and hedge fund managers, on all levels, have
been neglected by brokerage firms that ignore the demand for
unbiased research for small and mid-cap companies. Ladenburg
provides a branded in-depth research product. Ladenburgs
research department focuses on investigating investment
opportunities by utilizing fundamental, technical and
quantitative methods to conduct in-depth analysis. Currently,
our research department specializes in small- to mid-cap
companies in the power and electric utilities, exploration and
production, oil services, healthcare, healthcare technology and
on a special situations basis and may expand to additional
sectors in the future. Ladenburg recently initiated research
coverage on numerous Florida-based companies and intends to
increase its coverage in this geographic area. Research is
provided on a fee basis to certain institutional accounts.
Our research department:
|
|
|
|
|
reviews and analyzes general market conditions and other
industry groups;
|
|
|
|
issues written reports on companies, with recommendations on
specific actions to buy, sell or hold;
|
|
|
|
furnishes information to retail and institutional
customers; and
|
|
|
|
responds to inquires from customers and account executives.
|
Asset
Management
Ladenburg
Thalmann Asset Management
LTAM is a registered investment advisor. It offers various asset
management products utilized by Ladenburg clients, as well as
clients of Investacorp and Triads financial advisors.
Ladenburg
Asset Management Program
The Ladenburg Asset Management Program provides centralized
management of mutual fund and exchange-traded fund portfolios
based on asset allocation models. Features of the program
include active rebalancing at the asset class and security
level, minimum account balance, risk analysis, customized
investment policy statements and comprehensive performance
reporting.
Investment
Consulting Services
LTAMs Investment Consulting Services (ICS)
provides clients with access to professional money managers
usually only available to large institutions, across the
spectrum of major asset classes. Whether the client requires a
complete asset allocation strategy or an investment manager for
a single asset class, each of our managers has been thoroughly
examined for inclusion in the ICS program. Once a manager has
been added to the platform, it is regularly reviewed in order to
ensure that it represents a suitable solution. Through ICS, LTAM
services high net worth clients and institutions, such as
foundations and hospitals.
Private
Investment Management
The Private Investment Management program allows internal
managers to provide portfolio services to clients on a
discretionary basis with specific styles of investing for an
annual asset-based fee. The Private Investment Management
Program Accredited (PIMA) is offered for accredited
investors. The internal PIMA managers manage certain accounts
using various investment strategies, including short-selling and
use of leverage. In addition to an annual asset-based fee,
certain customers also are charged an incentive fee, if earned,
at the end of each calendar year.
Retirement
Plan Sponsor Services
LTAM provides investment consulting services to sponsors of
retirement plans, such as 401(k) plans. These services include:
identifying mutual funds for the plan sponsors review and
final selection based on the selection criteria stated in the
plans investment policy statement; assisting in the
planning of, and participating in, enrollment
5
and communication meetings; and providing to the plan sponsor
quarterly performance reports of the funds for the purpose of
meeting the plan fiduciarys obligation to monitor plan
assets. Certain plan participants also may engage LTAM to manage
their plan assets on a discretionary basis.
Alternative
Investments
LTAM provides high net worth clients and institutional investors
the opportunity to invest in proprietary and third party
alternative investments. These include, but are not limited to,
hedge funds, funds of funds, private equity, venture capital and
real estate.
Ladenburg
Architect Program
LTAM provides its customers the Ladenburg Architect Program as a
non-discretionary, fee-based, advisory account that allows them
to maintain control over the management of the account and
choose from a diverse group of securities. The program features
quarterly performance monitoring, check writing, a debit card
and online account access.
Third
Party Advisory Services
Together with its affiliates, LTAM may also provide advisory
services, ranging from proprietary investment solutions to
access to professional money managers for the clients of Triad
and Investacorp Advisory Services, Inc. (IAS),
Investacorps registered investment advisor.
Investment
Activities
Ladenburg may from time to time seek to realize investment gains
by purchasing, selling and holding securities for its own
account on a daily basis. Ladenburg may also from time to time
engage for its own account in the arbitrage of securities. We
are required to commit the capital necessary for use in these
investment activities. The amount of capital committed at any
particular time will vary according to market, economic and
financial factors, including the other aspects of our business.
Also, Ladenburg regularly receives shares or warrants that
entitle it to purchase securities of the corporate issuers for
which it raises capital or provides advisory services.
Independent
Brokerage and Advisory Services
Overview
Investacorp and Triad are independent broker-dealers and
registered investment advisors, whose non-employee financial
advisors offer securities brokerage and advisory services to
their clients, which may include packaged products such as
mutual funds, variable annuities and advisor managed accounts.
We believe that the financial services industry is experiencing
an increase in the number of financial advisors at independent
broker-dealers and registered investment advisors as financial
advisors are leaving large national firms. These new independent
financial advisors require client and back office support
services and access to technology and typically become
affiliated with an independent broker-dealer. We expect this
trend to continue and possibly accelerate in the future.
A financial advisor who becomes affiliated with Investacorp or
Triad generally establishes his or her own office and is solely
responsible for the payment of all expenses associated with the
operation of the branch office (including rent, utilities,
furniture, equipment, quotation systems, and general office
supplies); although all of that branchs revenues from
securities brokerage transactions and from advisory services
conducted through Investacorp or Triad accrue to Investacorp or
Triad. Because an independent financial advisor bears the
responsibility for these expenses, the financial advisor
receives a significant percentage of the commissions or advisory
fees he or she generates, typically at least 80%. This compares
with a payout rate of approximately 25% to 50% to financial
advisors working in a traditional brokerage setting where the
brokerage firm bears substantially all of sales force costs,
including providing employee benefits, office space, sales
assistants, telephone service and supplies. The independent
brokerage model permits Investacorp and Triad to expand their
respective base of revenue and retail distribution network of
investment products and services without the capital
expenditures that would be required to
6
open company-owned offices and the additional administrative and
other costs of hiring financial advisors as in-house employees.
Investacorps and Triads financial advisors must
possess a sufficient level of business experience to enable the
individual to independently operate his or her own office.
Insurance agents, financial planners, accountants and other
financial professionals, who already provide financial services
to their clients, often affiliate with independent
broker-dealers. These professionals then offer financial
products and services to their clients through Investacorp and
Triad and earn commissions and fees for these transactions and
services. Investacorps and Triads financial advisors
have the ability to structure their own practices and to focus
in different areas of the investment business, subject to
Investacorps and Triads supervisory procedures as
well as compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements.
Many of Investacorps and Triads financial advisors
provide financial planning services to their clients, wherein
the financial advisor evaluates a clients financial needs
and objectives, develops a detailed plan, and then implements
the plan with the clients approval. When the
implementation of such objectives involves the purchase or sale
of securities (including the placement of assets within a
managed account) such transactions may be effected through
Investacorp or Triad, for which Investacorp or Triad earns
either a commission or a fee. Representatives may be permitted
to conduct other approved businesses unrelated to their
Investacorp or Triad activities, such as offering fixed
insurance products and accounting, estate planning and tax
services, among others.
Each financial advisor is required to obtain and maintain in
good standing each license required by the SEC and FINRA to
conduct the type of securities or advisory business in which he
or she engages, and to register in the various states in which
he or she has customers. Each of Investacorp and Triad is
ultimately responsible for supervising all of its financial
advisors wherever they are located. We can incur substantial
liability from improper actions of any of Investacorps or
Triads financial advisors.
Many of Investacorps and Triads financial advisors
are also authorized agents of insurance companies. Investacorp
and Triad process insurance business through subsidiaries or
sister companies which are licensed insurance brokers, as well
as through other licensed insurance brokers. We do not act as an
insurance company and therefore retain no insurance risk related
to insurance and annuity products.
Investacorp and Triad financial advisors also may provide
consultation and financial planning services including: estate
planning, retirement and financial goal planning, educational
funding, asset allocation and insurance needs analysis, as well
as general analysis and planning. These financial advisors may
prepare a written financial plan based upon the clients
stated goals, needs and investment profile.
Strategy
for our Independent Brokerage and Advisory Services
Business
Investacorp and Triad are focused on increasing their networks
of financial advisors, revenues and client assets as described
below.
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit experienced financial
professionals. Each of Investacorp and Triad
actively recruits experienced financial professionals. These
efforts are supported by advertising, targeted direct mail and
inbound and outbound telemarketing. Although Investacorp and
Triad will continue to attempt to recruit those financial
advisors who sell primarily mutual funds, annuities and
insurance, it also intends to pursue financial advisors who
focus on the sale of equities, fixed income and alternative
investment products.
|
|
|
|
Provide technological solutions to home-office employees and
independent financial advisors. We believe that
it is imperative that Investacorp and Triad continue to possess
state-of-the-art
technology so that their employees and independent financial
advisors can effectively transact, facilitate, measure and
record business activity in a timely, accurate and efficient
manner. By continuing our commitment to provide a highly capable
technology platform to process business, we believe that
Investacorp and Triad can achieve economies of scale and
potentially reduce the need to hire additional personnel.
|
|
|
|
Build recurring revenue. We have recognized
the trend toward increased investment advisory business and each
of Investacorp and Triad is focused on building its fee based
investment advisory business, which may be better suited for
certain clients. While these fees generate substantially lower
first year revenue than
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
most commission products, the recurring nature of these fees
provides a platform for accelerating future revenue growth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assist financial advisors to increase their
sales. Investacorp and Triad are aligned with
their financial advisors in seeking to increase their sales and
improve productivity. Investacorp and Triad undertake
initiatives to assist their financial advisors with client
recruitment, training, compliance and product support.
Investacorp and Triad also focus on improving back-office
support to allow financial advisors more time to focus on
serving their clients, rather than administrative burdens.
|
|
|
|
Acquire other independent brokerage firms. We
may also pursue the acquisition of other independent brokerage
firms. The ability to realize growth through acquisitions,
however, will depend on the availability of suitable
broker-dealer candidates and our ability to successfully
negotiate favorable terms. There can be no assurance that we
will be able to consummate any such acquisitions. Further, there
are costs associated with the integration of new businesses and
personnel, which may be more than anticipated.
|
Investacorp
Investacorp supports its independent contractor financial
advisors in providing products and services to their clients in
approximately 309 branch offices located in 42 states. The
number of financial advisors in these offices ranges from one to
15. Approximately one-quarter of the financial advisors are
located in Florida with a significant number located in New
York. Revenues generated from Investacorps business
represented 34% of our total revenues in 2009.
Triad
Triad supports its independent contractor financial advisors in
providing products and services to their clients in
approximately 257 branch offices located in 40 states. The
number of financial advisors in these offices ranges from one to
seven. Approximately 15% of the financial advisors are located
in Georgia with a significant number located in Michigan.
Revenues generated from the business of Triad represented 40% of
our total revenues in 2009.
Investacorps
and Triads Brokerage Business
Each of Investacorp and Triad provides full support services to
each of its financial advisors, including: access to stock and
options execution; products such as insurance, mutual funds,
unit trusts and investment advisory programs; and research,
compliance, supervision, accounting and related services.
While an increasing number of clients are electing asset-based
advisory fee platforms rather than the traditional commission
schedule, in most cases Investacorp and Triad charge commissions
on variable annuity, mutual fund, equity and fixed income
transactions. Investacorp and Triad primarily derive revenue
from commissions from the sale of variable annuity and mutual
fund products by their independent financial advisors.
Investacorp and Triad continue to focus on growing asset-based
advisory fee platforms.
Investacorps
Asset Management Business
Advisor
Managed Accounts
IAS offers five account structures for advisor managed accounts,
based on NFS technologies, allowing its financial advisors and
their clients to determine the best structure for their needs.
These accounts consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Architect a complete wrap-fee account
with a $50,000 minimum; no transaction costs for mutual fund,
equity, fixed income or ETF trades.
|
|
|
|
Structure a fee-based account with a $25,000
minimum; allowing transactions in mutual funds, equities, fixed
income or ETFs with transaction costs.
|
|
|
|
Choice a fee-based account with a $25,000 minimum;
allowing transactions in mutual funds and ETFs with transaction
costs.
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
Edge a lower cost alternative fee-based account with
a $25,000 minimum; allowing transactions in non-transaction fee
mutual funds with no transaction costs.
|
|
|
|
Managed Account Solutions a fee-based account
allowing transactions in mutual funds, equities, fixed income
and ETFs with transaction costs which leverages NFS direct
technology.
|
IAS currently offers other account structures for advisor
managed accounts, based on the technologies of its clearing
firm, allowing its financial advisors and their clients to
determine the best structure for their needs across multiple
clearing options. The accounts in this series are titled Target.
The services may include advisory, administrative and processing
functions.
Third
Party Programs
For financial advisors who prefer not to act as portfolio
managers, IAS offers third party management options. These
options employ managers who select diversified, fee-based asset
management investment portfolios based on a clients needs.
The types of portfolios may include separately managed
portfolios, multi-managed accounts, and mutual fund model
portfolios. These portfolios may also include portfolio
analytics, performance reporting and position-specific reporting.
Triads
Asset Management Business
Advisor
Managed Accounts
Triad offers four account structures for advisor managed
accounts allowing its financial advisors and their clients to
determine the best structure for their needs. These accounts
consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Summit a mutual fund wrap account with a
$50,000 minimum; no transaction costs for mutual fund
transactions.
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle a complete wrap account with a
$150,000 minimum; no transaction costs for mutual fund, equity,
ETF or fixed income trades.
|
|
|
|
Apex no account minimum; discounted transaction
costs.
|
|
|
|
Crown no account minimum; $20 annual fee; discounted
transaction costs.
|
Third
Party Managed Accounts
For financial advisors who prefer not to act as portfolio
managers, Triad offers the following third party management
options:
|
|
|
|
|
Privately managed accounts provides a broad
selection of managers from which to select, together with
consultation with Triad regarding appropriate options.
|
|
|
|
Odyssey designed for
mid-net-worth
accounts; provides a diversified, fee-based asset management
solution with portfolio analytics.
|
|
|
|
Managed Account Solutions provides a turn-key asset
management platform offering fee-based asset management through
separate managed accounts, multi-managed accounts and mutual
fund model portfolios; includes analytics and performance and
position-specific reporting.
|
Investalink
Investalink®
is our proprietary and customized back-office and financial
advisor workstation. We believe this proprietary technology
provides a key competitive advantage in recruitment and
retention of financial advisors in our independent brokerage and
advisory services segment.
Investalink®
allows for online account opening, consolidated statements for
multiple clearing firms and fund families, compliance
monitoring, commissions tracking, comprehensive client
management and other features. Also, Investalinks
financial advisor desktop combines transactional and trend
analysis, links to real-time market data, quick logins for
inter-application
9
connectivity and integration of third-party applications.
Investacorps financial advisors currently use
Investalink®.
During 2010, Triad will make
Investalink®
available to its financial advisors.
Administration,
Operations, Securities Transactions Processing and Customer
Accounts
Our broker-dealer subsidiaries do not hold funds or securities
for their customers. Instead, each of Ladenburg, Triad and
Investacorp use the services of NFS as its clearing agent on a
fully disclosed basis. The clearing agent processes all
securities transactions and maintains customer accounts on a fee
basis. SIPC coverage protects client accounts up to $500,000 per
customer, including up to $100,000 for cash. NFS also maintains
excess securities bonds, Excess SIPC, providing
additional protection. Clearing agent services include billing,
credit control, and receipt, custody and delivery of securities.
The clearing agent provides operational support necessary to
process, record and maintain securities transactions for
Ladenburgs, Investacorps and Triads brokerage
activities. The clearing agent also lends funds to
Ladenburgs, Investacorps and Triads customers
through the use of margin credit. These loans are made to
customers on a secured basis, with the clearing agent
maintaining collateral in the form of saleable securities, cash
or cash equivalents. We have agreed to indemnify the clearing
agent for losses it may incur on these credit arrangements.
During the first quarter of 2010, Investacorp consolidated from
three clearing agents to one firm, NFS.
Seasonality
and Cyclical Factors
Seasonality generally does not impact our results. Our revenues
may be adversely affected by cyclical factors, such as the
current financial market downturn as well as problems or
recessions in the U.S. or global economies. These downturns
may cause investor concern, which results in fewer investment
banking transactions and less investing by institutional and
retail investors, thereby reducing our revenues and potential
profits. Such conditions might also expose us to the risk of
being unable to raise additional capital to offset related
significant reductions in revenues.
Competition
We encounter intense competition in all aspects of our business
and compete directly with many other providers of financial
services for clients as well as financial advisors. We compete
directly with many national and regional full service financial
services firms, discount brokers, investment advisors,
broker-dealer subsidiaries of major commercial bank holding
companies, insurance companies and other companies offering
financial services in the U.S., globally, and through the
Internet. Many of our competitors have significantly greater
financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do.
Also, many firms offer discount brokerage services and generally
effect transactions at substantially lower commission rates on
an execution only basis, without offering other
services such as investment recommendations and research.
Moreover, there is substantial commission discounting by
full-service broker-dealers competing for institutional and
retail brokerage business.
A growing number of brokerage firms offer online trading which
has further intensified the competition for brokerage customers.
Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad currently do not offer any
online trading services to their customers, although they offer
on-line account access to their customers to review their
account balances and activity. Competition also is increasing
from other financial institutions, notably banking institutions,
insurance companies and other organizations, which offer
customers some of the same services and products presently
provided by securities firms. We seek to compete through the
quality of our financial advisors and investment bankers, our
level of service, the products and services we offer and our
expertise in certain areas.
There is significant competition for qualified personnel in the
financial services industry. Our ability to compete effectively
depends on attracting, retaining and motivating qualified
financial advisors, investment bankers, trading professionals,
portfolio managers and other revenue-producing or specialized
personnel.
10
Government
Regulation
The securities industry, including our business, is subject to
extensive regulation by the SEC, state securities regulators and
other governmental regulatory authorities. The principal purpose
of these regulations is the protection of customers and the
securities markets. The SEC is the federal agency charged with
the administration of the federal securities laws. Much of the
regulation of broker-dealers, however, has been delegated to
self-regulatory organizations, principally FINRA and the MSRB.
These self-regulatory organizations adopt rules, subject to
approval by the SEC, which govern their members and conduct
periodic examinations of member firms operations.
Securities firms are also subject to regulation by state
securities commissions in the states in which they are
registered. Ladenburg is a registered broker-dealer with the SEC
and a member firm of the NYSE. Each of Investacorp and Triad is
a registered broker-dealer with the SEC. Each of Ladenburg,
Investacorp and Triad is licensed to conduct activities as a
broker-dealer in all 50 states.
The regulations to which broker-dealers are subject cover all
aspects of the securities industry, including:
|
|
|
|
|
sales methods and supervision;
|
|
|
|
trading practices among broker-dealers;
|
|
|
|
use and safekeeping of customers funds and securities;
|
|
|
|
capital structure of securities firms;
|
|
|
|
record keeping;
|
|
|
|
conduct of directors, officers and employees; and
|
|
|
|
advertising, including regulations related to telephone
solicitation.
|
As registered investment advisors under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940, as amended, Triad, LTAM and IAS are subject to the
regulations under both the Investment Advisers Act and certain
state securities laws and regulations. Such requirements relate
to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
limitations on the ability of investment advisors to charge
performance-based or non-refundable fees to clients;
|
|
|
|
record-keeping and reporting requirements;
|
|
|
|
disclosure requirements;
|
|
|
|
limitations on principal transactions between an advisor or its
affiliates and advisory clients; and
|
|
|
|
general anti-fraud prohibitions.
|
Additional legislation, changes in rules promulgated by the SEC
and by self-regulatory bodies and changes in the interpretation
or enforcement of existing laws and rules often directly affect
the method of operation and profitability of broker-dealers. The
SEC and the self-regulatory bodies may conduct administrative
proceedings which can result in censure, fine, suspension or
expulsion of a broker-dealer, its officers, employees or
financial advisors.
Net
Capital Requirements
Our registered broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the
SECs net capital rule, which is designed to measure the
general financial integrity and liquidity of a broker-dealer.
Net capital is defined as the net worth of a broker-dealer
subject to certain adjustments. In computing net capital,
various adjustments are made to net worth which exclude assets
not readily convertible into cash. Also, the regulations require
that certain assets, such as a broker-dealers position in
securities, be valued in a conservative manner to avoid
over-inflation of the broker-dealers net capital.
11
Ladenburg is subject to the SECs Uniform Net Capital
Rule 15c3-1
and the Commodity Futures Trading Commissions
Regulation 1.17. Ladenburg has elected to compute its net
capital under the alternative method allowed by these rules. At
December 31, 2009, Ladenburg had net capital, as defined by
such rules, of approximately $2,383,000, which exceeded its
minimum capital requirement of $500,000 by $1,883,000. Each of
Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad claims an exemption from the
provisions of the SECs
Rule 15c3-3
pursuant to paragraph (k)(2)(ii) as it clears its customer
transactions through its correspondent broker on a fully
disclosed basis.
Investacorp is subject to SEC
Rule 15c3-1,
which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital and
requires that the ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net
capital, both as defined by such rule, shall not exceed 15 to 1.
At December 31, 2009, Investacorp had net capital of
approximately $694,000 which was $379,000 in excess of its
required net capital of $315,000. At December 31, 2009,
Investacorps net capital ratio was 6.8 to 1.
Triad is also subject to SEC
Rule 15c3-1.
At December 31, 2009, Triad had net capital, as defined by
such rule of approximately $937,000, which was $645,000 in
excess of its required net capital of $292,000. At
December 31, 2009, Triads net capital ratio was 4.67
to 1.
Also, funds invested as equity capital may not be withdrawn, nor
may any unsecured advances or loans be made to any stockholder
of a registered broker-dealer, if, after giving effect to the
withdrawal, advance or loan and to any other withdrawal, advance
or loan as well as to any scheduled payments of subordinated
debt which are scheduled to occur within six months, the net
capital of the broker-dealer would fall below 120% of the
minimum dollar amount of net capital required or the ratio of
aggregate indebtedness to net capital would exceed 10 to 1.
Further, any funds invested in the form of subordinated debt
generally must be invested for a minimum term of one year and
repayment of such debt may be suspended if the broker-dealer
fails to maintain certain minimum net capital levels. For
example, scheduled payments of subordinated debt are suspended
in the event that the ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net
capital of the broker-dealer would exceed 12 to 1 or its net
capital would be less than 120% of the minimum dollar amount of
net capital required. The net capital rule also prohibits
payments of dividends, redemption of stock and the prepayment,
or payment in respect of principal or subordinated indebtedness
if net capital, after giving effect to the payment, redemption
or repayment, would be less than the specified percentage (120%)
of the minimum net capital requirement.
Failure to maintain the required net capital may subject a firm
to suspension or expulsion by FINRA, the SEC and other
regulatory bodies and ultimately may require its liquidation.
Compliance with the net capital rule could limit
Ladenburgs operations that require the intensive use of
capital, such as underwriting and trading activities, and also
could restrict our ability to withdraw capital from our
subsidiaries, which in turn, could limit our ability to pay
dividends and repay debt. In the past, Ladenburg has entered
into, and from time to time in the future may enter into,
temporary subordinated loan arrangements to borrow funds on a
short-term basis from our shareholders or clearing broker to
supplement the capital of our broker-dealers to facilitate
underwriting transactions.
Besides regulatory net capital restrictions, Investacorp is
restricted contractually from declaring a dividend to us that
would result in its retained earnings and paid-in capital
falling below the then outstanding principal balance of the
$15,000,000 promissory note we issued to Investacorps
former principal shareholder. At December 31, 2009, this
note had an outstanding principal balance of $4,353,511.
Geographic
Area
We are domiciled in the United States and substantially all of
our revenue is attributed to activities in the United States.
All of our long-lived assets are located in the United States.
Personnel
At December 31, 2009, Ladenburg had a total of
169 employees, of whom 107 are producers and 62 are other
full time employees; Investacorp had approximately 460
non-employee financial advisors and 60 full time employees; and
Triad had approximately 540 non-employee financial advisors and
41 full time employees. No employees are covered by a collective
bargaining agreement. We consider our relationship with our
employees and independent contractors to be good.
12
You should carefully consider all of the risks described below
regarding our company. Our business, financial condition or
results of operation could be materially adversely affected by
any of these risks. Additional risks and uncertainties not
currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also
may materially and adversely affect our business operations.
Risk
Factors Relating to Our Business
Changing
conditions in financial markets and the economy could result in
decreased revenues, losses or other adverse
consequences.
Our financial results were adversely affected in 2009 and 2008
by the turmoil in the financial markets and economy in general.
As a securities and investment banking firm, changes in the
financial markets or economic conditions in the United States
and elsewhere in the world could materially adversely affect our
business in many ways, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a market downturn could lead to a decline in the volume of
transactions executed for customers and, therefore, to a decline
in the revenues we receive from commissions and spreads;
|
|
|
|
unfavorable financial or economic conditions could reduce the
number and size of transactions in which we provide
underwriting, financial advisory and other services. Our
investment banking revenues, in the form of financial advisory
and underwriting or placement fees, are directly related to the
number and size of the transactions in which we participate and
could therefore be adversely affected by unfavorable financial
or economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in the market could lead to losses from
principal transactions. To the extent that we own assets, i.e.,
have long positions, a downturn in the market could result in
losses from a decline in the value of those long positions.
Conversely, to the extent that we have sold assets that we do
not own, i.e., have short positions, an upturn in the market
could expose us to potentially unlimited losses as we attempt to
cover our short positions by acquiring assets in a rising market;
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in the market could also lead to a reduction in
revenues from asset management fees. Even in the absence of a
market downturn, below-market investment performance by
portfolio managers could reduce asset management revenues and
assets under management and result in reputational damage that
might make it more difficult to attract new investors;
|
|
|
|
increases in credit spreads, as well as limitations on the
availability of credit, such as occurred during 2008, can affect
our ability to borrow on a secured or unsecured basis, which may
adversely affect our liquidity and results of operations;
|
|
|
|
new or increased taxes on compensation payments such as bonuses
or securities transactions may adversely affect our financial
results; and
|
|
|
|
low market interest rates adversely impact interest sharing
revenues received from our clearing firm.
|
We have
incurred, and may continue to incur, significant operating
losses.
Although we had net income for the year ended December 31,
2007, we incurred significant losses from operations during the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 and during each of
the four years ended December 31, 2006. We cannot assure
you that we will be able to achieve revenue growth,
profitability or positive cash flow on either a quarterly or
annual basis. Although we believe that we have adequate cash and
regulatory capital to fund our current level of operating
activities through December 31, 2010, if we are unable to
sustain profitability, we may not be financially viable in the
future and may have to curtail, suspend or cease operations.
13
A large
portion of our revenue for any period may result from a limited
number of underwriting transactions.
A large part of our revenue for any period may be derived from a
limited number of underwritings in which Ladenburg serves as
either the lead or co-manager. We cannot assure you that
Ladenburg will continue to serve as lead or co-manager of
similar underwritings in the future. If Ladenburg is not able to
do so, our revenue may significantly decrease and our results of
operations may be adversely affected.
Our
quarterly operating results may fluctuate substantially due to
the nature of our business and therefore we may fail to meet
profitability expectations.
Our revenue and operating results may fluctuate from quarter to
quarter and from year to year due to a combination of factors,
including the level of underwriting and advisory transactions
completed by us and the level of fees we receive from those
transactions. Accordingly, our results of operations may
fluctuate significantly due to an increased or decreased number
of transactions in any particular quarter or year.
Our
financial leverage impairs our ability to obtain financing and
limits cash flow available for operations.
Our indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
|
limits our ability to obtain additional financing for working
capital, regulatory capital requirements, acquisitions or
general corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
requires us to dedicate a substantial portion of cash flows from
operations to the payment of debt service on our indebtedness,
resulting in less cash available for operations and other
purposes; and
|
|
|
|
increases our vulnerability to downturns in our business or in
general economic conditions.
|
Our ability to satisfy our obligations and to reduce our total
debt which, as of December 31, 2009 was $35.4 million,
depends on our future operating performance and prospects. Our
future operating performance is subject to many factors,
including economic, financial and competitive factors, which may
be beyond our control. As a result, we may not be able to
generate sufficient cash flow, and future financings may not be
available to provide sufficient net proceeds, to meet these
obligations which would have a material adverse effect on our
business, profitability and results of operations.
Our
business depends on commissions and fees generated from the
distribution of financial products , and adverse changes in the
structure or amount of fees paid by the sponsors of these
products could materially adversely affect our cash flows,
revenues and results of operations.
An important portion of our revenues is generated from
commissions and fees related to the distribution of financial
products such as mutual funds and variable annuities by the
Investacorp and Triad financial advisors, and to a lesser
extent, Ladenburgs financial advisors. Changes in the
structure or amount of the fees paid by the sponsors of these
products could materially adversely affect our cash flows,
revenues and results of operation.
Also, regulatory agencies and other industry participants have
suggested that
Rule 12b-1
distribution fees in the mutual fund industry should be
reconsidered and, potentially, reduced or eliminated. Any
reduction or restructuring of
Rule 12b-1
distribution fees could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations.
Misconduct
by our employees and independent financial advisors is difficult
to detect and deter and could harm our business, results of
operations or financial condition.
Misconduct by our employees and independent financial advisors
could result in violations of law by us, regulatory sanctions
and/or
serious reputational or financial harm.
14
Misconduct could include:
|
|
|
|
|
binding us to transactions that exceed authorized limits;
|
|
|
|
hiding unauthorized or unsuccessful activities resulting in
unknown and unmanaged risks or losses;
|
|
|
|
improperly using or disclosing confidential information;
|
|
|
|
recommending transactions that are not suitable or in the
clients best interests;
|
|
|
|
engaging in fraudulent or otherwise improper activity;
|
|
|
|
engaging in unauthorized or excessive trading to the detriment
of customers; or
|
|
|
|
otherwise not complying with laws or our control procedures.
|
We cannot always deter misconduct by our employees and
independent financial advisors, and the precautions we take to
prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all
cases. Prevention and detection among our independent financial
advisors, who are not employees of our company and tend to be
located in small, decentralized offices, present additional
challenges. Misconduct by our employees and independent
financial advisors may have a material adverse effect on our
business and results of operations.
We may be
prohibited from underwriting securities due to capital
limits.
From time to time, our underwriting activities may require that
we temporarily receive an infusion of capital for regulatory
purposes. This is predicated on the amount of commitment
Ladenburg makes for each underwriting. In the past, we entered
into temporary subordinated loan arrangements with our
shareholders or clearing firm. Should we no longer be able to
receive such funding from these sources, and if there are no
other viable sources available, it would have an adverse impact
on our ability to underwrite offerings, generate profits,
recruit financial consultants and retain existing customers.
Our
capital markets and strategic advisory engagements are singular
in nature and do not generally provide for subsequent
engagements.
Ladenburgs investment banking clients generally retain it
on a short-term,
engagement-by-engagement
basis in connection with specific capital markets or mergers and
acquisitions transactions, rather than on a recurring basis
under long-term contracts. As these transactions are typically
singular in nature and our engagements with these clients may
not recur, Ladenburg must seek out new engagements when its
current engagements are successfully completed or are
terminated. As a result, high activity levels in any period are
not necessarily indicative of continued high levels of activity
in any subsequent period. If we are unable to generate a
substantial number of new engagements that generate fees from
new or existing clients, our business and results of operations
would likely be adversely affected.
We depend
on our senior employees and the loss of their services could
harm our business.
Our success is dependent in large part upon the services of
several of our senior executives and employees, including those
of our broker-dealer subsidiaries. We do not maintain and do not
intend to obtain key man insurance on the life of any executive
or employee. If our senior executives or employees terminate
their employment with us and we are unable to find suitable
replacements in relatively short periods of time, our business
and results of operations may be materially and adversely
affected.
We face
significant competition for professional employees.
From time to time, individuals we employ may choose to leave our
company to pursue other opportunities. We have experienced
losses of financial advisors, trading and investment banking
professionals in the past, and the level of competition for key
personnel remains intense. We cannot assure you that the loss of
key personnel will not occur again in the future. The loss of a
financial advisor or a trading or investment banking
professional, particularly a senior professional with a broad
range of contacts in an industry, could materially and adversely
affect our results of operations.
15
Poor
performance of the investment products and services recommended
or sold to asset management clients may have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Our investment advisory clients generally may terminate their
contracts upon 30 days notice. These clients can
terminate their relationship, reduce the aggregate amount of
assets under management or shift their funds to other types of
accounts with different rate structures for any number of
reasons, including investment performance, changes in prevailing
interest rates, financial market performance and personal client
liquidity needs. Poor performance of the investment products and
services recommended or sold to such clients relative to the
performance of other products available in the market or the
performance of other investment management firms tends to result
in the loss of accounts. The decrease in revenue that could
result from such an event could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations.
Systems
failures could significantly disrupt our business.
Our business depends on our and our clearing firms ability
to process, on a daily basis, many transactions across numerous
and diverse markets and the transactions we process have become
increasingly complex. We rely heavily on our communications and
financial, accounting and other data processing systems,
including systems we maintain and systems provided by our
clearing broker and service providers. We face operational risk
arising from mistakes made in the confirmation or settlement of
transactions or from transactions not being properly recorded,
evaluated or accounted.
If any of these systems do not operate properly or are disabled,
we could suffer financial loss, a disruption of our business,
liability to clients, regulatory intervention or reputational
damage. Any failure or interruption of our systems, the systems
of our clearing broker, or third party trading systems could
cause delays or other problems in our securities trading
activities, which could have a material adverse effect on our
operating results. Also, our clearing broker provides our
principal disaster recovery system. We cannot assure you that we
or our clearing broker will not suffer any systems failures or
interruption, including ones caused by earthquake, fire, other
natural disasters, power or telecommunications failure, act of
God, act of war, terrorism, or otherwise, or that our or our
clearing brokers
back-up
procedures and capabilities in the event of any such failure or
interruption will be adequate. The inability of our or our
clearing brokers systems to accommodate an increasing
volume of transactions could also constrain our ability to
expand our business.
A
relatively small number of institutional customers generate a
significant portion of our institutional trading
revenue.
A relatively small number of our institutional investor
customers generate a substantial portion of our institutional
trading revenue. If any key customers depart or reduce their
business with us and we fail to attract new customers that are
capable of generating significant trading volumes, our business
and results of operations will be adversely affected.
Our
expenses may increase due to real estate commitments.
We have subleased office space in various locations to
subtenants, some of whom are engaged in the financial services
industry. Should any of the
sub-tenants
experience financial difficulty, or otherwise not pay their rent
for an extended period of time, it may have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations.
Our risk
management policies and procedures may leave us exposed to
unidentified risks or an unanticipated level of risk.
The policies and procedures we employ to identify, monitor and
manage risks may not be fully effective. Some methods of risk
management are based on the use of observed historical market
behavior. As a result, these methods may not predict future risk
exposures, which could be significantly greater than the
historical measures indicate. Other risk management methods
depend on evaluation of information regarding markets, clients
or other matters that are publicly available or otherwise
accessible by us. This information may not be accurate,
complete,
up-to-date
or properly evaluated. Management of operational, legal and
regulatory risk requires, among other
16
things, policies and procedures to properly record and verify a
large number of transactions and events. We cannot assure you
that our policies and procedures will effectively and accurately
record and verify this information.
We seek to monitor and control our risk exposure through a
variety of separate but complementary financial, credit,
operational and legal reporting systems. We believe that we
effectively evaluate and manage the market, credit and other
risks to which we are exposed. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of
our ability to manage risk exposure can never be completely or
accurately predicted or fully assured. For example, unexpectedly
large or rapid movements or disruptions in one or more markets
or other unforeseen developments can have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations and financial condition. The
consequences of these developments can include losses due to
adverse changes in inventory values, decreases in the liquidity
of trading positions, higher volatility in earnings, increases
in our credit risk to customers as well as to third parties and
increases in general systemic risk.
We rely
on one clearing broker and the termination of the clearing
agreements could disrupt our business.
As of the first quarter of 2010, each of Ladenburg, Triad and
Investacorp uses one clearing broker to process securities
transactions and maintain customer accounts on a fee basis. The
clearing broker also provides billing services, extends credit
and provides for control and receipt, custody and delivery of
securities. Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad depend on the
operational capacity and ability of their clearing broker for
the orderly processing of transactions. By engaging the
processing services of a clearing firm, each of Ladenburg,
Investacorp and Triad is exempt from some capital reserve
requirements and other regulatory requirements imposed by
federal and state securities laws. If these clearing agreements
were terminated for any reason, we would be forced to find an
alternative clearing firm. We cannot assure you that we would be
able to find an alternative clearing firm on acceptable terms to
us or at all. Also, the loss of the clearing firm could hamper
Investacorps and Triads ability to recruit and
retain their respective independent financial advisors.
Our
clearing broker extends credit to our clients and we are liable
if the clients do not pay.
Each of Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad permits its clients to
purchase securities on a margin basis or sell securities short,
which means that the clearing firm extends credit to the client
secured by cash and securities in the clients account.
During periods of volatile markets, the value of the collateral
held by the clearing broker could fall below the amount borrowed
by the client. If margin requirements are not sufficient to
cover losses, the clearing broker sells or buys securities at
prevailing market prices, and may incur losses to satisfy client
obligations. Each of Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad has agreed
to indemnify the clearing broker for losses it may incur while
extending credit to its clients.
Risk
Factors Relating to Our Industry
Credit
risk exposes us to losses caused by third parties
financial or other problems.
We are exposed to the risk that third parties that owe us money,
securities or other assets will not perform their obligations.
These parties include:
|
|
|
|
|
trading counterparties;
|
|
|
|
customers;
|
|
|
|
clearing agents;
|
|
|
|
other broker-dealers;
|
|
|
|
exchanges;
|
|
|
|
clearing houses; and
|
|
|
|
other financial intermediaries as well as issuers whose
securities we hold.
|
17
These parties may default on their obligations owed to us due to
bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failure or other
reasons. This risk may arise, for example, from:
|
|
|
|
|
holding securities of third parties;
|
|
|
|
executing securities trades that fail to settle at the required
time due to non-delivery by the counterparty or systems failure
by clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses or other
financial intermediaries; and
|
|
|
|
extending credit to clients through bridge or margin loans or
other arrangements.
|
Significant failures by third parties to perform their
obligations owed to us could adversely affect our revenues,
results of operations and perhaps our ability to borrow in the
credit markets.
Intense
competition from existing and new entities may adversely affect
our revenues and results of operations.
The securities industry is rapidly evolving, intensely
competitive and has few barriers to entry. We expect competition
to continue and intensify in the future. Many of our competitors
have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and
other resources than we do. Some of our competitors also offer a
wider range of services and financial products than we do and
have greater name recognition and a larger client base. These
competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or
changing opportunities, technologies and client requirements.
They may also be able to undertake more extensive promotional
activities, offer more attractive terms to clients, and adopt
more aggressive pricing policies. We may not be able to compete
effectively with current or future competitors and competitive
pressures faced by us may harm our business and may adversely
affect our revenues and results of operations.
Errors
and omissions claims may negatively affect our business and
results of operations.
Our subsidiaries are subject to claims and litigation in the
ordinary course of business resulting from alleged and actual
errors and omissions in placing insurance, effecting securities
transactions and rendering investment advice. These activities
involve substantial amounts of money. Since errors and omissions
claims against our subsidiaries or their financial advisors may
allege liability for all or part of the amounts in question,
claimants may seek large damage awards. These claims can involve
significant defense costs. Errors and omissions could include,
for example, failure, whether negligently or intentionally, to
effect securities transactions on behalf of clients, to choose
suitable investments for any particular client, to supervise a
financial advisor or to provide insurance carriers with complete
and accurate information. It is not always possible to prevent
or detect errors and omissions, and the precautions our
subsidiaries take may not be effective in all cases. Moreover,
our Ladenburg subsidiary and its financial advisors do not carry
errors and omissions insurance coverage and some of
Investacorps financial advisors do not carry such coverage
either. Our liability for significant and successful errors and
omissions claims may materially and negatively affect our
results of operations.
We are
subject to various risks associated with the securities
industry.
We are subject to uncertainties that are common in the
securities industry. These uncertainties include:
|
|
|
|
|
the volatility of domestic and international financial, bond and
stock markets;
|
|
|
|
extensive governmental regulation;
|
|
|
|
litigation;
|
|
|
|
intense competition;
|
|
|
|
substantial fluctuations in the volume and price level of
securities; and
|
|
|
|
dependence on the solvency of various third parties.
|
As a result, revenues and earnings may vary significantly from
quarter to quarter and from year to year. In periods of low
volume, profitability is impaired because certain expenses
remain relatively fixed. We are much smaller and have much less
capital than many competitors in the securities industry. In the
event of a market
18
downturn, our business could be adversely affected in many ways.
Our revenues are likely to decline in such circumstances and, if
we are unable to reduce expenses at the same pace, our profit
margins would erode.
Legal
liability may harm our business.
Many aspects of our business involve substantial risks of
liability. An underwriter, such as Ladenburg, is exposed to
substantial liability under federal and state securities laws,
other federal and state laws, and court decisions, including
decisions about underwriters liability and limitations on
indemnification of underwriters by issuers. For example, a firm
that acts as an underwriter may be held liable for material
misstatements or omissions of fact in a prospectus used in
connection with the securities being offered or for statements
made by its securities analysts or other personnel. In recent
years, there has been an increasing incidence of litigation
involving the securities industry, including class actions that
seek substantial damages. Our underwriting activities often
involve offerings of the securities of smaller companies, which
may involve a higher degree of risk and are more volatile than
the securities of more established companies. In comparison with
more established companies, smaller companies are also more
likely to be the subject of securities class actions, to carry
directors and officers liability insurance policies with lower
limits or not at all, and to become insolvent. Each of these
factors increases the likelihood that an underwriter of a
smaller companys securities will be required to contribute
to an adverse judgment or settlement of a securities lawsuit.
In the normal course of business, our operating subsidiaries
have been and continue to be the subject of numerous civil
actions and arbitrations arising out of customer complaints
relating to our activities as a broker-dealer, as an employer or
as a result of other business activities. In general, the cases
involve various allegations that our employees or financial
advisors had mishandled customer accounts. We believe that,
based on our historical experience and the reserves established
by us, the resolution of the claims presently pending will not
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
However, although we typically reserve an amount we believe will
be sufficient to cover any damages assessed against us, we have
in the past been assessed damages that exceeded our reserves. If
we misjudge the amount of damages that may be assessed against
us from pending or threatened claims, or if we are unable to
adequately estimate the amount of damages that will be assessed
against us from claims that arise in the future and reserve
accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations
may be materially adversely affected.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Regulatory Environment
We are
subject to extensive securities regulation and the failure to
comply with these regulations could subject us to penalties or
sanctions.
The securities industry and our business is subject to extensive
regulation by the SEC, state securities regulators and other
governmental regulatory authorities. We are also regulated by
industry self-regulatory organizations, including FINRA and the
MSRB. The regulatory environment is also subject to change and
we may be adversely affected as a result of new or revised
legislation or regulations imposed by the SEC, other federal or
state governmental regulatory authorities, or self-regulatory
organizations. We also may be adversely affected by changes in
the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules by
these governmental authorities and self-regulatory organizations.
Each of Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad is a registered
broker-dealer with the SEC and FINRA. Broker-dealers are subject
to regulations which cover all aspects of the securities
business, including:
|
|
|
|
|
sales methods and supervision;
|
|
|
|
trading practices among broker-dealers;
|
|
|
|
use and safekeeping of customers funds and securities;
|
|
|
|
capital structure of securities firms;
|
|
|
|
record keeping; and
|
|
|
|
conduct of directors, officers and employees.
|
19
Compliance with many of these regulations involves a number of
risks, particularly in areas where applicable regulations may be
subject to varying interpretation. The requirements imposed by
these regulators are designed to ensure the integrity of the
financial markets and to protect customers and other third
parties who deal with us. Consequently, these regulations often
serve to limit our activities, including through net capital,
customer protection and market conduct requirements. Much of the
regulation of broker-dealers has been delegated to
self-regulatory organizations, principally FINRA. FINRA adopts
rules, subject to SEC approval, that govern broker-dealers and
conducts periodic examinations of firms operations.
If we are found to have violated any applicable regulation,
formal administrative or judicial proceedings may be initiated
against us that may result in:
|
|
|
|
|
censure;
|
|
|
|
fine;
|
|
|
|
civil penalties, including treble damages in the case of insider
trading violations;
|
|
|
|
the issuance of
cease-and-desist
orders;
|
|
|
|
the deregistration or suspension of our broker-dealer activities;
|
|
|
|
the suspension or disqualification of our officers or
employees; or
|
|
|
|
other adverse consequences.
|
The imposition of any of these or other penalties could have a
material adverse effect on our operating results and financial
condition.
Legislative,
judicial or regulatory changes to the classification of
independent contractors could increase our operating
expenses.
From time to time, various legislative or regulatory proposals
are introduced at the federal or state levels to change the
status of independent contractors classification to
employees for either employment tax purposes (withholding,
social security, Medicare and unemployment taxes) or other
benefits available to employees. Currently, most individuals are
classified as employees or independent contractors for
employment tax purposes based on 20 common law
factors, rather than any definition found in the Internal
Revenue Code or Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
regulations. Each of Investacorp and Triad classifies its
financial advisors as independent contractors for all purposes,
including employment tax and employee benefit purposes. We
cannot assure you that legislative, judicial, or regulatory
(including tax) authorities will not introduce proposals or
assert interpretations of existing rules and regulations that
would change the employee/independent contractor classification
of Investacorps and Triads financial advisors. The
costs associated with potential changes, if any, to these
independent contractor classifications could have a material
adverse effect on us, including our results of operations and
financial condition.
Failure
to comply with net capital requirements could subject us to
suspension or revocation by the SEC or suspension or expulsion
by FINRA.
Our broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the SECs net
capital rule which requires the maintenance of minimum net
capital. Also, Ladenburg and Triad are each subject to the net
capital requirements of CFTC Regulation 1.17. At
December 31, 2009, each of our broker-dealer subsidiaries
exceeded its minimum net capital requirement. The net capital
rule is designed to measure the general financial integrity and
liquidity of a broker-dealer. In computing net capital, various
adjustments are made to net worth which exclude assets not
readily convertible into cash. The regulations also require that
certain assets, such as a broker-dealers position in
securities, be valued in a conservative manner to avoid
over-inflation of the broker-dealers net capital. The net
capital rule requires a broker-dealer to maintain a minimum
level of net capital. The particular levels vary depending upon
the nature of the activity undertaken by a firm. Compliance with
the net capital rule limits those operations of broker-dealers
which require the intensive use of their capital, such as
underwriting commitments and principal trading activities. The
rule also limits the ability of securities firms to pay
dividends or make payments on certain
20
indebtedness such as subordinated debt as it matures. A
significant operating loss or any charge against net capital
could adversely affect the ability of a broker-dealer to expand
or, depending on the magnitude of the loss or charge, maintain
its then present level of business. FINRA may enter the offices
of a broker-dealer at any time, without notice, and calculate
the firms net capital. If the calculation reveals a net
capital deficiency, FINRA may immediately restrict or suspend
some or all of the broker-dealers activities, including
its ability to make markets. Our broker-dealer subsidiaries may
not be able to maintain adequate net capital, or their net
capital may fall below requirements established by the SEC or
the CFTC, as applicable, and subject us to disciplinary action
in the form of fines, censure, suspension, expulsion or the
termination of business altogether.
A change
in the tax treatment of insurance products or a determination
that these products are not insurance contracts for federal tax
purposes could reduce the demand for these products, which may
reduce our revenue.
The market for many insurance products sold by
Investacorps and Triads financial advisors depends
on the favorable tax treatment, including the tax-free build up
of cash values and the tax-free nature of death benefits that
these products receive relative to other investment
alternatives. A change in the tax treatment of insurance
products or a determination by the IRS that certain of these
products are not insurance contracts for federal tax purposes
could remove many of the tax advantages policyholders seek in
these policies. Also, the IRS periodically releases guidance on
the tax treatment of products. If the provisions of the tax code
were changed or new federal tax regulations and IRS rulings and
releases were issued in a manner that would make it more
difficult for holders of these insurance contracts to qualify
for favorable tax treatment or subject holders to special tax
reporting requirements, the demand for the insurance contracts
could decrease, which may reduce our revenue and negatively
affect our business.
Risk
Factors Relating to Strategic Acquisitions and the Integration
of Acquired Operations
We may be
unable to successfully integrate acquired businesses into our
existing business and operations.
We completed two acquisitions in 2008, one acquisition in 2007
and two acquisitions in 2006. We continue to explore
opportunities to grow our businesses, including through
potential acquisitions of other securities firms, both
domestically and internationally. These acquisitions may involve
payments of material amounts of cash incurrence of a material
amount of debt or the issuance of significant amounts of our
equity securities, which may increase our leverage
and/or be
dilutive to our existing shareholders. We may experience
difficulty integrating the operations of these entities or any
other entities acquired in the future into our existing business
and operations. Furthermore, we may not be able retain all of
the employees we acquire as a result of these transactions. If
we are unable to effectively address these risks, we may be
required to restructure the acquired businesses or write-off the
value of some or all of the assets of the acquired business. If
we are unable to successfully integrate acquired businesses into
our existing business and operations in the future, it could
have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, cash flows and
results of operations.
We may be
adversely affected if the firms we acquire do not perform as
expected.
Even if we successfully complete acquisitions, we may be
adversely affected if the acquired firms do not perform as
expected. The firms we acquire may perform below expectations
after the acquisition for various reasons, including legislative
or regulatory changes that affect the products in which a firm
specializes, the loss of key clients, employees
and/or
financial advisors after the acquisition closing, general
economic factors and the cultural incompatibility of an acquired
firms management team with us. The failure of firms to
perform as expected at the time of acquisition may have an
adverse effect on our earnings and revenue growth rates, and may
result in impairment charges
and/or
generate losses or charges to earnings.
We face
numerous risks and uncertainties as we expand our
business.
We expect the growth of our business to come primarily from
internal expansion and through acquisitions. As we expand our
business, there can be no assurance that our financial controls,
the level and knowledge of our personnel, our operational
abilities, our legal and compliance controls and our other
corporate support systems will be adequate to manage our
business and our growth. The ineffectiveness of any of these
controls or systems could adversely affect our business and
prospects. In addition, as we acquire new businesses, we face
numerous risks and uncertainties
21
integrating their controls and systems into ours, including
financial controls, accounting and data processing systems,
management controls and other operations. A failure to integrate
these systems and controls, and even an inefficient integration
of these systems and controls, could adversely affect our
business, cash flows and results of operations.
Risk
Factors Relating to Owning Our Stock
The price
of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, and this may
make it difficult for you to resell the shares of our common
stock at prices you find attractive.
The trading price of our common stock has ranged between $0.45
and $1.24 per share for the 52 week period ended
March 12, 2010. We expect that the market price of our
common stock may continue to fluctuate significantly.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate in response
to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control. These
factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
variations in quarterly operating results;
|
|
|
|
general economic and business conditions, including conditions
in the securities brokerage and investment banking markets;
|
|
|
|
our announcements of significant contracts, milestones or
acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
our relationships with other companies;
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain needed capital commitments;
|
|
|
|
additions or departures of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
the initiation or outcome of litigation or arbitration
proceedings;
|
|
|
|
sales of common stock, conversion of securities convertible into
common stock, exercise of options and warrants to purchase
common stock or termination of stock transfer restrictions;
|
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts; and
|
|
|
|
fluctuation in stock market price and volume.
|
Any one of these factors could have an adverse effect on the
market price of our common stock.
Also, the stock market in recent years has experienced
significant price and volume fluctuations that have materially
affected the market prices of equity securities of many
companies and that often have been unrelated to such
companies operating performance. These market fluctuations
have adversely impacted the price of our common stock in the
past and may do so in the future. Also, shareholders may
initiate securities class action lawsuits if the market price of
our stock drops significantly, which may cause us to incur
substantial costs and divert our managements time and
attention. These factors, among others, could significantly
depress the price of our common stock.
Our
principal shareholders including our directors and officers
control a large percentage of our shares of common stock and can
significantly influence our corporate actions.
At March 11, 2010, our executive officers, directors and
companies that these individuals are affiliated with
beneficially owned approximately 45% of our common stock.
Accordingly, these individuals and entities can significantly
influence most, if not all, of our corporate actions, including
the election of directors and the appointment of officers. Also,
this ownership of our common stock may make it difficult for a
third party to acquire control of us, therefore possibly
discouraging third parties from seeking to acquire us. A third
party would have to negotiate any possible transactions with
these principal shareholders, and their interests may be
different from the interests of our other shareholders. This may
depress the price of our common stock.
22
Possible
additional issuances will cause dilution.
At December 31, 2009, we had outstanding
167,907,038 shares of common stock and options and warrants
to purchase a total of 27,921,290 shares of common stock.
We are authorized to issue up to 400,000,000 shares of
common stock and are therefore able to issue additional shares
without being required under corporate law to obtain shareholder
approval. If we issue additional shares, or if our existing
shareholders exercise their outstanding options and warrants,
our other shareholders may find their holdings drastically
diluted, which if it occurs, means that they will own a smaller
percentage of our company.
We may
issue preferred stock with preferential rights that may
adversely affect your rights.
The rights of our shareholders will be subject to and may be
adversely affected by the rights of holders of any preferred
stock that we may issue in the future. Our articles of
incorporation authorize our board of directors to issue up to
2,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock
and to fix the rights, preferences, privilege and restrictions,
including voting rights, of these shares without further
shareholder approval.
We do not
expect to pay any cash dividends.
We intend to retain any future earnings to fund the development
and growth of our business. We do not anticipate paying cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, you must rely
on sales of your common stock after price appreciation, which
may never occur, as the only way to realize any positive return
on your investment in our common stock. Net capital requirements
imposed on our broker-dealer subsidiaries by the SEC and
covenants contained in our outstanding debt agreements may also
restrict our ability to pay dividends.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS.
|
Not applicable.
Our principal executive offices are located at 4400 Biscayne
Boulevard, 12th Floor, Miami, Florida 33137, where we lease
approximately 15,800 square feet of office space. The
lessor is Frost Real Estate Holdings, LLC, an entity affiliated
with Dr. Phillip Frost, our Chairman of the Board and
principal shareholder. Our lease expires in January 2012.
Ladenburgs principal executive offices are located at 520
Madison Avenue, 9th Floor, New York, New York 10022, where
it subleases approximately 15,400 square feet of office
space under a lease that expires in September 2014. Ladenburg
previously leased office space at 590 Madison Avenue, New York,
New York and has subleased all of this space to various
unrelated parties at various terms and lease periods. The lease,
under which Ladenburg is still obligated as the main lessor,
expires in June 2015. Ladenburg also operates branch offices in
leased office space located in Los Angeles, California,
Lincolnshire, Illinois, Miami and Boca Raton, Florida,
Princeton, New Jersey and Melville and New York, New York.
Investacorps principal executive offices are located at
15450 New Barn Road, Miami Lakes, Florida 33014, where it leases
approximately 15,100 square feet of office space under a
lease that expires in July 2011. Investacorps independent
financial advisors are responsible for the office space they
occupy, whether by lease or otherwise.
Triads principal executive offices are located at 5185
Peachtree Parkway, Suite 280 Norcross, Georgia, 30092,
where it leases approximately 11,300 square feet of office
space under a lease that expires in June 2012. Triads
independent financial advisors are responsible for the office
space they occupy, whether by lease or otherwise.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS.
|
The information under the heading Litigation and
Regulatory Matters contained in Note 11 to our
consolidated financial statements included in Part II,
Item 8 of this annual report on
Form 10-K
is incorporated by reference in this Item 3.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
REMOVED
AND RESERVED.
|
23
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
|
Our common stock trades on the NYSE Amex under the symbol
LTS. The following table sets forth the high and low
sales prices of our common stock for the periods specified:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
Period
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
.98
|
|
|
$
|
.36
|
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.60
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
.89
|
|
|
|
.45
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
.85
|
|
|
|
.45
|
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
.82
|
|
|
|
.57
|
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
Holders
At March 11, 2010, there were approximately 4,033 record
holders of our common stock.
Dividends
We have never paid or declared any dividends on our common
stock. The payment of future dividends, if any, will be at our
board of directors discretion after taking into account
our financial condition, operating results, anticipated cash
needs and any other factors that our board of directors may deem
relevant. The net capital requirements imposed on our
broker-dealer subsidiaries by the SEC and covenants contained in
our outstanding debt agreements also restrict our ability to pay
dividends.
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA.
|
The selected financial data set forth below is derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements. You should read this
selected financial data together with Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated
financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in
this annual report on
Form 10-K:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
Operating Results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
150,675
|
|
|
$
|
120,970
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
95,826
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
46,858
|
|
|
$
|
30,690
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
168,279
|
|
|
|
140,214
|
|
|
|
85,922
|
|
|
|
42,010
|
|
|
|
56,607
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(17,604
|
)
|
|
|
(19,244
|
)
|
|
|
9,904
|
(c)
|
|
|
4,848
|
(d)
|
|
|
(25,917
|
)(c)
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(18,673
|
)
|
|
|
(20,263
|
)
|
|
|
9,391
|
(c)
|
|
|
4,659
|
(d)
|
|
|
(25,971
|
)(c)
|
Per common and equivalent share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
Basic weighted average common shares
|
|
|
168,623,375
|
|
|
|
165,812,495
|
|
|
|
157,355,540
|
|
|
|
148,693,521
|
|
|
|
108,948,623
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares
|
|
|
168,623,375
|
|
|
|
165,812,495
|
|
|
|
168,484,469
|
|
|
|
153,087,961
|
|
|
|
108,948,623
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
94,637
|
|
|
$
|
101,668
|
|
|
$
|
114,132
|
|
|
$
|
47,343
|
|
|
$
|
39,299
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
56,843
|
|
|
|
50,378
|
|
|
|
60,029
|
|
|
|
19,009
|
|
|
|
26,332
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
37,794
|
|
|
|
51,290
|
|
|
|
54,103
|
|
|
|
28,334
|
|
|
|
12,967
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $21,190 of revenue from Triad (acquired August 13,
2008). |
|
(b) |
|
Includes $12,191 of revenue from Investacorp (acquired
October 19, 2007). |
|
(c) |
|
Includes losses on extinguishment of debt of $1,833 in 2007 and
$19,359 in 2005. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes $4,983 net gain on sale of Ladenburgs NYSE
and CBOE memberships. |
24
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS.
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share
amounts)
|
Overview
We are engaged in investment banking, equity research,
institutional sales and trading, independent brokerage and
advisory services and asset management services through our
principal subsidiaries, Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad. We are
committed to establishing a significant presence in the
financial services industry by meeting the varying investment
needs of our corporate, institutional and retail clients.
We have two operating segments which correspond to the
investment banking, sales and trading and asset management
services and investment activities conducted by Ladenburg and
LTAM and our independent brokerage and advisory services
business conducted by Investacorp and Triad.
Acquisition Strategy
We continue to explore opportunities to grow our businesses,
including through potential acquisitions of other securities and
investment banking firms, both domestically and internationally.
These acquisitions may involve payments of material amounts of
cash, the incurrence of material amounts of debt or the issuance
of significant amounts of our equity securities, which may be
dilutive to our existing shareholders
and/or may
increase our leverage. We cannot assure you that we will be able
to complete any such potential acquisitions on terms acceptable
to us or, if we do, that any acquired business will be
profitable. There is also a risk that we will not be able to
successfully integrate acquired businesses into our existing
business and operations. See Item 1A, Risk Factors
Risk Factors Relating to Strategic Acquisitions and
the Integration of Acquired Operations.
Recent
Developments
Amendment
of Clearing Arrangements and Forgivable Loan
In August 2009, we amended the terms of our clearing agreements
with NFS. NFS now serves as the exclusive clearing broker for
Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad and the clearing agreements
between the firms and NFS have a seven-year term. We are
realizing significant cost savings as a result of this new
clearing arrangement.
On August 25, 2009, NFS provided us with a seven-year,
$10,000 forgivable loan. Interest on the loan accrues at the
prime rate plus 2%. If our broker-dealer subsidiaries meet
certain aggregate annual clearing revenue targets set forth in
the loan agreement, the principal balance of the loan will be
forgiven in seven equal yearly installments of $1,429 commencing
in August 2010 and continuing on an annual basis through August
2016. Interest payments due for each such year also will be
forgiven if we meet the annual clearing revenue targets. Any
principal amounts not forgiven will be due in August 2016, and
any interest payments not forgiven are due annually. If any
principal amount is not forgiven, we may have such principal
forgiven in future years if our broker-dealer subsidiaries
exceed subsequent annual clearing revenue targets. We have
expensed, and will continue to expense, interest under the loan
agreement until such interest is forgiven.
The loan agreement contains other covenants including
limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness,
maintenance of minimum adjusted shareholders equity levels
and a prohibition on the termination of our revolving credit
agreement. If an event of default occurs, the outstanding
principal and interest under the loan agreement may be
accelerated and become immediately due and payable. If the
clearing agreements are terminated prior to the loan maturity
date, all amounts then outstanding must be repaid on demand. The
loan agreement is collateralized by our (but not our
broker-dealer subsidiaries) deposits and accounts held at
NFS or its affiliates, which amounted to $468 at
December 31, 2009.
We used the loan proceeds to repay amounts outstanding under our
revolving credit agreement. We intend to use the increased
availability under that facility to support our strategy to
become a leader in the independent broker-dealer space.
25
Critical
Accounting Policies
General. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, referred to as GAAP,
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Clearing Arrangements. Our broker-dealer
subsidiaries do not carry accounts for customers or perform
custodial functions related to customers securities. Each
of Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad introduces all of its
customer transactions, which are not reflected in these
financial statements, to its clearing broker, which maintains
the customers accounts and clears such transactions. Also,
the clearing broker provides the clearing and depository
operations for Ladenburgs and Investacorps
proprietary securities transactions. These activities may expose
us to off-balance-sheet risk in the event that customers do not
fulfill their obligations with the clearing broker, as we have
agreed to indemnify our clearing broker for any resulting
losses. We continually assess risk associated with each customer
who is on margin credit and record an estimated loss when we
believe collection from the customer is unlikely. We incurred
losses from these arrangements, prior to any recoupment from our
financial advisors, of $101, $74 and $58 for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Customer Claims, Litigation and Regulatory
Matters. In the ordinary course of business, our
operating subsidiaries have been and are the subject of numerous
civil actions and arbitrations arising out of customer
complaints relating to their activities as a broker-dealer, as
an employer or supervisor and as a result of other business
activities. In general, the cases involve various allegations
that our employees or independent financial advisors had
mishandled customer accounts. Due to the uncertain nature of
litigation in general, we are unable to estimate a range of
possible loss related to lawsuits filed against us, but based on
our historical experience and consultation with counsel, we
typically reserve an amount we believe will be sufficient to
cover any damages assessed against us. We had accruals of $453
at December 31, 2009 and $460 at December 31, 2008 for
potential arbitration and lawsuit losses. However, we have in
the past been assessed damages that exceeded our reserves. If we
misjudge the amount of damages that may be assessed against us
from pending or threatened claims, or if we are unable to
adequately estimate the amount of damages that will be assessed
against us from claims that arise in the future and reserve
accordingly, our operating income and liquidity would be
reduced. Such costs may have a material adverse effect on our
future financial position, results of operations and liquidity.
Fair Value. Trading securities
owned and Securities sold, but not yet
purchased on our consolidated statements of financial
condition are carried at fair value, with related unrealized
gains and losses recognized in our results of operations. The
determination of fair value is fundamental to our financial
condition and results of operations and, in certain
circumstances, it requires management to make complex judgments.
Fair values are based on listed market prices, where possible.
If listed market prices are not available or if the liquidation
of our positions would reasonably be expected to impact market
prices, fair value is determined based on other relevant
factors, including dealer price quotations. Fair values for
certain derivative contracts are derived from pricing models
that consider market and contractual prices for the underlying
financial instruments or commodities, as well as time value and
yield curve or volatility factors underlying the positions.
Pricing models and their underlying assumptions impact the
amount and timing of unrealized gains and losses recognized, and
the use of different pricing models or assumptions could produce
different financial results. Changes in the fixed income and
equity markets will impact our estimates of fair value in the
future, potentially affecting principal trading revenues. The
illiquid nature of certain securities or debt instruments also
requires a high degree of judgment in determining fair value due
to the lack of listed market prices and the potential impact of
the liquidation of our position on market prices, among other
factors.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has
issued authoritative accounting guidance that defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs
to valuation techniques. The new guidance clarifies that fair
value should be based on assumptions that market participants
would use when pricing an asset or liability and became
effective for us on January 1, 2008. The adoption of this
standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
26
Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets. We account
for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which
requires the recognition of tax benefits or expense on the
temporary differences between the tax basis and book basis of
our assets and liabilities as well as tax loss carryforwards.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. Deferred tax amounts as of
December 31, 2009, which consist principally of the tax
benefit of net operating loss carryforwards and compensation
charges related to equity instruments, amount to $38,300. After
consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative,
especially the fact that we sustained a cumulative pre-tax loss
for the periods 2006 through 2009, we have determined that a
valuation allowance at December 31, 2009 was necessary to fully
offset the deferred tax assets based on the likelihood of future
realization. At December 31, 2009, we had net operating
loss carryforwards of approximately $62,500, expiring in various
years from 2015 through 2029.
Stock-Based Compensation. Our stock based
compensation uses a fair value-based method to recognize
non-cash compensation expense for share-based transactions. The
accounting guidance requires an entity to measure the cost of
employee, officer and director services received in exchange for
an award of equity instruments, including stock options, based
on the grant-date fair value of the award. The cost is
recognized as compensation expense over the service period,
which would normally be the vesting period of the options.
Intangible Assets. We amortize intangible
assets over their estimated useful lives generally on a
straight-line basis. Intangible assets subject to amortization
are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may be not
recoverable. We assess the recoverability of our intangible
assets by determining whether the unamortized balance can be
recovered over the assets remaining life through
undiscounted forecasted cash flows. If undiscounted forecasted
cash flows indicate that the unamortized amounts will not be
recovered, an adjustment will be made to reduce such amounts to
an amount consistent with forecasted future cash flows
discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk associated with
achieving future discounted cash flows. Future cash flows are
based on trends of historical performance and our estimate of
future performances, giving consideration to existing and
anticipated competitive and economic conditions.
Goodwill. Goodwill is not subject to
amortization and is tested for impairment annually or more
frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the asset may be impaired. The impairment test consists of a
comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit with its
carrying amount. Fair value is typically based upon future cash
flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved
or market based comparables. If the carrying amount of the
reporting unit exceeds its fair value then an analysis will be
performed to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its
carrying amount of goodwill. An impairment loss will be
recognized in an amount equal to excess of the carrying amount
over the implied fair value. After an impairment loss is
recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of goodwill is its new
accounting basis. We did not identify any impairment of goodwill
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Results
of Operations
The following discussion provides an assessment of our
consolidated results of operations, capital resources and
liquidity and should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this report. Our consolidated financial statements
include our accounts and the accounts of Ladenburg, Investacorp
(since October 19, 2007), Triad (since August 13,
2008) and our other wholly-owned subsidiaries.
27
The following table presents a reconciliation of EBITDA, as
adjusted, to net (loss) income as reported:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
150,675
|
|
|
$
|
120,970
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
95,826
|
(2)
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
168,279
|
|
|
|
140,214
|
|
|
|
85,922
|
(3)
|
Pre-tax (loss) income
|
|
|
(17,604
|
)
|
|
|
(19,244
|
)
|
|
|
9,904
|
(3)
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(18,673
|
)
|
|
|
(20,263
|
)
|
|
|
9,391
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA, as adjusted
|
|
$
|
(2,258
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,891
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,005
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Sale of exchange memberships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3,977
|
)
|
|
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
|
(2,304
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(1,069
|
)
|
|
|
(1,019
|
)
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(3,734
|
)
|
|
|
(3,292
|
)
|
|
|
(1,491
|
)
|
Non-cash compensation
|
|
|
(7,534
|
)
|
|
|
(6,265
|
)
|
|
|
(6,694
|
)
|
Clearing conversion expense
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,833
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(18,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,263
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $21,190 of revenue from Triad (acquired August 13,
2008). |
|
(2) |
|
Includes $12,191 of revenue from Investacorp (acquired
October 19, 2007). |
|
(3) |
|
Includes loss on extinguishment of debt of $1,833 in 2007. |
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
or EBITDA, adjusted for gains or losses on sales of assets,
non-cash compensation expense, clearing conversion expense and
loss on extinguishment of debt is a key metric we use in
evaluating our financial performance. EBITDA is considered a
non-GAAP financial measure as defined by Regulation G
promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. We consider EBITDA, as adjusted, important in
evaluating our financial performance on a consistent basis
across various periods. Due to the significance of non-cash and
non-recurring items, EBITDA, as adjusted, enables the
Companys Board of Directors and management to monitor and
evaluate the business on a consistent basis. We use EBITDA, as
adjusted, as a primary measure, among others, to analyze and
evaluate financial and strategic planning decisions regarding
future operating investments and potential acquisitions. We
believe that EBITDA, as adjusted, eliminates items that are not
indicative of our core operating performance, such as debt
extinguishment expense or expenses related to Investacorps
conversion to a single clearing firm as part of a new seven-year
clearing arrangement, or do not involve a cash outlay, such as
stock-related compensation. EBITDA, as adjusted, should be
considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for,
pre-tax income, net income and cash flows from operating
activities.
Our EBITDA, as adjusted, increased $3,633 in 2009 compared to
2008 primarily as a result of a smaller net loss in 2009 as
compared to 2008. EBITDA, as adjusted, decreased $27,896 in 2008
as compared to 2007 primarily due to a loss due to decreased
investment banking revenue in 2008 as compared to 2007.
As a result of the Investacorp acquisition on October 19,
2007, we have two operating segments. For periods prior to
October 19, 2007, we operated in only one segment. The
Ladenburg segment includes the investment banking, sales and
trading and asset management services and investment activities
conducted by Ladenburg and LTAM. The independent brokerage and
advisory services segment includes the broker-dealer and
investment advisory services provided by Investacorp and Triad
to their independent contractor financial advisors.
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ladenburg
|
|
$
|
38,671
|
|
|
$
|
41,997
|
|
|
$
|
83,313
|
|
Independent Brokerage and Advisory Services(1)
|
|
|
111,931
|
|
|
|
79,190
|
|
|
|
12,191
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
150,675
|
|
|
$
|
120,970
|
|
|
$
|
95,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ladenburg
|
|
$
|
(8,006
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,140
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,435
|
|
Independent Brokerage and Advisory Services(1)
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
Corporate(2)
|
|
|
(10,400
|
)
|
|
|
(11,307
|
)
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pre-tax (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(17,604
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes Investacorp since its October 19, 2007 acquisition
and Triad since its August 13, 2008 acquisition. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes interest, compensation, professional fees and other
general and administrative expenses. |
Year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to year ended
December 31, 2008
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, we had a net
loss of $18,673 compared to a net loss of $20,263 for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008. Net loss for 2009 included
$7,534 of non-cash compensation expense. Net loss for 2008
included $6,265 of non-cash compensation expense and was reduced
by a $519 gain on the sale of exchange memberships.
Our total revenues for 2009 increased $29,705 (25%) from 2008,
primarily as a result of increased commissions and fees of
$26,544, increased principal transactions of $3,582, increased
other income of $1,784 partially offset by decreased interest
and dividends revenue of $1,927. 2008 revenues include $21,190
of revenues from Triad from the date of its acquisition
(August 13, 2008). 2009 revenue includes $60,449 from Triad
for the full year.
Our total expenses increased in 2009 by $28,065 (20%) from 2008
primarily as a result of an increase in commissions and fees of
$26,375, an increase in other expense of $2,119, an increase in
non-cash compensation expense of $1,269 and an increase in
brokerage, communication and clearance fees of $826, partially
offset by a decrease in compensation and benefits of $2,412. The
2008 expenses include $20,858 of expenses attributable to
Triads operations commencing August 13, 2008. 2009
expenses include $59,990 from Triad for the full year.
The $26,544 (27%) increase in commissions and fees revenue in
2009 as compared to 2008 is attributable to an increase of
$37,298 from the inclusion of Triad for the full 2009 year,
partially offset by decreases at Ladenburg and Investacorp of
$3,808 and $6,747, respectively. The decreases at Ladenburg and
Investacorp were primarily due to unfavorable market conditions.
The $441 (3%) increase in 2009 investment banking revenue was
primarily due to an increase in advisory fees of $437. Our
investment banking revenue is derived from Ladenburgs
capital raising activities, including underwritten public
offerings and private placements, and strategic advisory
services. Revenue from underwritten public offerings was $7,608
and $9,159 in 2009 and 2008, respectively. Private placement
revenue was $3,729, including $544 in warrants, and $2,174,
including $368 in warrants, in 2009 and 2008, respectively. 2009
and 2008 investment banking revenue includes $5,939 and $5,289,
respectively, of deferred fees from special purpose acquisition
companies (SPAC) transactions. Typically, a significant portion
of the underwriting fees for a SPAC transaction were deferred
fees and were recognized only upon a SPACs successful
completion of a business combination transaction. As of the date
of this report, Ladenburg does not have a material backlog of
deferred SPAC transaction fees.
29
The $719 (26%) decrease in asset management revenue in 2009 as
compared to 2008 was due to the lower average assets under
management at LTAM resulting from unfavorable market conditions.
Revenues associated with Triad and Investacorp client assets are
included in commissions and fees revenue, rather than asset
management revenue, which relates to Ladenburg and LTAM. We
expect asset management revenue to increase in 2010 due to
improved market conditions and newly-added advisory assets.
The $3,582 (131%) increase in principal transactions in 2009 as
compared to 2008 is primarily attributable to gains in the fair
value of securities received as underwriting consideration.
The $1,927 (45%) decrease in interest and dividends in 2009 as
compared to 2008 is primarily attributable to lower interest
rates and a decrease in margin account balances. We expect
continued lower interest and dividends revenue in 2010 due to
expected low interest rates and lower interest sharing from our
clearing broker.
The $1,784 (38%) increase in other income in 2009 as compared to
2008 is primarily attributable to the inclusion of Triad for the
full 2009 year. Triad contributed $3,201 and $1,437 of
other income in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The $26,375 (43%) increase in commissions and fees expense in
2009 as compared to 2008 is primarily due to the inclusion of
Triad for the full 2009 year. Triads commission and
fees expense was $48,511 and $16,170 for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our increase in
commissions and fees expense for the 2009 period as compared to
the 2008 period was partially offset by a decrease of $5,966 in
such expense at Investacorp. The decrease at Investacorp is
directly correlated to the reduction in commissions and fees
revenue at Investacorp. Commissions and fees expense comprises
compensation payments earned by the registered representatives
who serve as independent contractors in our independent
brokerage and advisory services segment. These payments to the
independent contractor registered representatives are calculated
based on a percentage of revenues and vary by product.
Accordingly, when the independent contractor registered
representatives increase their business, both our revenues and
expenses increase since they earn additional compensation based
on the revenue produced.
The $2,412 (6%) decrease in compensation and benefits expense in
2009 as compared to 2008 was primarily due to a $2,957 decrease
in producers compensation which is directly correlated to
revenue production by such persons, a $2,036 decrease in
salaries, bonus and benefits at Ladenburg and Investacorp which
is a result of staff reductions, partially offset by the
addition of Triad, which had a $2,580 increase in expense.
The $1,269 (20%) increase in non-cash compensation expense in
2009 as compared to 2008 is primarily attributable to new option
grants and a reduction in the forfeiture rate for our stock
options.
The $826 (14%) increase in brokerage, communication and
clearance fees expense is primarily attributable to the
inclusion of Triad for the full 2009 year. Triad and
Investacorp had an increase of $1,275 and $56 in 2009,
respectively, partially offset by a decrease in Ladenburg
expense of $543 resulting from cost reduction measures in 2009.
While brokerage, communication and clearance fee expense is
directly correlated with brokerage activity, we have benefitted
and expect to continue to benefit from reduced clearing and
execution expenses under our new clearing arrangements.
The $254 (8%) increase in rent and occupancy, net of sublease
revenue in 2009 as compared to 2008 is primarily attributable to
additional Triad expense of $224 for the full year in 2009.
The $251 (4%) decrease in professional services expense for 2009
is primarily due to a decrease of $599 in legal, audit, tax and
consulting expense at Investacorp and Ladenburg partially offset
by the additional expense from Triad of $348. We expect similar
levels of professional services expense for the near future.
The $557 (12%) decrease in interest expense in 2009 as compared
to 2008 is a result of reduced average borrowings under our
$30,000 revolving credit facility with Frost Gamma Investments
Trust (Frost Gamma), an affiliate of
Dr. Phillip Frost, our chairman of the board and principal
shareholder, which we entered into in 2007, and repayments of
promissory notes issued in connection with the Investacorp and
Triad acquisitions. An approximate $33,000 average balance was
outstanding for the 2009 period, as compared with an average
debt outstanding of $35,000 for the 2008 period. As discussed
above, in August, 2009, we entered into a seven-year, $10,000
forgivable loan with NFS. We used the NFS loan proceeds, which
bear interest at a lower rate than our revolving credit
agreement, to repay amounts outstanding under our revolving
credit facility.
30
The $442 (13%) increase in depreciation and amortization expense
is primarily due to additional Triad expense of $713, of which
$666 is attributed to the amortization of intangible assets
related to the acquisition.
The $2,119 (28%) increase in other expense in 2009 as compared
to 2008 is primarily attributable to the addition of Triad
expense of $1,666, increased bad debt and settlement expense of
$429 and a $112 increase in miscellaneous trading services.
We incurred income tax expense of $1,069 in 2009 as compared to
$1,019 in 2008. After consideration of all the evidence, both
positive and negative, management has determined that a
valuation allowance at December 31, 2009 was necessary to
fully offset the deferred tax assets based on the likelihood of
future realization. Our current deferred income tax liabilities
increased by approximately $946 during 2009 due to goodwill
amortization for tax purposes. The income tax rates for the 2009
and 2008 periods do not bear a customary relationship to
effective tax rates primarily as a result of the increase in the
valuation allowance in the 2008 and 2009 period.
Year
ended December 31, 2008 compared to year ended
December 31, 2007
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, we had a net
loss of $20,263 compared to net income of $9,391 for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2007. Net loss for 2008 included
$6,265 of non-cash compensation expense and was reduced by a
$519 gain on the sale of exchange memberships. Net income for
2007 was reduced by a $1,833 loss on extinguishment of debt and
$6,694 of non-cash compensation expense.
Our total revenues for 2008 increased $25,144 (26%) from 2007,
primarily as a result of increased commissions and fees of
$65,319 generated by Investacorp and Triad, offset by decreased
investment banking revenue of $40,687. 2008 revenues include
$58,000 of revenues from Investacorp and $21,190 of revenues
from Triad from the date of acquisition (August 13, 2008).
2007 revenue did not include Triad and only included Investacorp
revenue of $12,191 from October 19, 2007 to year end.
Excluding non-cash compensation expense of $6,265 in 2008 and
$6,694 in 2007 and loss on extinguishment of debt of $1,833 in
2007, our expenses increased in 2008 by $56,554 (73%) from 2007
primarily as a result of an increase in commissions and fees of
$51,778 primarily from Investacorp and Triad, an increase in
interest expense of $2,230, an increase in professional services
of $2,032, an increase in brokerage, communication and clearance
fees of $2,034, an increase in rent and occupancy of $1,915, an
increase in depreciation and amortization of $1,801, and an
increase in other expenses of $1,038, offset by a decrease in
compensation and benefits of $6,274. The 2008 expenses included
$20,858 of expenses attributable to Triads operations
commencing August 13, 2008 and the 2008 and 2007 periods
included expenses for Investacorp of $55,975 and $11,246,
respectively, attributable to Investacorps operations
commencing with its acquisition on October 19, 2007.
The $40,687 (73%) decrease in 2008 investment banking revenue
was primarily due to unfavorable market conditions, a decrease
in the number of SPAC offerings in which Ladenburg participated
and a decrease in the number of completed SPAC business
combinations. Ladenburg led or co-managed five SPAC offerings in
2008 compared to 29 offerings in 2007. This reduction in the
number of new SPAC offerings caused a $35,796 decline in
revenues in 2008. The reduction in the number of completed SPAC
business combinations resulted in a $4,420 decrease in
investment banking revenue. Revenues from advisory services and
private placement transaction fees decreased $471 from the prior
year period.
The $65,319 (204%) increase in commissions and fees revenue in
2008 as compared to 2007 is attributable to an additional
$62,764 from the operations of Triad and Investacorp and an
increase in the number of institutional sales representatives at
Ladenburg.
The $307 (10%) decrease in asset management revenue in 2008 as
compared to 2007 was primarily due to unfavorable market
conditions resulting in decreased assets under management.
Revenues associated with Triad and Investacorp client assets are
included in commissions and fees revenue, rather than asset
management revenue, which relates to Ladenburg and LTAM.
The $2,987 (1,190%) decrease in principal transactions revenue
in 2008 as compared to 2007 was primarily due to unfavorable
market conditions, partially offset by realized gains in sales
of Ladenburgs Boston Stock Exchange and American Stock
Exchange memberships.
31
The $1,329 (45%) increase in interest and dividends in 2008 as
compared to 2007 is primarily attributable to the addition of
Investacorp and Triad, which combined had an increase of $1,668
in interest and dividends. Ladenburg interest and dividends
decreased due to lower interest rates.
The $2,477 (112%) increase in other income in 2008 as compared
to 2007 is primarily attributable to the addition of Investacorp
and Triad which together contributed $3,682 and $804 in 2008 and
2007, respectively. Ladenburgs other income decreased
$397, primarily due to a decrease of $294 in transaction fee
rebates.
The $6,274 (13%) decrease in compensation and benefits expense
in 2008 as compared to 2007 was primarily due to a $18,092
decrease in producers compensation which is directly
correlated with a decrease in Ladenburgs revenue
production, a $12,174 increase in salaries, bonuses, payroll
taxes and employee benefits, and a $622 decrease in amortization
of cash held in escrow as security for obligations under a prior
acquisition agreement. The increase in salaries, bonuses and
benefits resulted from an increase in the average headcount for
salaried Ladenburg employees primarily resulting from the Punk
Ziegel acquisition, and an increase of $7,074 for
Investacorps and Triads employees in the 2008
period. During the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter
of 2009, Ladenburg reduced the size of its workforce.
The $429 (6%) decrease in non-cash compensation expense in 2008
as compared to 2007 is primarily due to a decrease of $3,162 for
the amortization of unearned compensation for our warrants and
common stock held in escrow for the principal shareholders of
Capitalink, an investment bank we acquired, which was amortized
over 15 months beginning on October 18, 2006, the date
of acquisition, and a decrease of $90 for the amortization of
unearned compensation from stock issued to employees in 2005 at
below market prices, partially offset by increased compensation
expense of $2,823 attributable to option grants to employees,
directors and consultants (including $1,619 to Investacorp
employees).
The $2,034 (51%) increase in brokerage, communication and
clearance fees expense is primarily attributable to increased
institutional trading and the addition of Investacorp and Triad
expense of $1,585.
The $1,915 (147%) increase in rent and occupancy, net of
sublease revenue in 2008 as compared to 2007 is primarily
attributable to an increase of $1,371 for Ladenburgs
additional leased property and Investacorp and Triad expense of
$551.
The $2,032 (52%) increase in professional services expense
during 2008 is primarily due to an increase of $1,569 in legal,
$414 for audit, tax and 404 compliance and $49 in consulting
fees and corporate development activities.
The $2,230 (97%) increase in interest expense in 2008 as
compared to 2007 is a result of borrowings under our credit
facility which we entered into 2007 and promissory notes issued
in connection with the Investacorp and Triad acquisitions. An
approximate $35,000 average balance was outstanding for the 2008
period, as compared with an average debt outstanding of $6,000
for the 2007 period.
The $1,801 (121%) increase in depreciation and amortization
expense is primarily attributable to the addition of Triad and
Investacorp expense of $1,524 and the additional expense related
to Punk Ziegel.
The $1,038 (16%) increase in other expense in 2008 as compared
to 2007 is primarily attributable to the addition of Investacorp
for the full year in 2008 and Triad expense of $2,307, partially
offset by a decrease of $1,136 in Ladenburgs bad debt and
settlement expense.
We incurred income tax expense of $1,019 in 2008 as compared to
$513 in 2007. After consideration of all the evidence, both
positive and negative, management has determined that a
valuation allowance at December 31, 2008 was necessary to
fully offset the deferred tax assets based on the likelihood of
future realization. Our current deferred income tax liabilities
increased by approximately $780 during 2008 due to goodwill
amortization for tax purposes. The income tax rates for the 2008
and 2007 periods do not bear a customary relationship to
effective tax rates primarily as a result of the increase in the
valuation allowance in the 2008 period and recognized tax
benefits from net operating loss carryforwards from prior years
utilized to offset taxable income in the 2007 and 2006 periods.
32
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Approximately 23% of our total assets at December 31, 2009
consisted of cash and cash equivalents, securities owned and
receivables from clearing brokers and other broker-dealers, all
of which fluctuate, depending upon the levels of customer
business and trading activity. Receivables from broker-dealers,
which are primarily from clearing brokers, turn over rapidly. As
a securities dealer, our broker-dealer subsidiaries may carry
significant levels of securities inventories to meet customer
needs. A relatively small percentage of our total assets are
fixed. The total assets or the individual components of total
assets may vary significantly from period to period because of
changes relating to economic and market conditions, and
proprietary trading strategies.
Each of Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad is subject to the
SECs net capital rules. Ladenburg and Triad are also
subject to the CFTCs net capital rules. Therefore, they
are subject to certain restrictions on the use of capital and
their related liquidity. At December 31, 2009,
Ladenburgs regulatory net capital, as defined, of $2,383,
exceeded minimum capital requirements of $500, by $1,883. At
December 31, 2009, Investacorps regulatory net
capital, as defined, of $694, exceeded minimum capital
requirements of $315, by $379. At December 31, 2009,
Triads regulatory net capital, as defined, of $937
exceeded minimum net capital requirements of $292 by $645.
Failure to maintain the required net capital may subject
Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad to suspension or expulsion by
FINRA, the SEC and other regulatory bodies and ultimately may
require its liquidation. The net capital rule also prohibits the
payment of dividends, redemption of stock and prepayment or
payment of principal of subordinated indebtedness if net
capital, after giving effect to the payment, redemption or
prepayment, would be less than specified percentages of the
minimum net capital requirement. Compliance with the net capital
rule could limit Ladenburgs operations that require the
intensive use of capital, such as underwriting and trading
activities, and also could restrict our ability to withdraw
capital from our subsidiaries, which in turn, could limit our
ability to pay dividends and repay debt.
In addition to regulatory net capital restrictions, Investacorp
also is contractually restricted from declaring a dividend to us
which would result in its retained earnings and paid-in capital
falling below the then outstanding principal balance of the
promissory note issued to Investacorps former principal
shareholder, which was $4,354 at December 31, 2009.
Our primary sources of liquidity include borrowings under our
$30,000 revolving credit agreement with Frost Gamma. Borrowings
under the $30,000 revolving credit agreement bear interest at a
rate of 11% per annum, payable quarterly. At December 31,
2009, $18,450 was outstanding under the revolving credit
agreement. We used the proceeds of the $10,000 NFS forgivable
loan to repay a portion of the amount outstanding under our
revolving credit facility. We may repay or re-borrow outstanding
amounts under our revolving credit facility at any time prior to
the amended maturity date of August 25, 2016, without
penalty. We believe our existing assets and funds available
under our $30,000 revolving credit facility provide adequate
funds for continuing operations at current activity levels. We
are currently in compliance with all debt covenants in our debt
agreements.
Cash used in operating activities for 2009 was $2,297 primarily
due to our net loss, an increase in other receivables, net,
receivables from other broker-dealers and other assets, a
decrease in securities sold , but not yet purchased, partially
offset by a decrease in securities owned at fair value, and
receivables from clearing brokers and an increase in accrued
compensation and commissions and fees payable. In 2008, cash
provided by operating activities was $23,765 primarily due to a
decrease in receivables from clearing brokers, receivables from
other broker dealers, and other assets partially offset by our
net loss, an increase in other receivables, net, a decrease in
securities sold , but not yet purchased, accrued compensation,
commissions and fees payable, and accounts payable and accrued
liabilities.
Investing activities used $48 for 2009, primarily due to the
purchase of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements
partially offset by a decrease in restricted assets related to
the termination of a letter of credit securing obligations under
one of Ladenburgs office leases. In 2008, investing
activities used $8,259, primarily due to payments for
acquisitions, and the purchase of furniture, equipment and
leasehold improvements partially offset by a decrease in
exchange memberships, and restricted assets related to the
termination of a letter of credit securing obligations under one
of Ladenburgs office leases.
Financing activities provided $1,426 for 2009, primarily due to
the $10,000 NFS forgivable loan agreement, loan re-borrowings
under our revolving credit facility, and the issuance of common
stock upon option exercises and
33
under the employee stock purchase plan, partially offset by
repayments of notes payable and common stock repurchases. In
2008, financing activities used $17,480 primarily due to
repayments of amounts outstanding under our revolving credit
facility and other notes payable, and common stock repurchases
partially offset by the issuance of common stock.
At December 31, 2009, we were obligated under several
non-cancelable lease agreements for office space, which provide
for future minimum lease payments aggregating approximately
$32,865 through 2015, exclusive of escalation charges. We have
subleased vacant space under subleases which entitle us to
receive rents aggregating approximately $25,918 through such
date.
In connection with the Investacorp acquisition, we entered into
the $30,000 credit agreement and issued a $15,000 promissory
note to Investacorps former principal shareholder. During
2009, we re-borrowed a net amount of $450 under the $30,000
credit agreement. Under the revolving credit facility, we may
prepay outstanding amounts without penalty, and reborrow amounts
up to the credit limit, prior to the August 2016 maturity date.
The $15,000 promissory note bears interest at 4.11% per annum
and is payable in 36 monthly installments. At
December 31, 2009, the outstanding balance of this note was
$4,354.
In connection with the Triad acquisition, we issued a $5,000
promissory note to Triads former shareholders. The note
bears interest at a rate of 2.51% per annum and is payable
quarterly. The outstanding balance of this note at
December 31, 2009 was $2,962.
In March 2007, our board of directors authorized the repurchase
of up to 2,500,000 shares of our common stock from time to
time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions
depending on market conditions. The repurchase program is being
funded using approximately 15% of our EBITDA, as adjusted. As of
December 31, 2009, 947,824 shares had been repurchased
for $1,689 under the program.
In April 2009, the Company repurchased 4,500,000 shares of
common stock at a price of $0.60 per share (an aggregate of
$2,700) in a privately-negotiated transaction. This purchase was
not made under the Companys share repurchase program,
which remains in effect.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Each of Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad, as guarantor of its
customer accounts to its clearing broker, is exposed to
off-balance-sheet risks in the event that its customers do not
fulfill their obligations with the clearing broker. Also, if
Ladenburg, Investacorp or Triad maintains a short position in
certain securities, it is exposed to future off-balance-sheet
market risk, since its ultimate obligation may exceed the amount
recognized in the financial statements.
Please see Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this annual report on
Form 10-K.
Contractual
Obligations
The table below summarizes information about our contractual
obligations as of December 31, 2009 and the effects these
obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow
in the future years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
4-5 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
Note payable to former Investacorp principal shareholder(1)
|
|
$
|
4,436
|
|
|
$
|
4,436
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Note payable to former Triad shareholders(2)
|
|
|
3,037
|
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit agreement with affiliate of our principal
shareholder(3)
|
|
|
32,114
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
4,059
|
|
|
|
4,059
|
|
|
|
22,312
|
|
Notes payable to clearing firm under forgivable loan(4)
|
|
|
12,100
|
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
3,682
|
|
|
|
3,382
|
|
|
|
3,082
|
|
Operating leases(5)
|
|
|
32,865
|
|
|
|
6,849
|
|
|
|
12,636
|
|
|
|
11,205
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
84,552
|
|
|
$
|
16,658
|
|
|
$
|
21,679
|
|
|
$
|
18,646
|
|
|
$
|
27,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Note bears interest at 4.11% per annum and is payable in 36
equal monthly installments. See Note 10 to our consolidated
financial statements. |
|
(2) |
|
Note bears interest at 2.51% per annum and is payable in 12
equal quarterly installments. See Note 10 to our
consolidated financial statements. |
|
(3) |
|
Revolving credit agreement has an August 25, 2016 maturity
date and bears interest at a rate of 11% per annum, payable
quarterly. Assumes no payments of principal prior to maturity.
See Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements. |
|
(4) |
|
Note bears interest at 5.25% per annum and is payable in 7
annual installments. See Note 10 to our consolidated
financial statements. |
|
(5) |
|
Excludes sublease revenues of $25,918. See Note 11 to our
consolidated financial statements. |
We have subleased office space in various locations to
subtenants, some of whom are engaged in the financial services
industry. Should any of the
sub-tenants
experience financial difficulty, or otherwise not pay their rent
for an extended period of time, it may have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations.
Market
Risk
Market risk generally represents the risk of loss that may
result from the potential change in the value of a financial
instrument as a result of fluctuations in interest and currency
exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, changes in the
implied volatility of interest rates, foreign exchange rates,
equity and commodity prices and also changes in the credit
ratings of either the issuer or its related country of origin.
Market risk is inherent to both derivative and non-derivative
financial instruments, and accordingly, the scope of our market
risk management procedures extends beyond derivatives to include
all market risk sensitive financial instruments.
Current and proposed underwriting, corporate finance, merchant
banking and other commitments are subject to due diligence
reviews by our senior management, as well as professionals in
the appropriate business and support units involved. Credit risk
related to various financing activities is reduced by the
industry practice of obtaining and maintaining collateral. We
monitor our exposure to counterparty risk through the use of
credit exposure information, the monitoring of collateral values
and the establishment of credit limits.
Special
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
We and our representatives may from time to time make oral or
written forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,
including any statements that may be contained in the foregoing
discussion in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in this
report and in other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and in our reports to shareholders, which reflect our
expectations or beliefs with respect to future events and
financial performance. These forward-looking statements are
subject to certain risks and uncertainties and, in connection
with the safe-harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act, we have identified under
Risk Factors in Item 1A above, important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those contained in any forward-looking statement made by or
on behalf of us.
Results actually achieved may differ materially from expected
results included in these forward-looking statements as a result
of these or other factors. Due to such uncertainties and risks,
readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on
which such statements are made. We do not undertake to update
any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time
by or on behalf of us.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
|
The information in Item 7 under the caption
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Market
Risk is incorporated herein by reference.
35
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
|
See the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto,
together with the report thereon of Eisner LLP dated
March 15, 2010 beginning on
page F-1
of this report which are incorporated by reference in this
Item 8.
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
|
None.
ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15)e)
or 15d-15(e)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) are our
controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that
we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in
the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act
is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report, and, based on that evaluation,
our principal executive officer and principal financial officer
have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f).
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
based on the framework in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Our internal
control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance to management and to our Board of Directors
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Our internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of our assets;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of our management and
directors; and
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition
of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
In connection with this annual report on
Form 10-K,
our chief executive officer and chief financial officer
evaluated, with the participation of our management, the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on
managements evaluation, our chief executive officer and
chief financial officer each concluded that our internal control
over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2009.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our
independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal
control over financial reporting. Managements report was
not subject to attestation by our independent registered public
accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that
permit us to provide only managements report in this
annual report.
36
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting during the fourth quarter that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION.
|
None.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
|
This information will be contained in our definitive proxy
statement for our 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be
filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of
our fiscal year covered by this report, and incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION.
|
This information will be contained in our definitive proxy
statement for our 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be
filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of
our fiscal year covered by this report, and incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
|
This information will be contained in our definitive proxy
statement for our 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be
filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of
our fiscal year covered by this report, and incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE.
|
This information will be contained in our definitive proxy
statement for our 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be
filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of
our fiscal year covered by this report, and incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
|
This information will be contained in our definitive proxy
statement for our 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be
filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of
our fiscal year covered by this report, and incorporated herein
by reference.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
|
(a)(1): Index to 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto,
together with the report thereon of Eisner LLP dated
March 15, 2010, appear beginning on
page F-1
of this report.
(a)(2): Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedules not included in this report have
been omitted because they are not applicable or the required
information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or
the notes thereto.
37
(a)(3): Exhibits Filed
The following exhibits are filed as part of this annual report
on
Form 10-K.
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Reference
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
No. in
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Document
|
|
Document
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation
|
|
A
|
|
3.1
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, dated
August 24, 1999
|
|
B
|
|
3.2
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, dated
April 3, 2006
|
|
C
|
|
3.1
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws
|
|
D
|
|
3.2
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of common stock certificate
|
|
A
|
|
4.1
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2007, by and
between the Company and Frost Gamma Investments Trust, including
the form of note thereto
|
|
E
|
|
4.1
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement by and between the
Company and Frost Nevada Investments Trust, as assignee, dated
as of August 25, 2009
|
|
V
|
|
4.2
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Forgivable Loan Agreement, dated as of August 25, 2009,
between the Company and National Financial Services LLC. Certain
Portions of this agreement have been omitted under a request for
confidential treatment pursuant to
Rule 24b-2
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and filed separately with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
V
|
|
4.1
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Non-Negotiable Promissory Note, dated as of October 19,
2007, made by the Company in favor of Bruce A. Zwigard
|
|
E
|
|
4.2
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Pledge Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2007, by and
between the Company and Bruce A. Zwigard
|
|
E
|
|
4.3
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Non-Negotiable Promissory Note, dated as of August 13,
2008, made by Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. in
favor of Mark C. Mettelman and Robert W. Bruderman as
representatives of the shareholders of Triad Advisors, Inc.
|
|
U
|
|
4.1
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Pledge Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2008, by and
between Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. and Mark C.
Mettelman and Robert W. Bruderman as representatives of the
shareholders of Triad Advisors, Inc.
|
|
U
|
|
4.2
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated 1999 Performance Equity Plan*
|
|
F
|
|
4.1
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
2009 Incentive Compensation Plan.*
|
|
W
|
|
Exhibit A
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement, dated as of May 7, 2001,
between the Company and certain directors*
|
|
G
|
|
10.3
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Schedule of Stock Option Agreements in the form of
Exhibit 10.3, including material detail in which such
documents differ from Exhibit 10.3*
|
|
G
|
|
10.3.1
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Stock Option Agreement, dated as of January 10, 2002,
between the Company and Richard J. Lampen*
|
|
H
|
|
10.2
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement, dated January 10, 2002,
between the Company and each of Richard J. Rosenstock and Mark
Zeitchick*
|
|
H
|
|
10.3
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Schedule of Stock Option Agreements in the form of
Exhibit 10.6, including material detail in which such
documents differ from Exhibit 10.6*
|
|
H
|
|
10.3.1
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. Qualified Employee
Stock Purchase Plan*
|
|
I
|
|
Exhibit A
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement, dated November 15, 2002,
between the Company and each of Bennett S. LeBow, Howard M.
Lorber, Henry C. Beinstein, Robert J. Eide and Richard J. Lampen*
|
|
J
|
|
10.48
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Schedule of Stock Option Agreements in the form of
Exhibit 10.9, including material detail in which such
documents differ from Exhibit 10.9*
|
|
J
|
|
10.48.1
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement, dated September 17, 2003,
between the Company and each of Howard M. Lorber, Henry C.
Beinstein and Richard J. Lampen*
|
|
K
|
|
10.1
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Schedule of Stock Option Agreements in the form of
Exhibit 10.11, including material detail in which such
documents differ from Exhibit 10.11*
|
|
K
|
|
10.1.1
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Office Lease dated March 30, 2007 between the Company and
Frost Real Estate Holdings, LLC
|
|
L
|
|
10.1
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Stock Option Agreement, dated July 13, 2006, issued to
Dr. Phillip Frost*
|
|
M
|
|
10.2
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Warrant issued to BroadWall Capital LLC
|
|
N
|
|
10.1
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Reference
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
No. in
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Document
|
|
Document
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement issued to employees of BroadWall
|
|
N
|
|
10.2
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated September 14, 2006, between
Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. and Vector Group Ltd.
(Vector Agreement)
|
|
O
|
|
10.1
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
First Amendment to Vector Agreement dated as of
December 20, 2007
|
|
P
|
|
10.1
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Form of Warrant issued to the stockholders of Telluride
Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Q
|
|
10.2
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Ladenburg Thalmann
Financial Services Inc., Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc.
and Mark Zeitchick.*
|
|
R
|
|
10.3
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2007, by
and among Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc., the
Investacorp Companies, the VIA Companies, Bruce A. Zwigard and
the Bruce A. Zwigard Grantor Retained Annuity Trust dated
June 20, 2007
|
|
E
|
|
10.1
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Non-Plan Option Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2007, by
and between Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. and Bruce
A. Zwigard
|
|
E
|
|
10.2
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Warrant, dated as of October 19, 2007, issued to Frost
Gamma Investments Trust pursuant to Credit Agreement
|
|
E
|
|
10.3
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Employment Letter dated as of February 8, 2008 between
Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. and Brett Kaufman*
|
|
S
|
|
10.1
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 9, 2008 by
and among Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc., Triple
Acquisition Inc., Triad Advisors, Inc. and the shareholders of
Triad Advisors, Inc.
|
|
T
|
|
2.1
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Eisner LLP
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
Power of Attorney
|
|
***
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Management Compensation Contract |
|
** |
|
Filed herewith |
|
*** |
|
Contained on the signature page hereto |
|
A. |
|
Registration statement on
Form SB-2
(File
No. 333-31001). |
|
B. |
|
Annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended August 24, 1999. |
|
C. |
|
Quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. |
|
D. |
|
Current report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 20, 2007 and filed with the SEC on
September 21, 2007. |
|
E. |
|
Current report on
Form 8-K,
dated October 19, 2007 and filed with the SEC on
October 22, 2007. |
|
F. |
|
Registration statement on
Form S-8
(File
No. 333-139254). |
|
G. |
|
Quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2001. |
|
H. |
|
Registration statement on
Form S-3
(File
No. 333-81964). |
|
I. |
|
Definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC on October 3,
2002 relating to the annual meeting of shareholders held on
November 6, 2002. |
|
J. |
|
Annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002. |
|
K. |
|
Quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. |
|
L. |
|
Current report on
Form 8-K,
dated March 30, 2007 and filed with the SEC on
April 2, 2007. |
|
M. |
|
Current report on
Form 8-K,
dated July 10, 2006 and filed with the SEC on
August 3, 2006. |
39
|
|
|
N. |
|
Current report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 11, 2006 and filed with the SEC on
September 12, 2006. |
|
O. |
|
Current report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 21, 2006 and filed with the SEC on
September 27, 2006. |
|
P. |
|
Current report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 20, 2007 and filed with the SEC on
December 20, 2007. |
|
Q. |
|
Current report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 6, 2006 and filed with the SEC on
September 7, 2006. |
|
R. |
|
Current report on
Form 8-K/A
dated September 6, 2006 and filed with the SEC on
October 24, 2006. |
|
S. |
|
Current report on
Form 8-K,
dated March 27, 2008 and filed with the SEC on
March 28, 2008. |
|
T. |
|
Current report on
Form 8-K,
dated July 9, 2008 and filed with the SEC on July 10,
2008. |
|
U. |
|
Current report on
Form 8-K,
dated August 13, 2008 and filed with the SEC on
August 14, 2008. |
|
V. |
|
Quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. |
|
W. |
|
Definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC on July 20,
2009 relating to the annual meeting of shareholders held on
August 27, 2009. |
40
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
LADENBURG THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
(Registrant)
Dated: March 16, 2010
Name: Brett H. Kaufman
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
The undersigned directors and officers of Ladenburg Thalmann
Financial Services Inc. hereby constitute and appoint Brett H.
Kaufman, Richard J. Lampen and Mark Zeitchick, and each of them,
with full power to act without the other and with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, our true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact with full power to execute in our name and
behalf in the capacities indicated below, this annual report on
Form 10-K
and any and all amendments thereto and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and
hereby ratify and confirm all that such attorneys-in-fact, or
any of them, or their substitutes shall lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on
March 16, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
J. Lampen
Richard
J. Lampen
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Brett
H. Kaufman
Brett
H. Kaufman
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Henry
C. Beinstein
Henry
C. Beinstein
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
J. Eide
Robert
J. Eide
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Phillip
Frost, M.D.
Phillip
Frost, M.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Brian
S. Genson
Brian
S. Genson
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Saul
Gilinski
Saul
Gilinski
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dr. Richard
M. Krasno
Dr. Richard
M. Krasno
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Howard
M. Lorber
Howard
M. Lorber
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey
S. Podell
Jeffrey
S. Podell
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
J. Rosenstock
Richard
J. Rosenstock
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark
Zeitchick
Mark
Zeitchick
|
|
Director
|
41
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
ITEMS 8 and 15(a) (1) AND (2)
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial Statements of the Registrant and its subsidiaries
required to be included in Items 8 and 15(a) (1) and
(2) are listed below:
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. Consolidated
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
financial condition of Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services
Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.
Our audit included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc.
and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and
the consolidated results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Eisner LLP
New York, New York
March 15, 2010
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,702
|
|
|
$
|
6,621
|
|
Securities owned, at fair value
|
|
|
2,209
|
|
|
|
4,828
|
|
Receivables from clearing brokers
|
|
|
13,406
|
|
|
|
14,558
|
|
Receivables from other broker-dealers
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables, net
|
|
|
6,203
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net
|
|
|
3,154
|
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
Restricted assets
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
28,509
|
|
|
|
31,625
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
29,739
|
|
|
|
29,739
|
|
Unamortized debt issue cost
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,157
|
|
|
|
3,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
94,637
|
|
|
$
|
101,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
4,299
|
|
|
|
3,661
|
|
Commissions and fees payable
|
|
|
5,957
|
|
|
|
5,203
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
5,671
|
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
3,378
|
|
|
|
3,863
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
35,438
|
|
|
|
30,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
56,843
|
|
|
|
50,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3 and 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 2,000,000 shares
authorized; none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 400,000,000 shares
authorized; shares issued and outstanding, 167,907,038 in 2009
and 171,715,514 in 2008
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
171,349
|
|
|
|
166,172
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(133,572
|
)
|
|
|
(114,899
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
37,794
|
|
|
|
51,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
94,637
|
|
|
$
|
101,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and fees
|
|
$
|
123,821
|
|
|
$
|
97,277
|
|
|
$
|
31,958
|
|
Investment banking
|
|
|
15,155
|
|
|
|
14,714
|
|
|
|
55,401
|
|
Asset management
|
|
|
2,002
|
|
|
|
2,721
|
|
|
|
3,028
|
|
Principal transactions
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
(2,736
|
)
|
|
|
251
|
|
Interest and dividends
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
4,299
|
|
|
|
2,970
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
6,479
|
|
|
|
4,695
|
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
150,675
|
|
|
|
120,970
|
|
|
|
95,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and fees
|
|
|
87,165
|
|
|
|
60,790
|
|
|
|
9,012
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
40,232
|
|
|
|
42,644
|
|
|
|
48,918
|
|
Non-cash compensation
|
|
|
7,534
|
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
|
|
6,694
|
|
Brokerage, communication and clearance fees
|
|
|
6,836
|
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
|
3,976
|
|
Rent and occupancy, net of sublease revenue
|
|
|
3,476
|
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
5,725
|
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
|
|
3,944
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
3,977
|
|
|
|
4,534
|
|
|
|
2,304
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,734
|
|
|
|
3,292
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,833
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9,600
|
|
|
|
7,481
|
|
|
|
6,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
168,279
|
|
|
|
140,214
|
|
|
|
85,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(17,604
|
)
|
|
|
(19,244
|
)
|
|
|
9,904
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(18,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,263
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share (basic and diluted)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares used in computation of per share
data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
168,623,375
|
|
|
|
165,812,495
|
|
|
|
157,355,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
168,623,375
|
|
|
|
165,812,495
|
|
|
|
168,484,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
155,972,805
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
132,346
|
|
|
$
|
(104,027
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,334
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
183,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
Exercise of stock options, net of 400,702 shares tendered
in payment of exercise price and 355,355 options used in
cashless exercise
|
|
|
3,618,420
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
978
|
|
Shares acquired from an employee in satisfaction of withholding
taxes on exercise of options
|
|
|
(521,711
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,122
|
)
|
Stock options granted to members of former Advisory Board and
consultants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
Stock-based compensation to employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,257
|
|
Stock retired under stock repurchase plan
|
|
|
(332,529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock in exchange for promissory notes
payable to former parent
|
|
|
2,777,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
Warrant issued in connection with credit agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,391
|
|
|
|
9,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
161,698,071
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
148,723
|
|
|
|
(94,636
|
)
|
|
|
54,103
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
196,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Exercise of stock options, net of 128,657 shares tendered
in payment of exercise price and 255,183 options used in
cashless exercise
|
|
|
2,018,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
Stock options granted to members of former Advisory Board and
consultants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
Stock-based compensation to employees
|
|
|
143,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,998
|
|
Stock retired under stock repurchase plan
|
|
|
(583,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,060
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,060
|
)
|
Common stock issued in Punk Ziegel acquisition
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
Common stock issued in Triad acquisition
|
|
|
7,993,387
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
10,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,427
|
|
Warrants issued for acquisition of customer accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,263
|
)
|
|
|
(20,263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
171,715,514
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
166,172
|
|
|
|
(114,899
|
)
|
|
|
51,290
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
210,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
512,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Stock options granted to members of former Advisory Board and
consultants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Stock-based compensation to employees
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,984
|
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
|
|
|
(4,531,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,717
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,717
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,673
|
)
|
|
|
(18,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
167,907,038
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
171,349
|
|
|
$
|
(133,572
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(18,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,263
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,391
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in)
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
Write-off of furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Adjustment to deferred rent
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
Amortization of debt discount
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
Amortization of debt issue cost
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
3,116
|
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
Non-cash compensation expense
|
|
|
7,534
|
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
|
|
6,694
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,833
|
|
(Increase) decrease in operating assets, net of effects of
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities owned
|
|
|
2,619
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(2,386
|
)
|
Receivables from clearing brokers
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
24,562
|
|
|
|
(9,749
|
)
|
Receivables from other broker-dealers
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
15,511
|
|
|
|
(9,559
|
)
|
Other receivables, net
|
|
|
(1,780
|
)
|
|
|
(2,116
|
)
|
|
|
(1,569
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities, net of effects of
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold, but not yet purchased
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(865
|
)
|
|
|
(1,096
|
)
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
(3,876
|
)
|
|
|
2,929
|
|
Commissions and fees payable
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
(645
|
)
|
|
|
646
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(1,767
|
)
|
|
|
(4,152
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(2,297
|
)
|
|
|
23,765
|
|
|
|
(2,860
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of relationships and customer accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
Adjustment to intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment for Triad acquisition, net of cash received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,843
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payment for Punk Ziegel acquisition, net of cash received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,461
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payment for Investacorp acquisition, net of cash received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(25,044
|
)
|
Purchases of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of exchange memberships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in restricted assets
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(8,259
|
)
|
|
|
(24,393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock other than private equity offerings
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
Shares tendered for withholding taxes on exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,122
|
)
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(2,717
|
)
|
|
|
(1,060
|
)
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
Issuance of subordinated notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
Repayment of subordinated notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,000
|
)
|
Issuance of other notes payable
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Principal borrowings (payments) under revolving credit facility,
net
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(12,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on other notes payable
|
|
|
(6,667
|
)
|
|
|
(5,232
|
)
|
|
|
(786
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
(17,480
|
)
|
|
|
28,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(919
|
)
|
|
|
(1,974
|
)
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
6,621
|
|
|
|
8,595
|
|
|
|
6,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
5,702
|
|
|
$
|
6,621
|
|
|
$
|
8,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
2,524
|
|
|
$
|
3,440
|
|
|
$
|
2,766
|
|
Taxes paid
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants issued for acquisition of customer accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
571
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Lease commitment capitalized as part of Capitalink acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
Issuance of shares of common stock in exchange for $5,000 of
promissory notes payable to former parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
Warrant issued in connection with credit agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
Leasehold improvements financed by landlord in connection with
relocation of premises and included in deferred rent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Investacorp and affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,849
|
|
Liabilities assumed ($6,676) and note payable issued to former
principal shareholder ($13,550)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,226
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,623
|
|
Cash acquired in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Punk Ziegel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,039
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Triad Advisors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,172
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note issued in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,384
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-7
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
1.
|
Description
of Business
|
Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. (LTS or
the Company) is a holding company. Its
wholly-owned
principal operating subsidiaries are Ladenburg
Thalmann & Co. Inc. (Ladenburg),
Investacorp, Inc. (collectively with related companies,
Investacorp), Triad Advisors, Inc.
(Triad) and Ladenburg Thalmann Asset Management Inc.
(LTAM).
Ladenburg is a full service registered broker-dealer that has
been a member of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
since 1879. Broker-dealer activities include sales and trading
and investment banking. Ladenburg provides its services
principally for middle market and emerging growth companies and
high net worth individuals through a coordinated effort among
corporate finance, capital markets, brokerage and trading
professionals.
Investacorp and Triad, which were acquired on October 19,
2007 and August 13, 2008, respectively, are registered
broker-dealers and investment advisors that have been serving
the independent financial advisor community since 1978 and 1998,
respectively. Investacorps and Triads independent
financial advisors primarily serve retail clients. They derive
revenue from advisory fees and commissions, primarily from the
sale of mutual funds, variable annuity products and other
financial products and services.
LTAM is a registered investment advisor. It offers various asset
management products utilized by Ladenburg clients as well as
clients of Investacorp and Triads financial advisors.
Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad customer transactions are
cleared through clearing brokers on a fully-disclosed basis.
Each of Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad is subject to
regulation by, among others, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (FINRA) and the Municipal Securities
Rulemaking Board. Ladenburg and Triad are also subject to
regulation by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission
(CFTC) and the National Futures Association.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiaries after elimination of all
significant intercompany balances and transactions.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements were
reclassified to conform with the current year financial
statement classifications.
Cash
Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid financial instruments
with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
F-8
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Revenue
Recognition
Commissions and fees revenue results from transactions in equity
securities, mutual funds, variable annuities, and other
financial products and services. Revenue from such transactions,
executed as agent or principal, and related expenses are
recorded on a trade-date basis.
Investment banking revenue consists of underwriting revenue,
strategic advisory revenue and private placement fees.
Underwriting revenues arise from securities offerings in which
Ladenburg acts as an underwriter and include management fees,
selling concessions and underwriting fees, net of related
syndicate expenses. Underwriting revenues are recorded at the
time the underwriting is completed and the income is reasonably
determined. Underwriting revenues include revenues earned from
offerings by Specified Purpose Acquisition Companies
(SPAC). Ladenburg received a significant portion (up
to approximately 50%) of its revenue from the SPAC transaction
upon the completion of a SPACs initial public offering and
received the remaining portion of the revenue (Deferred
Fees) only if the SPAC completed a business combination
transaction. The Company records the portion of the revenue
payable upon completion of the initial public offering at the
time the offering is completed and recognizes the deferred fees
only if, and when, the SPAC completes the business combination.
Generally, these Deferred Fees were received within
24 months from the date of the offering, or not received at
all if no business combination transaction is completed during
such time period. Upon recognition of Deferred Fees, related
compensation expense and finders fees were also
recognized. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007, Ladenburg received and recognized Deferred Fees of
approximately $5,900, $5,300 and $9,700, respectively (included
in investment banking revenues) and incurred commissions and
related expenses of approximately $2,200, $2,100 and $3,500,
respectively. Strategic advisory revenue primarily consists of
success fees on completed merger and acquisition transactions,
as well as retainer and periodic fees, earned in connection with
advising on both buyers and sellers transactions.
Fees are also earned for related advisory work and other
services such as providing fairness opinions and valuation
analyses. Strategic advisory revenues are recorded when the
transactions or the services (or, if applicable, separate
components thereof) to be performed are substantially complete,
the fees are determinable and collection is reasonably assured.
Private placement fees are recorded on the closing date of the
transaction.
Asset management revenue consists of base management fees and
incentive fees. The Company recognizes base management fees on a
monthly basis over the period in which the investment services
are performed. Base management fees earned are generally based
on the fair value of assets under management. Base management
fees are calculated at the investor level and, depending on the
program, use their monthly, average monthly or quarter-ending
capital balances adjusted for any contributions or withdrawals.
Since base management fees are based on assets under management,
significant changes in the fair value of these assets will have
an impact on the fees earned in future periods. The Company also
earns incentive fees that are based upon the performance of
investment funds and accounts.
Principal transactions revenue includes realized and unrealized
net gains and losses resulting from Ladenburgs and
Investacorps investments in equity securities for their
accounts and equity-linked warrants received from certain
investment banking assignments. In addition, principal
transactions include realized and unrealized gains and losses
related to sales of exchange memberships.
Interest is recorded on an accrual basis and dividends are
recorded on an ex-dividend date basis.
Furniture,
Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements are carried at
cost net of accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the related
F-9
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line
basis over the lease term, or their estimated useful lives,
whichever is shorter.
Share-Based
Compensation
The Company measures the cost of employee, officer and director
services received in exchange for an award of equity
instruments, including stock options, based on the grant-date
fair value of the award. The cost is recognized as compensation
expense over the service period, which would normally be the
vesting period of the equity instruments.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful
lives, generally on a straight-line basis. Intangible assets
subject to amortization are tested for recoverability whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the
recoverability of its intangible assets by determining whether
the unamortized balance can be recovered over the assets
remaining life through undiscounted forecasted cash flows. If
undiscounted forecasted cash flows indicate that the unamortized
amounts will not be recovered, an adjustment will be made to
reduce such amounts to fair value determined based on forecasted
future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the
risk associated with achieving such cash flows. Future cash
flows are based on trends of historical performance and the
Companys estimate of future performance, giving
consideration to existing and anticipated competitive and
economic conditions.
Goodwill
Goodwill, which was recorded in connection with the acquisition
of Investacorp, Triad and Punk, Ziegel & Company, L.P.
(Punk Ziegel) (see Note 3 and Note 8), is
not subject to amortization and is tested for impairment
annually, or more frequently if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. The
impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of
the reporting unit with its carrying amount. Fair value is
typically based upon future cash flows discounted at a rate
commensurate with the risk involved or market based comparables.
If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair
value then an analysis will be performed to compare the implied
fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. An
impairment loss will be recognized in an amount equal to the
excess of the carrying amount over the implied fair value. After
an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount
of goodwill is its new accounting basis.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
During the third quarter of 2009, the Financial Accounting
Standards Boards (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (the Codification) became the single
source of authoritative U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP). The Codification does not create
any new GAAP standards, but incorporates existing accounting and
reporting standards into a new topical structure. Beginning with
this annual report, the Company adopted the Codification. Other
than the manner in which the new accounting guidance is
referenced, the adoption of the Codification did not have any
impact on the Companys financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance which establishes general
standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur
after the balance sheet date, but before financial statements
are issued. The guidance, as amended in February 2010, requires
that subsequent events be evaluated through the date the
financial statements are issued.
F-10
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance which changes how a
company determines when an entity that is insufficiently
capitalized or is not controlled through voting should be
consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required
to consolidate such an entity is based on, among other things,
an entitys purpose and design and a companys ability
to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly
impact the entitys economic performance. The guidance was
to become effective for the Company beginning on January 1,
2010; however, in February 2010, the FASB issued guidance which
defers the previous guidance with respect to a hedge fund in
which the Company has an ownership interest and accordingly, the
Company does not believe that the adoption of the guidance will
have any effect on its financial statements.
In August 2009, the FASB issued guidance which provides
clarification regarding how to value a liability when a quoted
price in an active market is not available for that liability.
The adoption of the guidance did not have any impact on the
Companys financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which
amended the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset for amortization purposes.
The guidance is intended to improve the consistency between the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset for amortization
purposes and the period of expected cash flows used to measure
the fair value of the asset under other U.S. GAAP. The
guidance, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, was adopted by the Company effective
January 1, 2009. The guidance is to be applied
prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective
date and did not have any impact on the Companys financial
statements.
Triad
On August 13, 2008, to increase its presence in the
independent broker-dealer business, the Company acquired Triad
through a merger for an aggregate of $6,826 in cash (net of a
post-closing adjustment of $674), 7,993,387 shares of the
Companys common stock, valued at $10,427 and a $5,000
promissory note valued at $4,384. The Companys common
stock was valued at $1.60 per share based on the average closing
market price for a reasonable period before and after
July 10, 2008, the date the acquisition was announced, and
discounted for certain transfer restrictions. The note, which
was valued based on an imputed interest rate of 11%, is
collateralized by a pledge of Triads stock held by the
Company. In the event that Triad meets certain cumulative profit
targets during the three-year period following completion of the
merger, the Company also will pay to Triads former
shareholders up to $7,500 in cash and issue to such shareholders
up to 4,134,511 shares of the Companys common stock.
Any such payments will be accounted for as additional purchase
price and allocated to goodwill.
The total consideration paid by the Company, including $130 of
merger-related costs, was allocated to the identifiable assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
values with the amount exceeding the fair values being recorded
as goodwill. The Company obtained third party valuations in
determining fair value for acquired intangible assets.
F-11
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The allocation of the purchase price was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,113
|
|
Receivables from clearing broker
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
397
|
|
Intangible assets(a)
|
|
|
13,022
|
|
Goodwill(b)
|
|
|
5,837
|
|
Securities owned
|
|
|
500
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
296
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
23,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and fees payable
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
853
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
21,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Intangible assets relate principally to relationships with
financial advisors ($9,786), vendor relationships ($1,731) and
non-compete covenants ($1,364), have a weighted average useful
life of 16 years and are expected to be deductible for tax
purposes over 15 years (see Note 7). |
|
(b) |
|
Goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes over a
15-year
period (see Note 8). |
Punk
Ziegel
On May 2, 2008, Punk, Ziegel & Company, L.P.
(Punk Ziegel), a specialty investment bank based in
New York City, was merged into Ladenburg. The Company paid the
sellers $2,700, representing Punk Ziegels retained
earnings plus
paid-in-capital,
plus 250,000 shares of the Companys common stock
valued at $435.
Investacorp
On October 19, 2007, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding shares of Investacorp for approximately $30,000 in
cash and a promissory note valued at $13,550. In connection with
financing the acquisition, LTS entered into a $30,000 revolving
credit agreement with Frost Gamma Investment Trust (Frost
Gamma), an entity affiliated with LTS chairman of
the board and principal shareholder (see Note 10). The
acquisition was made to achieve a presence in the independent
broker-dealer business.
The purchase price of $44,173, including acquisition costs, was
allocated to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based on their estimated fair values with the amount
exceeding the fair values being recorded as goodwill. The
Company obtained third party valuations in determining fair
value for the acquired intangible assets.
F-12
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The allocation of the purchase price was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,579
|
|
Securities owned
|
|
|
478
|
|
Receivables from clearing brokers
|
|
|
2,984
|
|
Intangible assets(a)
|
|
|
17,441
|
|
Goodwill(b)
|
|
|
23,546
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
50,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and fees payable
|
|
|
3,995
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
6,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
44,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Intangible assets relate principally to relationships with
financial advisors ($14,921), have a weighted average useful
life of 18 years and are expected to be deductible for tax
purposes over 15 years (see Note 7). |
|
(b) |
|
Goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes over a
15 year period (see Note 8). |
In connection with his continued employment with Investacorp,
the Company granted Investacorps former principal
shareholder stock options to purchase a total of
3,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock at
$1.91 per share, the closing price of the Companys common
stock on the acquisition date. The options, which were valued at
a total of $5,130, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model,
vest over a three-year period (subject to certain exceptions).
Also, the Company issued to certain other Investacorp employees
options to purchase 1,150,000 shares of common stock under
its 1999 Performance Equity Plan, as amended (1999 Option
Plan), at $1.91 per share, which were valued at a total of
$1,967, and vest in four equal annual installments.
Pro Forma
Information
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
results of operations of the acquired entities from their dates
of acquisition. The following unaudited pro forma information
represents the Companys consolidated results of operations
as if the acquisitions of Investacorp and Triad had occurred at
the beginning of 2007. Pro forma data does not include the Punk
Ziegel acquisition based on materiality. The pro forma net loss
reflects amortization of the amounts ascribed to intangibles
acquired in the acquisitions, amortization of employee
stock-based compensation and interest expense on debt used to
finance the acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
163,334
|
|
|
$
|
209,846
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(18,709
|
)
|
|
$
|
(71
|
)(1)
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic and
diluted
|
|
|
170,726,463
|
|
|
|
165,348,927
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes a non-recurring charge of $9,200 for special bonuses
paid to Investacorp employees prior to the closing of the
acquisition. |
The unaudited proforma financial information is not intended to
represent or be indicative of the Companys consolidated
results of operations that would have been reported had the
acquisitions been completed as of the beginning of the periods
presented, nor should it be taken as indicative of the
Companys future consolidated results of operations.
F-13
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
4.
|
Securities
Owned and Securities Sold, But Not Yet Purchased
|
The components of securities owned and securities sold, but not
yet purchased as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Sold, But Not
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Yet Purchased
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Common stock and warrants
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted common stock and warrants
|
|
|
1,592
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Common stock and warrants
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Restricted common stock and warrants
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,828
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, approximately $687 and
$3,535, respectively, of securities owned were deposited with
the Companys subsidiaries clearing brokers. Pursuant
to the clearing agreements with such clearing brokers, the
securities may be sold or hypothecated by the clearing brokers.
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value represents
obligations of the Companys subsidiaries to purchase the
specified financial instrument at the then current market price.
Accordingly, these transactions result in off-balance-sheet risk
as the Companys subsidiaries ultimate obligation to
repurchase such securities may exceed the amount recognized in
the consolidated statements of financial condition.
Authoritative accounting guidance defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and
establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs
to valuation techniques. Fair value is the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. A fair value measurement assumes that the
transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs
in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the
absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market.
Valuation techniques that are consistent with the market, income
or cost approach are used to measure fair value.
The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of
the information used to determine fair values. Financial assets
and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and
disclosed in one of the following three categories:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted)
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities the
Company has the ability to access.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs are inputs (other than quoted
prices included within level 1) that are observable
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs for the asset or
liability and rely on managements own assumptions about
the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability. (The unobservable inputs should be
developed based on the best information available in the
circumstances and may include the Companys own data.)
|
F-14
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Securities are carried at fair value and classified as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Securities owned, at fair value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Common stock and warrants
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
1,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
517
|
|
|
$
|
1,692
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Common stock and warrants
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Securities owned, at fair value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
Common stock and warrants
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,231
|
|
|
$
|
1,597
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Common stock and warrants
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants are carried at a discount to fair value as determined
by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model due to
illiquidity. This model takes into account the underlying
securities current market value, the underlying securities
market volatility, the term of the warrants, exercise price, and
risk free return rate. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
the fair value of the warrants are $1,351 and $297,
respectively, and are included in common stock and warrants
(level 2) above.
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, investments in securities
not held by the Companys registered broker-dealer
subsidiaries, which amounted to $3 and $2,443, respectively,
were classified as trading and carried at fair value
(Level 1) with unrealized gains and losses reflected
in principal transactions. For such investments the Company
determines their appropriate classification as
held-to-maturity,
available-for-sale,
or trading at the time of purchase, and re-evaluates such
classification as of each balance sheet date.
|
|
5.
|
Net
Capital Requirements
|
As a registered broker-dealer, Ladenburg is subject to the
SECs Uniform Net Capital
Rule 15c3-1
and the CFTCs Regulation 1.17, which require the
maintenance of minimum net capital. Ladenburg has elected to
compute its net capital under the alternative method allowed by
these rules. At December 31, 2009, Ladenburg had net
capital, as defined, of $2,383, which exceeded its minimum
capital requirement, as defined, of $500, by $1,883.
Investacorp and Triad are also subject to the SECs Uniform
Net Capital
Rule 15c3-1,
which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital and
requires that the ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net
capital, both as defined, shall not exceed 15 to 1. At
December 31, 2009, Investacorp had net capital of $694,
which was $379 in excess of its required net capital of $315.
Investacorps net capital ratio was 6.81 to 1. At
December 31,
F-15
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
2009, Triad had net capital of $937, which was $645 in excess of
its required net capital of $292. Triads net capital ratio
was 4.67 to 1.
Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad claim exemptions from the
provisions of the SECs
Rule 15c3-3
pursuant to paragraph (k)(2)(ii) as they clear their customer
transactions through correspondent brokers on a fully disclosed
basis.
|
|
6.
|
Furniture,
Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
|
Components of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements,
net included in the consolidated statements of financial
condition were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
$
|
2,944
|
|
|
$
|
2,932
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
|
1,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,361
|
|
|
|
6,964
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(4,207
|
)
|
|
|
(3,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,154
|
|
|
$
|
3,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, intangible assets subject to
amortization consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Life (years)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
Relationships with financial advisors
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
24,707
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
24,707
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
Vendor relationships
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3,613
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
3,613
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
Covenants not to compete
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Customer accounts
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Relationships with investment banking clients
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2,586
|
|
|
|
2,094
|
|
|
|
2,586
|
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,431
|
|
|
$
|
6,922
|
|
|
$
|
35,431
|
|
|
$
|
3,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Aggregate amortization expense amounted to $3,116, $2,754 and
$1,103 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The weighted-average amortization period for
total amortizable intangibles at December 31, 2009 is
15.27 years. Estimated amortization expense for each of the
five succeeding years and thereafter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
2,899
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,393
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
2015 2027
|
|
|
16,612
|
|
There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the
year ended December 31, 2009. Changes during 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Brokerage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ladenburg
|
|
|
and Advisory Services
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,546
|
|
Acquisition of Investacorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Acquisition of Punk Ziegel
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
Acquisition of Triad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 and 2009
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
29,438
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The annual impairment tests performed at December 31, 2009
and 2008 did not indicate that the carrying value of goodwill
had been impaired. However, changes in circumstances or business
conditions could result in an impairment of goodwill. As
required, the Company will continue to perform impairment
testing on an annual basis or when an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the
fair value of the Companys reporting units below the
carrying amount of their net assets.
F-17
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and
certain combined state and local income tax returns with its
subsidiaries. The Company is on a tax year ending
September 30th.
Income taxes consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
Local
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
781
|
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
|
$
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
726
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
513
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount of income
tax determined by applying the applicable U.S. statutory
federal income tax rate (34%) to pre-tax (loss) income as a
result of the following differences:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(17,604
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision under statutory U.S. tax rates
|
|
|
(5,985
|
)
|
|
|
(6,543
|
)
|
|
|
3,367
|
|
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondeductibility of loss on conversion of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
Utilization of net operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,366
|
)
|
Increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
6,659
|
|
|
|
6,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other nondeductible items
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
State taxes
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
1,069
|
|
|
$
|
1,019
|
|
|
$
|
513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and
liability method, which requires the recognition of tax benefits
or expense on the temporary differences between the tax basis
and book basis of its assets and liabilities as well as tax loss
carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income
in the years in which those differences are expected to be
recovered or settled.
F-18
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Deferred tax amounts are comprised of the following at December
31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
28,961
|
|
|
$
|
25,417
|
*
|
AMT credit carryforward
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
7,985
|
|
|
|
5,238
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
Other
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Unrealized gain
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(1,726
|
)
|
|
|
(780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,247
|
|
|
|
32,534
|
*
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(39,973
|
)
|
|
|
(33,314
|
)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred taxes
|
|
$
|
(1,726
|
)
|
|
$
|
(780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Restated from amounts previously reported. |
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on the existence
of sufficient taxable revenue within the carryforward period,
including future reversals of taxable temporary differences. The
taxable temporary difference related to goodwill, which is
amortized for tax purposes, will reverse when goodwill is
disposed of or impaired. Because such period is not determinable
and, based on available evidence, management was unable to
determine that realization of the deferred tax assets was more
likely than not, management has provided a valuation allowance
at December 31, 2009 and 2008 to fully offset the deferred
tax assets.
At December 31, 2009, the Company has an aggregate net
operating loss carryforward of approximately $62,500 for federal
income tax purposes expiring in various years from 2015 through
2029.
The Companys tax years 2006 through 2009 remain open to
examination by federal and certain state taxing authorities. For
other state and local authorities, tax years 2005 through 2009
remain open for examination.
The Company applied the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold to all tax positions taken or expected to
be taken in a tax return, which resulted in no unrecognized tax
benefits as of December 31, 2009.
The Company has elected to classify interest and penalties that
would accrue according to the provisions of relevant tax law as
interest and other expense, respectively.
Notes payable consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Note payable to former Investacorp shareholder, net of $124 and
$565 of unamortized discount at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively
|
|
$
|
4,230
|
|
|
$
|
8,820
|
|
Note payable to affiliate of principal shareholder of LTS
|
|
|
18,450
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
Note payable to former Triad shareholders, net of $204 and $484
of unamortized discount at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
Notes payable to clearing firm under forgivable loan
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
35,438
|
|
|
$
|
30,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Company estimates that the fair value of notes payable
approximated $30,076 at December 31, 2009 and $27,483 at
December 31, 2008 based on anticipated current rates at
which similar amounts of debt could then be borrowed. The
Company is currently in compliance with all debt covenants in
its debt agreements.
Investacorp
Note
On October 19, 2007, as part of the purchase price for the
Investacorp acquisition, the Company issued a three-year,
non-negotiable promissory note in the aggregate principal amount
of $15,000 to Investacorps then principal shareholder. The
note bears interest at 4.11% per annum and is payable in 36
equal monthly installments. The note was recorded at $13,550
based on an imputed interest rate of 11%. The Company has
pledged the stock of Investacorp as security for the payment of
the note. The note contains customary events of default, which,
if uncured, entitle the holder to accelerate the due date of the
unpaid principal amount of, and all accrued and unpaid interest
on, the note.
Frost
Gamma Credit Agreement
On October 19, 2007, in connection with the Investacorp
acquisition, the Company entered into a $30,000 revolving credit
agreement with Frost Gamma Investments Trust (Frost
Gamma), an affiliate of LTS chairman of the board
and principal shareholder, and borrowed $30,000. Borrowings
under the Frost Gamma credit agreement bear interest at a rate
of 11% per annum, payable quarterly. Frost Gamma received a
one-time funding fee of $150. On August 25, 2009, the
revolving credit agreement was amended to extend the maturity
date to August 25, 2016.
The note issued under the credit agreement contains customary
events of default, which, if uncured, entitle the holder to
accelerate the due date of the unpaid principal amount of, and
all accrued and unpaid interest on, such note. Under the
revolving credit agreement, Frost Gamma received a warrant to
purchase 2,000,000 shares of LTS common stock. The warrant
is exercisable at any time during its ten-year term at an
exercise price of $1.91 per share, the closing price of the
Companys common stock on the acquisition date. The
warrant, which is classified as debt issue cost, was valued at
$3,200 based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and is
being amortized under the straight-line method over the
remaining term of the revolving credit agreement.
The Company may repay outstanding amounts at any time prior to
the maturity date of August 25, 2016, without penalty, and
may re-borrow up to the full amount of the agreement.
Triad
Note
On August 13, 2008, as part of the consideration paid for
Triad, the Company issued a three-year, non-negotiable
promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $5,000 to
Triads then shareholders. The note bears interest at 2.51%
per annum and is payable in 12 equal quarterly installments. The
note was recorded at $4,384, based on an imputed interest rate
of 11%. The Company has pledged the stock of Triad as security
for the payment of the note. The note contains customary events
of default, which, if uncured, entitle the holder to accelerate
the due date of the unpaid principal amount of, and all accrued
and unpaid interest on, the note.
Notes
Payable to Former Parent
In 2002, the Company borrowed a total of $5,000 from New Valley
Corporation (New Valley), the Companys former
parent. The notes, which bore interest at 1% above the prime
rate, were due on March 31, 2007, as subsequently extended.
In February 2007, the Company entered into a debt exchange
agreement with New Valley, where New Valley agreed to exchange
the principal amount of the notes for shares of LTS common stock
at an exchange price of $1.80 per share, representing the
average closing price of LTS common stock for the 30
trading days ending on the date of the agreement.
F-20
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
On June 29, 2007, after the Companys shareholders
approved the debt exchange, the Company exchanged
2,777,778 shares of its common stock for the principal
amount of the notes and paid $1,732 to New Valley for accrued
interest on the loans. The exchange resulted in a loss on
extinguishment of debt of $1,833 representing the excess of the
quoted market value of the 2,777,778 shares of common stock
at the date of the exchange agreement ($2.46 per share) over the
carrying amount of the notes.
Temporary
Subordinated Loans
In October 2007, Ladenburg received a temporary subordinated
loan in the amount of $72,000 from an affiliate of
Dr. Frost, the Companys chairman of the board and
principal shareholder, to provide additional regulatory capital
required for additional underwriting participations. The loan
was repaid during the following month, with interest at the rate
of LIBOR plus 2% per annum, which amounted to $354. In addition,
the Company paid the lender a commitment fee of $420.
NFS
Forgivable Loan
On August 25, 2009, National Financial Services LLC
(NFS), a Fidelity Investments company, provided the
Company with a seven-year, $10,000 forgivable loan. NFS serves
as the primary clearing broker for the Companys three
principal broker-dealer subsidiaries. During the third quarter
of 2009, the three firms amended their clearing agreements with
NFS to, among other things, extend the term for a seven-year
period. Subsequently, NFS became the exclusive clearing broker
for the three firms. Interest on the loan agreement accrues at
the prime rate plus 2%. If the Companys broker-dealer
subsidiaries meet certain aggregate annual clearing revenue
targets set forth in the loan agreement, the principal balance
of the loan will be forgiven in seven equal annual installments
of $1,429 commencing in August 2010 and continuing on an annual
basis through August 2016. Interest payments due for each such
year will also be forgiven if the annual clearing revenue
targets are met. Any principal amounts not forgiven will be due
in August 2016, and any interest payments not forgiven are due
annually. If any principal amount is not forgiven, the Company
may have such principal forgiven in future years if its
broker-dealer subsidiaries exceed subsequent annual clearing
revenue targets. The Company has expensed, and will continue to
expense, interest under the loan agreement until such interest
is forgiven.
The loan agreement contains covenants including limitations on
the incurrence of additional indebtedness, maintaining minimum
adjusted shareholders equity levels and a prohibition on
the termination of the Companys revolving credit
agreement. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the
outstanding principal and interest under the loan agreement may
be accelerated and become immediately due and payable. If the
clearing agreements are terminated prior to the loan maturity
date, all amounts then outstanding must be repaid on demand. The
loan agreement is collateralized by the Companys (but not
the Companys broker-dealer subsidiaries) deposits
and accounts held at NFS or its affiliates, which amounted to
$468 at December 31, 2009.
|
|
11.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
Leases
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are obligated under
several non-cancelable lease agreements for office space,
expiring in various years through June 2015. Certain leases have
provisions for escalation based on specified increases in costs
incurred by the landlord. The Company is a sublessor to third
parties for a
F-21
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
portion of its office space. The subleases expire at various
dates through June 2015. Minimum lease payments (net of lease
abatement and exclusive of escalation charges) and sublease
rentals are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
Sublease
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
Rentals
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
6,849
|
|
|
$
|
4,801
|
|
|
$
|
2,048
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6,713
|
|
|
|
4,713
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5,923
|
|
|
|
4,756
|
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
2013
|
|
|
5,778
|
|
|
|
4,818
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
2014
|
|
|
5,427
|
|
|
|
4,818
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
2,012
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
32,865
|
|
|
$
|
25,918
|
|
|
$
|
6,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred rent of $3,378 and $3,863 at December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively, represents lease incentives related to the
value of landlord financed improvements together with the
difference between rent payable calculated over the life of the
leases on a straight-line basis (net of lease incentives), and
rent payable on a cash basis.
Litigation
and Regulatory Matters
In May 2003, a suit was filed in the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of New York by Sedona Corporation
against Ladenburg, former employees of Ladenburg and a number of
other firms and individuals. The plaintiff alleged, among other
things, that certain defendants (not Ladenburg) purchased
convertible securities from plaintiff and then allegedly
manipulated the market to obtain an increased number of shares
from the conversion of those securities. Ladenburg acted as
placement agent and not as principal in those transactions.
Plaintiffs original complaint alleged that Ladenburg and
the other defendants violated federal securities laws and
various state laws. In August 2005, Ladenburgs motion to
dismiss was granted in part and denied in part. On May 27,
2009, the Court granted in part and denied in part motions to
dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, and granted plaintiff
leave to replead. On July 9, 2009, plaintiff filed its
Third Amended Complaint, which contains no claims under the
federal securities laws, leaving only common law claims; the
plaintiff seeks compensatory damages from the defendants of at
least $660,000 and punitive damages of $400,000.
Ladenburgs motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint
is currently pending. The Company believes the plaintiffs
claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend
against them.
In July 2004, a suit was filed in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas by Pet Quarters, Inc.
against Ladenburg, a former employee of Ladenburg and a number
of other firms and individuals. The plaintiff alleged, among
other things, that certain defendants (not Ladenburg) purchased
convertible securities from the plaintiff and then allegedly
manipulated the market to obtain an increased number of shares
from the conversion of those securities. Ladenburg acted as
placement agent and not as principal in those transactions.
Plaintiff has alleged that Ladenburg and the other defendants
violated federal securities laws and various state laws. The
plaintiff seeks compensatory damages from the defendants of at
least $400,000. In April 2006, Ladenburgs motion to
dismiss was granted in part and denied in part. On April 9,
2007, the Court issued an order staying the action pending the
final outcome of an arbitration involving parties other than
Ladenburg. A motion by plaintiff to enforce a purported
settlement among the parties to that arbitration is pending in
the court action. The Company believes that the plaintiffs
claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend
against them.
In December 2005, a suit was filed in New York State Supreme
Court, New York County, by Digital Broadcast Corp. against
Ladenburg and a Ladenburg employee. The plaintiff alleged, among
other things, that in
F-22
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
connection with plaintiffs retention of Ladenburg to
assist it in its efforts to obtain financing through a private
placement of its securities, Ladenburg committed fraud and
breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract. The plaintiff
seeks compensatory damages in excess of $100,000. In December
2008, the Court issued a decision granting Ladenburgs
motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. On
June 30, 2009, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court
issued an order unanimously affirming the dismissal. The New
York Court of Appeals has denied the plaintiffs motion for
leave to appeal. The Company believes that the plaintiffs
claims are without merit and, if there are any further
proceedings, intends to vigorously defend against them.
In July 2008, a suit was filed in the Circuit Court for the
17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida, by
BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. against Ladenburg
and a former Ladenburg research analyst. The plaintiffs alleged,
among other things, that research reports issued by defendants
were false and defamatory, and that defendants are liable for
defamation per se and negligence; the amount of the alleged
damages was unspecified. In February 2010, the parties entered
into a settlement agreement resolving all claims against
Ladenburg; the settlement expense is reflected in accrued
liabilities in the Companys 2009 financial statements. A
motion by the former research analyst for leave to assert a
cross-claim against Ladenburg for breach of contract and
indemnification is pending. The Company believes the purported
cross-claim is without merit and intends to vigorously defend
against it.
In February 2010, an arbitration case was commenced by a former
employee against Ladenburg and the Company. The claim asserts
breach of an employment agreement and seeks compensatory damages
of $750. The Company believes that the allegations are without
merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.
In the ordinary course of business, the Companys
subsidiaries are defendants in litigation and arbitration
proceedings and may be subject to unasserted claims or
arbitrations primarily in connection with their activities as
securities broker-dealers or as a result of services provided in
connection with securities offerings. Such litigation and claims
may involve substantial or indeterminate amounts and are in
varying stages of legal proceedings. Where the Company believes
that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the
amount of loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company has
included an estimation of such amount in accounts payable and
accrued liabilities.
Upon final resolution, amounts payable may differ materially
from amounts accrued. The Company has accrued liabilities in the
amount of approximately $453 at December 31, 2009 and $460
at December 31, 2008 in respect to these matters. With
respect to other pending matters, the Company is unable to
estimate a range of possible loss; however, in the opinion of
management, after consultation with counsel, the ultimate
resolution of these matters should not have a material adverse
effect on the Companys consolidated financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.
|
|
12.
|
Off-Balance-Sheet
Risk and Concentrations of Credit Risk
|
Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad do not carry accounts for
customers or perform custodial functions related to
customers securities. They introduce all of their customer
transactions, which are not reflected in these financial
statements, to their clearing brokers, which maintain the
customers accounts and clear such transactions. Also, the
clearing brokers provide the clearing and depository operations
for proprietary securities transactions. These activities may
expose the Company to off-balance-sheet risk in the event that
customers do not fulfill their obligations to the clearing
brokers, as each of Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad has agreed
to indemnify their respective clearing brokers for any resulting
losses. Each of Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad continually
assesses risk associated with each customer who is on margin
credit and records an estimated loss when management believes
collection from the customer is unlikely.
F-23
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The clearing operations for the Ladenburg, Investacorp and Triad
securities transactions are primarily provided by one clearing
broker, a large financial institution. At December 31, 2009
and 2008, a significant percentage of securities owned and the
amounts due from clearing brokers reflected in the consolidated
statements of financial condition are positions held at and
amounts due from this one clearing broker. The Company is
subject to credit risk should this clearing broker be unable to
fulfill its obligations.
In the normal course of its business, Ladenburg, Investacorp and
Triad may enter into transactions in financial instruments with
off-balance sheet risk. These financial instruments consist of
financial futures contracts, written equity index option
contracts and securities sold, but not yet purchased. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, Ladenburg, Investacorp and
Triad were not contractually obligated for any equity index or
financial futures contracts; however, Ladenburg and Triad sold
securities that they do not own and will therefore be obligated
to purchase such securities at a future date. These obligations
have been recorded in the statements of financial condition at
market values of the related securities and Ladenburg and Triad
will incur a loss if the market value of the securities
increases subsequent to December 31, 2009.
The Company and its subsidiaries maintain cash in bank deposit
accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits.
The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and
believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on
cash.
Repurchase
Program
In March 2007, the Companys board of directors authorized
the repurchase of up to 2,500,000 shares of the
Companys common stock from time to time on the open market
or in privately negotiated transactions depending on market
conditions. The repurchase program is being funded using
approximately 15% of the Companys EBITDA, as adjusted. As
of December 31, 2009, 947,824 shares had been
repurchased for $1,689 under the program.
In April 2009, the Company repurchased 4,500,000 shares of
common stock at a price of $0.60 per share (an aggregate of
$2,700) in a privately-negotiated transaction. This purchase was
not made under the Companys share repurchase program,
which remains in effect.
Warrants
As of December 31, 2009, outstanding warrants to acquire
the Companys common stock were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
.95
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
2016
|
|
|
.94
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
2016
|
|
|
.96
|
|
|
|
2,900,000
|
|
2017
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net (loss) income per share is computed using the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. The
dilutive effect of common shares potentially issuable under
outstanding options and warrants
F-24
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
is included in diluted earnings per share. The computations of
basic and diluted per share data for December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(18,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,263
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares
|
|
|
168,623,375
|
|
|
|
165,812,495
|
|
|
|
157,355,540
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,343,776
|
|
Warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,354,148
|
|
Common stock held in escrow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,431,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive potential common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,128,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive
potential common shares
|
|
|
168,623,375
|
|
|
|
165,812,495
|
|
|
|
168,484,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009, 2008 and 2007, options and warrants to purchase
27,921,290, 28,862,415, and 10,569,166 common shares,
respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted
(loss) income per share as the effect would have been
anti-dilutive.
|
|
15.
|
Stock
Compensation Plans
|
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
Under the Companys Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
a total of 10,000,000 shares of common stock are available
for issuance. As currently administered by the Companys
compensation committee, all full-time employees may use a
portion of their salary to acquire shares of LTS common stock
under this purchase plan at a 5% discount from the market price
of LTS common stock at the end of each option period.
Option periods have been set at three month periods and commence
on January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1 of
each year and end on March 31, June 30, September 30
and December 31 of each year. The plan is intended to qualify as
an employee stock purchase plan under
Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. During 2009,
210,048 shares of LTS common stock were issued to employees
under this plan, at prices ranging from $0.50 to $0.68; during
2008, 196,305 shares of LTS common stock were issued to
employees under this plan, at prices ranging from $0.68 to
$1.78; during 2007, 183,308 shares were issued at prices
ranging from $1.86 to $2.54 per share; resulting in a capital
contribution of $118, $285 and $407 for 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Amended
and Restated 1999 Performance Equity Plan and 2009 Incentive
Compensation Plan
In 1999, the Company adopted the 1999 Option Plan and in 2009
the Company adopted the 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan
(2009 Option Plan) which provide for the grant of
stock options and stock purchase rights to designated employees,
officers and directors and certain other persons performing
services for the Company and its subsidiaries, as designated by
the board of directors. The option plans each provide for the
granting of up to 25,000,000 awards with an annual limit on
grants to any individual of 1,500,000. Awards under the option
plans include stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, deferred stock, stock reload options
and/or other
stock-based awards. Dividends, if any, are not paid on
unexercised stock options. The compensation committee of the
board of directors of LTS administers the option plans. Stock
options granted under the 2009 Option Plan may be incentive
stock options and non-qualified stock options. An
F-25
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
incentive stock option may be granted only through
August 27, 2019 under the 2009 Option Plan and May 27,
2009 under the 1999 Option Plan and may only be exercised within
ten years of the date of grant (or five years in the case of an
incentive stock option granted to an optionee who at the time of
the grant possesses more than 10% of the total combined voting
power of all classes of stock of LTS (10%
Shareholder)). The exercise price of both incentive and
non-qualified options may not be less than 100% of the fair
market value of LTSs common stock at the date of grant,
provided, that the exercise price of an incentive stock option
granted to a 10% Shareholder shall not be less than 110% of the
fair market value of LTS common stock at the date of
grant. As of December 31, 2009, there were options to
purchase 24,860,000 shares of common stock available for
issuance under the 2009 Option Plan and 5,182,154 non-qualified
options available for grant under the 1999 Option Plan.
A summary of the status of the 1999 Option Plan at
December 31, 2009 and changes during the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
11,043,311
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
7.92
|
|
|
$
|
4,458
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
4,735,000
|
|
|
|
2.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,874,477
|
)
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(820,418
|
)
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
13,083,416
|
|
|
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
8.01
|
|
|
|
10,332
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
4,068,500
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(901,867
|
)
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(537,634
|
)
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
15,712,415
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
7.69
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,105,000
|
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(26,875
|
)
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,301,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(372,250
|
)
|
|
|
3.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
15,117,290
|
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
|
|
6.91
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest
|
|
|
14,465,863
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
6.84
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
9,469,581
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
6.19
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
A summary of the status of the 2009 Option Plan at
December 31, 2009 and changes during the year ended
December 31, 2009 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
9.75
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest
|
|
|
77,322
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
9.75
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Plan
Options
The Company has granted stock options to newly-hired employees
in conjunction with their employment agreements or in connection
with acquisitions, which are outside of the option plans. A
summary of the status of these options at December 31, 2009
and changes during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
8,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
|
$
|
5,008
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,500,001
|
)
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,249,999
|
)
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
7,750,000
|
|
|
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
8.52
|
|
|
|
7,434
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,500,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
6,250,000
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
7.83
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(486,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
5,764,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
|
|
6.97
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest
|
|
|
5,702,768
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
|
|
6.97
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
4,426,510
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of employee options
granted during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007 was $0.58, $1.17 and $1.70, respectively. The fair value of
each option award was
F-27
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
96.8
|
%
|
|
|
99.9
|
%
|
|
|
127.3
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
3.13
|
%
|
|
|
4.34
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
During 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company considered authoritative
accounting guidance when reviewing and developing assumptions
for the 2009, 2008 and 2007 grants. The weighted average
expected life for the 2009, 2008 and 2007 grants reflects a
permitted alternative simplified method, which defines the
expected life as the average of the contractual term of the
options and the weighted-average vesting period for all option
tranches. Expected volatility for the 2009, 2008 and 2007 option
grants is based on historical volatility over the same number of
years as the expected life, prior to the option grant date.
As of December 31, 2009, there was $6,439 of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based
compensation arrangements. This cost is expected to be
recognized over the vesting periods of the options, which on a
weighted-average basis is approximately 1.76 years.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 amounted to $146,
$3,492 and $5,828, respectively. Tax benefits related to option
exercise were not deemed to be realized since net operating loss
carryforwards are available to offset taxable income computed
without giving effect to the deductions related to option
exercises and the deferred tax assets related to those net
operating losses have been fully reserved.
Non-cash compensation expense relating to stock options was
calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model,
amortizing the value calculated over the vesting period and
applying a forfeiture percentage as estimated by the
Companys management, using historical information. The
Company has elected to recognize compensation cost for option
awards that have graded vesting schedules on a straight line
basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
non-cash compensation expense relating to stock option
agreements granted employees amounted to $6,984, $5,856 and
$2,862, respectively. Also, the non-cash compensation expense
related to common shares and warrants granted to employees in
connection with an acquisition made in 2006 amounted to $0, $142
and $3,305 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
On September 1, 2005, the Company granted to certain
advisors options to purchase an aggregate of
1,200,000 shares of the Companys common stock at an
exercise price of $0.51 per share under the Option Plan. The
options, which expire on August 31, 2015, vested 25% on
each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. The
Company recorded a charge of $528, $221 and $397 for the fair
value of the options for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively, based on the Black-Scholes option
pricing model.
On January 14, 2010, the Company granted ten-year stock
options to purchase 3,645,000 shares of its common stock at
an exercise price of $0.90 per share to directors, officers and
employees. The options vest over four years and the exercise
price was 25% in excess of the closing price ($0.72) of
LTS common stock on the grant date. The options are
generally subject to earlier vesting upon the recipients
death or disability or if the Company undergoes a change of
control.
F-28
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Company has two operating segments. The Ladenburg segment
includes the broker-dealer and asset management activities,
conducted by Ladenburg and LTAM. The Independent Brokerage and
Advisory Services segment includes the broker-dealer and
investment advisory services provided by Investacorp and Triad,
since their respective dates of acquisition.
Segment information for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokerage and
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Ladenburg
|
|
Advisory Services(1)
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
38,671
|
|
|
$
|
111,931
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
150,675
|
|
Pre-tax (loss) income
|
|
|
(8,006
|
)
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
(10,400
|
)(2)
|
|
|
(17,604
|
)
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
20,940
|
|
|
|
72,108
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
94,637
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
3,734
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
3,937
|
|
|
|
3,977
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
Non-cash compensation
|
|
|
2,270
|
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
3,326
|
|
|
|
7,534
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
41,997
|
|
|
$
|
79,190
|
|
|
$
|
(217
|
)
|
|
$
|
120,970
|
|
Pre-tax (loss) income
|
|
|
(8,140
|
)
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
(11,307
|
)(2)
|
|
|
(19,244
|
)
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
24,802
|
|
|
|
73,343
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
101,668
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
3,292
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
4,470
|
|
|
|
4,534
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
Non-cash compensation
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
83,313
|
|
|
$
|
12,191
|
|
|
$
|
322
|
|
|
$
|
95,826
|
|
Pre-tax income (loss)
|
|
|
18,435
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)(2)
|
|
|
9,904
|
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
61,309
|
|
|
|
50,644
|
|
|
|
2,179
|
|
|
|
114,132
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
2,304
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
Non-cash compensation
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
6,694
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes Investacorp from October 19, 2007 and Triad from
August 13, 2008 |
|
(2) |
|
Includes interest, compensation, professional fees and other
general and administrative expenses. |
F-29
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
17.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
In 2007, the Company entered into a lease for office space with
an entity affiliated with Dr. Frost, the Companys
chairman of the board and principal shareholder, which expires
in January 2012 and which provides for minimum annual payments
of $490. Rent expense under such leases amounted to $490, $464
and $392 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company is a party to an agreement entered into with Vector
Group Ltd. (Vector), where Vector agreed to make
available to the Company the services of Vectors Executive
Vice President to serve as the President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company and to provide certain other financial
and accounting services, including assistance with complying
with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Various
executive officers and directors of Vector and its subsidiary
New Valley serve as members of the board of directors of the
Company, and Vector and its subsidiaries own approximately 8.6%
of the Companys common stock. In consideration for such
services, the Company agreed to pay Vector an annual management
fee plus reimbursement of expenses and to indemnify Vector. The
agreement is terminable by either party upon 30 days
prior written notice. The Company paid Vector $600 for 2009,
$500 for 2008 and $400 for 2007 related to the agreement and
pays Vector at the rate of $600 for 2010.
Howard Lorber, vice-chairman of the Companys board of
directors, is a consultant to (and, prior to January 2005, was
the chairman of) Hallman & Lorber Associates, Inc., a
private consulting and actuarial firm, and related entities,
which receive commissions from insurance policies written for
the Company. These commissions amounted to approximately $14,
$51 and $61 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
In May 2008, upon the completion of the Punk Ziegel merger, the
Company paid $250 to the then
brother-in-law
of Mark Zeitchick, an executive vice president and director of
the Company, as payment for introducing the Company to Punk
Ziegel.
See Note 10 for information regarding loan transactions
involving related parties.
|
|
18.
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters
|
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
4th
|
|
|
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
33,290
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
34,326
|
|
|
$
|
39,246
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
43,813
|
(b)
|
Expenses
|
|
|
39,290
|
(a),(b)
|
|
|
39,165
|
(a)
|
|
|
43,066
|
(a),(b)
|
|
|
46,758
|
(a),(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,839
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,820
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,945
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(6,241
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,158
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,728
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,546
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares
|
|
|
171,727,332
|
|
|
|
167,318,633
|
|
|
|
167,624,573
|
|
|
|
167,876,256
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $1,921, $1,666, $1,685 and $2,262 charge for non-cash
compensation in the first, second, third and fourth quarters
2009, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes $3,025 of revenue and $1,037 of expenses in the first
quarter 2009, $550 of revenue and $216 of expense in the third
quarter 2009 and $2,364 of revenue and $956 of expense in the
fourth quarter 2009 resulting from deferred fees from SPAC
transactions. |
F-30
LADENBURG
THALMANN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters
|
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
4th
|
|
|
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
28,791
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
25,232
|
|
|
$
|
31,272
|
(b),(c),(d)
|
|
$
|
35,675
|
(c),(d)
|
Expenses
|
|
|
29,851
|
(a),(b)
|
|
|
30,376
|
(a)
|
|
|
36,273
|
(a),(b)
|
|
|
43,714
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(1,060
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,001
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,039
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,233
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,691
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,306
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares
|
|
|
161,501,065
|
|
|
|
162,709,005
|
|
|
|
167,303,935
|
|
|
|
171,655,110
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $1,569, $1,498, $1,538 and $1,660 charge for non-cash
compensation in the first, second, third and fourth quarters
2008, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes $2,411 of revenue and $865 of expenses in the first
quarter 2008, and $2,878 of revenue and $1,196 of expense in the
third quarter 2008 resulting from deferred fees from SPAC
transactions. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes $5,339 in the third quarter 2008 and $15,851 in the
fourth quarter 2008 of Triad revenues. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes $305 gain on sale of BSE membership the third quarter
2008 and $214 gain on the sale of AMEX membership in the fourth
quarter 2008. |
F-31