Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this

chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period than the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. 344,000 as of March 31, 2011, based upon 132,307,666 shares at $0.0026 per share as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 138,328,378 shares of common stock as of December 29, 2011.

We do not currently have sufficient capital to engage in any of the present or proposed business activities described below. The costs to operate our business are approximately $100,000 per month. In order for us to cover our monthly operating expenses, we must generate revenues of approximately $300,000 per month. Accordingly, in the absence of revenues, we must secure $100,000 in equity or debt capital each month to cover our overhead expenses. In order to remain in business for one year without any revenues, we must secure $1.2 million in equity or debt capital. If we are unsuccessful in securing sufficient capital or revenues, we will be unable to resume any business activities. We have not obtained any commitments for additional capital, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain any additional capital on terms not unfavorable to us, if at all.

To the extent not superseded by the disclosure in this Annual Report, the disclosure under captions “Risk Factors” and “Forward Looking Statements,” in the registrant’s prospectus dated August 7, 2008 filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) under the Securities Act of 1933 is hereby incorporated by reference.

In this Annual Report, “Cleartronic,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “the Company” refer to Cleartronic, Inc., a Florida corporation, and our wholly owned subsidiary, unless the context otherwise requires.

From March 2005 to October 2007, we were primarily engaged in providing telecommunications services to our customers employing Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology. In October 2007, we sold substantially all of our assets utilized in that business.

We are now a provider of Internet Protocol, or IP, unified group communication solutions. The products used in our solutions include our own proprietary products as well as products from other software and hardware vendors. An integral component of our unified group communication solution is WAVE™ software developed by Twisted Pair Solutions, Inc. of Seattle, WA.

We have designed and customized standards based audio and voice collaboration solutions for prospective customers as part of a unified group communication system. We have considered all aspects of a potential customer’s information technology resources and existing telecommunications network in creating a design best suited for that customer. Substantially all of our designs for unified group communication solutions have required the integration of WAVE software as a core component. We have designed, built and installed eight unified group communication solutions as of the filing date of this Annual Report, all of which utilize WAVE software.

Revenues have been generated from the design, construction and installation of the systems. We have also generated revenues from maintenance and support contracts once a unified group communication solution has been installed and tested.

We have also sold our proprietary line of IP Gateways which we have branded the AudioMate 360 Series. These units are currently being sold directly to end-users and by Value Added Resellers (“VARs”) to their end-user customers. As of the date of this filing, we have approximately 70 active VARs, and we have sold our gateways to more than 500 end-users in the United States and seventeen foreign countries.

In May 2008, we changed our corporate name from GlobalTel IP, Inc. to Cleartronic, Inc. All of our operations are conducted through our wholly owned subsidiary, VoiceInterop, Inc., a Florida corporation.

Although public safety personnel regularly use cellular phones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and other commercial wireless devices and services, we believe that these devices are currently not sufficiently suited for public safety mission critical communications during critical incidents. As an example, hundreds of firefighters and police officers rushed to rescue victims from the attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. As police and firefighters swarmed the building searching for survivors, incident commanders outside were hearing warnings from helicopters circling the scene from above that the towers were beginning to glow and were dangerously close to collapse. Radio communications were a lifeline for the hundreds of police officers who received the word to evacuate the building—all but 60 police officers escaped with their lives. Tragically, hundreds of New York firefighters did not receive that warning because they were using a different radio communications system. Unaware of the impending collapse, at least 121 firefighters, most within striking distance of safety, died. A report from the University of New Hampshire based ATLAS Project stated, “From numerous interviews gathered as part of a fire department inquiry into the events of September 11th, it would appear that non-interoperability was at least partially responsible for the loss of 343 firefighters at the World Trade Center.”

We believe that public safety officials should not depend solely on commercial communication systems that can be overloaded and that may be unreliable during critical incidents when public demand can overwhelm the systems. Public safety officials have unique and demanding communications requirements. Optimal public safety radio communication systems require:

Dedicated channels and priority access that is available at all times to handle unexpected emergencies.

Reliable one-to-many broadcast capability, which is not generally available in cellular systems.

Highly reliable and redundant networks that are engineered and maintained to withstand natural disasters and other emergencies.

The best possible coverage within a given geographic area, with a minimum of dead zones.

Unique equipment designed for quick response in emergency situations—dialing, waiting for call connection, and busy signals are unacceptable during critical events when seconds can mean the difference between life and death.

We believe that the WAVE software when properly used can add value, redundancy and alternative methods of communicating for radios and radio systems and the personnel who use them.

Twisted Pair Solutions’ WAVE software has been designed to enable and manage real-time, secure group communications over the IP network, linking people and devices. WAVE connects people who are using disparate and often incompatible communications technologies, such as two-way radios, personal computers, cell phones, and IP phones, into a single, interoperable and manageable communications system via IP communications technology.

WAVE technology consists of software building blocks and development tools designed to convert all forms of communication to IP packets, use a network to carry those packets between endpoints, and build distributed intelligence and management capabilities at the network edge to connect the endpoints together. The technology converts communications from individual users’ devices into group-level IP packets that can be forwarded to other devices and users. Once brought into a WAVE domain, these interoperable communication sessions are subject to management and security controls, and may be bridged, recorded, joined into conferences, or routed to devices outside of the system.

WAVE supports both voice and data media types. In addition, status, presence and adaptive transport network management provide for rich collaboration among group communications participants. The result is that groups of people can talk and share real-time data, with full control, regardless of the devices or systems used. With audio data converted into IP packets and streamed across a network, a new set of devices can directly link together and participate simply and easily in critical communications.

We have been advised by Twisted Pair Solutions that claims based upon the WAVE technology are the subject of a patent application filed by or on behalf of it with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. There can be no assurance that any patent will be issued as a result of the application or, if issued, that it will be meaningful. Furthermore the validity of issued patents is frequently challenged by others. One or more patent applications may have been filed by others previous to the Twisted Pair Solutions’ filing, which encompass the same or similar claims.

We have no right to sell, license or otherwise utilize WAVE other than through our written agreements with Twisted Pair Solutions as described below.

In May 2006, we entered into a reseller agreement with Twisted Pair Solutions. Subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement, Twisted Pair Solutions appointed us as a nonexclusive authorized worldwide reseller of its products. We have the right to purchase products from Twisted Pair Solutions and to resell the products to end users.

We have agreed to provide all necessary implementation services and support, including but not limited to the tools, expertise, and resources required for design, installation, integration, and/or upgrades, for all products sold by us as a reseller through either our own internal resources or contracting with Twisted Pair Solutions’ approved subcontractor partners. We do not now have and there can be no assurance that we will ever have the resources to perform the required implementation services and support.

We have further agreed to maintain trained sales representatives and sales and integration engineers in the number determined by Twisted Pair Solutions. We do not now have and there can be no assurance that we will ever have the resources to maintain such representatives and engineers.

For each product we resell, we are responsible for either the sale of the appropriate annual renewal and update subscription or submittal to Twisted Pair Solutions of written waiver of software updates signed by the end user. In the event an end user purchases or renews the update subscription directly from Twisted Pair Solutions, we will not receive any compensation associated with the sale.

Twisted Pair Solutions has granted to us a non-exclusive, limited license during the term of the agreement to use both Twisted Pair Solutions’ name and any stylized form or logo used by Twisted Pair Solutions and the applicable product trademarks solely in connection with our distribution, advertising and promotion of the products. The exclusive ownership of the trademarks has been retained by Twisted Pair Solutions.

The prices we pay for the products will be set by Twisted Pair Solutions. Twisted Pair Solutions may change prices, discount schedules, and any other similar terms on sixty days notice to us. Subject to Twisted Pair Solutions’ ability to impose maximum resale price limitations, we are free to determine our resale prices. There can be no assurance that the prices we are required to pay to Twisted Pair Solutions or the maximum resale price limitations will not significantly adversely affect our ability to make sales or operate profitably.

Other than with respect to patents, each party’s liability to the other party under the agreement is limited to the total payment made by us to Twisted Pair Solutions in the most recent full calendar year. In the event that any claims are successfully made against us with respect to Twisted Pair Solutions’ products, it is likely that our exposure will be substantially greater than Twisted Pair Solution’s obligation to us.

The agreement may be terminated by Twisted Pair Solutions or us at any time without cause upon thirty days prior written notice to the other party. If Twisted Pair Solutions were to terminate the agreement, we would not be entitled to purchase or resell any of its products under the agreement.

In August 2006, we entered into an application service provider license agreement with Twisted Pair Solutions. Subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement, Twisted Pair Solutions granted to us a nonexclusive and nontransferable right to install, store, operate and use certain WAVE components and market and license access to those components within North America, Central America and South America directly to end users solely as a part of a hosted service operated and maintained by us. The Company ceased to market its hosted service in July 2011 and the application service provider agreement with Twisted Pair Solutions, Inc. expired in August 2011.

We offer to design and customize, standards based audio and voice collaboration solutions for prospective customers that will result in a unified group communication system. We intend to consider aspects of a potential customer’s information technology resources and existing telecommunications network in creating a design best suited for that customer. We anticipate that substantially all of our designs for unified group communication solutions will require the integration of WAVE software as a core component. We have designed, built and installed eight unified group communication solutions as of the date of this Annual Report, all of which utilize WAVE software.

Revenue from installations can be generated from the amount we charge to design, build, install and support a system. We also intend to generate revenues from a maintenance contract once a unified group communication solution is installed and tested. There can be no assurance that we will realize any meaningful levels of revenues from the design and building of unified group communication solutions in the future, if at all.

Prior to and subsequent to sales we have made to three airport authorities, we have had discussions with approximately 15 other airport authorities as well as airlines in the United States and abroad to design, build and install voice interoperability solutions. Those discussions have not resulted in any sales.

We have developed an Internet Protocol gateway which we call the AudioMate 360. The AudioMate 360 has been designed to provide an Internet Protocol gateway to users of unified group communications. The AudioMate 360 is available in different configurations which enable it to be used with various types of communications equipment.

Although other devices are available that perform the same or similar functions, we believe that our price for the AudioMate 360 is substantially lower than the prices others are presently charging for similar devices. If we are unable to provide the AudioMate 360 to our prospective customers at substantially lower prices than others are charging for similar gateways, our business will be materially adversely affected.

We have marketed our unified group communication solutions and AudioMate 360 IP gateways through our Director of Sales and Marketing. The majority of our sales leads have come through our strategic partners and our website.

If we are able to continue our business activities, we intend to continue to develop a network of channel partners and VARs. As of September 30, 2011, we had ten channel partners in our network of over 75 VARs. These existing and potential channel partners and VARs range in size from single-site, regional firms with specialized products and services to multi-national firms that provide a full range of IT products and services.

We have also received sales prospects from our website. We intend to use search engine optimization to increase the number of inquiries that we receive from our website and if we become adequately funded, we intend to hire additional direct sales people.

The unified group communications industry is extremely competitive. Over the past year, the number of companies entering our industry has increased dramatically. Competitive pricing pressures can negatively impact profit margins, if any. Competitors include Cisco Systems, Inc., Tyco Electronics Ltd., Catalyst Communications Technologies, Inc., Telex, Inc., Federal Signal Corporation and Mutual-Link, Inc. as well as Twisted Pair Solutions and its other resellers and licensees.

These and other potential competitors are generally large and well capitalized and have substantially more experience than we do in our industry.

We expect to face intense competition from traditional telephone companies, wireless companies, cable companies and alternative voice communication providers. We may also face intense competition from cable companies which have added or are planning to add VoIP services to their existing product lines.

The traditional wireline and wireless telephone service providers and cable companies are substantially larger and better capitalized than we are and have the advantage of a large existing customer base. Because substantially all of our prospective customers are already purchasing communications services from one or more of these providers, our success may be dependent upon, among other things, our ability to attract target customers away from their existing providers. These potential competitors could focus their substantial financial resources to develop competing technology that may be more attractive to potential customers than what we offer.

Our competitors’ financial resources may allow them to offer services at prices below cost or without charge in order to maintain and gain market share or otherwise improve their competitive positions. Our competitors also could use their greater financial resources to offer more attractive service packages that include on-site installation and more robust customer service. In addition, because of the other services our competitors provide, they may choose to offer unified group communication services as part of a bundle that includes other products, such as VoIP telephone service, video, high speed Internet access and wireless telephone service, which we do not and cannot offer. This bundle may enable our competitors to offer unified group communication service at price levels with which we may not be able to compete or to offer functionality that integrates that service with their other offerings, both of which may be more desirable to consumers. Any of these competitive factors could make it difficult or impossible for us to attract and retain customers, cause us to lower our prices in order to compete and reduce our market share and revenues.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to increase our revenues or achieve profitability.

We have outsourced the manufacturing of our hardware products. This outsourcing has allowed us to:

Currently, we have arrangements for the production of our gateways with a contract manufacturer in Florida. Our reliance on contract manufacturers involves a number of potential risks, including the absence of adequate capacity, ownership of certain elements of electronic designs, and reduced control over delivery schedules. Our contract manufacturers can provide us with a range of operational and manufacturing services, including component procurement and performing final testing and assembly of our products. We intend to depend on our contract manufacturers to procure components and to maintain adequate manufacturing capacity.

We have also relied on a small number of suppliers for several key components utilized in the assembly of our products. For example, our contract manufacturer has purchased a key component that is essential to the production of our gateways from a single source supplier. We have not identified any alternative suppliers for that component. Our contract manufacturer has maintained relatively low inventories and acquired components only as needed. As a result, our ability to efficiently respond to customer orders, if any, may be constrained by, among other things, the then-current availability or terms and pricing of necessary components. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain a sufficient quantity of these components in a timely manner to meet the demands of our customers or that prices of these components will not increase. Any delays or any disruption of the supply of these components could also materially and adversely affect our operating results.

If we are able to resume our business activities, our business will be dependent on our intellectual property, some of which we have developed for our software and hardware applications. We do not have any patents, trademarks or trade secret confidentiality agreements. For projects that are in development, we intend to rely on intellectual property rights afforded by trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements, to establish and protect our rights to our technology and other intellectual property. There is no assurance that these procedures and arrangements will be adequate in protecting our intellectual property.

We have filed a patent application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with various configurations of our AudioMate 360 Internet Protocol gateway. We may file similar patent applications in additional countries. The claims in the patent application relate to various aspects of the AudioMate 360. On October 28, 2011, the United States Patent Office notified the Company that thirty four claims of the Company’s patent application for Multi Ad Hoc Interoperable Communicating Networks have been allowed. There can be no assurance that any of the allowed claims are meaningful. Furthermore, the validity of issued patents is frequently challenged by others. One or more patent applications may have been filed by others previous to our filing, which encompass the same or similar claims.

Because of our limited resources, we may be unable to protect a patent or to challenge others who may infringe upon a patent. Because many holders of patents in our industry have substantially greater resources than we do and patent litigation is very expensive, we may not have the resources necessary to successfully challenge the validity of patents held by others or withstand claims of infringement or challenges to any patent we may obtain. Even if we prevail, the cost and management distraction of litigation could have a material adverse affect on us.

Because Internet Protocol gateways and their related manufacturing processes are covered by a large number of patents and patent applications, infringement actions may be instituted against us if we use or are suspected of using technology, processes or other subject matter that is claimed under patents of others. An adverse outcome in any future patent dispute could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, require disputed rights to be licensed or require us to cease using the infringed technology.

If trade secrets and other means of protection upon which we may rely may not adequately protect us, our intellectual property may become available to others. Although we may rely on trade secrets, copyright law, employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements and other protective measures to protect some of our intellectual property, these measures may not provide meaningful protection to us.

The laws of many foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States, if at all.

As of December 29, 2011, we have no employees, and we have five consultants, including our two executive officers.

We lease approximately 3,400 square feet for our principal offices in Boca Raton, Florida from an unaffiliated party at a monthly rental of approximately $6,200. The lease, which provides for annual increases of base rent of 4%, expires on November 30, 2014.

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against us, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers, or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial holder of more than 5% of our voting securities, or any associate of such persons, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our company.

Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board ("OTCBB") under the symbol "CLRI." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low closing bid quotations for our common stock as reported on the OTCBB for each quarterly period within our two most recent fiscal years. The bid prices reflect inter-dealer quotations, do not include retail markups, markdowns, or commissions, and do not necessarily reflect actual transactions.

As of December 29, 2011, we have approximately 148 stockholders of record of our issued and outstanding common stock based upon a shareholder list provided by our transfer agent.

We have never paid dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain any earnings for the operation and expansion of our business. Other than financial ability, we have no legal, contractual or corporate constraints against the payment of dividends. Commitments we may make in the future may, however, contractually limit or prohibit the payment of dividends.

The Company is obligated to pay dividends on its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Each Series A Preferred Holder is entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate of 8% of $1.00 per annum on each outstanding share of Series A Preferred then held by such Series A Preferred Holder, on a pro rata basis. The Company has accrued dividends payable to preferred shareholders through September 30, 2011. No cash dividends have been paid to date.

The following table sets forth, as of September 30, 2011, certain information related to our compensation plans under which shares of our common stock are authorized for issuance.

In September 2011, we issued 4,517,778 shares of our common stock and 4,277,778 shares of our common stock for a total of 8,795,556 unregistered shares of common stock to two officers and directors due to their conversion of accrued consulting fees of $26,000 and $24,800, respectively, totaling $50,800.

In December 2010, we issued 750,000 shares of our common stock to two shareholders, as discounts on notes payable in the amount of $15,000.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition for the fiscal years ending September 30, 2011 and 2010 should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those consolidated financial statements that are included elsewhere in this report. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations, and intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth elsewhere in this report. We use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.

From inception on November 15, 1999 through February 28, 2005, we were a development stage company or inactive, generated no revenue and incurred cumulative net losses of $488,642. In February 2005, we acquired certain VoIP assets from Interactive Media Technologies, Inc. (“IMT”) under an Asset Purchase Agreement. These assets enabled us to begin generating revenue by providing VoIP services to customers. Due to increased competition and additional government regulation and taxation it became increasingly difficult to earn a profit marketing VoIP services and in August and October 2007 we sold certain equipment and software used to operate the VoIP business, the proceeds of which were used to reduce our liabilities. These assets were not then being utilized by us. Following the asset sale we decided to concentrate on marketing unified group communications services to public and private enterprises, market our Audiomate 360 series of IP gateways and to continue to develop an application service provider solution for voice interoperability.

We have provided Internet Protocol, or IP, unified group communication solutions for enterprises. The products used in our solutions include our own proprietary products as well as products from other software and hardware vendors. An integral component of our unified group communication solution is WAVE™ software developed by Twisted Pair Solutions, Inc. of Seattle, WA.

We have designed and customized standards based audio and voice collaboration solutions for prospective customers that will result in a for unified group communication systems. We consider all aspects of a potential customer’s information technology resources and existing telecommunications network in creating a design best suited for that customer. Substantially all of our designs for unified group communication solutions require the integration of WAVE software as a core component. We have designed, built and installed eleven unified group communication solutions as of the date of this filing all of which utilize WAVE software.

We have marketed our products and services primarily through a consultant who serves as Director of Sales and Marketing. We intend to develop a network of channel partners and distributors which when and if established we believe will increase the revenue we receive from the sale of our products and services.

We outsource the manufacturing of our products to a contract manufacturer. Our outsourced manufacturing model allows us to scale our business without the significant capital investment and on-going expenses required to establish and maintain a manufacturing operation. Our AM360 gateways are manufactured by a contract manufacturer located in Pompano Beach, Florida. Our contract manufacturer provides us with a range of operational and manufacturing services, including component procurement, final testing and assembly of our products. We work closely with our contract manufacturer to manage the cost of components, since our total manufacturing costs are directly tied to component costs. We do not provide forecasts to our contract manufacturer, and we order products from our contract manufacturers on an as needed basis. We do not maintain a large finished goods inventory which limits our ability to fill customers' orders should they demand product quickly.

Our plans to continue our business and make investments in certain areas as described below are contingent upon substantial amounts of capital becoming available to us. We do not now have any such capital and there can be no assurance that we can obtain any capital on terms not unfavorable to us, if at all.

We are headquartered in Boca Raton, Florida and all of our personnel work at this location.

Our significant accounting policies and recently issued accounting pronouncements are described in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe the following represent our critical accounting policies:

Estimates and Assumptions The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are made when accounting for revenue (as discussed below under “Revenue Recognition”), depreciation, amortization, bad debt reserves, income taxes and certain other contingencies. We are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to vary from estimates. We review all significant estimates affecting the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis and record the effects of any adjustments when necessary.

Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenues Unified group communication solutions consist of three elements to be provided to customer: software licenses and equipment purchased from third-party vendors, proprietary hardware that is manufactured on contract to required specifications and installation and integration of the hardware and software into the cohesive communication source.

The Company's revenue recognition policies are in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 605-10 “Revenue Recognition”. (ASC 605-10). Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the contract price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. No right of return privileges are granted to customers after shipment. The Company recognizes revenue for the elements separately as the sales of the equipment and software, installation and integration, and support services represent separate earnings processes that are generally specified under separate agreements.

Revenue from the resale of equipment utilized in unified group communication solutions is recognized when shipped. For software licenses, the Company does not provide any services that are considered essential to the functionality of the software, and therefore revenue is recognized upon delivery of the software, provided (1) there is evidence of an arrangement, (2) collection of the fee is considered probable and (3) the fee is fixed and determinable.

The Company also provides support to customers under separate contracts varying from one to five years. The Company’s obligations under its service contracts vary by the length of the contract. In all cases the Company is the primary obligor to provide first level support to the client. If the contract has less than one year of service and support remaining on the contract it is classified as a current liability, if longer it is classified as a non-current liability.

Inventory. Inventory consists of components held for assembly and finished goods held for resale or to be utilized for installation in projects. Inventory is valued at lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis.

Stock-Based Compensation. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 718-10 “Compensation” (ASC 718-10) using the modified retrospective transition method. ASC718-10 requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service periods. The Company has estimated the fair value of each award as of the date of grant or assumption using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which was developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and that are freely transferable. The Black-Scholes option pricing model considers, among other factors, the expected life of the award and the expected volatility of the Company's stock price. In March 2005, the SEC issued SAB No. 107, Share-Based Payment ("SAB 107") which provides guidance regarding the interaction of ASC 718-10 and certain SEC rules and regulations. The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of ASC 718-10.

Revenue. We have derived our revenue from sales of our unified group communication solutions, AudioMate 360 sales and related support and services. Our typical solution sale included a combination of third party hardware, WAVE software and installation and integration services. Channel partners buy our products directly from us. Prices to a given channel partner for hardware and software products depend on that channel partner’s volume, as well as our own strategic considerations.

Support and services revenue has primarily consisted of post-contractual support and maintenance contracts. Post-contractual support includes software updates which grant rights to unspecified software license upgrades and maintenance releases issued during the support period. Post-contractual support also includes both Internet and phone-based technical support. Post-contractual support revenue is recognized ratably over the contractual service period.

Cost of revenue. Cost of product revenue consisted primarily of hardware costs, royalties and license fees for third-party software included in our systems, salary and related overhead costs of operations personnel and freight. The majority of these costs vary with the unit volumes of product sold. Cost of support and services revenue consists of salary and related overhead costs of personnel engaged in support and services, and hence is substantially fixed in the near term.

Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses primarily included personnel costs, outside engineering costs, professional services, prototype costs, test equipment, software usage fees and facilities expenses. Research and development expenses are recognized when incurred. We have devoted substantial resources to the development of additional functionality for existing products and the development of new products and related software applications. We intend to continue to make significant investments in our research and development efforts because we believe they are essential to maintaining and improving our competitive position. Accordingly, we expect research and development expenses to continue to increase in absolute dollars.

Selling expenses. Selling expenses primarily include personnel costs, sales commissions, travel, marketing promotional and lead generation programs, advertising, trade shows, professional services fees and facilities expenses. We plan to continue to invest in development of our distribution channels by increasing the size of our field sales force and the number of our channel partners to enable us to expand our business. In conjunction with channel partner growth, we plan to increase the investment in our training and support of channel partners to enable them to more effectively sell our products. We also plan to continue investing in our domestic and international marketing activities to help build brand awareness and create sales leads for our channel partners. We expect that sales and marketing expenses will increase in absolute dollars and remain one of our largest operating expense categories.

Administrative expenses. Administrative expenses relate to our executive, finance, human resources, legal and information technology organizations. Our general and administrative expenses have primarily included consultant expenses, professional fees for legal, accounting, tax, compliance and information systems, travel, recruiting expense, and facilities expenses. In addition, as if we are able to continue and then we expand our business, we expect to increase our administrative expenses.

Other income (expenses). Other income (expenses) has primarily consisted of interest and finance charges paid, dividend expense and other miscellaneous income (expenses).

Income tax provision. We recognize income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a tax rate change on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount considered more likely than not to be realized. Changes in estimates of future taxable income can materially change the amount of such valuation allowances.

Results of Continuing Operations – Comparison of the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010

Revenues increased from $296,366 during 2010 to $542,941 during 2011. This increase was due to increased sales of unified communication projects.

Cost of revenues increased from $136,489 in 2010 to $274,094 in 2011.Gross margins decreased to approximately 50% or to $268,847 from 54% or $159,877 for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The primary reason for the decrease in gross margin was the increased sales of third party hardware and software as opposed to proprietary hardware and software, which generate higher gross margins.

Operating expenses increased approximately 19% in 2011 to $1,358,266 compared to $1,140,619 during 2010. Operating expenses include selling expenses, administrative expenses, research and development costs and depreciation. This increase was primarily due to a 75% increase in selling expenses.

Selling expenses increased from $247,442 in 2010 to $433,437 in 2011 primarily due to the increased use of third party consultants and increased travel expenses.

Administrative expenses increased approximately 4% from $648,364 in 2010 to $674,747 in 2011 primarily due to increased management and financial consulting expenses partially offset by lower rent expense.

Research and development expenses increased to $237,013 in 2011 from $219,384 in 2010 due to increased development expense related to the expansion the AM-360 family of IP gateway devices and to expenses related to developing a demand response energy solution for the consumer market.

Depreciation expenses decreased approximately 48% primarily due to certain non-core assets reaching the end of their depreciation period.

Interest and other expense was $114,617 and $64,801 for 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase was primarily due to accrual of cumulative dividends of approximately $66,000 on outstanding Series A Preferred stock issued during the year. Interest expense declined to $23,779 for 2011 from $58,207 in 2010 due to a decline in the amortization of notes payable discount to $937 in 2011 from $37,513 in 2010. In addition, finance charges increased to $24,865 during the year ended September 30, 2011from $6,594 in the prior year due to increased use of a factoring company.

In 2010, we realized a loss on impairment of certain equipment of approximately $39,863 and a loss of $1,610 from the sale of non-core assets. In 2011, there were no such losses.

We have chosen to concentrate on developing the business of providing unified group communication solutions to public and private enterprises and marketing our AudioMate 360 series of Internet Protocol gateways. Our ability to grow our unified communications business and market our AudioMate 360 gateways are critical to our future financial position and operations.

Cash and cash equivalents increased by $16,840 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 to $39,188. Net cash used in operating activities for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 was $770,479 as compared to $777,305 for the prior fiscal year due primarily to a decrease in depreciation expense. We funded our operating activities during the most recent fiscal year through financing activities that generated net proceeds of approximately $790,000.

At September 30, 2011, our total liabilities were approximately $804,364, which included $41,656 in deferred revenue and $283,499 in notes payable from stockholders.

Based on our initial unified communication installations and the development of our AudioMate 360 series of IP gateways, we have developed a business plan. The business plan calls for us to continue to market and sell unified communications hardware and software directly to enterprise customers. In addition, we intend to market our AudioMate 360 series of IP gateways both directly to clients and through strategic partners and VARs. Our strategic partners and VARs have introduced us to customers in the past, and we will continue to rely on them to introduce us to additional customers. We have also received sales prospects from our website. We intend to use search engine optimization to increase the number of inquires that we receive from our website, and if we have sufficient available funds, we intend to hire direct sales people. Our business plan further calls for us to seek additional strategic partners such as consulting firms, equipment manufacturers and communications companies.

We believe that in order to fund our business plan, we will need approximately $1.5 million in new equity or debt capital. In the past, in addition to revenues and deferred revenues, we have obtained funds from the private sale of our debt and equity securities. We have also had discussions with several securities broker-dealers with respect to a private or public offering of our securities. Although none of such discussions has resulted in any funding, we intend to continue to have such discussions in the future. We also intend to continue to seek private financing from certain of our existing stockholders and others.

Our current operating expenses are approximately $100,000 per month. In order for us to cover our monthly operating expenses, we must generate approximately $300,000 per month in revenue. Accordingly, in the absence of sufficient revenues, we must $100,000 in equity or debt capital each month to cover our overhead expenses. In order to remain in business for one year without any revenues, we must secure $1.2 million in equity or debt capital. If we are unsuccessful in securing sufficient capital or revenues, we will be unable to resume our business activities.

On September 30, 2011, we had current assets of $93,842 and current liabilities of $670,494. Our independent certified public accountants have stated in their report on our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year end that there is a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. In the absence of significant revenue and profits, we will be completely dependent on additional debt and equity financing. There can be no assurance that any funds will be available to us, or if available, that they will be sufficient to fund our capital expenditures, working capital and other cash requirements. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that any such additional funding that may be available can be obtained on terms not unfavorable to us. If we are unable to raise needed funds on acceptable terms, we will not be able to execute our business plan, develop or enhance existing services, take advantage of future opportunities, if any, or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements. If we do not obtain sufficient capital, we will not be able to continue operations.

In November 2011, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with a private investor in connection with the issuance of a 8% convertible note in the amount of $60,000. The note matures August 17, 2012 and is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a variable conversion price (58% multiplied by the market price).

In December 2011, the Company issued a promissory note to a stockholder for $45,000. The note bears interest at 10%, which is payable quarterly and matures on December 31, 2012.

Our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes begin on Page F-1 of this Annual Report.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered in this report, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2011. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer (CEO) and principal financial officer (CFO), who concluded, that because of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described below that, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2011. A material weakness is a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal controls over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under that Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management is also responsible for establishing internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Our internal controls over financial reporting are intended to be designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal controls over financial reporting are expected to include those policies and procedures that management believes are necessary that:

(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

As of September 30, 2011, management assessed the effectiveness of the our internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Based on that assessment, management concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2011 and that material weaknesses in ICFR existed as more fully described below.

As defined by Auditing Standard No. 5, “An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting that is Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements and Related Independence Rule and Conforming Amendments,” established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"), a material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies that result in a more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected. In connection with the assessment described above, management identified the following control deficiencies that represent material weaknesses as of September 30, 2011:

(1) Lack of an independent audit committee or audit committee financial expert. Although our board of directors serves as the audit committee it has no independent directors. Further, we have not identified an audit committee financial expert on our board of directors. These factors are counter to corporate governance practices as defined by the various stock exchanges and may lead to less supervision over management.

(2) Inadequate staffing and supervision within our bookkeeping operations. We have only a single consultant involved in bookkeeping functions. This prevents us from segregating duties within our internal control system. The inadequate segregation of duties is a weakness because it could lead to the untimely identification and resolution of accounting and disclosure matters or could lead to a failure to perform timely and effective reviews which may result in a failure to detect errors in spreadsheets, calculations, or assumptions used to compile the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Our management determined that these deficiencies constituted material weaknesses.

Due to our small size and a lack of personnel resources, we are not able to, and do not intend to, immediately take any action to remediate these material weaknesses. However, we will implement further controls as circumstances permit. Notwithstanding the assessment that our ICFR was not effective and that there were material weaknesses as identified herein, we believe that our consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report fairly present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the years covered thereby in all material respects.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Between June and August 2011, the Company borrowed $90,000 from a shareholder and issued a promissory note for $90,000. The note bears interest at 10% per annum and matures on December 31, 2012.

On September 30, 2011, the Company issued a promissory note to a shareholder for $50,000 and received $50,000 in cash. The note bears interest at 15% per annum and matures on December 31, 2011.

Set forth below are the name, age, position, and a brief account of the business experience of each of our executive officers and directors. Each of our directors holds office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until the director’s successor is elected and qualified or until the director’s resignation or removal. Each of our executive officers holds office until the next annual meeting of shareholders. The experience and background of each of the directors, as summarized below, were significant factors in their previously being nominated as directors of the Company.

Dana Waldman, was appointed Chief Executive Officer and a member of Board of Directors in July 2011. From January 2010 to July 2011 Mr. Waldman served as a management consultant to the company. Mr. Waldman has served as the owner and principal of Waldman and Associates, a Management Consulting firm since 2003 where he has consulted to numerous start-up companies. He also served as CEO and Director of Voyant International Corp. from January 2007 to September 2009.

Larry M. Reid has been a member of our Board of Directors since 1999 and our Chief Financial Officer since March 2005. He served as President from September 2006 to July 2011. He was also our President from 1999 to March, 2005 at which time he became our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From December 2001 until September 2005, Mr. Reid was the Chief Financial Officer and a director of Connectivity Inc., which was primarily engaged in the manufacture and distribution of emergency call boxes. In April 2003, Connectivity Inc. was acquired by Arrow Resources Development, Inc. at which time Mr. Reid became the Executive Vice President and a director of that company.

Michael J. Gutowski has held his present positions with us since March 2005. From November 1999 to December 2002 Mr. Gutowski was the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Connectivity Inc., which was primarily engaged in the manufacture and distribution of emergency call boxes. In April 2003, Connectivity Inc. was acquired by Arrow Resources Development, Inc. at which time Mr. Gutowski became the President, Chief Operating Officer and a director of that company.

There are no family relationships among our directors, executive officers, or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive officers.

Had any petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law filed by or against, or had a receiver, fiscal agent, or similar officer appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

Been convicted in a criminal proceeding or a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

Been the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:

Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of federal or state securities laws or federal commodities laws;

Been the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated, of any federal or state authority barring, suspending, or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in (i) above, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

Been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC to have violated any federal or state securities law, where the judgment in such civil action or finding by the SEC has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

Been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any federal commodities law, where the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

Been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or

Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

Been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

We have not adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. We have not done so because of our small size and limited resources.

We have never adopted any procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors.

We do not have an audit committee because we do not have D&O insurance and are unable to attract outside board members.

The following table discloses all plan and non-plan compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the following for all services rendered in all capacities to us: (a) all individuals serving as our principal executive officer (PEO) or acting in a similar capacity during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, regardless of compensation level; (b) all individuals serving as our principal financial officer (PFO) or acting in a similar capacity during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, regardless of compensation level; (c) our two most highly compensated executive officers other than the PEO who were serving as executive officers at September 30, 2011 and whose total compensation was in excess of $100,000; and (d) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided pursuant to (c) of this paragraph but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer of us at September 30, 2011 and whose total compensation was in excess of $100,000 (the “Named Executive Officers”):


Name and principal position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Compensa- tion ($)		Non- qualified Deferred Compensa- tion Earnings ($)		All Other Compen- sation ($)(1)		Total ($)

Dana Waldman	2011	(2)	$	116,000	$	---	$	---	$	---	$	---	$	---	$	56,000	$	172,000
Chief Executive Officer	2010	(2)	$	---	$	---	$	---	$	---	$	---	$	---	$	---	$	---

Larry M. Reid	2011		$	101,000	$	--	$	--	$	---	$	---	$	---	$	26,000		127,000
Chief Financial Officer	2010		$	104,000	$	―	$	―	$	―	$	―	$	―	$	―	$	104,000

Michael J. Gutowski	2011		$	102,200	$	---	$	---	$	---	$	---	$	---	$	24,800	$	127,000
Vice President of Sales and Marketing,	2010		$	104,000	$	―	$	―	$	―	$	―	$	―	$	―	$	104,000

10,290,370 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock were issued in lieu of cash compensation of $56,000 in accrued consulting fees due to Mr. Waldman. 4,517,778 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in lieu of cash compensation of $26,000 in accrued consulting fees due to Mr. Reid. 4,277,778 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in lieu of cash compensation of $24,800 in accrued consulting fees due to Mr. Gutowski. Represents the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the fiscal year in accordance ASC 718-10.

The following table provides certain information concerning outstanding equity awards at September 30, 2011 for each of the Named Executive Officers:

During our fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, we did not compensate our directors for acting in that capacity. We have no arrangements pursuant to which any of our directors were or are to be compensated or are expected to be compensated in the future for any service provided as a director.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Equity Securities Authorized for Issuance With Respect to Equity Compensation Plans

Please see the section titled “Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans” under Item 5 above.

The following table sets forth certain information as of December 29, 2011 with respect to any person (including any “group”) who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock and as to each class of our equity securities beneficially owned by our directors and directors and officers as a group:

Unless otherwise noted below, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them.

For purposes hereof, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by such person within 60 days from December 29, 2011 upon the exercise of warrants or options or the conversion of convertible securities. Each beneficial owner’s percentage ownership is determined by assuming that any such warrants, options or convertible securities that are held by such person (but not those held by any other person) and which are exercisable within 60 days from December 29, 2011 have been exercised.

Includes 1,750,000 shares that can be acquired by Mr. Reid upon exercise of options.

Includes 2,250,000 shares that can be acquired by Mr. Gutowski upon exercise of options and 500,000 shares owned by Mr. Gutowski's spouse.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

In September 2011, the Company issued 10,290,370 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock to an officer and director of the Company for services valued at $56,000.

In September 2011, the Company issued 8,795,556 shares of the Company’s common stock to two officers and directors for services valued at $50,800.

We currently have no members of our Board who qualify as “independent” as the term is used in Section 803A and Rule 10A-3(b)(ii) promulgated thereunder of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the listing standards of the Nasdaq Capital Market

The aggregate fees billed for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 for professional services rendered by the principal accountants for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements for services that are normally provided by the accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years were $19,000 and $19,000, respectively. We do not have an audit committee.

The aggregate fees billed for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 for assurance and related services by the principal accountants that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under the caption “Audit Fees” above were $12,000 and $12,000, respectively.

The aggregate fees billed for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 for professional services rendered by the principal accountants for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $0 and $0, respectively.

The aggregate fees billed for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 for products and services provided by the principal accountants, other than the services reported above in this Item 14, were $0 and $0, respectively.

Less than 50% of the hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.

The following consolidated financial statements have been filed as part of this Annual Report:

Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity (Deficit) For the Years Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Form of option issued pursuant to GlobalTel, Inc. 2005 Incentive Equity Plan. (1)

Convertible Debenture in the principal amount of $100,000 issued to Judith Holding Ltd. (2)

Convertible Debenture in the principal amount of $100,000 issued to Josephine and Santo Sciarrino. (2)

Convertible Debenture in the principal amount of $25,000 issued to James Drew. (2)

Application Service Provider License Agreement between Twisted Pair Solutions, Inc. and the registrant of August 6, 2006, as amended. (4) (Portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.)

Authorized Reseller Agreement between Twisted Pair Solutions, Inc. and the registrant of May 10, 2006. (4) (Portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.)

Lease Agreement of December 1, 2010 between BGNP Associates, LLC and the Registrant.*

Consultant Services Agreement of July 25, 2007 between John Boteler and the registrant. (4)

Amendment to Consultant Services Agreement of October 1, 2008 between Michael J. Gutowski and the registrant. *

Amendment to Consultant Services Agreement of October 1, 2008 between Larry Reid and the registrant. *

Amendment to Waldman and Associates Contract of January 22, 2010 and the registrant. (*)

Filed on July 3, 2006 as an exhibit to the registrant’s registration statement on Form SB-2 and hereby incorporated by reference.

Filed on March 22, 2007 as an exhibit to Amendment No. 2 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form SB-2 and hereby incorporated by reference.

Filed on July 5, 2007 as an exhibit to Amendment No. 4 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form SB-2 and hereby incorporated by reference.

Filed on March 17, 2008 as an exhibit to Amendment No. 5 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 and hereby incorporated by reference.

Filed on May 28, 2008 as an exhibit to Amendment No. 6 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 and hereby incorporated by reference.

Filed on January 12, 2010 as an exhibit to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and hereby incorporated by reference.

Filed on January 28, 2010 as an exhibit to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K and hereby incorporated by reference.

Filed on July 26, 2010 as an exhibit to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K and hereby incorporated by reference.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm-Goldstein Schechter Koch P.A....... F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm-Kramer Weisman and Associates... F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets............................................................................................... F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations................ ............................................................... F-4

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows ............................................................................... F-5

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit ................................................................ F-6

Notes to the Financial Statements ………….......... ........................................................... F-7-18

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Cleartronic, Inc. and Subsidiary as of September 30, 2011 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. The consolidated financial statements of Cleartronic, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2010 were audited by other auditors, whose report dated December 31, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purposes of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amount and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cleartronic, Inc. and Subsidiary as of September 30, 2011 and the consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a net loss of $1,204,036 for the year ended September 30, 2011. The Company also had a working capital deficit of $576,652 and a stockholders’ deficit of $698,321 at September 30, 2011. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Cleartronic, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purposes of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amount and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cleartronic, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a net loss of $1,087,016 of $415,162 for the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company also had a working capital deficiency of $6,483,574 and a stockholders’ deficit of $ 343,463 at September 30, 2010. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of theses consolidated financial statements


CLEARTRONIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010





	2011	2010

Revenue	$ 542,941	$ 296,366

Cost of revenue	274,094	136,489

Gross profit	268,847	159,877

Operating expenses:
Selling expenses	433,437	247,442
Administrative expenses	674,747	648,364
Research and development	237,013	219,384
Depreciation	13,069	25,429

Total operating expenses	1,358,266	1,140,619

Other income (expenses)
Interest and other (expense)	(114,617)	(64,801)
(Loss) on impairment of equipment	-	(39,863)
(Loss) on disposal of equipment	-	(1,610)
Total other expenses	(114,617)	(106,274)


(Loss) from operations	(1,204,036)	(1,087,016)


Net (loss)	$ (1,204,036)	$ (1,087,016)

Net (loss) per common share - basic and diluted	$ (0.009)	$ (0.010)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding
- basic and diluted	129,879,740	107,721,047

The accompanying notes are an integral part of theses consolidated financial statements

Cleartronic, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Florida on November 15, 1999 originally formed as a website developer under the name Menu Sites, Inc., which operations ceased in 2002.

In 2005, the Company became a provider of Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services and re-seller of international pre-paid telecommunication services and was renamed GlobalTel IP, Inc.

In November 2007, the Company formed, as Florida corporations, two wholly owned subsidiaries: Gulf Telco, Inc. and VoiceInterop, Inc.

In August 2008, the Company ceased re-selling international pre-paid telecommunication services, sold certain of its VoIP assets and discontinued all business in its subsidiary Gulf Telco. The Company began to transition its remaining VoIP business into managed unified group communication operations and the development of VoIP related products in its subsidiary VoiceInterop, Inc.

The Company now designs, builds and installs unified group communication solutions, including unique hardware and customized software, for public and private enterprises and markets those services and products under the VoiceInterop brand name. VoiceInterop is the Company's operating subsidiary. The Company is currently developing a demand response energy management solution targeting the consumer market.

The consolidated financial statements and accompany notes have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cleartronic, Inc. and its subsidiary, VoiceInterop, Inc. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and operations for the reporting period. Although these estimates are based on management’s knowledge of current events and actions it may undertake in the future, they may ultimately differ from actual results.

For financial statement purposes, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company did not own any cash equivalents at September 30, 2011 and 2010.

The Company provides an allowance for uncollectible accounts based upon a periodic review and analysis of outstanding accounts receivable balances. Uncollectible receivables are charged to the allowance when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of accounts previously written off are used to credit the allowance account in the periods in which the recoveries are made.

The Company has an Accounts Receivable Purchase and Security Agreement with Bridgeport Capital Resources of Birmingham, AL. Under the terms of the agreement the Company sells certain acceptable accounts receivable to Bridgeport Capital at a discount to the receivable face value. Discounts can range between 2.25 and 6.25 percent depending on the length of time the receivable remains outstanding.

The Company provided no allowance for doubtful accounts for the year ended September 30, 2011 and $1,000 for the year ended September 30, 2010.

The Company periodically evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful life of long-lived assets. If and when such factors, events or circumstances indicate possible impairment to long lived-assets the Company makes an estimate of undiscounted cash flows over the remaining lives of the respective assets in measuring recoverability from future operations. There was no impairment of assets for the year ended September 30, 2011. For the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company wrote off $39,863 in impairment of equipment.

The Company maintains cash balances at one banking institution. Beginning December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2012, deposits held in noninterest-bearing transaction accounts are fully insured, regardless of the amount in the account, at all FDIC-insured institutions.

The Company expenses research and development costs as incurred. For the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had $237,013 and $219,384, respectively, in research and development costs.

The Company had no comprehensive income during the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

Unified group communication solutions consist of three elements to be provided to customers: software licenses and equipment purchased from third-party vendors,

proprietary hardware that is manufactured on contract to required specifications and installation and integration of the hardware and software into the cohesive communication source.

The Company's revenue recognition policies are in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 605-10 “Revenue Recognition” (ASC 605-10). Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the contract price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. No right of return privileges are granted to customers after shipment. The Company recognizes revenue for the elements separately as the sales of the equipment and software, installation and integration, and support services represent separate earnings processes that are generally specified under separate agreements.

The Company also provides support to customers under separate contracts varying from one to five years. The Company’s obligations under its service contracts vary by the length of the contract. In all cases the Company is the primary obligor to provide first level support to the client. If the contract has less than one year of service and support remaining on the contract, it is classified as a current liability; if longer, it is classified as a non-current liability.

In accordance with accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC 260 “Earning per Share”, basic income (loss) per common share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods reported. Diluted earnings per share include the weighted average effect of all dilutive securities outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted per share loss is the same as basic per share loss when there is a loss from continuing operations. Accordingly, for purposes of dilutive earnings per share, the Company excluded the effect of warrants and options as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 for 34,538,487 and 22,471,265 shares, respectively.

The Company adopted ASC topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC 820), formerly SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements,” effective January 1, 2009. ASC 820 defines “fair value” as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There was no impact relating to the adoption of ASC 820 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASC 820 also describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet approximate their fair values due to their relatively short-term nature. The fair value of long-term debt is based on current rates at which the Company could borrow funds with similar remaining maturities. The carrying amounts approximate fair value. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to any significant currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

Inventory consists of components held for assembly and finished goods held for resale or to be utilized for installation in projects. Inventory is valued at lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company’s policy is to record a reserve for technological obsolescence or slow-moving inventory items. No reserve was made for inventory balances as of September 30, 2011 and 2010.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. For financial statement purposes depreciation of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the asset.

Expenditures for replacements, maintenance and repairs that do not extend the lives of the respective assets are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are retired, sold or otherwise disposed of, their costs and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and resulting gains or losses are recognized.

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” which requires that the Company recognizes income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a tax rate change on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company records valuation allowance to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount considered more likely than not to be realized. Changes in estimates of future taxable income can materially change the amount of such valuation allowances.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 718-10 “Compensation” (ASC 718-10) using the modified retrospective transition method. ASC 718-10 (formerly SFAS 123R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service periods. The Company has estimated the fair value of each award as of the date of grant or assumption using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which was developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and that are freely transferable. The Black-Scholes option pricing model considers, among other factors, the expected life of the award and the expected volatility of the Company's stock price. In March 2005, the SEC issued SAB No. 107, Share-Based Payment ("SAB 107") which provides guidance regarding the interaction of ASC 718-10 and certain SEC rules and regulations. The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of ASC 718-10.

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. The Company had advertising costs of $4,144 during the year ended September 30, 2011 and $3,649 during the year ended September 30, 2010.

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued an update to the fair value measurement guidance to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The amendments in the update change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendment is not intended to result in a change in the application of the requirements in the Fair Value Measurements Topic in the ASC. This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application is permitted. The Company is expecting to adopt this guidance in the fiscal year 2012. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. This guidance eliminates the current option to report Other Comprehensive Income ("OCI") and its components in the statement of changes in equity. Under this guidance, an entity can elect to present items of net income and OCI in one continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive, statements. In addition, the guidance requires entities to show the effects of items reclassified from OCI to net income on the face of the financial statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012 and interim and annual periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted, but full retrospective application is required. The FASB has issued a proposal that would defer the requirement to separately present within net income reclassification adjustments of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The proposed deferral is intended to be temporary until the FASB has time to reconsider these changes. The other provisions of the guidance will become effective as originally planned by the FASB. The Company is expecting to adopt this guidance in the fiscal year 2012. The adoption of this guidance will not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued amended guidance on goodwill impairment testing. Under the revised guidance, entities testing goodwill for impairment have the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the reporting unit. Because the qualitative assessment is optional, entities may bypass it for any reporting unit in any period and begin their impairment analysis with the quantitative calculation in step 1. Entities may resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. In the qualitative assessment, entities would determine whether it is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. If entities determine, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of the reporting unit is more likely than not less than the carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would be required. However, if it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, further testing of goodwill for impairment would not be performed. The guidance does not change how goodwill is calculated or assigned to reporting units, nor does it revise the requirement to test goodwill annually for impairment. In addition, the guidance does not amend the requirement to test goodwill for impairment between annual tests if events or circumstances warrant, however, it does revise the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider. The amended guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

During the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and since inception, the Company has experienced cash flow problems. From time-to-time, the Company has experienced difficulties meeting its obligations as they became due. As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred net losses from operations of approximately $1,204,000 for the year ended September 30, 2011 and had working capital deficit of approximately $577,000 for the year ended September 30, 2010. The Company also had an accumulated deficit of $7,687,610 and a stockholders’ deficit of $698,321 at September 30, 2011.These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

In fiscal year 2007, the Company began its transition from the business of providing VoIP services directly to agents and resellers to the management of VoIP communication services and to design and install unified group communication solutions for public and private enterprises. In fiscal year 2008, the Company completed initial design for an IP gateway device (AM360) and began manufacturing and assembly and marketing. The Company has marketed and sold these devices for the past three years and intends to expand the capabilities of the devices to allow them to be sold into a larger market sectors. The Company has completed development of an Application Service Provider or “Hosted” solution for voice interoperability that is available to customers as a subscription service. The Company discontinued two pilot programs for this service and has discontinued efforts to market this subscription service. The Company is currently developing a demand response energy management solution targeting the consumer market. The development of this solution will require substantial increases in research and development expenses and will require the Company to rely on equity and debt financing to supplement cash flow from operations. Management believes its new business strategy and anticipated increases in revenue and gross margins will enable it to alleviate some its liquidity and profitability issues. However, as part of its revised business strategy, and in recognition of current economic conditions, the Company plans to raise additional debt or equity capital and is discussing debt and equity finance options with private individuals and allied groups.

The Company anticipates that it will have to continue to rely on periodic infusions of equity capital and/or substantial credit facilities to meet its financial obligations.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue its existence.

The Company’s property and equipment as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following:

During the year ended September 30, 2010, management determined that certain equipment held for use in research and development would not be used and were therefore impaired. The Company recognized a loss on impairment of approximately $39,000.

Depreciation expense totaled $13,069 and $25,429 for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company calculates its deferred tax assets based upon its consolidated net operating loss (NOL) carryovers available to offset future taxable income, net of other tax credit(s) or tax deferred liabilities, if any. No deferred tax assets for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 have been recorded since any available deferred tax assets are fully offset by increases in its valuation allowances. The Company increased its valuation allowance based on its history of consolidated net losses.

Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes plus any available consolidated, net deferred tax credits. Significant components of the Company’s net deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are:


	2011		2010

Consolidated NOL carryover	$	7,207,000	$	6,002,000
Deferred tax asset from NOL carryover arising from current net effective tax rate	$	2,810,000	$	2,340,000
Net deferred income tax asset		2,810,000		2,340,000
Less: valuation allowance		(2,810,000)		(2,340,000)
Total deferred income tax assets	$	0.00	$	0.00

A reconciliation of the Federal and respective State income tax rate as a percentage of income before taxes is as follows:


	2011		2010

Federal statutory income tax rate		34.0%		34.0%
State taxes, net of federal benefit		5.0		5.0%
Effective rate for deferred tax asset		39.0%		39.0%
Less: Valuation allowance		(39.0%)		(39.0%)
Effective income tax rate		0.0%		0.0%

A valuation allowance is required if it is more likely than not that some or the entire portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. For income tax purposes, the Company has approximately $7,207,000 in consolidated net operating loss carry forwards, subject to limitations, that expire in the years 2014 through 2030. The valuation allowance increased $470,000 in 2011 due to an increase in the consolidated NOL carryover of $1.2 million.

In May 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FIN 48-1 “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48” (FSP FIN 48-1). Now codified FASB ASC 740-10-25-9 provides guidance on how to determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. FSP FIN 48-1 is effective retroactively to January 1, 2007. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operation.

In the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued two promissory notes totaling $140,000 to two individual stockholders of the Company. The first note in the amount of $50,000 bears interest at 15%, is payable quarterly, and matures on December 31, 2011. The second note in the amount of $90,000 bears interest at 10%, is payable quarterly, and matures on December 31, 2012.

In the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued three promissory notes totaling $40,000 to three individual stockholders of the Company. Two of the notes, which total $15,000, bear interest at 15% which is payable quarterly, and was to mature in December 2010. The maturity was extended to December 2011. One of the notes, in the amount of $25,000, bears interest at 10%, is payable quarterly, and matures on December 31, 2012. In January 2010, one shareholder converted a promissory note in the amount of $32,063 plus accrued interest in the amount of $1,037 into 1,818,832 shares of the Company's restricted common stock.

In connection with two of the notes payable to stockholders, the Company issued 750,000 restricted shares of common stock. The common stock was valued at $3,750 based on the fair value of the stock at the time of issuance. The discount is being recognized over the life of the notes payable, which matured in December 2010. The Company recognized $937 and $2,813 of the discount as interest expense for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

In the year ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued four promissory notes totaling $112,459 to four individual stockholders of the Company. Three of the notes, which total $86,959, bear interest at 15% and are payable quarterly. These notes were to mature in August 2010. The fourth note for $25,500 bears interest of 14% payable monthly and was to matures in December 2009. The maturity of all of these notes was extended to December 31, 2011.

In connection with three of the notes payable to stockholders issued during the year ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued 4,097,975 restricted shares of common stock. The common stock was valued at $35,128 based on the fair value of the stock at the time of issuance. The discount is being recognized over the life of the notes payable, which mature in August 2010. The Company recognized $32,201 and $2,927 of the discount as interest expense for the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

In connection with the one of the notes payable for $25,500 the Company made principal payments of $2,681 and $1,279 for the year ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company issued a new note in 2011 in the principal amount of $21,540 bearing interest at 14% and maturing on December 31, 2011.

Interest expense on notes payable – stockholders was $22,752 in 2011 and $58,207 in 2010.

In June 2010, the Board of Directors voted to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation in order to and authorize the issuance of 200 million shares of Preferred Stock with a par value of $0.001 per share. Concurrently, the Board designated the preferred stock as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred stock is convertible into the Company's common stock after two years at a conversion price of $0.01 per share at the holder's option. Each Series A Preferred Holder is also entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate of 8% of $1.00 per annum on each outstanding share of Series A Preferred then held by such Series A Preferred Holder, on a pro rata basis.

In May 2011, the Company issued 174,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to one shareholder in exchange for the shareholder's agreement to cancel 17,400,000 shares of the Company's common stock issued and registered to the shareholder.

In November 2010, the Company issued 250,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to one shareholder for $250,000 and in March 2011, the Company issued an additional 400,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to the same shareholder for $400,000.

In June 2010, the Company issued 250,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to one shareholder for $250,000.

Dividends payable on Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of approximately $66,000 are included in Accrued Expenses at September 30, 2011.

On April 21, 2011, the Board of Directors voted to increase the Company’s authorized shares of common stock to 1,250,000,000 shares.

During the year ended September 30, 2010 the Company sold 13,736,625 units consisting of two shares of the Company's restricted common stock and a warrant for the purchase of one share of the Company's common stock at a price of $0.0364 per unit for net proceeds of $500,000. The unit sales were completed in five separate installments of 2,747,253 units each. The 13,736,625 warrants have an exercise price of $0.10 and were valued at approximately $10,000 using the Black Scholes Merton Option pricing model with the following range of

assumptions for the five issuances – risk-free interest rate of 1.25% to 1.50%; expected dividend yield of 0%; expected life of 2 years; expected volatility of 80% to 90%. The common stock price range upon issuance was between $0.012 and $0.018 per share.

In April 2011, the Company issued 8,581,446 shares of the Company's common stock to two consultants in exchange for services valued at approximately $54,000.

In September 2011, two officers and directors of the Company converted accrued consulting fees of $50,800 into 8,795,556 shares of common stock. The Company accounted for these transactions pursuant to ASC 718-10 (formerly FASB 123(R)) and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 under which costs or values are measured at the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or equities issued whichever is more readily determinable.

During the year ended September 30, 2010 the Company also issued 15,356,263 shares to consultants, officers and directors for services rendered during the year of approximately $182,000. Between December 2009 to February 2010, four individuals and two officers and directors of the Company converted accrued consulting fees of approximately $216,000 into 12,264,828 shares of common stock and the Company converted accounts payable of approximately $51,000 into 2,927,851 shares of common stock. The Company accounted for these transactions pursuant to ASC 718-10 (formerly FASB 123(R)) and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 under which costs or values are measured at the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or equities issued whichever is more readily determinable.

In April 2011, the Company issued 2,372,409 shares of the Company's common stock to preferred shareholders in lieu of a cash dividend of $23,724.

Common Stock issued for conversion of notes and in connection with debt issuance

In January 2010, a shareholder converted a note payable and accrued interest of approximately $33,000 into 1,818,832 shares of common stock.

In December 2010, the Company issued 750,000 shares of common stock to two shareholders as discounts on notes payable in the amount of $15,000. The discounts are amortized to interest over the life of the respective notes.

During the year ended September 30, 2011 the Company adopted the Cleartronic, Inc. 2011 Consultant Stock Plan to assist the Company in obtaining and retaining the services of persons providing consulting services to the Company. In April 2011, the Company filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission registering 20,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock for issuance under the plan.

During the year ended September 30, 2005 the Company adopted the GlobalTel IP, Inc. 2005 Incentive Equity Plan (the “Plan”) allocating up to five million shares of the Company’s common stock to offer incentives to key employees, contractors, directors and officers. On July 18, 2007, the Board of Directors, pursuant to the Plan, granted 3,050,000 options to 4 employees (including 2 officers and directors), and 2 consultants at an exercise price of $0.275. The 2,000,000 options issued to the 2 officers and directors vested upon issuance and expire on July 31, 2012. In May 2008, the Board authorized an expansion of the number of shares allocated to the Plan to a total of 15,000,000 shares (10,000,000 additional shares of common stock). Pursuant to the Plan, in September 2008 the Board authorized a grant of 2,300,000 options to six employees (including 2 officers and directors) at an exercise price of $0.12 and expiring December 31, 2013. In September 2009, pursuant to the Plan, the Board authorized a grant of 4,000,000 options to six consultants (including 2 officers and directors) at an exercise price of $0.03 per share that expire December 31, 2014. In September 2009, two officers and directors cancelled 1,250,000 options each. Each of the option cancellations were for 250,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.20 expiring March 1, 2010 and 1,000,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.275 per share expiring on July 31, 2012.

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at September 30, 2011:

The following table summarizes the number of outstanding options with their corresponding contractual life, as well as the exercisable weighted average (WA) outstanding exercise price, and number of vested options with the corresponding exercise price by price range.

In October 2010 the 2005 Incentive Equity Plan expired. During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company granted no options and no options expired or were cancelled.

Outstanding options held by related parties as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 amounted to 4,600,000.

During the year ended September 30, 2011, 12,202,222 warrants were issued to three consultants for services rendered (including one officer and director). The Company recorded an expense of $71,000 as a result of the issuance.

The Company applied fair value accounting for all share based payment awards. The fair value of each warrant granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes assumptions used are as follows:

During the year ended September 30, 2010, 13,736,625 warrants were issued to one shareholder as part of 5 unit purchase agreements, no warrants expired and no warrants were cancelled.

The following table summarizes the number of outstanding warrants with their corresponding contractual life, as well as the exercisable weighted average (WA) outstanding exercise price, and number of vested warrants with the corresponding exercise price by price range.

Included in Accounts Payable is approximately $9,400 and $19,000 at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively, due to an officer of the Company.

During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 10,290,370 warrants to an officer and director of the Company for services valued at $56,000.

During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 8,796,000 shares to two officers and directors of the Company for services valued at $50,800.

For the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 1,529,411 shares of common stock to a financial advisor in exchange for services valued at $24,470 and paid cash compensation totaling approximately $20,000.

For the year ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued 2,262,500 shares of common stock to a financial advisor in exchange for services valued at $52,875, in consideration for cancellation of all outstanding warrants held by him and paid cash compensation totaling $10,000.

The Company leases approximately 3,400 square feet for its principal offices in Boca Raton, Florida at a monthly rental of approximately $6,500. The lease, which provides for annual increases of base rent of 4%, expires on November 30, 2014.

Rental expense incurred during the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $82,578 and $104,063, respectively.

Approximately 55% of the Company’s revenues for the year ended September 30, 2011 was derived from five customers.

During 2011 and 2010, the Company’s unified group communication services business relied primarily on one major vendor to supply its software development platform. During the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, this vendor represented approximately 67% and 26%, respectively, of the total cost of revenue. The Company has contracted with a single local manufacturing facility to maintain its component parts inventory and to assemble its developed line of IP gateway devices. Interruption to either its software vendor or manufacturing source presents additional risk to the Company. The Company believes that other commercial facilities exist at competitive rates to match the resources and capabilities of its existing manufacturing source

Management has evaluated subsequent events through December 30, 2011, which is the date the consolidated financial statements were issued.

In November 2011, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with a private investor in connection with the issuance of a 8% convertible note in the amount of $60,000. The note matures on August 17, 2012 and is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a variable conversion price (58% multiplied by the market price).

In December 2011, the Company issued a promissory note to a stockholder for $45,000. The note bears interest at 10%, is payable quarterly and matures on December 31, 2012.


x	ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________________ to _____________________


Florida (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	65-0958798 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

8000 North Federal Highway, Suite 100 Boca Raton, FL (Address of principal executive offices)	33487 (Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (561) 939-3300


Quarter Ended	High Bid		Low Bid
September 30, 2011	$	─	$	─
June 30, 2011	$	─	$	─
March 31, 2011	$	0.0009	$	0.00
December 31, 2010	$	0.006	$	0.0009

September 30, 2010	$	0.006	$	0.0009
June 30, 2010	$	0.012	$	0.002
March 31, 2010	$	0.021	$	0.002
December 31, 2009	$	0.14	$	0.01


Plan Category	COLUMN A: Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options Warrants and Rights			Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights		Number of Securities Remaining Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in COLUMN A)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		7,100,000	(1)	$	$0.087		75,000,000	(2)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (3)		27,438,487			$0.070		17,342,602	(4)
Total		34,538,847		$	$0.078		92,342,602


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1)(2)	Approximate Percent of Class

Officers and directors:
Dana Waldman 8000 N Federal Highway Boca Raton, FL 33487	11,169,490(5)	7.7%(5)
Larry M. Reid 8000 North Federal Highway Boca Raton, FL 33487	11,752,674(3)	8.6%(3)
Michael J. Gutowski 8000 North Federal Highway Boca Raton, FL 33487	9,792,483(4)	7.1%(4)

Officers and directors as a group (3 persons):	32,714,647	21.9%


	•		avoid costly capital expenditures for the establishment of manufacturing operations;


	•		focus on the design, development, sales and support of our hardware products; and


	•		leverage the scale, expertise and purchasing power of specialized contract manufacturers.


	(1)	Includes outstanding options granted pursuant to GlobalTel IP 2005 Incentive Equity Plan, which terminated by its terms on October 17, 2010.
	(2)	Includes shares available for future issuance under the Cleartronic 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.
	(3)	These consist of individual consulting agreements.
	(4)	Includes shares remaining available for future issuance under the 2011 Consultant Stock Plan.


NAME	AGE	POSITIONS
Dana Waldman	47	Chief Executive Officer and a director
Larry M. Reid	67	Chief Financial Officer and a director
Michael J. Gutowski	53	Vice President of Sales and Marketing and a director


Signatures	Title	Date
/s/ Larry Reid Larry Reid	Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director	December 30, 2011
/s/ Dana Waldman Dana Waldman	Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board	December 30, 2011


CLEARTRONIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010



ASSETS


	2011	2010
Current assets:
Cash	$ 39,188	$ 22,348
Accounts receivable, net	-	5,019
Inventory	45,998	51,076
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	8,656	32,407

Total current assets	93,842	110,850

Property and equipment, net	12,201	25,270

Total assets	$ 106,043	$ 136,120


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT


Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$ 333,735	$ 243,887
Accrued expenses	145,474	79,950
Deferred revenue, current portion	22,786	8,503
Notes payable - Stockholders	168,499	121,180

Total current liabilities	670,494	453,520

Long Term Liabilities
Notes Payable - Stockholders	115,000	25,000
Deferred revenue, net of current portion	18,870	1,063

Total long term liabilities	133,870	26,063

Total liabilities	804,364	479,583

Stockholders' deficit:
Series A preferred stock - $.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized,
1,074,000 and 250,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	1,074	250
Common stock - $.001 par value; 1,250,000,000 shares authorized,
134,657,169 and 132,307,758 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	134,657	132,308
Additional paid-in capital	6,853,558	6,007,553
Accumulated Deficit	(7,687,610)	(6,483,574)


Total stockholders' deficit	(698,321)	(343,463)

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$ 106,043	$ 136,120


	CLEARTRONIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010


		2011	2010

Net (Loss)		$ (1,204,036)	$ (1,087,016)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash (used in)
operating activities:
Depreciation		13,069	25,429
Loss on disposal of equipment		-	1,610
Loss on impairment of equipment		-	39,863
Common stock issued for services		53,657	182,252
Warrants issued for services		71,000	-
Amortization of notes payable discount		937	37,513
(Increase) decrease in assets:
Accounts receivable		5,019	(3,879)
Inventory		5,078	(15,256)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		23,751	(29,689)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable		89,809	18,065
Accrued expenses		139,147	73,054
Deferred revenue		32,090	(19,251)
Net cash (used in) operating activities		(770,479)	(777,305)

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Purchases of equipment		-	(4,004)
Disposal of equipment in connection with settlement		-	6,663
Net cash provided by investing activities:		-	2,659

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Principal payments on notes payable		(2,681)	(1,279)
Proceeds from notes payable		140,000	40,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		-	500,000
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		650,000	250,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		787,319	788,721

Net increase in cash		16,840	14,075

Cash - Beginning of year		22,348	8,273

Cash - End of year		$ 39,188	$ 22,348

Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest		$ 17,170	$ 15,079



Non-cash financing transactions:
During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 8,581,446 common shares to non-employees for services rendered for $53,654.
During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 2,372,409 common shares in lieu of cash dividends for $23,724.
During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company cancelled 17,400,000 common shares in exchange for 174,000 shares of Series A Preferred stock.
During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 8,795,556 common shares to company directors for services rendered for $50,800.
During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 12,202,222 warrants to purchase common shares to consultants for services rendered for $71,000.
During the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 15,356,263 common shares to non-employees for services rendered amounted $181,000.
During the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 15,192,679 common shares for conversion of accrued expenses and accounts payable for $267,392.
During the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 1,818,832 common shares for conversion of notes payable and accrued interest payable for $33,104.


CLEARTRONIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010


					Additional
	Series A Preferred Stock		Common Stock		paid-in	Accumulated
	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount	capital	deficit	Total

BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2009	-	$ -	71,717,454	$ 71,717	$ 4,830,648	$ (5,396,558)	$ (494,193)

Common Shares issued for cash			27,472,530	27,473	472,527		500,000
Preferred Shares issued for cash	250,000	250		-	249,750		250,000
Shares issued for non-employee services			15,356,263	15,356	165,644		181,000
Shares issued for note conversion			1,818,832	1,819	31,285		33,104
Shares issued in connection with debt issuance			750,000	750	5,500		6,250
Shares issued for conversion of accrued expenses			15,192,679	15,193	252,199		267,392
Net (loss) for the year ended September 30, 2010						(1,087,016)	(1,087,016)

BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2010	250,000	$ 250	132,307,758	$ 132,308	$ 6,007,553	$ (6,483,574)	$ (343,463)

Preferred Shares issued for cash	650,000	650	-	-	649,350		650,000
Shares issued for non-employee services	-	-	8,581,446	8,581	45,073		53,654
Shares issued in lieu of cash dividends	-	-	2,372,409	2,372	21,352		23,724
Shares cancelled in exchange for Preferred Shares	174,000	174	(17,400,000)	(17,400)	17,226		-
Shares issued for conversion of accrued expenses			8,795,556	8,796	42,004		50,800
Warrants issued in exchange for services					71,000		71,000
Net (loss) for the year ended September 30, 2011						(1,204,036)	(1,204,036)

BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2011	1,074,000	$ 1,074	134,657,169	$ 134,657	$ 6,853,558	$ (7,687,610)	$ (698,321)


			ESTIMATED
			USEFUL LIFE
	2011	2010	(IN YEARS)
Software	$ 47,823	$ 47,823	4
Network equipment	32,653	32,653	4
RoIP equipment and software	3,873	3,873	5
Office equipment and furniture	30,226	30,226	5
Testing and R & D equipment	21,550	21,550	5
	136,125	136,125

Less accumulated depreciation	(123,294)	(110,855)

Net property and equipment	$ 12,201	$ 25,270


	Outstanding					Exercisable
Range	Outstanding Options	WA Remaining Contractual Life		WA Outstanding Exercise Price	Vested Options		WA Vested Exercise Price
$0.00 to $0.030	4,000,000	4.25 yrs	$0.030			4,000,000		$0.030
$0.04 to $0.120 $0.20 to $0.275	2,300,000 800,000 7,100,000	2.25 yrs 0.84 yrs 2.45 yrs	$0.120 $0.275 $0.105			2,300,000 800,000 7,100,000		$0.120 $0.275 $0.087


	•	Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets.


	•	Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.


	•	Level 3: Inputs that are generally unobservable. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.


	Stock Options
	Shares	Wtd. Avg. Exercise Price
Outstanding at September 30, 2009	8,450,000	$0.105
Granted/Issued	--	--
Exercised	--	--
Expired/Canceled	1,350,000	$0.200
Outstanding at September 30, 2010 Granted/Issued Exercised Expired/Canceled	7,100,000 -- -- --	$0.087 -- -- --
Outstanding at September 30, 2011	7,100,000	$0.087


Exercise price	$0.01 - $0.001
Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	199%
Risk free interest rate	0.96%
Expected life of warrant	5 years
Expected forfeitures	0%


	Warrants	Weighted average exercise price
Outstanding at September 30, 2009	1,635,000	$ 0.275
Granted	13,736,265	$ 0.100
Exercised	-	$ -
Outstanding at September 30, 2010	15,371,265
Granted	12,202,222	$ 0.001
Exercised	-
Forfeited/Cancelled	(135,000)	$ 0.200
Outstanding at September 30, 2011	27,438,487	$ 0.070

Warrants exercisable at September 30, 2011	27,438,487	$ 0.070
Warrants outstanding at September 30, 2011	27,438,487	$ 0.070