3. Going Concern
|9 Months Ended|
Sep. 30, 2016
|Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]|
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, "Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40)". The Company chose to adopt this pronouncement in 2015 due to the applicability to our current condition. The new guidance addresses management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and in certain circumstances to provide related footnote disclosures.
As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred losses from operations resulting in an accumulated deficit of ($34,634,370) as of September 30, 2016, which was reduced in the current year by a gain on debt restructuring of $41,621,150. While the debt restructuring outlined in Note 4 – Debt Restructuring leaves the Company debt free, it also eliminated the asset base from which the Company derived the majority of its cash flow. The management fees from the management agreement entered into as part of the debt restructuring should be sufficient to cover the Company’s overhead costs for the balance of 2016. However, the management agreement can be cancelled by either party without penalty after January 1, 2017 with three months notice. While the Company is actively working to secure additional joint ventures with assets to manage, to date the Company has not found other sources of revenue. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of any uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements also do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
The entire disclosure when substantial doubt is raised about the ability to continue as a going concern. Includes, but is not limited to, principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a going concern, management's evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the ability to meet its obligations, and management's plans that alleviated or are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a going concern.
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef