140 Scott Drive Menlo Park, California 94025 Tel: +1.650.328.4600 Fax: +1.650.463.2600 www.lw.com
| ||||
June 10, 2011
VIA EDGAR |
FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICES | |||
Abu Dhabi Barcelona Beijing Boston Brussels Chicago Doha Dubai Frankfurt Hamburg Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Milan |
Moscow Munich New Jersey New York Orange County Paris Riyadh Rome San Diego San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Washington, D.C. |
Brian Cascio
Division of Corporate Finance
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549-3628
Re: | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. |
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2010 |
Filed February 18, 2011 |
File No. 001-07882 |
Dear Mr. Cascio:
On behalf of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD or the Company), we confirm receipt of the letter dated May 31, 2011 from the staff (the Staff) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) with respect to the above referenced Form 10-K, as amended. We are responding to the Staffs comments on behalf of AMD, as set forth below. The Staffs comments are set forth below in bold and numbered to correspond to the numbered comments in the Staffs letter. AMDs responses follow each of the Staffs comments.
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2010
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Note 3. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, page 82
1. | In future filings please clarify your accounting policy for equity method losses. That is, please clarify how you considered the guidance in ASC 323-10-35-19 in determining the amount of additional losses you record in excess of your investment. Please discuss the relevant factors that you considered in determining your accounting treatment. |
Response: The Company respectfully advises the Staff that in future filings, to the extent the Company has losses in excess of its equity method investment, the Company will clarify how it considered the guidance in ASC 323-10-35-19 in determining the amount of additional losses, and the Company will discuss the relevant factors it considered in determining the accounting treatment.
June 10, 2011
Page 2
This Offer, page 12
2. | We note that you recognized a $232 million gain on the issuance of new GF shares in 2010. Please tell us the accounting treatment for this transaction and how you determined the amount of the gain. |
Response: The Company respectfully advises the Staff that its ownership interest in the Class A Preferred Shares of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GF) decreased from approximately 83% as of December 26, 2009 to approximately 62% as of December 25, 2010. The dilution of the Companys ownership interest in GF resulted from investments by Advanced Technology Investment Company LLC (ATIC) into GF of an aggregate of $930 million of cash during fiscal 2010 in exchange for GF equity securities. GF used the funds primarily for operating expenses, capacity expansion and technology capability. The Company did not participate in any of these fundings.
As a result of the dilution of its ownership interest, the Company recognized a total gain of $232 million in fiscal 2010. The accounting treatment of the gain followed the accounting guidance set forth in ASC 323-10-40-1 which states that an equity method investor shall account for a share issuance by an investee as if the investor had sold a proportionate share of its investment, and any gain or loss to the investor resulting from an investees share issuance shall be recognized in earnings.
The Company determined the gain as the difference between AMDs post-funding share of the underlying net assets of GF and AMDs pre-funding share of the underlying net assets of GF. The gain was adjusted for previous basis differences between the Companys book value and the fair value of the underlying net assets of GF.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence, page 132
3. | We note your disclosure on page 60 of your proxy statement that is incorporated by reference to your Form 10-K under the heading Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. Please expand your disclosure regarding the Wafer Supply Agreement including any other underlying transactions with the related party to comply with the requirements of Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. Specific disclosure should include identifying your current relationship with the related party, the approximate dollar value of the amount involved in the transaction including the approximate dollar value of the amount of the related persons interest in the transaction and any other information regarding the transaction or the related person in the context of the transaction that is material to investors in light of the circumstances of this transaction. In addition, please expand your disclosure to explain how the term cost plus is calculated and the term where competitive, is evaluated as well as how the price for GPU products will be determined by the parties so that investors can evaluate these transactions. Please show us how your disclosure in this section will appear in your future filings. |
June 10, 2011
Page 3
Response: The Company respectfully submits that it believes the disclosure in its Annual Report on Form 10-K and related proxy statement is in compliance with Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. The Companys current relationship with the related party, its 19.69%1 beneficial owner, West Coast Hitech, L.P. (WCH), is described in detail in the Companys proxy statement under the Certain Relationships and Related Transactions section, the Principal Stockholders section and Mr. Waleed Al Muhairis director biography in the Companys proxy statement. Similar details are also provided in the Business section (see -Manufacturing Arrangements and Assembly and Test Facilities), the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition (MD&A) section (see GLOBALFOUNDRIES) and Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. The relationship between WCH and GF has recently changed, and both Advanced Technology Investment Company LLC, which together with a sister company owns a significant majority of GF, and WCH are subsidiaries of Mubadala Development Company PJSC, a strategic investment and development company owned by the Government of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. There is no set dollar value of the transactions under the Wafer Supply Agreement. However, in the MD&A section in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, under -Contractual Obligations Purchase Obligations, the Company discloses approximate payments under the Wafer Supply Agreement for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012 and made similar disclosure for fiscal 2010. The Company notes that the Wafer Supply Agreement was amended following the filing of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the material terms of that amendment are disclosed in the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2011. The precise disclosure in next years Annual Report on Form 10-K and proxy statement will depend upon the terms of the agreement in place at that time. For example, we note that for fiscal 2011, the Company will not make payments under a cost plus pricing model. We further note that cost plus is standard nomenclature for the payment of the costs to manufacture the product plus an additional percentage of such costs. With respect to GPU products, the Wafer Supply Agreement provides that AMD is only obligated to purchase GPU products from GF, where competitive. No additional detail is provided in the Wafer Supply Agreement, and pricing for manufacturing of GPU products will be determined by the parties through customary price negotiation.
Exhibits
4. | Please provide us the a copy of the order granting confidential treatment for Exhibit 10.46 from your exhibit index filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 5, 2009. If you have not been granted confidential treatment for such agreement, please submit such confidential treatment request or refile the agreement to a Form 8-K removing the redactions. |
1 | As of March 1, 2011. |
June 10, 2011
Page 4
Response: Please see:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2488/999999999709001670/filename1.pdf.
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2011
Financial Statements
Note 2. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, page 6
5. | We note that you recognized a gain of $492 million in the quarter ended April 2, 2011. Please tell us the basis for your accounting treatment and how you determined the amount of the gain. |
Response: The Company respectfully advises the Staff that as disclosed in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2011, the Company recognized a net gain of $492 million related to the dilution of its ownership interest in GFs Class A Preferred Shares as a result of the contribution by ATIC International Investment Company LLC (ATIC II) of all of the outstanding ordinary shares of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Singapore Pte. Ltd., (formerly Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd.), to GF in exchange for 2,808,981 newly issued shares of GF Class A Preferred Shares. ATIC II is an affiliate of ATIC. Consistent with the response to Comment Number 2 above, the Company recognized the gain based on the accounting guidance under ASC 323-10-40-1.
The amount of the gain, which was limited to the fair value of the Companys remaining investment in GF, was computed in the same manner as described in Comment Number 2 above.
Gross Margin, page 26
6. | Please tell us the nature of the charges included in gross margin in the first quarter 2011. |
Response: The Company respectfully advises the Staff that as disclosed in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2011, the Company included two unusual charges in its gross margin for the first fiscal quarter of 2011: a $24 million charge in connection with a payment to GF and a $5 million charge related to a legal settlement. The nature of each of the items is as follows:
GF charge:
The $24 million GF charge related to a payment to GF, primarily for certain manufacturing equipment that was never placed in service by GF and therefore did not benefit the Company. Since the Company made the payment to GF, the Companys microprocessor wafer supplier, the Company expensed the entire amount in cost of sales for its operating results for the first fiscal quarter of 2011.
June 10, 2011
Page 5
Legal settlement charge:
The $5 million charge relates to the settlement of litigation related to the past use of currently licensed patents in the Companys products.
* * *
Additionally, at the Staffs request, we have provided concurrently with this letter, a written statement from AMD acknowledging that:
| the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; |
| Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and |
| the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. |
We therefore respectfully request that if the Staff has any additional questions or comments, please direct them as soon as possible to the undersigned at (650) 463-3060.
Very truly yours, |
/s/ Tad J. Freese
Tad J. Freese, Esq. of Latham & Watkins LLP |
cc: | Thomas Seifert, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. |
Harry A. Wolin, Esq., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Faina Medzonsky, Esq., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
One AMD Place
Sunnyvale, California 94088
June 10, 2011
VIA EDGAR
Brian Cascio
Division of Corporate Finance
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549-3628
Re: | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2010 Filed February 18, 2011 File No. 001-07882 |
Dear Mr. Cascio:
In connection with the letter dated May 31, 2011 from the staff (the Staff) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) with respect to the above referenced Form 10-K, as amended, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (the Company), hereby acknowledges that:
| the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; |
| Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and |
| the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. |
Very truly yours, |
/s/ Faina Medzonsky |
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. |
By: Faina Medzonsky, Assistant Secretary |